Connect with us

Movies

[Interview] ‘Cheap Thrills’ Stars Pat Healy and Ethan Embry at Fantastic Fest

Published

on

Despite not fitting into traditional genre restraints, Cheap Thrills is one of the most physically and emotionally brutal movies I saw in 2013. Even though the idea of two friends who are down on their luck reuniting after years apart to engage in an escalating series of dares for money might not sound as horrific as other films covered on Bloody Disgusting, the lengths that these two are willing to go might scare you when you realize you’d be willing to do the same.

With his great performances in 2011’s The Innkeepers and 2012’s Compliance, it’s no surprise that Pat Healy gives us another great character in Craig, a mechanic with a wife and infant who managed to get evicted AND fired in the same. Playing against him is Ethan Embry as Vince, who works in the kind of “collections” department that leaves him with scarred up knuckles. Believe me when I tell you that whatever memory you might have of Embry’s movies from the 90’s will be shattered, stomped on, chewed up and spit out after you see where he goes with Vince.

I got to speak to the two last September at Fantastic Fest after a screening that involved an inebriated Q & A, people getting tattooed onstage, and a popsicle made of crickets. Head on over to The Wolfman Cometh for the rest of the interview and check out my review here.

WolfMan: This movie’s fucking awesome. I think you guys know that from me talking about it all the time.

Ethan Embry: We know that YOU like it.

WM: And what else matters?

EE: In this context? Not much.

WM: But it’s a difficult movie to talk about without giving things away. As you’re watching it, you don’t know where it’s going to go next and you don’t know how it’s going to escalate. I really don’t want to give anything away because I don’t want to take any enjoyment away from the audience. The big thing that sells the movie is your friendship, or your past friendship.

EE: Let’s call it a “relationship”.

Pat Healy: It’s a complicated relationship. It’s somewhat complicated in real life because we are different kinds of guys, but it works for the movie. When there’s tension, there’s tension.

WM: Did you guys know each other before the movie?

EE: We met maybe 2 days before, 3 days before?

PH: We met for 2 seconds when we were doing our makeup tests. He’s a lot more gregarious than I am and I think we probably just had different styles of acting, in general, but I think it was very good casting because there was real tension. At the end of the day, neither of us hated each other or were in any real danger.

WM: Now would be a good time to admit you hate each other though.

PH: A Wolfman exclusive. (laughs) A really great moment, for me anyway, and I know we’ve talked about it a ton, after the big sort of crazy moment in the movie, we had this scene that was like a page or two long that we just had to shoot really quickly, which was just he and I talking, and on the page it’s really just an excuse to make some time go by for something else to happen, but it was an amazing scene because of what we had just been through emotionally and through the filming of the movie and it’s just us talking about it’s a two camera setup and what you see is what you get. Us really connecting. It’s a quiet moment, which the movie’s not full of, but we were very connected at that point and I thought that it was what it’s all about. To go through all of that to get to that moment, it’s worth it.

EE: And I think what you said about us just having different styles. Like if I get hit, I like getting hit.

PH: Right, and I don’t.

EE: And it comes down to something as simple as that. I hit him a couple of times.

PH: And then I didn’t mean to, but unconsciously I probably wanted to.

EE: And I fucking loved it. It was probably funny enough, and I thought that that moment was the most connected you and I were.

PH: To be fair, the move…George Wilbur coordinated the fight, and Ethan wanted another move, and…I felt bad. I gave him a black eye.

EE: And for me, it’s like, DO that shit. I fucking love it.

PH: And for me, there’s no right way or wrong way to act. If you want to act like Abraham Lincoln, then that’s fine because the proof is in the pudding. He’s great in the movie, but I did buy him a carton of cigarettes because I felt bad.

EE: And those aren’t cheap.

PH: And we had one more day of shooting, and what we had to shoot was the beginning of the movie.

WM: And Pat just won’t stop bragging about how strong of a puncher he is.

PH: I didn’t punch him, it was my foot.

WM: How good of a KICKER he is.

PH: We did this scene, and he’s on the ground, and I knew that the camera was behind him and that I wasn’t close and that I had to kick him in the face.

EE: I actually asked you to put your boot on my face.

PH: And then what happened was I looked at the thing and I just lost my mind but they didn’t actually use that take.

EE: It was great, because then in the next scene I have this fresh bootprint on my fucking face.

PH: And what follows that is fucking brutal. The one thing about the movie that people always ask about “When would you stop and what would be too far?” and I just look at the movie and I know it’s a good script is because everything that happens logically follows. As crazy as any of that stuff is, if you were in the middle of it, like Compliance too, if you were there, it wouldn’t seem that crazy of a time. It might, in retrospect, like talk to David (Koechner) about last night, and at the time, if I were in the same situation, I doubt I would go so far as to murder someone, but when you’re in the quicksand, you’re just trying to get out and you’re struggling and you sink deeper into it. (To Ethan) You told me you’d cut your finger off when we were having dinner together.

WM: Just for fun or for money?

EE: I think that’s why the movie as a whole works, because, depending on, if I had to, depending on who it was, I’d go as far as you. I think my character gives you enough reasons to justify.

PH: It’s not like I’m unprovoked, you see it, but at the same time…that’s another great thing about his performance. The vulnerability that comes out at the end and the humanity, and there’s tragedy in that.

WM: It’s not an entire 180 degree turn for either character, but the perception of the characters switch.

PH: Even Ethan’s hat falling off tilts it. It’s actually my favorite stuff in the movie, and the way it’s shot in the movie, it’s beautiful. That whole sequence when the slideshow is on and all that stuff, it’s great. I don’t think anything could happen in the movie and our relationship and performances included,  without the crazy way that the movie was set up. And only because there wasn’t a lot of money all of the time. It was crazy, and we just kind of had to be there and do it.

EE: There was talk about if it could be done as a play.

WM: And Dave had talked a lot last night about how it felt like a play on set.

EE: Did you actually decipher anything he said last night?

WM: I know he made it rain on someone, I remember that.

PH: What makes it like a play is that you don’t really get to work scenes, long scenes, with actors where you’re acting with them. It’s usually bits and pieces or it’s coverage. With this film, we had these two cameras and we had to learn these scenes and they were long scenes and you had to look at each other and do these scenes. The budget and everything kind of forced that, but I prefer it because we got to actually do real acting with one another.

Cheap Thrills is available on VOD on February 21st and in select theaters March 21st.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Movies

’28 Years Later’ – Ralph Fiennes, Jodie Comer, and Aaron Taylor-Johnson Join Long Awaited Sequel

Published

on

28 Days Later, Ralph Fiennes in the Menu
Pictured: Ralph Fiennes in 'The Menu'

Danny Boyle and Alex Garland (AnnihilationMen), the director and writer behind 2002’s hit horror film 28 Days Later, are reteaming for the long-awaited sequel, 28 Years Later. THR reports that the sequel has cast Jodie Comer (Alone in the Dark, “Killing Eve”), Aaron Taylor-Johnson (Kraven the Hunter), and Ralph Fiennes (The Menu).

The plan is for Garland to write 28 Years Later and Boyle to direct, with Garland also planning on writing at least one more sequel to the franchise – director Nia DaCosta is currently in talks to helm the second installment.

No word on plot details as of this time, or who Comer, Taylor-Johnson, and Fiennes may play.

28 Days Later received a follow up in 2007 with 28 Weeks Later, which was executive produced by Boyle and Garland but directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo. Now, the pair hope to launch a new trilogy with 28 Years Later. The plan is for Garland to write all three entries, with Boyle helming the first installment.

Boyle and Garland will also produce alongside original producer Andrew Macdonald and Peter Rice, the former head of Fox Searchlight Pictures, the division of one-time studio Twentieth Century Fox that originally backed the British-made movie and its sequel.

The original film starred Cillian Murphy “as a man who wakes up from a coma after a bicycle accident to find England now a desolate, post-apocalyptic collapse, thanks to a virus that turned its victims into raging killers. The man then navigates the landscape, meeting a survivor played by Naomie Harris and a maniacal army major, played by Christopher Eccleston.”

Cillian Murphy (Oppenheimer) is on board as executive producer, though the actor isn’t set to appear in the film…yet.

Talks of a third installment in the franchise have been coming and going for the last several years now – at one point, it was going to be titled 28 Months Later – but it looks like this one is finally getting off the ground here in 2024 thanks to this casting news. Stay tuned for more updates soon!

Continue Reading