Connect with us

Editorials

5 Awesome Superhero Movies, As Selected By ‘Crave’ Director Charles de Lauzirika!

Published

on

In celebration of Phase 4 Films’ release of Crave on VOD and in limited theaters this Friday, December 6, Bloody Disgusting caught up with director Charles de Lauzirika to talk about some of his favorite superhero movies.

Starring Josh Lawson (“House of Lies”, Anchorman 2), Emma Lung, Ron Perlman (“Sons of Anarchy”, Hellboy), and Edward Furlong (Night of the Demons, T2), the pseudo-superhero horror Crave follows a downtrodden photographer, haunted by the urban violence and decay around him, who retreats into an inner world of dark fantasies. Those dangerous visions explode in reality with deadly consequences when his intoxicating new relationship with a beautiful young woman goes sour.

For me, the criteria for a superhero movie goes beyond just a mild mannered character putting on flashy tights and leaping into action to save the day,” explains Lauzirika. “It can be that, and has been mostly that, but as this subgenre continues to evolve and reinvent itself, I consider a “superhero” to be any character that uses special abilities, technology or powers in the service of good. So rather than limit my selections to guys in capes and masks (though there is certainly some of that on my list,) I figured I would discuss a few films I enjoy that explore what it means to be an extraordinary hero in an ordinary world.

Without further adieu, here’s 5 awesome superhero films as selected by Charles de Lauzirika!

ROBOCOP (1987)


“It’s easy to look back at Paul Verhoeven’s ROBOCOP now and see it as the masterpiece of extreme action, genuine emotion and brilliant satire that it is. But there was nothing really like it before and there hasn’t really been much like it since: A comic book movie not actually adapted from a comic book – and for grown-ups, no less! It seems unheard of in this bleak era of studio filmmaking when virtually nothing but established franchises and “pre-awareness” titles see a greenlight, as evidenced by this film receiving its very own remake this year in the wake of two sequels and a TV show. But between an amazingly charismatic and engaging cast of both heroes and especially villains, some bleeding edge commentary on big business and American consumerism, and several absolutely thrilling action scenes – not to mention kick-ass work by the likes of Rob Bottin, Phil Tippett and Basil Poledouris – I came out of that first screening of ROBOCOP on a cinematic high I’ve rarely felt since. Side note: While making CRAVE, I often referred to ROBOCOP not because we were shooting on the mean streets of Detroit…but because I wanted our squibs to be like the fat, bloody woundgasms that Verhoeven employed. In particular, Mr. Kinney’s hilariously over-the-top demise at the “hands” of ED-209 was always a major discussion point whenever squibs were mentioned.”

SUPERMAN: THE MOVIE (1978)


“Although I was casually raised as a Catholic, more or less, I think it’s safe to say that my moral compass was at least partially calibrated by that other savior sent to Earth to protect us: Superman. And in particular, Richard Donner’s epic first film in this movie franchise. Jor-El’s message to his only son, “They’re a good people, Kal-El. They wish to be. They only lack the light to show the way,” heavily resonated with me growing up. I wanted to be good. I wanted to be, as Christopher Reeve so perfectly delivered it, “a friend.” The sheer joy on Reeve’s face whenever he saved the day is what made me want to be (at least in theory) a do-gooder, something the recent moodier Superman movies haven’t tapped into quite yet. But then these are moodier times…and I have certainly found myself taking some darker paths in life, as my first feature might attest to. But that’s why Superman matters now more than ever. We seek the light. And even if we’ve perhaps grown beyond the simplistic desire for a savior, we still long for the ideal. The beacon that leads us forward out of the darkness. That this core message was lovingly wrapped up in a spectacular adventure that masterfully spanned, blended and contained entire genres within its brisk 143 minute run time, supported by a massively talented cast and one of John Williams’ essential top tier signature scores, was all a very welcome bonus. I still believe this man can fly, and I always will…no matter how dark the world (or his costume) becomes.”

CHRONICLE (2012)


“I have to be honest and say I was kind of dreading this movie. Like a lot of people, I’m pretty burned out on the found footage genre. And worse, based on the trailer, this seemed like it could be an especially douchey “brah” off-shoot of that tired breed. So it goes without saying that I was very pleasantly surprised and highly impressed by what Josh Trank did with the material. Not only did he capture an emotionally-engaging character study (thanks to a very talented cast, including the amazing Dane DeHaan) and managed to find very creative ways to break out of the limitations of the form, but he also delivered perhaps the most engaging super-fight I had ever seen on the big screen…all on a relatively meager budget! As The Fantastic Four was one of my favorite comic books growing up, I’m feeling quite optimistic that this property is now in Mr. Trank’s hands and I look forward to seeing him expand as a filmmaker beyond the superhero genre.”

THE ROCKETEER (1991)


“Two of my absolute favorite adventure films from childhood are RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK and the aforementioned SUPERMAN THE MOVIE. I also had a fondness for other random icons of the past, such as Bettie Page, air shows and test pilots, Giant Robot, Howard Hughes and, being a native Angelino, old Hollywood. Throw all those potent ingredients into a World War II era blender and out comes a delicious mix of nostalgia, spectacle and alternate history…otherwise known as THE ROCKETEER. I’ve always rooted for Joe Johnston as a director, having been a longtime fan of his work as a superb concept artist on the original STAR WARS films. To me, this film is still his best directorial effort. Based on the Dave Stevens comic, this film is a nonstop love letter to the spirit of an imagined history in which a world at war was heavily flavored with elements of fantasy and pulp adventure. Growing up, I could easily thrill to the exploits of Doc Savage, Indiana Jones or, in this case, Cliff Seacord. They made crushing the enemy not just a case of blue collar good versus globe-dominating evil, but they also made it incredibly fun. I was charmed by this film. “Doubly charmed.” ”

THE IRON GIANT (1999)


“Some people might not consider a story about an alien weapon of mass destruction who befriends a little boy to fall in the superhero category. Normally, I probably wouldn’t either. But nothing about Brad Bird’s underappreciated masterpiece should really be considered “normal.” It’s an entirely exceptional film about overcoming fear, looking deep within yourself and becoming the best “you” that you can. Released during a crowded summer when many fanboys angrily turned their backs on the long-awaited return of STAR WARS and instead embraced a more modern and stylized vision of fantastic cinema with THE MATRIX, it might be forgivable to have missed the quiet, humble release of THE IRON GIANT amidst the deafening clash of mega-hyped movies elsewhere. But if you love movies about heroes, or movies about what it means to be a hero…or hell, if you just love movies, period…then it’s unforgivable to miss this beautiful film now. And I defy anyone with a human heart to not crack a big wet-eyed smile of joy when our large mechanical friend leaps into action and utters the name of another famous superhero. In many ways, the best superheroes don’t just do the dirty work of fighting evil. They also inspire and uplift us. And in that regard, THE IRON GIANT is one of the best superheroes of all.”

Horror movie fanatic who co-founded Bloody Disgusting in 2001. Producer on Southbound, V/H/S/2/3/94, SiREN, Under the Bed, and A Horrible Way to Die. Chicago-based. Horror, pizza and basketball connoisseur. Taco Bell daily. Franchise favs: Hellraiser, Child's Play, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Halloween, Scream and Friday the 13th. Horror 365 days a year.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading