Connect with us

Movies

Judy Greer’s Triumphant ‘Halloween’ One-liner Was the Result of Test Screenings

Published

on

Slight spoiler warning, although I hope most of you dear Bloody Disgusting readers have seen the new Halloween by now.

While the movie is a monster hit, it wasn’t the easiest road to the big screen. In fact, Miramax, Trancas, Universal Pictures, and Blumhouse’s Halloween was shut down just days before production to go under a series of rewrites. After finally going behind cameras, the film would go back for a series of reshoots leading up to the October release. There were even reports that one of the test screenings went poorly. Hardcore horror fans caught wind of a lot of this and went into a fevered panic, although we attempted to downplay the severity of reshoots. It really does depend on the movie and the situation, but Blumhouse is notorious for allowing filmmakers to go back and fix up their project. This is not a bad thing. In fact, in Blumhouse’s case, this is the norm and one way they’re able to tweak a film to make it even better.

We can go back and forth on this all day, but I found a revealing quote from director David Gordon Green that gives the perfect representation as to why a test screening can be so important to a film’s impact and success. An interview at the LA Times takes us back to the TIFF World Premiere where Michael Myers was first unleashed on audiences. Outside of child actor Jibrail Nantambu stealing the show, Judy Greer‘s triumphant “gotcha” one-liner caused the theater to erupt. It was so loud that the audience couldn’t hear Jamie Lee Curtis’ “Happy Halloween, Michael” line.

“I’ll tell you an interesting thing … it’s about editing and test screenings. Test screenings are beautiful because you can know how to move things around for those types of audience responses.”

I know this is a long article to deliver a single point, but us horror fans are very protective of our genre and how the films are made. I think it’s so important that we occasionally have these conversations to understand that not all “failed” test screenings are bad and neither are all reshoots. Because of the process, Green was able to deliver one of the biggest crowd-pleasing horror moments of the year.

Funny enough, the lack of testing actually hurt the delivery of Curtis’ final zinger.

“I’d never tested that line because I thought it was like, ‘Oh, is that too much?’ And then the last change we made in our picture cutting was to add that line back in,” Green revealed. “Then the result is that you don’t hear it because we put it in the wrong place. It’s got its own charm as obviously people will watch the movie in different environments without necessarily a ruckus. It’s in there.”

You gotta love Green giving some deep insight into the filmmaking process and admitting to where it works and how it goes wrong. These are the kind of stories that make you appreciate the process and how much work goes into making a movie “just right”.

Halloween is going to make a killing again this weekend.

Horror movie fanatic who co-founded Bloody Disgusting in 2001. Producer on Southbound, V/H/S/2/3/94, SiREN, Under the Bed, and A Horrible Way to Die. Chicago-based. Horror, pizza and basketball connoisseur. Taco Bell daily. Franchise favs: Hellraiser, Child's Play, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Halloween, Scream and Friday the 13th. Horror 365 days a year.

Movies

‘The Invisible Man 2’ – Elisabeth Moss Says the Sequel Is Closer Than Ever to Happening

Published

on

Universal has been having a hell of a time getting their Universal Monsters brand back on a better path in the wake of the Dark Universe collapsing, with four movies thus far released in the years since The Mummy attempted to get that interconnected universe off the ground.

First was Leigh Whannell’s The Invisible Man, to date the only post-Mummy hit for the Universal Monsters, followed by The Last Voyage of the Demeter, Renfield, and now Abigail. The latter three films have attempted to bring Dracula back to the screen in fresh ways, but both Demeter and Renfield severely underperformed at the box office. And while Abigail is a far better vampire movie than those two, it’s unfortunately also struggling to turn a profit.

Where does the Universal Monsters brand go from here? The good news is that Universal and Blumhouse have once again enlisted the help of Leigh Whannell for their upcoming Wolf Man reboot, which is howling its way into theaters in January 2025. This is good news, of course, because Whannell’s Invisible Man was the best – and certainly most profitable – of the post-Dark Universe movies that Universal has been able to conjure up. The film ended its worldwide run with $144 million back in 2020, a massive win considering the $7 million budget.

Given the film was such a success, you may wondering why The Invisible Man 2 hasn’t come along in these past four years. But the wait for that sequel may be coming to an end.

Speaking with the Happy Sad Confused podcast this week, The Invisible Man star Elisabeth Moss notes that she feels “very good” about the sequel’s development at this point in time.

“Blumhouse and my production company [Love & Squalor Pictures]… we are closer than we have ever been to cracking it,” Moss updates this week. “And I feel very good about it.”

She adds, “We are very much intent on continuing that story.”

At the end of the 2020 movie, Elisabeth Moss’s heroine Cecilia Kass uses her stalker’s high-tech invisibility suit to kill him, now in possession of the technology that ruined her life.

Stay tuned for more on The Invisible Man 2 as we learn it.

[Related] Power Corrupts: Universal Monsters Classic ‘The Invisible Man’ at 90

Continue Reading