Quantcast
Connect with us

Interviews

Radio Silence on Casting David Cronenberg and Spilling Even More Blood in ‘Ready or Not 2: Here I Come’

Published

on

Ready or Not 2 David Cronenberg
From L to R: Kara Wooten, Shawn Hatosy, David Cronenberg, and Sarah Michelle Gellar in READY OR NOT 2: HERE I COME. Photo by Searchlight Pictures/Pief Weyman, Courtesy of Searchlight Pictures. © 2026 Searchlight Pictures. All Rights Reserved.

Between Ready or Not and Abigail, it’s safe to say that filmmakers Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett have a way with bursting bodies for maximum splatter via practical effects.

The directors, also known as Radio Silence, up the ante in the sequel Ready or Not 2: Here I Come.

It’s not just double the protagonists and double the satanists out to murder them; Ready or Not 2 doubles down on the gore, too.

Considering the amount of Satanists in this sequel, and their penchant for exploding into a massive amount of blood and viscera, could this be Bettinelli-Olpin and Gillett’s bloodiest film yet? “We’ve been going back and forth on that,” Bettinelli-Olpin tells Bloody Disgusting. “We don’t know.

“We do know we used 325 gallons in this one, which is a lot.

Gillett recalls, “I feel like we did more testing on Abigail, which is one of the reasons why the blood amount was so high. I mean, the body, the pool of bodies on Abigail was a lot, and maybe a little bit of a cheat. We shot the blood cannons in Abigail practically as well, but I feel like there was a little, slightly more digital enhancement in Abigail. I don’t know where the ceiling is for us on this.”

Kathryn Newton in READY OR NOT 2: HERE I COME. Photo by Searchlight Pictures/Pief Weyman, Courtesy of Searchlight Pictures. © 2026 Searchlight Pictures. All Rights Reserved.

The filmmakers don’t necessarily set out to top themselves in the gore department, though. Bettinelli-Olpin explains, “I think this is what suits this particular story, but that said, I think, because we do work with the same group on a lot of these movies or all of these movies, there is a desire amongst all of us to continue to push ourselves and challenge ourselves. Why it is largely centered around exploding bodies, I do not know. I mean, it’s really fun.

“We are figuring something out,” Bettinelli-Olpin deadpans.

Gillett adds, “Triple down on it.”

Adding to the sequel’s maximalist quality is an even bigger cast, with horror master David Cronenberg appearing early in a pivotal role. It turns out that his casting was even a surprise to Ready or Not 2‘s directors.

“No, because I don’t think we ever in a million years thought we would get David Cronenberg to be in a movie,” Bettinelli-Olpin answers when asked whether Cronenberg was the first choice to play the father of Sarah Michelle Gellar and Shawn Hatosy‘s characters in the film. “Our casting director was like, ‘Hey, we could take a swing at David Cronenberg.’ Of course, within seconds, we were like, ‘Oh my God, yes, please, that’d be incredible.’ I mean, we’re still pinching ourselves that he said yes, it’s fucking crazy.'”

“I think the idea, too, is that he is playing a character that the world has so much reverence for in the story. Then he shows up on set, and he’s a man who you just, there’s so much reverence for him. I mean, he’s in so many ways, and obviously a gentleman, and lovely, and kind, and not a Satan worshiper, but it was just like, it felt like he had that level of power in the making of it because we were just so starstruck,” Gillett says.

“He brings a level of gravitas to that role that is pretty incredible.”

Ready or Not 2: Here I Come is now showing in theaters.

Directors Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett on the set of READY OR NOT 2: HERE I COME. Photo by Searchlight Pictures/Pief Weyman, Courtesy of Searchlight Pictures. © 2026 Searchlight Pictures. All Rights Reserved.

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon, SeriesFest, and Popcorn Frights Film Fest.

Click to comment

Interviews

‘Rubberhead’ Director Nick Taylor on FX Maverick Steve Johnson, Practical Effects, and Seven-Year Journey

Published

on

Rubberhead interview Nick Taylor
Steve Johnson in the documentary RUBBERHEAD: THE LIFE AND MONSTERS OF STEVE JOHNSON, an American Nightmare Studios release. Photo courtesy of American Nightmare Studios

Horror journalist, producer, and podcast host Nick Taylor moves into the director’s seat for his feature debut with illuminating documentary Rubberhead: The Life & Monsters of Steve Johnson.

It chronicles the wild life and career of SFX maverick Steve Johnson, based on the multi-volume book series Rubberhead: Sex, Drugs and Special FX, and those familiar likely already know Rubberhead isn’t your standard horror documentary.

Johnson is responsible for so many memorable movie monsters, having worked on Fright Night, Poltergeist II, An American Werewolf in London, A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master and Night of the Demons, to name a few. He’s also extremely candid in ways that feel atypical in this industry, open about his failures as much as his successes.

“It was a natural progression for sure,” Nick Taylor tells Bloody Disgusting of his transition into filmmaking ahead of Rubberhead‘s world premiere next week at the Fantasia Film Festival on July 23. “I think with my podcast, I got adept at interviewing people and pulling creative lessons out of them, which was the point of my podcast. I wanted this movie to be sort of a creativity pill for artists where if they’re starting a project or feel creatively stuck, they could watch this movie and be inspired and get actual practical creative lessons.”

Taylor’s background in PR and marketing also organically led him down this path.

He charts the course from book promo to documentary director: “But also Bloody Disgusting had a lot to do with this movie because in the very beginning when I first met Steve, I was helping him promote his book and I said, ‘Hey, I got a marketing background and a journalism background. Let me help you promote this book. I’ll just pitch stories from your life to the media, and we’ll see what happens.’ And John Squires wrote an article about Steve making Slimer under the influence of tons and tons of cocaine, and that went fairly viral.”

“For a week, it was story time with Steve,” Taylor continues. “He would tell me a story from his life, and every story was about a major movie, a major director, lots of drugs and alcohol and insanity. I would write them up, and I think John published about three or four of them. So huge shout out to John Squires because that was really great. So yeah, there were definitely a lot of outgrowths of my journalism background that definitely contributed to this movie.”

Rubberhead condenses the multi-book series into a cohesive feature film with a breezy runtime, sparking the obvious question as to how Taylor approached condensing Johnson’s life down to an under 2-hour documentary film.

That was one of the more difficult parts of all of this, because we had enough for a series or an epically long six-hour fan documentary,” he answers. “But from day one, I did not want to make a fan documentary. I love them. They’re a lot of fun, but I did want the movie to stand on its own two feet as a character-driven portrait of an artist and a time period and a technology, that being practical effects. I did want to be objective. I didn’t want to make this too long. I wanted to make it re-watchable. So I think we just really had to focus on what the narratives were that we wanted to tell. So there were some basically almost cliché archetypical mythic narratives present in Steve’s life. We could have made this way longer, but we wanted to keep it short. But luckily that’s why you have special features.”

Rubberhead trailer

Johnson quickly proves to be an engaging subject thanks to his self-effacing wit and frank self-reflections; expect no shortage of stories about how drugs factored into the height of his career or the failures it wrought. 

That rare quality was an asset for Rubberhead, Taylor confirms. “He does not shy away from anything about the drugs, the addiction, the bridges burned, the mistakes made, the lessons learned. He just is honest about all of it. He’s had a lot of time for reflection, and he’s done a lot of reflection, so he doesn’t shy away from any of it, which is huge because it’s very refreshing. I don’t think a lot of people are that way, at least in this industry from what I can see. So I think it was hugely beneficial. We wanted to lean into that, and we wanted to make this sort of a gonzo Hunter S. Thompson sort of wild tale through Steve’s overall life.

Condensing his life into this doc was a slow and steady process for Taylor, too. “It’s been almost seven years. It’s been a labor of love. We’ve been as indie as it gets. We would shoot what we could when we could, and then we would edit when we could. Then after a while it all came together.”

In a way, making Rubberhead brings Taylor’s horror fandom full circle. It turns out that the very film that sparked his interest in the genre and practical effects also comes with an amusing Steve Johnson anecdote.

Taylor explains, “My gateway for sure was Beetlejuice. I saw that at a very young age; I think I was four or five. I felt somebody had shown me, my soul. I get a little emotional thinking about it. There was something about that movie that felt so strange and unusual, but also felt so familiar. It was spooky, but it was fun, and it was lighthearted, and it had humor, but it also had this macabre celebration to it that I just really got into as a kid. I felt somebody had shown me my own soul. And funny story, Steve got fired from Beetlejuice because Tim Burton gave him his hand-drawn designs and Steve’s like, ‘Oh my God, these look like kids did them. This is not what you want. I know what you want. I’m going to redesign these for you.’ And Tim Burton was like, ‘Yeah, no, you’re not.’ So yeah, funny story.”

Continue Reading