Connect with us

Interviews

[Special Report] ‘The Caller’ Premiere in Puerto Rico: Lights! Camera! Hurricane!

Published

on

Samuel Goldwyn Films’ suspense thriller The Caller is headed to select cities this Friday, August 26th. Directed by Matthew Parkhill from a script by Sergio Casci and starring Rachelle Lefevre (Twilight, New Moon), Stephen Moyer (“True Blood”, Quills), Ed Quinn (“True Blood”, “Eureka”) Luis Guzman (Boogie Nights) and Lorna Raver (Drag Me To Hell), the film centers around a recent divorcee who starts receiving some seriously needy and deranged phone calls on the old-timey landline in her new apartment.

Originally set to film in New York, the movie instead set up shop in Puerto Rico to take advantage of the territory’s tax incentives and the assistance of the local film commission. The subsequent plan was to shoot San Juan and pass it off as New York, but the filmmakers wisely decided to take full advantage of the exotic local flavor (and avoid the insurmountable task of finding more than two square feet of the Caribbean island that could pass for the Big Apple) and adapted the story to take place in the Puerto Rican capital instead.

Earlier this week I flew out to the island – which was literally enveloped by Hurricane Irene at the time – to attend the premiere, get a feel for the vibes of San Juan (the city is something of a character in the movie) and with speak with some of the film’s cast and crew about their soon to be notoriously difficult 23 day shoot. A shoot most of the people I spoke to felt was appropriately mirrored by the many, many difficulties that beset the premiere and, well… everything that went down over the past few days.

Check it out after the jump.

The Caller

There’s something about Puerto Rico, it’s not just another Caribbean island. I realized when I got here, it’s Spain. It’s more European than any tropical island I’ve ever been on. The people and the energy are just the best. I was here for the entire shoot and I stayed two weeks extra for vacation after it was over.” – Ed Quinn

After hearing the dressing options for his grilled tuna salad, Stephen Moyer easily zeroes in on his choice, “blood orange please“. This is probably about as close as I’ll get to Bon Temps in my lifetime, hearing Bill Compton order something with the word `blood’ in it. Only he doesn’t sound at all like Bill Compton, and he certainly doesn’t carry himself in the same tortured way. He’s much looser, much happier and much more English than that brooding oversexed vampire.

I’m not really supposed to be having lunch with him, our on-camera interview is scheduled by the following day, but we’re in the only room of our hotel that the emergency generator can power. The lobby. There’s still no AC, it’s literally 90 degrees and with the rain pouring down outside the open glass doors I figure we’re at 100% humidity. So people aren’t eating in their rooms. In fact no one in the hotel seems to be in their room at all. They’re all here in the lobby either drinking mojitos or crowded around the one working television, tracking the progress of the first hurricane to hit Puerto Rico since 1998.

Moyer, who plays love interest John Guidi in the film, has another reason to not be in his 11th floor room. It’s flooded (Ed Quinn’s room is flooded too, but for different reasons we’ll get to later – at this point he’s currently SURFING in the hurricane and is thus not around to explain himself). So instead he’s here with me, his publicist and three members of the film’s publicity team. Funnily enough, the mood could not be lighter. When approached by hotel staff who are offering to swap out his room he politely declines, “Nah I’m fine, could I just get a few towels please?” While he’s most likely exhausted, he doesn’t show it. Instead he’s cracking jokes, ordering drinks for the table (diet coke for him) and just generally shooting the breeze. He’s turned the hurricane into happy hour as we dig into the hotel’s dwindling supply of refrigerated food. It would have been bad form for me to whip out my recorder at this point but in the moments when tourists aren’t approaching and asking for pictures (a request he graciously and endlessly obliges) he swaps stories with everyone at the table, riffing on weird solicitations made by New Orleans society mavens and extolling the virtues of Michael Dougherty’s ‘Trick Or Treat’. This all starts within 30 minutes of me setting foot in the resort and it’s an excellent primer for the next two days as well as a healthy analogue for the production of ‘The Caller’ – people rising above a series of challenges so endless it’s almost comical and making the best of it.

After catching the red-eye to Miami, then sitting on the runway for a few hours as a leaky engine is fixed and the connecting flight’s pilot tries to figure out a way to fly around the storm, “we ‘should’ be okay” is heard over the intercom, and finally embarking on the very bumpy final trek into San Juan – I’m beat. After lunch I head up to my room, plug in my computer so that it’ll start charging as soon as the power is switched back on (something that won’t happen for another 36 hours) and hop in the shower in the hopes that it will be hot. Nope. I settle in for a nap before getting an email that the designated theater across town doesn’t have power either and the film’s premiere will now have to take place sometime after our interviews. They’ve found a theater with power a few miles away (one isn’t suitable for the premiere), so we’re still seeing ‘The Caller ‘that night, but everything has been pushed back a day. After changing my travel arrangements I finally get a few hours sleep.

That night, after taking a cold shower and shaving in the dark, I head down to the lobby to meet up with everyone for the shuttle to this mystical building that somehow has enough electricity to power a projector bulb (at least in theory). I drop my iPhone off at the front desk so they can charge it a bit, you know, maybe get me back up above 20%. This becomes a common theme throughout the trip. Initially I was optimistic enough to siphon the power from my computer to charge the device, figuring that it was only a matter of hours before the lights came back on. All I got out of that was a dead computer and repeated trips to the lobby to see if one of the four or five electrical outlets there were unoccupied, which I never had any luck with. There were practically electrical outlet social clubs, people playing cards, eating and drinking, all while charging up. In each of these cases just go to the front desk and leave my phone there for 15 minutes to get out of the red.

I leave the front desk and find Ed Quinn, who plays abusive ex-husband Steven in the film, noshing on some sliders and having a drink with the publicists. Also milling about are director Matthew Parkhill and writer Sergio Casci. Unfortunately Rachelle Lefevre (who plays Mary Kee, the central character) couldn’t make it due to the shooting schedule of her new show (“A Gifted Man“) and Lorna Raver made it as far as Atlanta before deciding against battling Hurricane Irene and heading back home. Also absent is Luis Guzman, though I intentionally didn’t inquire about the reasons behind this since I prefer that he remain an utter enigma to me. But everyone who ‘is’ here seems happy about it and determined to make the best out of things. Again, it’s all kind of unexpected. Their premiere has been postponed and the streets are flooded but there’s nary a complaint to be heard as everyone loads into the vans to head to the screening.

At the screening I notice something off, the projector’s bulb is a little dim which is kind of an issue for a film that’s already shot fairly darkly to begin with. Also, the premiere print never arrived due to the storm so we’re watching a scratched print that, to make matters worse, doesn’t really seem to be threaded through the projector properly. Moyer and Quinn are seeing the film for the first time – as are many of the press – and I’m a bit nervous for everyone involved. But yet again, like everything on this trip and the making of the film, it turns out that something with all the recipes for a surefire disaster turns out to not be a disaster at all. The crowd seemed into it, with one journalist sinking her nails into my arm during the film’s climax and literally drawing blood. LITERALLY. In the van ride back to the hotel Casci asks for a picture of the wound, which he deemed the highest form of compliment.

Back at the hotel bar I speak briefly with Moyer and Quinn, both of whom seemed genuinely thrilled with the film. I then grab a quick drink with Matthew Parkhill and we talk about digital vs. film (‘The Caller’ was shot on the RED 1) with him clearly being in the camp of directors who prefer digital for budgetary reasons and the amount of takes it allows. We actually went fairly deep down the rabbit hole in terms of budgets, cameras and even color grading and I kind of wished that every single electronic device I owned wasn’t dead at this point because I’d love to accurately share his exact opinions. Suffice to say, he doesn’t think that “blue” should always be the default setting for every digital grading program. He also conceded that the print shown wasn’t ideal (he prefers digital projection as well) but joked about how this whole thing was just another bit of “The Caller Karma“.

Speaking of budgets and karma and trouble in general, I should probably get into what exactly made ‘The Caller’ such a difficult shoot. Initially the film was set to go in New York, and at that point the budget was easily a multiple of what it ultimately wound up being. By the time they ultimately decided to shoot in Puerto Rico the costs had lowered considerably but so had the funds available to them. The shooting schedule was cut from 35 to 23 days. The character of Mary Kee is in every scene of the film and on the first day of shooting Parkhill had to dismiss the original lead actress. They contacted Rachelle Lefevre, who was attending to family in the hospital. She read the script and four hours later was on a plane to San Juan, carrying only a backpack. Later that very night she was in the rain, shooting a split. Weather, technical issues, money issues… something went wrong at seemingly every turn. Parkhill commented that every day he showed up on set he was sure would find the production shuttered. And yet, it never was. It gets worse but I’m not sure ‘exactly’ how. Whenever the cast and crew speak about the process there’s inevitably a sense of someone holding back. They get to a certain point and then knowing glances are thrown around, nods and laughs are exchanged and people stop talking. There are clearly some details I’m not allowed in on. It’s akin to hearing your grandfather almost tell you that great World War 2 story, but then shutting down. You know it was some serious sh*t, but it’s simply too much to talk about.

I grab my flashlight (the hotel has begun issuing them to the guests) from the concierge and head back up to my room – missing out on a wild night of ocean swimming in the rain, according to a few that stayed up. Quinn, who is almost imposingly athletic and very much drawn to the water, was stung by a jellyfish, “It was not a big deal, in a hurricane they get gut into pieces and the surge pushes them in. I’ve actually been stung twice here“. I ask him how he’s enjoying the hurricane and how his room being flooded differed from Moyer’s situation, “ I’m loving it. I’m just happy there’s not more damage to the island because it’s been the coolest experience being here. I love the tropics so the experience of this is actually really cool. Except for when I flooded my hotel room. I wanted to listen to the hurricane so I opened the sliding glass door not realizing it created a vacuum effect and sucked all of the moisture out of the atrium. So I woke and there was an inch of water in the living room.

The next morning I awake hoping that the AC will be on, that my computer will be charged and that I’ll have hot water. No on all accounts. I drop my phone off at the front desk and head to breakfast, where it becomes apparent that the hotel really is running out of food. All of the menu items are cancelled, and there is a brunch set up consisting of what’s available. Stuff I don’t normally eat. It was fine, and at this point the power wasn’t even on in the local hospitals so I consider myself lucky to be getting coffee.

Everyone’s on-camera interviews with Moyer and Parkhill are scheduled for 10AM but have obviously been pushed back. Around an hour is spent finding a room in the hotel with a suitable temperature that can be reach by the power generator for the audio/video equipment. Everything’s hot already and those big lights make it even hotter, so there’s some last minute running around to find some place to shoot that won’t melt the talent. Once everything is set up we all sit in the same room as the interviews are being conducted, which means that every journalist there (to be fair, there are only 5 of us) could hear the journalist before them ask the exact same questions. Repetitive lines of questioning are the nature of the beast at junkets, but it’s a little unnerving hearing 70% of yours asked literally 5 minutes before you and again 5 minutes after you.

To their credit, Moyer and Parkhill each did a good job of not giving a rote answer to every question, they’re clearly happy enough with the film to find new ways to talk about which aspects they found most engaging. At one point, during an interview for another outlet conducted by the journalist who dug her nails into me, Moyer asks me to bring my iPhone over so he can show the film camera the picture of “what you did to Evan“. For more on what they had to say, check out my interviews with them which will be posted soon.

After Moyer and Parkhill I sit down with Ed Quinn for a quick chat. When asked what he liked most about the script Quinn replied, “It’s smart. I did a really brutal CSI:NY arc and I swore I’d never play the abusive husband or boyfriend again because it’s just such an intense [experience]… but here there’s a very smart aspect of it where you can take it on face value superficially just as an abusive husband in a broken marriage, which is genius because it’s terrifying and opens up the audience to a terror that [even if] they don’t personally understand they know someone who has gone through it and then by having those sensors of terror opened up then here comes the psychological aspects of the story that’s being woven. However in all of the scenes that I play, I was able to play them with a sense of duality. That there may be a different truth, a different pov, and if you watch the movie closely especially for little things like wardrobe and mannerisms and energy and if you really look at that last scene there is a possibility that the movie may be something different than what we thought on surface, on face value. So I wasn’t always justifying the abuse, I could play it all with frustration and sadness. There’s lots of different ways to look at it and that allowed me in every scene to play hurt, frustration, awkward, embarrassed, exasperated and that’s what was so wonderful. Sergio’s script and Matthew’s attention to detail is what allowed all of those performances to come through.

The film’s ending is narratively satisfying, yet conceptually ambiguous. When asked on his personal take Quinn offers, “You can watch this as a straight horror film and it’s a lot of fun and really scary or you can sit back there and be very cerebral about it and interpret it in a different way. I’m part of something where some people say, `wow that was scary’ and other people say `wow dude, that was heavy’ because the way I’m looking at it, it can be brain food.

Quinn’s favorite horror movies? “‘Night Of The Living Dead’, ‘The Exorcist’ and ‘Jaws’. And ‘The Thing’. I love the ‘The Thing’, I watched that with my writing partner the other night, it’s so simple and contained and it’s just like ‘Das Boot’ meets god only knows what.

I shuffle over to Sergio Casci and ask him where he got the idea for the film, “14 years ago I was living in an old tenement in Glasgow and the phone rang and the idea popped into my head fully formed. The idea stayed with me and it was one of those happy situations where the story wrote itself, first as a half hour short, with only two characters, Rose and Mary…. basically it was a two act play and I wanted to expand it to a three act film.

I mention the location change from New York to Puerto Rico and adapting the piece to fit the change of scenery and he answers, “Well when I wrote it as a feature at first it was set in Glasgow and it was so hard to get people interested in it. Then I changed it to New York and suddenly people were interested and we hooked up with producers and so on. But they wanted to film in Puerto Rico because they have great incentives and great crews and they wanted to shoot Puerto Rico as New York. I said to Matthew yeah you can shoot San Juan for New York, but why would you want to when you can shoot San Juan for San Juan? It’s a beautiful place, aesthetically it’s gorgeous but it also has this incredible cultural and spiritual background. You know the business with the Santeria and the different religions here. I think watching the movie, what Puerto Rico brings to it in the background are all of these subtle little things which I think adds a richness.

Casci’s favorite horror films? “I’ve got to say it’s ‘The Excorcist’. Though I don’t think an 18 year old who had never seen it would like it. If ‘The Excorcist’ was being made today I can guarantee that there would be an opening kill in the first five minutes. I’d say out of modern horror my favorite is ‘The Sixth Sense’. It has such a sense of dread which is what I’m most interested in conveying. I’m hoping ‘The Caller’ will scare the sh*t out both kids and their parents“.

Casci ended the interview with an impassioned plea for horror filmmakers to get rid of the `Opening Kill’ unless absolutely necessary, “nowadays before the titles they need to opening kill so the 14 year old boys don’t get bored.I would take to the streets and protest the opening kill. If I hate one thing more than anything, it’s the opening kill, because it destroys the movie if it’s not needed there. You should write an article about how it’s killing horror movies. I mean some scripts call for an opening kill, what I hate is when it doesn’t and they artificially put one in to indulge the 14 year old boys“.

After the interviews I head down to the beach to swim in an afternoon rainstorm that Quinn describes as “intoxicating“. After trying to bodysurf a bit (and hoping no one was watching from the hotel) I become increasingly concerned about being struck by lightning and exit the water.

That night everyone piles into the two vans to hit the premiere (the allocated cinema now has power, even if the hotels and hospitals don’t). After a few words from Parkhill, producer Luillo Ruiz (who is quite the character) gives an impassioned introduction to the film though it was in Spanish so I have no real idea what he said. He then handed the microphone over to Moyer right before the PA sound cut out. Moyer laughs and shrugs it off, this is par for the course. Then the lights go down and we get video introductions from Rachelle Lefevre (who is now blond and on the set of “A Gifted Man“) and Luis Guzman. Guzman’s introduction in particular was pretty great. I have no idea what he was saying – Spanish again – but it involved him giving a speech in front of his open refrigerator with a bottle of Bacardi. The premiere print still hasn’t arrived, so they have to use the scratched one from the prior night. At least now the projector is working properly. Things are getting better.

And then things get better still. Once back at the hotel we happen upon a miracle – THE POWER IS BACK ON. We head down to the afterparty where Sergio Casci cuts a rug, Parkhill chats away and Moyer and Quinn are practically forced into the corner by party crashers with cameras. Everyone seems happy and relieved. The production of the film definitely fostered a sense of community that was rekindled, nearly two years after the film wrapped, by the intensity of the premiere. Everyone involved on ‘The Caller’ went through quite a bit of trouble to get the film made, but it seems none of them would take it back. Whether or not it’s for the movie or the experience, or a mixture of both.

At 330PM the next day I head to the airport with Quinn. He comments that most of the time junkets are awful, and that in the cases where he doesn’t like the film they can be absolute torture. Finding something good to say can be difficult. Though it’s clearly not the case here, even at this point he’s not at a loss of good things to say about the experience or the film. Our plane is late due to mechanical failure. When we finally get to Miami for the final flight back to LAX ‘that’ plane is late because there’s no pilot. Everything is pushed back a few hours.

I finally got home at 2AM this morning. When I swiped my credit card through the taxi’s magnetic reader, it was declined. I was confused, he was enraged. I called my bank and they informed me that “half our cards aren’t functioning due to system maintenance. You can use it again at 6AM“. I ask them to tell this to the cabbie, it makes no difference. He demands my iPhone as collateral (he refuses to take me to an ATM) claiming “I’ll come back here with your phone at noon tomorrow and you have my money then!” There’s no way I’m giving this lunatic my phone. He threatens to call the cops. After a few minutes of pleading he lets me try my card again….. it works. But at this point I am utterly broken and exhausted.

I head up the stairs to my apartment, tired and nauseous. I think to myself, “almost everything that technically could have gone wrong with this trip went wrong. And yet, I had a blast. I wouldn’t have traded the experience of these two days for anything and I’d do it again in a heartbeat.

I more than suspect the people behind ‘The Caller’ feel the same way.

Interviews

“Be Not Afraid”: Andrea Perron Shares the Chilling True Story Behind ‘The Conjuring’ [Interview]

Published

on

Pictured: 'The Conjuring'

Welcome back to DEAD Time. I hope you left a light on for me because this month we’re going inside The Conjuring house to find out the real story of what happened to Carol and Roger Perron when they moved their five daughters into a house in Burrillville, Rhode Island in the early 1970s.

In 2013, director James Wan unleashed the terrifying horror film The Conjuring, which was based on the case files of paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren and told the story of a family tormented by a demonic force after moving into their new home. In real life, the Warrens did investigate the activity in the Perron home, but the story goes a bit differently. You may think you know what really happened inside that house based on the horror movie alone, but you would be mistaken. The true story is much, much scarier.

Bloody Disgusting was delighted to have the opportunity to chat with Andrea Perron, the oldest of the five Perron daughters, who was witness to the paranormal activity in the family’s home. Andrea is a lecturer and the author of the trilogy of books, House of Darkness House of Light, which tells the story of what her family experienced while living in the house in Rhode Island for a decade. Read on for our exclusive interview.


Bloody Disgusting: Your family moved into the old Arnold Estate in 1970, correct? How long after you moved into the house did your family begin to experience unusual activity?

Andrea Perron: We bought the house in December of 1970, but we didn’t move in right away because my mother didn’t want to move during Christmas. My mother found the farm for sale and our family went to the farm a number of times and we loved it and we all felt like it was home to us. It was an original colonial home and a farm and 200 acres of land it was a big deal. My parents paid $72,000 for the house and back in 1970 that was a lot of money. All of the times we visited the house with Mr. Kenyon, who was the owner, none of us remembered having anything strange or otherworldly or mystical happen. We just enjoyed the property and the land, and the place itself was just so incredibly enticing. None of us have any memory of seeing anything strange or weird there until the day we moved in. It was as though the spirits were all just holding their breath [laughs] waiting for us to get there and live there.

The first thing that happened was my father opened up the back of the moving truck and handed me a box. We were in the middle of a snow and sleet and ice event, and the wind was whipping around, and it was freezing cold. I went into the nearest door with the box that was marked kitchen and my mother had already come in with my baby sister April and had gone into the kitchen. April was only five, she was too young to help unpack or help unload boxes, so she just stayed with mom. I walked into the parlor and took a right into the living room and Mr. Kenyon was packing a box of his wife’s china. I stopped and started chatting with him and then I picked up the box and turned to go into the kitchen through the front foyer, and there was a man standing there that I thought was oddly dressed. He seemed like flesh and blood to me to the extent that as I walked past him, I said, “Good morning, sir.” I didn’t see him when I walked into the room, but he was standing in the corner of the door when I picked up the box. So, I walked into the kitchen, and I remember asking my mother who that man was with Mr. Kenyon. Her response was, “There’s nobody with Mr. Kenyon. His son is on the way, but he’s not here yet.” So, I’m sure at the age of twelve, I assumed that a neighbor had stopped by, and my mom didn’t know it.

I went back outside to the moving van and meanwhile, my sister Christine walked in, and she saw him and walked into the kitchen and asked my mom the same question. Mom was busy; she had discovered that Mr. Kenyon had not packed anything in the kitchen. So, Christine asked who the man was. Then my sister Cindy walked through with her box, and she saw him and asked mom about the man that was with Mr. Kenyon and made some comment that he was dressed funny. Then Nancy walked in behind Cindy and said, “Cindy, did you see that man with Mr. Kenyon? I did, but he just disappeared.” That was our introduction to the farm, and it all happened within the first five minutes. Right before he left, Mr. Kenyon asked my father to go for a walk with him. He said to my father, “Roger, for the sake of your family, leave the lights on at night.” My father didn’t know how to interpret that statement. In his mind, Mr. Kenyon was saying that we were moving into a new house with one bathroom on the first floor and the girls would be sleeping upstairs, and that he should leave lights on, so the kids don’t go tumbling down the stairs in the middle of the night. That’s how he interpreted what Mr. Kenyon said to him. Over the first few months we were living there, we were told by various people in the area that there was never a time when it was dark outside that every light in the house would not be on.

BD: I read that you described the house as “a portal cleverly disguised as a farmhouse.” What led you to believe the house was a portal?

AP: It wasn’t just the house, it’s the property. The barn is as active as the house is. And the property is as active as both the house and the barn. There’s an awful lot of elemental activity. There’s tons of extraterrestrial activity there. And I think it has something to do with the fact that the farm is built on top of an ancient river which was lost during the last Ice Age. It’s known as the Lost River of New Hampshire, but it actually runs all the way underground. It’s buried about 700 feet underground. And on certain days when the water is very heightened and rushing, you can actually feel the vibration of it in the land. And you can lay on the stone walls and feel the stones vibrating from the river rushing underneath our feet. And it goes directly underneath the farm, but also there are two creeks or tributaries to the Nipmuc River, which runs right along the bottom of the property just beyond the stone wall that marks the backyard. So, the river is maybe 700 or 800 yards away.

I think it has something to do with all the water that it is surrounded by. Somebody sent me a drone shot of the farm from high enough up that it was probably, the drone was probably at least 3,000 feet. And it was the most interesting photograph that I have ever seen of the farm because from the angle that the shot was taken directly over it, it looks like a pyramid in the middle of a forest.

BD: Do you have an idea of how many spirits or entities you were dealing with in the house?

AP: Well, I can tell you that there were at least a dozen of them that we were very familiar with that we saw over and over and over again. Another interesting thing too is that the, none of us had any fear of this spirit that we saw that first day moving in. It was, it was not that kind of a vibe at all. In fact, he appeared to be very sweet-natured and cheerful, and he was really focused on Mr. Kenyon. But within the first couple of nights that we lived there, my sister Cindy came crawling into bed with me and she was obviously upset. She was only eight years old and asked if she could sleep with me. And I said, “Of course.” Then I pulled back the quilt and she hopped down.

I’m like, “What’s wrong?” And she said that she could hear voices in her room. Well, the upstairs of the house, every door opens into the next bedroom. And we had all of the doors open because the house was cold and that was the way, you know, to keep the heat moving instead of being trapped in one room or the other. And it was a new house to us even though it was 250 years old. And so, we always left the doors open between our bedrooms. And when she came in, she kept saying, “I hear voices. There’s voices in the room and I’m scared and it got louder and louder. I can’t believe you didn’t hear it.” I can’t believe it didn’t wake you up.” And at first, she was at that time sharing a room with Christine. And my sister Christine has a tendency to talk in her sleep from time to time.

So, I think I just assumed that Chris was doing that. And I asked her, and she said, “No, it’s not me.” She said, “It’s a whole bunch of voices and they’re all talking at the same time. And they’re all saying the same thing.” So naturally I asked her what they were saying, and her response was, “There are seven dead soldiers buried in the wall. There are seven dead soldiers buried in the wall” over and over and over. And she said all the voices were what you would describe as monotone, even though she did not use that word. She didn’t know that word at that time. But she said they all sounded the same. Like they were all talking together, and they all had basically the same voice. And they were all saying the same thing at the same time. And they were all around her bed to the point where the floorboards were shaking. The bed was shaking. And she put the pillow over her head to try to muffle the sound. And when it became so loud that she couldn’t tolerate it anymore, that’s when she jumped out of bed and ran into my room and got in bed with me. And about three years ago, the house, I mean, nothing could be buried in the walls of the house because the house is just clapboard with horsehair plaster. That’s it. There’s no insulation. There’s no, you know, there’s some eaves that go up under the roof line. But there’s just, there’s no place that bodies could have ever been stored or hidden.

So, it didn’t make any sense. But over the years other people speculated maybe there’s someone buried out near the retaining wall behind the house or down around the stone walls. And so, the previous owner, not the woman that owns it now, but the previous owners had some people come in with ground penetrating radar. And sure enough, they found seven distinct anomalies under the stone wall at the bottom of the property just before you go into the cow pasture. And because it is illegal to exhume anything in the state of Rhode Island, all they could do is offer the photographs as evidence. But there it is. There are seven distinct images that are buried just behind the stone wall on the side of the cow pasture. And that’s where they found whatever they found. But when you consider that that house was completed as it stands now in 1736, the property was originally deeded in 1680. And the house was finished as it is now 40 years before the signing of the Declaration of Independence. And so, it really is truly an original colonial home. And it survived the Revolutionary War.

It survived the door rebellion. The King Phillips War, the Civil War. And at the time of the Civil War, the owners, and it was all through marriage. It was eight generations of one extended family that built and then lived in the South for hundreds of years. And we were the first outsiders. We have absolutely no familial attachment to the Richardson family or the Arnold family. And that house was passed through marriage because at that time women were not allowed to own property. So, through marriage it became the Arnold estate, but it actually is the Richardson Arnold homestead.

The Real ‘Conjuring’ House – Photo Credit: Visit Rhode Island

BD: At what point did Ed and Lorraine Warren become involved? There were a few things I read that made it sound like they just showed up at your house because they’d heard about the case.

AP: Yes, they really did. They just showed up at our house. Just one day they just showed up.

BD: So, your family had no idea they were coming?

AP: Well, it’s actually a little bit more complicated than that. We’d already been there for about two and a half years. A group of college students came to the house. Keith Johnson and his twin brother, and some of their friends, were paranormal investigators. And Keith said that my mother had called him and asked him to come check the house out. And my mother said, “I never called anybody.” I never told anybody other than our closest friends about the activity in the house.” Our attorney, Sam, knew. Our babysitter, Kathy, knew. And my mother’s friend, Barbara, knew. And she can’t remember anybody else that she ever said a word to about it. It was a very taboo subject back then. And, yeah, nobody wanted to open Pandora’s box. It was way more than a can of worms. It was just not something that people would talk about except for some of my peers at school, kids that had grown up in that town and knew the reputation of the house, which we were never warned about before we moved in. But, you know, I guess the best way to look at this is that the college students that came, we will never know why they showed up. Keith said my mother called him.

My mother said, “I never called anybody.” But there was some reason, and this is a spirit thing. There is some reason that he was drawn to that house and brought his team and had such extraordinary experiences on the one afternoon that they spent there that he sought out. Ed and Lorraine Warren, he and his team sought them out. They were speaking. His team was from Rhode Island College, and the Warrens were doing a lecture in the fall of that year at the University of Rhode Island. And they told the Warrens about our predicament and where we lived and who we were. The Warrens came the night before Halloween in 1973. It was either the night before Halloween or the night after Halloween. When they showed up at the door, my mother let them in the house. It was freezing out and she offered them a cup of coffee and presumed that they were lost because the farm is very remote. And then they identified themselves. My mother had absolutely no idea who they were. She had never heard their names before. And Mrs. Warren walked over to our old black stove in the kitchen, and she put her hand over her eyes and her other hand on the corner of the stove and became very quiet. And she said, “I sense a malignant entity in this house. Her name is Bathsheba.” Now, Mrs. Warren knew absolutely nothing about the history of the house or the area. Nothing. And she plucked that name out of thin air.

Bathsheba Sherman never lived in that house. She lived at the Sherman farm, which was about a mile away. There were only a few homesteads in the area at that time. She was born in 1812 and she died in 1885. And there were stories that she was in that house and had an infant in her care and that the baby died. The autopsy revealed that a needle had been impaled at the base of its skull and it was ruled that the baby’s death was from convulsions. My mother only found one article about it and it was stored in the archives of Clark University in Worcester, Massachusetts. She read about an inquest in the town of Burillville, Rhode Island. So, there was apparently a hearing in the neighboring town of Gloucester. And apparently there was an inquest and Bathsheba was questioned by a judge about her involvement with the death of the child. And apparently, she was very convincing that she had absolutely nothing to do with it. So it never went to a jury. There was never a formal indictment. It was let go and she was dismissed from the inquest. But in the court of public opinion, this young woman who had just married Judson Sherman was tried and convicted in the court of public opinion. And there were all kinds of accusations and innuendos and rumors that circulated around her for years and years, all the years of her life, that she had something to do with it.

Oh my God, if you were to ever go there and just go to a few of the graveyards around that farm, you would stumble over one little, tiny gravestone after another after another. I mean, infant mortality rates were through the roof. And it was actually bad luck to name your baby before it reached one year old. And Bathsheba Sherman was by some, I guess, accused of practicing witchcraft. She was apparently a very beautiful woman and the other women in town were threatened by her. It was back in the time when folklore and old wives tales and the accusation of being a witch could get you killed up in San Luis, which was just like an hour north of where we were living. And had it been a little bit different time, she could have paid with her life for being accused of that. But instead, it was just a vicious rumor that circulated that she had killed the baby for making a deal with the devil for eternal youth and beauty. We listen to all of that now and say, “Well, that’s just stupid. You know, that’s just superstitious nonsense. The woman would not be buried in the middle of hallowed ground in the Riverside Cemetery in Harrisville next to her husband and all of her children had there been any proof that she was a practicing witch.” I will spend the rest of my life defending her because even though I don’t know for certain if she had anything to do with the death of that child, I don’t think it’s fair to accuse someone of murder unless you have some evidence as proof. And there was no evidence back then. There was no DNA. There was nothing. And so, I just don’t think that she had anything to do with that.

I think that it was a very unfair condemnation of her. But unfortunately, the Warrens were asking my mother to be able to do an investigation of the house. My mother told her what she knew about the history of the house. After Lorraine came up with that name, my mother said, “Well, I’ve been doing some historical research on this property and some surrounding properties in the area.” And she showed Lorraine her notebook that was filled with stories and birth certificates and death certificates. On her second or third visit, Mrs. Warren asked for the notebook, and it was filled with descriptions of the spirits in the house. It was filled with drawings of the spirits that my mother had seen. And Mrs. Warren asked if she could borrow that thick notebook of absolutely invaluable information. And she wanted to make Xerox copies of it, so it tells you what time in history that was. My mother begrudgingly handed it over to her with the promise that she would get it back. But she never did return it. Mrs. Warren kept it. It was our understanding that when the movie The Conjuring was made that that notebook was sold as part of her case files. And it’s gone. We never ever saw it again. My mother asked for it back.

My mother felt that it was part of her legacy to her children. Mrs. Warren perceived it to be a haunted item and didn’t think that it belonged in the house. So, she told my mother she would return it, but then she never did and like 15 years later, she sold it. A number of things that we had found on the property went missing when they came one night with their team. It was the night of the séance that they foisted upon my mother, insisting that she was being oppressed and that she was right on the verge of possession and if they didn’t intervene on her behalf at that point that she would be lost. That was the most horrible night of my life. I was 15 when that happened. And I remember it like it just happened. It was absolutely traumatizing. I suffer PTSD from it. I swear to you I do. It was just a few minutes, but in those few minutes, I saw the dark side of existence and that is why I choose deliberately to live in the light. I will never let anything that evil touch me. I never will.

The Warrens only came maybe five times over the course of about a year and a half. And the last time that they came was after the séance. And when my father threw them out of the house that night along with their entourage, they left that house with my mother unconscious on the parlor floor. They came back to see if she had survived that night because when they left that house, they didn’t know if she was dead or alive. It was horrible. I don’t want to disparage them. They can’t defend themselves. Mrs. Warren, I think her heart was in the right place. I mean, she was a collector of objects. Their paranormal museum didn’t make itself. Every investigation she ever did, she had something from that investigation that went into their paranormal museum. And I know people personally who’ve been through it and have seen items that disappeared from our house the night of the séance that are under glass in that museum now.

BD: Do you know if that notebook was in their paranormal museum?

AP: No, it never was. Not that I know of. No, that was kept separately.

BD: What were your interactions with the Warrens like during the times that they were doing their investigation?

AP: Mrs. Warren didn’t really have anything much to do with us, with the children. She kind of turned us over to Ed, and he’s the one that interviewed us individually. My little sister, April, had a friend, a spirit friend, up in the chimney closet between the first and second bedroom. And she wouldn’t tell them about him. And he had identified himself to her as Oliver Richardson. But she wouldn’t tell Ed about him because she was afraid that the Warrens would make him go away and she loved him. And she felt very protective of him. And he was basically the same age as she was in life when he died. So, they had a very strong connection that she was not willing to jeopardize by telling them anything about him. But the rest of us just spilled our guts. It was kind of cathartic. It was a relief to be able to talk about the activity in that house with someone who believed us.

The night that Mrs. Warren originally came to the house, Mrs. Warren told my mother that I was in the room. I was a witness to this conversation. And she told my mother that the reason, even though she had known about our predicament for a number of weeks, she decided that she and her husband would not come out to the house until Halloween was because she said that’s when the veil has thinned. And I remember my mother looking at her and then kind of not laughing because it was certainly not a laughing matter, but kind of this incredulous grunt came out of her like, well, and then she just looked at her and she said, “Well then, I guess every day is Halloween at this house and there is no veil. I don’t know what you’re talking about, this veil. There’s no veil here. We share this with a lot of spirits.” One of the things that my mother resented about the film The Conjuring—I understand why they did what they did. I get it. But what they tried to do is juxtapose the devout Roman Catholic paranormal investigators, Ed and Lorraine Warren, against the godless heathen parent family. You know, like we were, I won’t say pagan because pagan is a religion also, but that we didn’t have any connection to the church. And my mother took great exception to that. She didn’t even watch the film until it had been out on DVD for more than a year.

I thought that she would be very upset about the way she was represented in the film. Some of it she thought was just so ridiculous that it was not anything that she would bother to take exception to. But the one thing that she was really offended by was that our portrayal was that of a family that had no faith. And nothing could have been further from the truth. My father was born and raised in a staunch Catholic tradition as the eldest of six boys. Church was an integral part of his childhood and his family’s life. He went to parochial school, and he served as an altar boy for years of his youth. And when he graduated from high school, he went into the Navy with the intention of serving the country and then going immediately into seminary to become a priest. That’s what my father’s life plan was. And in the interim, he met my mother and fell in love. And so, the priesthood thing was out the window. But my mother, who he met in Georgia, was a Southern Baptist. And she had to convert to Catholicism in order to marry him. All of us were baptized and all of us made our first communion and all of us were raised in the Roman Catholic Church.

It was the second year, the second Easter that we were at the farm. April was seven years old, and we went to Easter Mass, and we filled our own pew. There were so many of us. And at the very end of Mass, the priest said, “and the father and the son and the Holy Ghost.” And April turned and just with her big blue eyes just looked up at my mother and she said in her big girl, outdoor voice, “See, Mom, God has ghosts just like we do.” And every single head in that church turned and looked at our family. And as we got up to leave, the priest followed us out and he came up to my father and he said, “Mr. Perron, I would appreciate it if you would take your family and worship elsewhere.” My father was so angry and so hurt that he felt abandoned by the religion that he had invested himself into his whole life. I have rarely seen my father cry and he cried on the way home that day. As we were all getting out of our big Pontiac Bonneville car, which we called the Catholic Mobile because it had room for seven plus luggage and the family dog, my mother said, “Girls, if you want to know God, go to the woods. Go to the woods.” We never ever went back to church again. Ever. Our family has never been together in a church ever since then.

BD: That’s awful for a priest to react that way to a child.

AP: The priest was afraid. He was afraid that he had that weird family from the old, haunted house up on Round Top Road in St. Patrick’s Parish. And that others might not come back to the parish if we were there. I was already in catechism classes to make my confirmation and, you know, all my friends were Catholics. Everybody went to St. Patrick’s. I would just go and kind of sit in the back of the class and all my peers were there who were getting ready to make their final confirmation into the church. It was the nuns who were teaching us. But one night, the priest was there, and he recognized me. And sure as hell, not a week later, my parents received a letter from the Bishop, who was the head of the diocese of Providence, informing my parents that I was not welcome in confirmation classes because I asked too many questions. That was it. There was something about living in that house that made you more faithful. And I found out very early on that when all hell was breaking loose in that house and there was a lot of negative energy swirling in the house, or I felt threatened or any of my sisters felt threatened, all you ever had to do was say, “Oh God, help me. “And it stopped instantly. Good conquers evil and love conquers fear. And hatred is not the opposite of love. Fear is the opposite of love and hatred is born of fear.

I believe in my heart that the Warrens had the best of intentions. 40 years later, when I saw Mrs. Warren again out in California when she and I had been invited to preview The Conjuring before it was released, she recognized me immediately and came and wrapped her arms around me. During those three days that we spent in California together, she told me that she and Ed were in over their heads the moment they crossed the threshold of that house. They just didn’t know it. She admitted terrible mistakes were made. They didn’t mean to stir up activity, but she was a bona fide clairvoyant. She had great abilities, and she didn’t always use them to their greatest good. And I think that that was because of her fascination but also her reverence and respect for spirits. She knew that spirits were real, but unfortunately, because of her sensing Bathsheba in the house, who was really only a neighbor—Her sense of that spirit’s presence is what changed everything. Because not only did she have a sense of her presence and we didn’t find out until five decades later that her husband, Judson Sherman, died on that property. We still don’t know how he died. One of my historian friends dug up that he died at the Arnold state. We don’t know how, but that would explain why her presence would be there. You know, spirits are free to come and go as they please.

They’re not locked into an earthbound, specific location. There are differences of opinion even within our own family about how free the spirits are. My sister Cindy will still argue with me about it. She believes that they’re attached to the farm because she said that when we moved, they loved us so much that if they could have come with us, they would have. My response to her is that the spirit that was standing behind Nancy on the front porch of that house the day the whole rest of the family left for Georgia was the spirit that was standing behind my sister Cindy when we arrived at the new house in Georgia. Same exact woman; same entity standing right behind her. And Cindy’s like, “No, no, it must have been somebody else. It must have been one of my guides because the spirits are stuck there. They’re trapped there. And I’m like, “No, they’re not, babe.”

‘The Conjuring’ Movie House – Photo Credit: J. Patrick Swope

BD: How much of what we see in The Conjuring really happened?

AP: There are so many discrepancies between The Conjuring and the real story that is documented in House of Darkness House of Light, the trilogy of books that I wrote that they are unrecognizable except for the names. Everybody that was associated with the film read my books, including the actors, except for maybe the youngest children couldn’t read them. But everybody, all the adults for sure, read the books and said, “Oh, hell no, we can’t tell this story,” because they were about to invest somewhere between $25 and $30 million into making this film. And it was based predominantly on the case files of Ed and Lorraine Warren. It says right on the movie trailer, case files of Ed and Lorraine. But I gave them permission to use anything that was in my books that was the actual story, the authentic telling of our family memoir. And they wouldn’t. The screenwriters, Chad and Carey Hayes, twin brothers, lovely men, wanted desperately to include elements of the true story and they wrote some of the stories into the screenplay. And every single time the suits at New Line Cinema and Warner Brothers sent the script back and said, “Take that out, redact it. We’re not going to run people out of the theater. We’re not going to make a movie that nobody will stay to watch to the end because they are terrified.” So, The Conjuring is a very toned-down version of events.

BD: Why didn’t they want to use it?

AP: They thought it was too scary; it was too real; it was too raw. It was, I mean, people who read my trilogy of books are changed. They are never the same again. When they come up for air after that deep dive, they think about everything differently. Nothing is ever the same. A lot of my readers over the years have deemed it interactive literature. They feel like by the time they’re done reading volume three, that they lived there with us, that they grew up with us, that they know every member of my family intimately well, and that they had the same experiences that we did. There’s something about this story that unlocks a person’s third eye and opens them to the netherworld in a way that nothing else ever has or ever could. Actually, the ability to expand human consciousness is not the most important part of the trilogy. House of Darkness House of Light got its title from my mother when I was about 300 pages into the first book. And she asked me what I was going to title the trilogy, and I told her I didn’t know. And she stood next to me at her old cherry desk right here in the room in which I’m sitting speaking with you right now. I wrote those books in this house. And she just looked at me and she said, “House of Darkness House of Light,” it was both. No comma, it was both. And so, there is no comma. It’s House of Darkness House of Light as one thing because my mother believes the same way that I do; that everything is energy, and everything is consciousness, and everything is one thing.

There is no delineation between natural and supernatural, between normal and paranormal. At least there isn’t for us. This is just how our lives are now. That you cannot experience what we did immersed in that environment for a decade and be unchanged by it. And I think the greatest value in me finding the courage to finally tell our story more than, I didn’t even start writing it until more than three decades after we had left. But I finally got to an age and a place in my own mind where I didn’t care how people were going to react to it anymore. I knew that we would be scrutinized. I knew that we would be belittled. I knew that there would be mean-spirited people out there that would attack our family. And instead, we were embraced by the paranormal community worldwide.

I would not be one of the very best-selling authors in this genre worldwide had it not been for The Conjuring. So, I don’t hold any grudges. The power of a well-made feature film and the images that are placed in people’s minds is what causes them to dig deeper. And based on a true story, well where’s the true story? Who wrote the true story? All they have to do is Google the name Perron and up come the books. They’ve been read all over the world. Hundreds of thousands of copies have been sold. And they’re selling better now than they did after the film came out. So, the story is getting around. And I think that the great value of the story is not the expansion of human consciousness. It is liberating people to tell their own story. Because so many people have been touched by spirits and they’re afraid to share it. They’re afraid to speak out. They’re afraid to be criticized and to be treated as somehow less than. Or I’ve often been asked, “Was there ever a time that you questioned your own sanity?” Oh, hell yes. And that is true of every member of my family. We saw things in that house that there’s no plausible explanation other than spirits are real.

We’re still learning things about that house and about the spirits who quote unquote live there, who dwell there. And I love them. I even love the cranky ones. I do because to me it doesn’t even matter who they were, that they still are is a freaking miracle. That is magical. That is cosmic forces beyond our comprehension. One of my famous quotations is very simple, but it’s very true—To be touched by a spirit is not a curse, but a blessing. It is that rare glimpse into the realm from which we come and will all inevitably return. And I end it with, be not afraid.

Continue Reading