Connect with us

Editorials

‘I Know What You Did Last Summer 2’ – Mike Mendez Recalls His Unmade Pitch [Phantom Limbs]

Published

on

I Know What You Did Last Summer 2 movie
Pictured: 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' (1997)

For this installment of Phantom Limbs, we’ll be diving back into the I Know What You Did Last Summer franchise with filmmaker Mike Mendez, the director behind The Convent, The Gravedancers and Big Ass Spider!. As Mendez noted during a recent appearance on the Best Films Never Made podcast, he had pitched to write and direct a sequel to the original 1997 film, a project which eventually became Danny Cannon’s Bahamas-set I Still Know What You Did Last Summer. While Mendez notes that he remembers very little of his pitch, what he does recall makes for a fun and fascinating peek into an established genre filmmaker’s take on a well-known horror property.

During our brief but lively chat, Mendez touched on how he came to pitch on the project, what his take was, and why it ultimately didn’t happen.


“I’m not sure this is worthy of an article,” Mendez admits, laughing. “You tell me. This is a concept from 25 years ago that I barely remember, but I do remember going in there to pitch on I Know What You Did Last Summer 2: Electric Boogaloo. This was in 1997, roughly. It was right after I had had my first film [the intense horror/thriller Killers] at the Sundance Film Festival, and Scream was all the rage at that time … I Know What You Did Last Summer was coming out. So [the sequel] seemed like a logical choice to pitch, ’cause I was doing a lot of meetings and doing the rounds.”

Ben Willis/The Fisherman in I Know What You Did Last Summer (1997)

Ben Willis/The Fisherman in I Know What You Did Last Summer (1997)

Was Mendez familiar with Lois Duncan’s original 1973 source novel before tackling his take? “No, no. I mean, honestly, it was a reaction to the movie being a big hit. I was kind of against the PG-13 thing anyway. I mean, Scream obviously set a precedent, but it always annoyed me that so many others that followed went the PG-13 route. Slasher movies with no blood are like porn films with no sex. So I just don’t get it. I was old enough to have lived through the original 80s slasher craze. So the poppy, glossy kind of modernizations of them I wasn’t the biggest fan of, so I wanted to put in a little bit of the more old school kills and go a little more traditional and make them scary again, you know?”

Mendez notes that he wasn’t merely pitching to direct I Still Know…, but was hoping to write the project as well. “It was an original idea that I pitched. At the time, I was very much into making little rip reels and lookbooks … and I had also made a lookbook [for I Know 2]. I was very big into gimmicky stuff. So there was the hook that was on the front of the cover, and it pulled out to open and have the pitch inside.”


I Know What You Did Last Summer 2 Mike Mendez

Ray (Freddie Prinze Jr.) and Julie (Jennifer Love Hewitt) try to survive the Fisherman’s wrath in I Know What You Did Last Summer (1997)

And what did Mendez’s pitch entail? “From what I remember, my concept was basically this: Jennifer Love Hewitt‘s character [Julie James] went off to college. It was playing off of that thing that Freddie Prinze Jr. [Ray] says to her in the first movie, something like ‘I’ll always be there, I’ll always be watching over you,’ something like that. It’s actually kind of creepy, the way he says it.”

Mendez reveals that this creepiness would have extended to the character’s portrayal in his sequel, as Ray would have become dangerously jealous of Julie being in college, meeting other guys. When the killings start up again, the audience would have been left to wonder if the culprit was Ben Willis, the Fisherman who terrorized Julie and her friends in the original film, or possibly Ray, driven to murder by his obsession with Julie. “It was playing on that idea of, ‘Is it the original killer? Or is it a jealous Freddie Prinze Jr.?'”

A decidedly moodier Ray (Freddie Prinze Jr.) from I Still Know What You Did Last Summer (1998)

As the bodies begin piling up and “I Know What You Did Last Summer” notes are flying about, Julie struggles with trusting the man she loves, realizing he may very well be the killer this time around. As the story would have barreled toward its conclusion, a shocking twist would have unfolded: Ben Willis has returned as the villainous Fisherman…but Ray has been killing Julie’s friends as well. “So there are two Fisherman killers that are both trying to kill Julie,” Mendez laughs.

The climax to this surprising slasher would have paid homage to another iconic slasher franchise as well, Mendez reveals. “It ends in kind of an homage to Child’s Play 3, in a big funhouse with both killers trying to get her. But they also hate each other, so the killers would be popping up, trying to fight each other, as well as still trying to get her. I wanted to make it a big, zany setpiece that had lots of scares. I do remember making a video reel of it … using lots of clips from The Funhouse and Childs Play 3.”

Ray (Freddie Prinze Jr.) takes aim in I Still Know What You Did Last Summer (1998)

Mendez also notes that he’s certain he would have concluded his sequel with the possibility of having even more follow-ups, noting that he remembers Ray dying and Ben Willis escaping to stalk Julie another day. “I’m a child of the 80s! I know that death is not the end. It’s always designed for the killer to jump out at the end.

“So that was the idea. The bodies would rise, there would be a college slasher element, there would be two killers, there would be a funhouse involved, it would be much more fun. Just something a little different and more amped than the first one. But fuck it, what do I know? They sent them to the Bahamas!”

I Know What You Did Last Summer 2

Ben Willis/The Fisherman (Muse Watson) returns in I Still Know What You Did Last Summer (1998)


So ultimately, what happened with Mendez’s I Know What You Did Last Summer 2 (as the filmmaker remembers it being officially referred to)? “I don’t think it went very far. I think it was rejected immediately. Again, how can I beat the Bahamas and Jack Black in dreadlocks?

A recurring theme with recent Phantom Limbs articles is filmmakers and showrunners never being given a concrete “No” from studios when their projects don’t move forward. Was this Mendez’s experience as well? “You know, you go in, you do your pitch, and then you don’t hear anything. Then months later, they announce so-and-so is directing and you go, ‘Oh. I guess I didn’t get it.'”


Looking back on his brief brush with the franchise, Mendez provides his final thoughts on his I Know 2 pitch. “I barely spent any time on it. It was a failed pitch of me trying to get a gig that I didn’t get. There are hundreds of those, and I’m sure hundreds on a daily basis that happen in Hollywood. So there’s nothing particularly out of the ordinary on this one. I gave my pitch, for whatever reason they didn’t like it, and they [made the film they did].

“I do have a bloodlust, so I’m sure [his take] would’ve been filled with lots of kills, and I know it would’ve been geared towards being more fun and scarier than the first, so that’s all I can say. It’s not something I cry myself to sleep over going, ‘Man, if only I had done that I Know What You Did Last Summer sequel.'”

Very special thanks to Mike Mendez for his time and insights.


This has been Phantom Limbs, a recurring feature which takes a look at intended yet unproduced horror sequels and remakes – extensions to genre films we love, appendages to horror franchises that we adore – that were sadly lopped off before making it beyond the planning stages. Here, we chat with the creators of these unmade extremities to gain their unique insight into these follow-ups that never were, with the discussions standing as hopefully illuminating but undoubtedly painful reminders of what might have been.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading