Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

‘Wrong Turn’ – How Does the Survival Horror Movie Hold Up 21 Years Later?

Published

on

May of 2003 was almost bone-dry for big-screen horror until 20th Century Fox released Wrong Turn; director Rob Schmidt and screenwriter Alan B. McElroy’s collaboration arrived in theaters the weekend after Memorial Day. Later on, the fairly successful film inspired a whole franchise of follow-ups, which exceeded the original in terms of sheer gruesomeness. However, this underrated offering of backwoods horror still delivers in areas its direct descendants do not.

As a reflection of the real world, horror steadily became urbanized. The late 1990s had all but abandoned the great outdoors as a dreadful destination and backdrop, especially in the wake of Scream. No longer did characters have to leave their neighborhood in order to feel threatened. The next decade, however, saw a comeback for travel terror; vacations overseas and across borders commonly unfolded in horrific fashion (Hostel, Turistas), and local sojourns, like that of Wrong Turn, did not turn out any better. Regardless of its distinguishing aspect of domestic ecotourism, as opposed to those horrors found abroad, this film still deals in the universal concept of fearing the unknown.

In Wrong Turn, the unknown is manifested as the Odets Family, who have largely gone undetected in this rural neck of West Virginia. Or, at the very least, denied by locals. The mythology of these cannibalistic mountain folk transformed over the course of the franchise’s straight-to-video phase, but the first film only provides a basic and underdeveloped suggestion for the villains’ origin: inbreeding. After the title sequence, the story does not dwell on this taboo, which is often used as a narrative shorthand for strangeness, abnormality, and depravity. Even the family’s latest victims are repulsed not so much by their attackers’ grotesque appearance and lineage, but by their crimes both old and new.

wrong turn

Image: Desmond Harrington, Eliza Dushku, Jeremy Sisto and Emmanuelle Chriqui’s characters hide in Wrong Turn.

Wrong Turn wastes no second of its short runtime. McElroy pared the wilderness horror subgenre down to its best elements, and Schmidt supplied a fast pace to go with his sleek direction. The characters, including a time-pressed doctor named Chris (Desmond Harrington), are all doomed before the film even passes the fifteen-minute mark. The condemned in question are thrust into this backwoods misadventure as their cars collide on an ominous country road and their cell phones become useless. Admittedly, there is not a lot of fat on this film, which can be challenging for anyone seeking more substance and nuance. Even so, there are bright spots of writing to go with the surface-level enjoyment.

The horror trend of self-awareness had been, more or less, overplayed by the time Wrong Turn was released. This meta act would eventually be adapted for pure comedy, as seen in the Scary Movie franchise. Meanwhile, biting and fussy commentary on horror within horror was not as novel as it once was, and treating the genre with a little seriousness again was refreshing, even if critics and audiences did not realize it at the time. Schmidt’s aim for a straightforward survival film was precise, and in hindsight, undervalued. The closest this film comes to indulging postmodern horror was when two destined-to-die characters, played by Lindy Booth and Kevin Zegers, get frisky in a conscious but also facetious attempt to summon both company and help. Otherwise, the unaffected method going forward ensures a more immersive experience.

In these rustic, culture-clash horror films, there is a tendency to blame the victims. These outsiders usually go where they do not belong, and due to their ignorance or arrogance, they offend their aggressors. Accordingly as well as unduly, they are then punished as a result of that error. Wrong Turn, on the other hand, is not built on any discernible set of black-and-white ethics. The antagonists would have hunted Chris and his fellow prey regardless. And as demonstrated by the perfectly good but neglected deer carcass spotted on the foreboding Bear Mountain Road, the Odets are not driven to cannibalism because there is a lack of their normal food supply. Overhunting by urbanites or an ecological concern are not to blame, either. No, this family simply fancies human flesh. Not everyone agrees, but there is something rather freeing about a slasher film where the script does not have to bend over backwards and surrender to ridiculousness just to rationalize a series of murders. Particularly in an era where convoluted murder motives ran rampant.

Wrong Turn

Image: Emmanuelle Chriqui’s character loses her head in Wrong Turn.

No one enters any Wrong Turn film and expects profound character writing. Or rather, no one should. Indeed the attention to character became negligible as the franchise grew (not counting the 2021 reboot), however, the first is where the targets are not reduced to stereotypes or are just another number in the overall body-count. Even though they are underdeveloped, Chris, Jessie (Eliza Dusku), Carly (Emmanuelle Chriqui) and Scott (Jeremy Sisto) still feel believable. And more importantly, they are sympathetic. That bad habit of 2000s horror, where the characters are intentionally obnoxious and grating out of an attempt to make their vicious deaths entertaining, is not here. Beyond a slightly annoying couple (Booth, Zegers), McElroy’s script turns in characters worth caring about. It helps how Chris and the others are altruistic; they look out for one another, be it physically or emotionally. Instances of them being comforting and vulnerable in the face of adversity tend to go unnoticed.

Above all, Wrong Turn fans tune in to witness carnage. What followed this first chapter is far more violent and over and top; based on this merit alone, gorehounds understandably prefer the straight-to-video installments. Yet the executions here also scratch the itch, if not for bloodlust, then the element of surprise. Namely one character’s treetop beheading, and later an unexpected arrow to the eye. These set-pieces were one-upped in Wrong Turn 2: Dead End, but in spite of the grislier results, they did not boast the same startle factor. Another benefit was the late and great Stan Winston, who not only co-produced the initial film, his studio handled the practical effects and makeup. It goes without saying, Winston’s unique workmanship is sorely missed.

While not considered an outright classic from its own time period, the first Wrong Turn is a wicked love letter to ’70s brutality. Its unapologetic yet sincere approach has been long underappreciated.

wrong turn

Image: Desmond Harrington and Eliza Dushku respectively as Chris and Jessie in Wrong Turn.

Paul Lê is a Texas-based, Tomato approved critic at Bloody Disgusting, Dread Central, and Tales from the Paulside. Bluesky: paulle.bsky.social

Click to comment

Editorials

Beyond the Bargain Bin: 5 Underrated Direct-to-Video Horror Sequels

Published

on

Underrated direct-to-video horror sequels

The home video market used to be a chaotic industry wedged neatly between theatrical releases and television productions. It was where indie filmmakers could experiment with and profit from low-budget bangers while big studios could also squeeze extra money out of beloved properties without necessarily investing in blockbuster sequels.

There were plenty of cinematic duds during this time, and you never really knew whether you had just picked up a legitimately fun low-budget endeavor or a quick cash-grab from the rental store, but I’d argue that the good outweighed the bad because these flicks were allowed to be weirder than their big-budget counterparts – especially where sequels were concerned.

In honor of these home video hidden gems, today I’d like to recommend five underrated direct-to-video horror sequels that are still worth tracking down!

For the purposes of this list, I’ll be defining direct-to-video productions as films that were exclusively released on video/DVD, so no limited theatrical releases or TV movies that later made it big on home video. That means avoiding popular recommendations like Curse of Chucky and Wrong Turn 2 in order to focus on less-discussed horror flicks.

That being said, don’t forget to comment below with your own favorite sequels if you think we missed a particularly thrilling one.

With that out of the way, onto the list!


5. Tremors 4: The Legend Begins (2004)

The success of Ron Underwood’s original Tremors was lightning in a bottle that can’t ever be replicated, so as much as I understand the love for the second film and its campy thrills, Tremors 4 remains my personal favorite sequel simply because it dares to do something different with the franchise.

Directed by series co-creator S.S. Wilson, The Legend Begins is a surprisingly effective prequel that tells the story of how the town of Perfection earned its name after a terrifying 1889 encounter with the graboids. This horror western may not live up to the original, but it doesn’t really have to, with the period aesthetic and fresh story making it one hell of a standalone adventure.


4. Children of the Corn III: Urban Harvest (1995)

There are those who argue that there are no good Children of the Corn films, but I think the series has something to offer for every kind of horror fan if you’re willing to deal with low budgets and strange creative decisions. In fact, I’m of the opinion that the initial trilogy of Children films only got better over time, with the third entry being the most entertaining despite having the least to do with Stephen King’s original story.

In this urban horror romp, we follow a pair of siblings who enter foster care after their abusive father is transformed into a scarecrow by He Who Walks Behind the Rows. What follows is an effects-heavy descent into madness as the kids bring their particular brand of religious fury to 90s Chicago – with deadly results.

If that’s not enough to convince you to give this flick a try, you should know that this is the only entry in the series that King himself has admitted to liking. Not only that, but it also marks Charlize Theron’s feature film debut.


3. Boogeyman 2 (2007)

Jeff Betancourt had his job cut out for him when he was first contacted to helm the sequel to 2005’s Boogeyman. Not only was the first film a critical bomb, but the sequel was set to be produced for a mere $4.5 million – less than a fourth of the budget of the original flick.

Yet, Jeff decided to use this direct-to-video sequel as an opportunity to improve on the generic aspects of the flick’s predecessor by making the monster more uncannily human and focusing more on the script than elaborate set pieces. The best part is that Boogeyman 2 isn’t limited by a PG-13 rating, meaning that the deaths are more interesting in spite of the lower budget.


2. Maniac Cop 2 (1990)

The original Maniac Cop is a legitimately entertaining slasher even if it can’t compete with some of the other great franchises from the 80s, but fans know that the direct-to-video sequel is way more fun to revisit despite its shoddy production value and rushed script.

In fact, this rental store hit features more elaborate death sequences while also exploring more of what it means for a community when a police officer goes rogue. Director William Lustig also looks back on this project fondly, claiming that he considers it his personal favorite film of his career and a “terrific B-movie”.

I couldn’t have said it better myself.


1. Bloodstone: Subspecies II (1993)

Direct-to-Video Horror Sequels

More of a middle part of a sprawling trilogy than a standalone horror romp, Ted Nicolaou’s Subspecies II is still the pinnacle of the auteur director’s vampire series and a great example of why it was often worth diving into the bargain bin in order to pick up a Full Moon Features VHS tape.

This fast-paced sequel takes place immediately after the events of the 1991 original, meaning that Subspecies II wastes no time in getting to the lovable practical effects that likely motivated you to purchase the flick in the first place. Nicolaou and Anders Hove (who plays Radu, the iconic vampire) are also much more sure of themselves in this sophomore effort, and that’s why I’d argue that it’s worth watching even if you’re not a fan of the first movie.

Continue Reading