Interviews
Ari Aster Digs into His Extended Director’s Cut of ‘Midsommar’ [Q+A]
“This is a different film- there are things that bolster other things in this cut that I always did miss.”
In a Q&A session after the premiere of his intended director’s cut of Midsommar in New York this weekend (read my review), Ari Aster admitted to feeling “self-indulgent” by releasing this version so soon after the theatrical cut’s original July 3 release to the masses. However, Aster quickly realized how necessary it was for him to show a fuller story of his initial vision.
“The movie was fucking long, and we had a three hour and 45-minute long assembly cut, but that was an assembly cut that I saw, so this is not the whole movie. But we got it down to a certain point.”
He continued, “I’m happy with (the theatrical release) but there were things that were very painful to cut…I had spent so long in the editing room, repeating over and over again, ‘There’s going to be a Director’s Cut’ that I just realized I had to see it through.”
The most painful edit for Aster seems to be a pivotal argument scene by the lake between Dani (Florence Pugh) and Christian (Jack Reynor) that he describes as the “centerpiece” of this version, similar to the Attestupan scene in the original theatrical cut. And when you see this cut of the film, you’ll understand why Aster had a difficult time letting it go.
When an audience member inquired about the lack of a levitating man scene you may have noticed in one of the film’s trailers, (to which he has no control over, as he reiterated) Aster explained that this was actually Christian in the sex temple, tripping, and starting to imagine himself floating across the room towards Maya’s open legs before their encounter, to which Aster describes as a “scandalous image,” and that he loved the way it turned out. However, he changed his mind in the editing room: “I could just hear all the confused people complaining, and I just didn’t want to do it.”
Aster admits to having an affinity for long films, which he realizes alienates wider audiences. Even as far back as his short film days, noting how difficult it was for The Strange Thing About the Johnsons to get picked up for film festivals because of its lengthy runtime, he explained, “(Editing Midsommar) was a real lesson for me, so was Hereditary, which was also a longer film, to understand that, I write these screenplays that are pretty chunky, and this is how I pace certain scenes and this is how I like to live in these things, and it results in a length that doesn’t make sense for a wide, theatrical release, which I was lucky to have twice.”
Indeed, he has read some of the criticism about the pacing within his films, but he preferred to create a fully lived-in experience for the audience’s time spent in Halsingland:
“I really like to just live in worlds and live in movies. If a movie is good, I want to stay in it.
“So the attention here was to always make something that viewers can live in, and I feel closer to this version because it feels a little bit closer to what I originally intended, which was basically to make a film that you have to give yourself to and just lie in.”
In terms of what genres he would use to describe either version of Midsommar, he looks at it from four different lenses: a dark comedy, a “feel-good movie for dissatisfied partners,” a fairytale, and a less-overt horror movie about codependency:
“(In the Director’s Cut) Christian is even more of a disappointment. If it is a horror film, I don’t think it’s an overt one. I love the horror genre. I think Hereditary is a horror movie- no question about it. I see this more as a fairytale, but I see it as a horror movie about codependency.” And he’s glad that you had a wide grin on your face during the film’s final 10 minutes, as he explained, “I absolutely wanted it to feel cathartic…But, I hope the catharsis you feel when you’re watching is unmuddied, but then as you walk away, it becomes more complicated. That’s the hope.”
In response to an inquisition about final girl tropes, his empathy towards his female characters, and how they’re represented in his films, Aster explained that he attempts to incorporate himself into them: “Well, for every character, I figure I can just put myself in their shoes, and put myself into those characters as much as I can, and hopefully they’ll be believable and as (contextually) rich as I am. There’s a lot of me in Dani. I see a lot of myself in her. There’s also a lot of me in Annie (from Hereditary). A lot of parts of myself that I feel very close to, and other parts of myself that I’m not thrilled with. It’s up to you guys to politicize or decide if it works- it is a question that I ask as well.”
He seems to have no problem with getting his leading ladies to immerse themselves in their stellar performances either, especially with Florence Pugh, whose natural abilities Aster praised. “I try to make things very, very clear in the script, so when we get to those (extreme) scenes, the actor knows that something is coming that they have to prepare for. If you’re working with great actors, you don’t really have to push them, provoke them, or manipulate them- they know what their job is. Florence is a really remarkable actress. She’s a natural. I could just sit behind a monitor and enjoy what she was doing.”
When Aster says he loves the horror genre, he sincerely means it. One audience member inquired about his interest in making a creature feature (he would “love to.”) And, of all the random franchises to associate Aster with, another asked if he’d ever remake a Gremlins movie, to which, he says: Maybe? “I can improve upon the New Batch. I wouldn’t dare fuck with (the original) Gremlins,” he joked.
Midsommar arrives on DVD and Blu-ray this October with no word on when we’ll see the Director’s Cut released.
Interviews
Paul Tremblay on Fighting AI with Horror in New Novel ‘Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep’
Paul Tremblay didn’t start his writing career believing he’d be battling machines over the sanctity of his job, but like so many writers of his generation, the battle found him. In the years since Large Language Models (LLMs) and neural networks started gaining traction as an advertised shortcut to creativity, Tremblay has been active in lawsuits to prevent the use of his works in training AI models, and he’s found that, with each new project, he has to consider the possibility that some LLM, somewhere, is going to latch on to what he’s creating.
“Now I feel like I’m thinking about, ‘Man, how am I going to write things that would be really hard or impossible for an AI to replicate?’,” Tremblay told me, speaking by Zoom from his home in Massachusetts. “Maybe some of that is ego. I’m sure every writer thinks, ‘Oh, an AI could never write what I write.’ Yes, I’d be lying if I said that wasn’t part of the thought process.”
While that’s something Tremblay might consider with any new work at this point in his career, the Bram Stoker Award-winning author of A Head Full of Ghosts, The Cabin at the End of the World, and many other novels and short stories tackled it in a more direct way with his latest book. Inspired by Philip K. Dick, Harlan Ellison, and the quirky humor of the Coen Brothers, Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep is Tremblay’s attempt at a sci-fi-horror mash-up that’s both darkly funny and existentially nightmarish. It’s also, in his own words, a screed against the movement by AI companies to supplant human artists.
“I didn’t want to make it too didactic, but no, I playfully described this book as an anti-AI screed,” he said. “This book, in particular, was driven by anger and frustration, for sure. Not every book is going to be driven that way.“
Despite the emotions that fueled it, Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep does not read like a screed. Instead, wielding offbeat humor and tech concepts that feel both lived-in and frighteningly tactile, the book lays out tandem narratives all building to the same conclusion, each of them exploring our relationship to machine learning in a different way. One of these narratives belongs to Julia, a former gaming streamer looking for a new challenge in life, who gets a call from a California tech company with an interesting offer.

Paul Tremblay in documentary series “First Word on Horror”
The company has, it seems, implanted some new technology in a brain-dead middle-aged man which will, in theory, allow them to pilot the man’s body through a rudimentary, still-developing system of controls. Julia, with her gaming background, would be the pilot, in her own way just as much a test subject as the human vegetable she’s controlling.
Julia is a Gen Z streamer with an omnivorous pop culture appetite, inspired by Tremblay’s own adult children, who riffs on The Big Lebowski constantly and calls her strange new meat puppet “Bernie” in reference to Weekend at Bernie’s. Her wide frame of reference, and her interest in art and stories far beyond video games, is in part informed by Tremblay’s own experiences with Gen Z, and in part a response to AI companies who scrape art and culture as a means of consuming it for reference without really experiencing a story.
“I know that one of the arguments that OpenAI and other tech companies are trying to make is like, ‘Hey, you writers, you artists, you take pop culture, you take your influences, and you create something. That’s just the same thing that the bots are doing.’ And it’s just not,” Tremblay said. “I wanted to have Julia have her outlook informed by all this pop culture, and I wanted to make that feel really human as a way to show how inhuman the AI is.”
The other side of the story belongs to “Bernie,” who’s addressed in his point-of-view chapters as “You.” In these chapters, the technology in Bernie’s body starts to flicker images through his seemingly dead brain, delivering half-remembered imagery and perspective in a nod to the “hallucinations” of an AI model groping for understanding it can never reach. These chapters in particular show off Tremblay’s flair for formalist shake-ups, and echo the kind of hyperstimulated writing that Dick and Ellison made so influential.
“I think it was more just the general Philip K. Dick feeling of ‘The world is so strange,'” Tremblay said. “He’s a lot funnier, I think, than maybe a lot of people credit him. That’s definitely what I was thinking of when writing the book.“
Bernie’s chapters embody the strangeness of Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep, presenting imagery that’s at times puzzling, at times eerily filmic, and always unnerving. They also mirror Julia’s own journey in fascinating ways as the odd couple – the Gen Z gamer and the middle-aged vegetable – traverse the United States, and the tech in Bernie’s body wakes up to the possibilities of using his flesh for its own purposes. It’s a compelling narrative technique, but it presented some new writing challenges for Tremblay.
“I quickly realized I couldn’t write this book the same way I have in the past,” he said. “By that, I mean all my other novels I had written in the order in which it was presented, even things that are nonlinear, which is most of them. I knew I couldn’t do that in this book. It’s not a spoiler, but hopefully the readers figure out pretty early that the Bernie chapters are a little bit of a preview of the next chapter from Julia, what’s actually happening with Julia. It’s all refracted from him.”

Mary Roach’s Stiff
Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep began with a simple image, inspired by Tremblay’s reading of Mary Roach‘s book chronicling the history of our treatment of corpses, Stiff. As he read, Tremblay imagined a body sitting on an airplane, remote-controlled by someone else. At the time, it was a “silly what-if” concept, filed away in his head. Years later, when he became an author suing a tech company to keep AI from scraping his work for ideas, it started to feel frighteningly plausible, taking the “silly what-if” into the territory of a high-concept horror show about what happens when we try to exploit and commodify uniquely human aspects of consciousness.
“It stuck with me,” Tremblay said of that what-if imagery. “And then a few years later, when I was a part of the case suing OpenAI on behalf of writers, that what-if suddenly didn’t seem as silly. The more I learned about how that corporation operates and without really any sort of ethical thought to anything, I was like, ‘Oh, I’m going to play with that. That’s actually happening.”
So, what if someone actually in favor of generative AI picks up Tremblay’s self-described “anti-AI screed?” He hopes that, at the very least, he’s made the ride enjoyable in a distinctly human way that might begin to reshape the conversation.
“I think that was another reason why I wanted to have the humor,” Tremblay said. “If people are reading this book who aren’t on the side of like, ‘Hey, LLMs taking authors’ books is bad,’ maybe if they read something that’s cut with some humor, that maybe they’ll be more easily swayed.”
Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep is now in bookstores everywhere.



You must be logged in to post a comment.