Interviews
The Puppetry and Violence of Casper Kelly’s Killer Mascot ‘Buddy’ [Sundance Interview]
The filmmaker behind twisted sitcom parody “Too Many Cooks” is back with another dark voyage into the absurd underbelly of familiar television fare: Buddy.
Writer/Director Casper Kelly takes aim at kids’ shows, blending Barney with Pee-Wee, with a dash of Howdy Doody and Dora the Explorer, in a horror-comedy with a cuddly but murderous mascot.
“The end for me was the idea of living in the world of the show,” Kelly tells Bloody Disgusting at the Sundance premiere. “As a child, I would watch a show and think they lived in that world. I would think about things like, how come we never see the bathrooms? Where do they sleep? What happens if they don’t want to do the storyline that day? Are they forced to do it? You know what I mean? I thought that was life. That becomes a metaphor for other things in our lives.”
Buddy employs a unique structure designed to place viewers directly in the unsettling but seemingly wholesome set of the mascot’s television series. So much so that it maintains a wholesome facade, only revealing the cracks slowly.
Kelly strikes a delicate balance, not tipping the scales too far into absurdity too early. The filmmaker established this with one key rule: “Don’t make it satirical. Play it as straight as humanly possible. There was an earlier incarnation of Buddy where his eyes looked crazy, like he looked like a crazy person. I’m like, ‘No. He needs to look comforting, just like a real show.’ If you’re going to have a show and then start messing with it, I, personally, that’s my taste, is play it very straight of what the show, a real show.”
As for Buddy himself, it took a talented crew to bring him to life on screen. Three mascot suits, many of which get put through the bloody wringer here, inhabited by suit actor Sergey Zhuravsky.
Kelly has endless praise for Zhuravsky’s physical performance, and looked to one beloved kids’ show, in particular, as an example when addressing Buddy’s dialogue.

Barney & Friends inspired Casper Kelly’s Buddy
“One of the puppeteers was a huge Barney fan, huge, and knew all the Barney lore and knew all the people that worked on Barney,” Kelly said. “We’re like, ‘How does this even work?’ So, how it would work, and it’s how we did it, was there was a voice not in the suit, a voice actor off camera, and then someone else doing a remote control of the mouth. That allows the suit actor to listen and act, too, because it’s very hard, because you cannot see a lot. All you can see is out of the mouth, which is not much. It allows him to focus on just the physical acting,”
Kelly continued, “He did it like that. Then Keegan-Michael Key, who was delightful and brought a whole new layer to it, came in after we shot and edited it, because it just wouldn’t have worked out schedule-wise for him to be there for 25 days. We had the puppeteers, I think Cedwan [Hooks] and his wife, Jamica, who are both puppeteers here in Atlanta, would voice it. They did a great job. I love puppets and the puppet community.”
It’s not a spoiler to say that Buddy is a stickler for rules and doesn’t take kindly to those who ignore or break them. That puts the kids trapped on his show in harm’s way, and Kelly isn’t afraid to raise the stakes or play with taboos.
But the filmmaker did heavily consider how much to actually show Buddy’s violence. The filmmaker revealed, “We did shoot a little that we decided not to show. We wanted to get just the right emotion at the right time. A good example is animals. My wife, if she sees something where a dog’s getting hurt, she’s like, ‘I’m out,’ so we didn’t want that. But yeah, the kids enjoyed it. They knew it was pretend, and they had fun.”
Buddy is currently screening at the Sundance Film Festival. Stay tuned for acquisition and release details as they arrive.
Interviews
Paul Tremblay on Fighting AI with Horror in New Novel ‘Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep’
Paul Tremblay didn’t start his writing career believing he’d be battling machines over the sanctity of his job, but like so many writers of his generation, the battle found him. In the years since Large Language Models (LLMs) and neural networks started gaining traction as an advertised shortcut to creativity, Tremblay has been active in lawsuits to prevent the use of his works in training AI models, and he’s found that, with each new project, he has to consider the possibility that some LLM, somewhere, is going to latch on to what he’s creating.
“Now I feel like I’m thinking about, ‘Man, how am I going to write things that would be really hard or impossible for an AI to replicate?’,” Tremblay told me, speaking by Zoom from his home in Massachusetts. “Maybe some of that is ego. I’m sure every writer thinks, ‘Oh, an AI could never write what I write.’ Yes, I’d be lying if I said that wasn’t part of the thought process.”
While that’s something Tremblay might consider with any new work at this point in his career, the Bram Stoker Award-winning author of A Head Full of Ghosts, The Cabin at the End of the World, and many other novels and short stories tackled it in a more direct way with his latest book. Inspired by Philip K. Dick, Harlan Ellison, and the quirky humor of the Coen Brothers, Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep is Tremblay’s attempt at a sci-fi-horror mash-up that’s both darkly funny and existentially nightmarish. It’s also, in his own words, a screed against the movement by AI companies to supplant human artists.
“I didn’t want to make it too didactic, but no, I playfully described this book as an anti-AI screed,” he said. “This book, in particular, was driven by anger and frustration, for sure. Not every book is going to be driven that way.“
Despite the emotions that fueled it, Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep does not read like a screed. Instead, wielding offbeat humor and tech concepts that feel both lived-in and frighteningly tactile, the book lays out tandem narratives all building to the same conclusion, each of them exploring our relationship to machine learning in a different way. One of these narratives belongs to Julia, a former gaming streamer looking for a new challenge in life, who gets a call from a California tech company with an interesting offer.

Paul Tremblay in documentary series “First Word on Horror”
The company has, it seems, implanted some new technology in a brain-dead middle-aged man which will, in theory, allow them to pilot the man’s body through a rudimentary, still-developing system of controls. Julia, with her gaming background, would be the pilot, in her own way just as much a test subject as the human vegetable she’s controlling.
Julia is a Gen Z streamer with an omnivorous pop culture appetite, inspired by Tremblay’s own adult children, who riffs on The Big Lebowski constantly and calls her strange new meat puppet “Bernie” in reference to Weekend at Bernie’s. Her wide frame of reference, and her interest in art and stories far beyond video games, is in part informed by Tremblay’s own experiences with Gen Z, and in part a response to AI companies who scrape art and culture as a means of consuming it for reference without really experiencing a story.
“I know that one of the arguments that OpenAI and other tech companies are trying to make is like, ‘Hey, you writers, you artists, you take pop culture, you take your influences, and you create something. That’s just the same thing that the bots are doing.’ And it’s just not,” Tremblay said. “I wanted to have Julia have her outlook informed by all this pop culture, and I wanted to make that feel really human as a way to show how inhuman the AI is.”
The other side of the story belongs to “Bernie,” who’s addressed in his point-of-view chapters as “You.” In these chapters, the technology in Bernie’s body starts to flicker images through his seemingly dead brain, delivering half-remembered imagery and perspective in a nod to the “hallucinations” of an AI model groping for understanding it can never reach. These chapters in particular show off Tremblay’s flair for formalist shake-ups, and echo the kind of hyperstimulated writing that Dick and Ellison made so influential.
“I think it was more just the general Philip K. Dick feeling of ‘The world is so strange,'” Tremblay said. “He’s a lot funnier, I think, than maybe a lot of people credit him. That’s definitely what I was thinking of when writing the book.“
Bernie’s chapters embody the strangeness of Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep, presenting imagery that’s at times puzzling, at times eerily filmic, and always unnerving. They also mirror Julia’s own journey in fascinating ways as the odd couple – the Gen Z gamer and the middle-aged vegetable – traverse the United States, and the tech in Bernie’s body wakes up to the possibilities of using his flesh for its own purposes. It’s a compelling narrative technique, but it presented some new writing challenges for Tremblay.
“I quickly realized I couldn’t write this book the same way I have in the past,” he said. “By that, I mean all my other novels I had written in the order in which it was presented, even things that are nonlinear, which is most of them. I knew I couldn’t do that in this book. It’s not a spoiler, but hopefully the readers figure out pretty early that the Bernie chapters are a little bit of a preview of the next chapter from Julia, what’s actually happening with Julia. It’s all refracted from him.”

Mary Roach’s Stiff
Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep began with a simple image, inspired by Tremblay’s reading of Mary Roach‘s book chronicling the history of our treatment of corpses, Stiff. As he read, Tremblay imagined a body sitting on an airplane, remote-controlled by someone else. At the time, it was a “silly what-if” concept, filed away in his head. Years later, when he became an author suing a tech company to keep AI from scraping his work for ideas, it started to feel frighteningly plausible, taking the “silly what-if” into the territory of a high-concept horror show about what happens when we try to exploit and commodify uniquely human aspects of consciousness.
“It stuck with me,” Tremblay said of that what-if imagery. “And then a few years later, when I was a part of the case suing OpenAI on behalf of writers, that what-if suddenly didn’t seem as silly. The more I learned about how that corporation operates and without really any sort of ethical thought to anything, I was like, ‘Oh, I’m going to play with that. That’s actually happening.”
So, what if someone actually in favor of generative AI picks up Tremblay’s self-described “anti-AI screed?” He hopes that, at the very least, he’s made the ride enjoyable in a distinctly human way that might begin to reshape the conversation.
“I think that was another reason why I wanted to have the humor,” Tremblay said. “If people are reading this book who aren’t on the side of like, ‘Hey, LLMs taking authors’ books is bad,’ maybe if they read something that’s cut with some humor, that maybe they’ll be more easily swayed.”
Dead But Dreaming of Electric Sheep is now in bookstores everywhere.

You must be logged in to post a comment.