Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

19 Things We Learned from the ‘Day of the Animals’ Commentary

Published

on

Day of the Animals

Earth Day used to be a pretty big deal. You may not even realize that we celebrated it earlier this month, but it was unavoidable back in its early days. The first Earth Day arrived in 1970 with a strong focus on people working together to curb pollution, litter, and all kinds of ills that humankind levels towards the planet. It was a good thing.

Even better? That renewed focus on the environment and our role in its care helped give new, thrilling life to the eco-horror/animal attack subgenres. I’m a massive fan of both, and while I think the films of the 1970s and 1980s are some of the best the subgenres have to offer, I also recognize that it wasn’t always a good time for the onscreen animals themselves. The end of those abuses was a good, necessary step, even if the subsequent attempts at manufacturing animal-related thrills via CG only rarely succeed.

In honor of the most recent Earth Day, though, we’re looking back to the heyday of the animal attack/eco-horror subgenres with a film that mashes them together pretty succinctly to deliver a truly thrilling slice of eco-horror.

Now keep reading to see what I heard on the commentary for


Day of the Animals (1977)

Commentator: Lee Gambin (critic, columnist, author)

1. The opening crawl about the Earth’s weakening ozone layer sees Gambin identify an immediate distinction between this eco-horror/animal attack film and director William Girdler’s previous effort, Grizzly. While the earlier movie is clearly a simple Jaws riff – a great one, at that – Day of the Animals is attempting to give itself a more serious grounding.

2. He compares the film’s setup/structure as much to the disaster films of the 1970s as to eco horror films, due mostly to the introduction of an ensemble cast – made up of several recognizable faces like Christopher George, Leslie Nielsen, Richard Jaeckel, Andrew Stevens, and more – who are forced into a survival situation.

3. Paul Jenson (Nielsen) works in advertising and mentions a TV commercial “with the Indian with the tear in his eye,” and he’s referring to a very real ad. For those of you too young to remember/have seen the ad, it was part of the “Keep America Beautiful” campaign and featured a Native American man with a single tear falling from his eye while he stands amid landscapes ruined by litter, pollution, or deforestation. It was powerful stuff at the timeeven if the actor, Iron Eyes Cody, was actually Italian.

4. A quick aside to that last point, Michael Ansara plays a Native American character here named Daniel Santeeand Ansara was Syrian.

5. Hollywood “legend” Lou Schumacher is credited here as both animal furnisher and trainer, and it was the horror genre that kept him busy in the ’70s with work on movies like Eaten Alive, Dracula’s Dog, and more. Gambin quotes another animal trainer who reported that Schumacher’s dogs weren’t always well-trained and were instead, on occasion, quite dangerous.

6. One trick that trainers/filmmakers use to make a dog look ferocious involves an appliance that fits a piece of beef jerky under the upper lip. It gives the impression of a snarl, and the only downside is that directors have to get their shot quickly before the dog figures out how to free the jerky and gobble it up.

7. Ranger Tucker is played by Walter Barnes, an actor who previously played football for the Philadelphia Eagles. It’s unclear if it’s a coincidence or an intentional nod, but Barnes’ first appearance at 4:07 coincides with shots of a golden eagle looking down upon the humans below.

8. Gambin recorded his commentary during the height of the pandemic in 2020, and he finds similarities between real life and the film’s display of ignorant people not believing scientists and newscasters telling people to stay indoors.

9. George and Lynda Day George were a real-life couple and epitomized certain ideals in the Hollywood of the 1970s. He was “such a stoic, strong, man’s man,” and she was “this gorgeous, leggy, beautiful blond.” They were more than just their looks, though, as both do great work here (and in their other horror collaborations, Pieces and Mortuary). The couple also became vocal activists working with campaigns against animal abuse, aerosols, and more.

10. The film’s wolves were provided by George Toth, whose family owned an animal sanctuary in California that frequently assisted with film productions. Gambin says that Joe Dante and Rob Bottin visited the sanctuary’s wolf enclosure when they were considering having the werewolves in The Howling transform into actual wolves. “And they were freaked out,” he says, “these wolves were not easy to manage, wolves are not an animal that’s easily trained.” They instead went the practical special effects route, and we’re all better off for it, as Bottin’s werewolf transformation remains the best to ever grace the screen. (It’s true, and while An American Werewolf in London is the better movie overall, Rick Baker’s transformation effects land in second place.)

11. Mandy Young is played by Susan Backlinie, and her character is the first to die here as she’s attacked by both a wolf and some vultures. Her cinematic claim to fame, though, is as Chrissie – the first character to be killed by the shark in Jaws. She also worked as an animal activist, a trainer with various birds of prey, and served as Day George’s double in this film.

12. Gambin describes animal attack sequences, particularly in films from the 1970s, as a “magpie’s nest of varied elements in filmmaking. The scenes find life due to the animal performers themselves, the cinematographers working to capture the right movement and angles, effects teams creating puppets and animatronics, and “the most important aspect… would be the editing.”

13. He points out that while the overwhelming majority of animal attack/eco-horror films feature a single type of animal at their heart, this one has numerous species attacking people. “Frogs, Day of the Animals, Wild Beasts, and even the made-for-TV movie The Beasts Are on the Streets, and some others, host an army of varied animals causing havoc for people who need to understand and respect their existence.”

14. William W. Norton co-wrote the film alongside his wife, Eleanor E. Norton, and he’s the scribe behind several genre gems, including Night of the Juggler, Gator, and Big Bad Mama. He was also an ardent supporter of Roman Catholics he saw as being under attack in the UK, to the point that he bought firearms in the U.S. to send to the Irish Republican Army back in Ireland. The couple was arrested in 1986 in possession of a van modified to conceal dozens of weapons and thousands of rounds.

15. The film’s release in 1977 coincided with several big achievements in the world of animal rights, including the founding of the Animal Liberation Front. The direct actions of ALF (no, not that one) involving activists breaking into laboratories to free test animals have been used as inciting incidents in horror films as diverse as 28 Days Later and Meat Kills.

16. The bear that Jenson fights is a cinnamon bear standing in for a grizzly, much as a Kodiak bear played the furry killer in Grizzly. It’s a subspecies of the black bear.

17. The little mute girl is played by Michelle Stacy, and while they don’t share a scene here, she co-stars with Nielsen in Airplane! The boy, John, is played by Bobby Porter, who would go on to become a prolific stunt performer in films like Pumpkinhead, Critters, Link, and more.

18. Gambin breaks down the eco-horror subgenre into 6 different categories: character–driven natural horror (Cujo), character studies drawing thematic parallels with human existence (Of Unknown Origin), alienated humans (Willard), revenge-fueled (Orca), the relentless and unfeeling leviathan (Grizzly), and the environmentally concerned (Tarantula). This is obviously a very quick breakdown, but if you’re at all interested in eco-horror movies, Gambin’s book Massacred by Mother Nature: Exploring the Natural Horror Film is a must-read.

19. Other animal attack/eco-horror movies mentioned by Gambin include Grizzly, The Swarm, Long Weekend, The Pack, White Dog, Nightwing, Prophecy, Alligator, They Only Kill Their Masters, Kingdom of the Spiders, Orca, Jaws, Frogs, Wild Beasts, The Beasts Are on the Streets, Bug, Willard, Night of the Lepus, Trapped, Dogs, Chosen Survivors, Mako: Jaws of Death, Ants, The Ghost and the Darkness, In the Shadow of Kilimanjaro, Deadly Eyes, Empire of the Ants, Tarantulas, Tintorera: Killer Shark, Tentacles, The Uncanny, The White Buffalo, Cujo, Of Unknown Origin, Monkey Shines, Phase IV, Black Zoo, Piranha, Rattlers, and Benji Takes a Dive at Marineland. He gives a special shoutout to one of my personal favorites, 1981’s Savage Harvest, calling it “a magical film” in desperate need of a restoration and Blu-ray release, and I couldn’t agree more.


Quotes Without Context

“Girdler should absolutely be championed as a filmmaker.”

“This is a magnificently staged and executed and horrific death.”

“To see animals kill humans is always a good thing in my book.”

“Animal rights, now.”


Keep up with more horror commentary breakdowns here.

Click to comment

Editorials

‘Bloodstone: Subspecies II’ Revisited: A Bigger, Bolder Follow-Up to Full Moon’s Vampire Cult Classic

Published

on

Bloodstone: Subspecies II

Horror sequels are a peculiar thing. In most cases, follow-ups to scary movies tend to retread the same formula with different victims and more over-the-top scares. This is because audiences tend to be more interested in the antagonists of these pictures than anything else, with even main characters becoming disposable when the time comes to produce a sequel.

That’s why some of the most memorable horror sequels are the ones that actually manage to hold onto interesting survivors from previous films while also pushing the story forward instead of having the same thing happen again to a different group of people. From Scream 2 to Dream Warriors (and arguably even The Exorcist III: Legion), there are quite a few of these innovative sequels to go around.

However, if there’s one franchise that deserves more attention when discussing bigger and better continuations that make the most of episodic filmmaking, it has to be Ted Nicolaou’s Subspecies.

The Full Moon classic spawned an indie horror icon, but bizarre sequel Bloodstone: Subspecies II is even more beloved than its predecessor.

Building a Bigger Vampire Saga

While the film itself takes place almost immediately after the events of the first movie, Bloodstone only entered production a couple of years after the release of the original as both Charles Band and Nicolaou weighed the pros and cons of returning to Romania to continue the series. In an effort to maximize efficiency, the team decided to invest in a trilogy where parts II and III, now fully written by Nicolaou, would be filmed simultaneously over the course of a single grueling shoot.

Much like the first Subspecies, Bloodstone’s low budget meant that the filmmakers once again had to cut corners and re-use as many of their resources as possible. Thankfully, the process was much easier this time around as Nicolaou, with the help of Romanian cinematographer Vlad Paunescu and his wife Oana, became more acquainted with local customs and made new friends. Shooting abroad still came with its own unique set of challenges due to a lack of translators and the occasional safety concerns, but the crew managed to make things work by filming things guerrilla-style and setting up shop in abandoned caves and real medieval ruins.

The director’s newfound contacts, coupled with the relative success of the first movie, meant that he was basically given free rein over an assortment of shooting locations usually considered off-limits for indie horror. That’s why Bloodstone features insanely ambitious lighting and effects work even during scenes shot in the middle of a bustling Bucharest. The filmmakers went so far as to project Radu’s Nosferatu-like shadows over local monuments as if he were a Romanian boogeyman, an idea that was actually encouraged by local cinephiles.

In fact, many of the more elaborate scenes here had originally been planned for the first movie before being discarded due to the lack of available resources. It was only with the support of Romanian fans and filmmakers that Bloodstone was able to give Radu a chance to be even more menacing the second time around.

Michelle’s Transformation Takes Center Stage

However, when it came to the American part of the crew, not everyone was able or willing to return for another round of Romanian adventuring. That’s why Radu’s human-loving half-brother Stefan (Michael Watson) is unceremoniously killed off at the beginning of the film while the role of Michelle had to be recast. Denice Duff took over for Laura Mae Tate, with the character now being joined by her sister, Rebecca, played by Melanie Shatner (yes, that Shatner).

In the finished film, we follow Michelle as she awakens to her new life as a vampire and discovers that Radu has murdered her lover. Struggling with grief and her newfound bloodlust, Michelle contacts her sister overseas, with Rebecca soon travelling to Romania on an ill-advised rescue mission. Meanwhile, Radu (Anders Hove) reaches out to his undead Mummy (Pamela Gordon, underneath heavy layers of impressive makeup effects) and promises to deliver her the coveted Bloodstone artifact while also making Michelle his eternal consort.

Revisiting the movie, I was impressed with how introspective this story is when compared to the original. The sequel assumes that you’re already familiar with the previously established characters, so the story wastes no time in exploring the immediate aftermath of the previous film’s events. From Michelle’s reluctant transformation into a creature of the night to Radu’s obvious mommy issues, Nicolaou is way more interested in pushing these characters into new and uncharted territory rather than recycling existing plot points.

Practical Effects and Gothic Atmosphere Still Impress

Yet, much like the first film, it’s Romania itself that makes the movie worth watching. The ruins of Castle Vladislav are even more majestic now, and visiting the moody streets of Bucharest with its surprisingly punk-rock nightlife made for a nice change of pace when compared to the original film’s quiet village setting. Once again, the abundance of interesting locations makes the movie feel much more expensive than it really is, with the filmmakers surrounding our characters with a living, breathing environment that would be impossible to recreate in a studio.

The increased freedom also allowed Nicolaou to flex his filmmaking muscles and tackle more ambitious blocking/composition in the sequel. The low budget and tropey script mean that the visuals don’t always work, but it’s consistently clear that this neo-expressionist style could only come from a passionate team attempting to pay homage to the shadowy horror classics of yesteryear. If the retro atmosphere isn’t enough for you, there’s enough practical gore here to satisfy even the most demanding of horror hounds!

Radu himself is also far more interesting now that Hove is more comfortable working alongside an international crew, with the actor having gone on record explaining that, while he spent more time drinking vodka than working while shooting the first movie, the sequel was a much more creatively satisfying experience for everyone involved. The character’s relationship with his abusive Mummy is also a highlight of the expanded mythology, especially since the practical effects that bring her to life are just as freaky now as they were back in ’93.

My only real gripe with the horror elements of the picture comes from the glaring absence of the diminutive stop-motion minions from the first film, though I guess the surprisingly entertaining addition of Professor Popescu (Michael Denish) and his archeological antics mostly make up for that.

Bloodstone: Subspecies II is obviously the middle chapter of a trilogy, with the ending feeling a lot less definitive than its predecessor as several plot threads are left to dangle in the wind, but I appreciate how the flick explores new ground while remaining faithful to nearly all the ideas that made the original such a good time. While I don’t think it’s as big of an improvement over the first movie as some fans make it out to be, Bloodstone is definitely worth revisiting if you’re a fan of old-fashioned vampire yarns.

Tune in next time for the thrilling conclusion to this initial trilogy, Bloodlust: Subspecies III!

Continue Reading