Quantcast
Connect with us

Movies

[Box Office] Let’s Talk About ‘Slender Man’s Performance and ‘The Meg’s Stupid Budget

Published

on

This summer carries more than a handful of box office surprises, but nothing like Sony Screen Gems’ Slender Man, which nobody is talking about. This reminds me of last year’s Jigsaw, the eight film in the Saw franchise that several websites declared a flop even though it grossed $100M on a measly $10M budget. (They were wrong in their reporting and a ninth film is currently in development.) While Slender Man isn’t exactly a hit (yet), it’s performing well enough that we should take note. We’ve talked about this several times prior, but the Sylvain White-directed Creepypasta was butchered by the studio heads out of fear of public retaliation (2018 for the win). The studio also pulled back on the marketing spend and quietly dumped the film in theaters with the expectation of taking one to the chin. Yet, with minimal marketing, horrendous reviews and terrible word of mouth, Slender Man has just topped $42.6M worldwide. With a reported $10M budget, and a less than typical marketing spend, the Joey King-starrer is well into the profit territory for the studio. Reflecting on this yet again, can you imagine if Screen Gems backed this little movie and didn’t fuck it up? It could have been a massive hit. While some are calling Slender Man (the character) dead before he even had a chance to spook audiences, I say it’s possible that this is just the beginning. A sequel – whether it be theatrical or direct-to-video – is more than likely at this point.

Speaking of sequels, let’s talk about Warner Bros. Pictures’ The Meg for a second. Good or bad is irrelevant in this conversation, but as of this writing, it’s touched $465M worldwide. That’s pretty wild for a film about a giant shark. Unfortunately, the budget was out of control with it costing a reported $130-$180M – the latter more likely. Meeting it in the middle, the studio and investors were all-in at around $300M, which means the box office gross (total before net) would need to be approximately $500M-$550M. As you can see, the film is still light of break-even, but it’s looking more than likely with each passing week.

The Meg is an interesting film in comparison to IT, which was in a similar boat. When Cary Fukunaga was originally attached to direct, the budget was ballooning to $150M. Warners made the smart move and shifted the project over to New Line Cinema and brought the budget down to a reported $35M (I’ve heard it’s actually around $60M). While IT was a bonafide hit, the studio set it up for success by recalibrating the budget and making it for a more reasonable price. While I don’t have insight into the executives’ mentality, it’s possible the success of IT gave them too much confidence in pulling the trigger on the supposed-to-be-R-rated The Meg. It’s interesting in retrospect because, if you recall, the studio allegedly got cold feet mid-shoot and targeted a more general PG-13 audience. At some point, they must have come to the realization that they’ve made a mistake and did whatever they could to fix it. The point I’m trying to make is this: if The Meg had a more reasonable budget (like IT), it would have been a tidal wave of a hit. The good news is that it’s treading water and keeping afloat in hopes of breaking even, which means that a refocused sequel with a smaller budget could be in the cards. (I’d also note that nobody knows the dynamic between the studio and the Chinese investors – how much did each entity invest? Who has what territories? What was the box office percentage recoup? Who gets first back? etc. etc. etc. There’s a lot of grey area and nobody knows exactly the interworkings of the deal.)

Digressing quite a bit, nobody is laughing about The Happytime Murders‘ box office numbers, with it sitting at $18M on a whopping $40M reported budget. Flop is an understatement. There is no way this film hits $125-150M worldwide.

In other genre disappointments, the director of Room saw his The Little Stranger open in only 474 locations to an abysmal $417k. That is only $880 per theater average, which is less than all three previously mentioned films in their third or fourth week of release. Chalk this one up as a film we’ll never talk about again, ever.

Oh, hey, and just for laughs, Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation is sitting at $485M worldwide, and Universal’s Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom just topped $1.3 BILLION. Whoa.

Click to comment

Movies

‘Backrooms’ Director Kane Parsons Is No Fan of Generative AI: “Defeats the Purpose Entirely for Me”

Published

on

backrooms director kane parsons mark duplass

There has been a lot of talk recently about filmmakers embracing generative AI as part of the filmmaking process, from Darren Aronofsky to Martin Scorsese. But what about filmmakers that are against the use of Gen AI for creative pursuits? You can count 20-year-old Backrooms director Kane Parsons among that group, which should give you some hope for the future.

In a new chat with The Australian, the self-taught young filmmaker makes it crystal clear that he won’t be using generative AI in any of his upcoming filmmaking projects.

“I think I’m in the same boat as most well-adjusted people,” Parsons tells the outlet. “If I could snap my fingers and make generative AI disappear forever, I probably would. Creatively, I get no enjoyment from using those tools. It defeats the purpose entirely for me.”

“What interests me more is interrogating it artistically,” Parsons notes. “We already live in a world where you walk outside and there are billboards and signs that are obvious AI slop. That’s become part of our visual reality. To me, generative AI feels less like innovation than a symptom of a broader cultural and economic rot.”

He explains, “I’m interested in using that iconography in art – not using AI to make the art itself, but examining what it represents. I definitely want to explore it further in future projects.”

Kane Parsons also notes during the interview with The Australian, “… there’s so much at stake and so many genuinely harmful consequences already happening.”

Backrooms marks young prodigy Kane Parsons’ feature directorial debut, and it’s based on his own series of YouTube videos that were brought to life using Blender, the open-source 3D computer graphics software suite. So it’s no surprise that Parsons, who has hand-made his filmmaking career up to this point, isn’t buying into the hoopla around Generative AI.

His debut feature is the #1 movie in the world, so perhaps he’s onto something.

What’s next from Kane Parsons, you ask? Stay tuned…

backrooms 2 movie

Continue Reading