Reviews
[Review] ‘Sea Fever’ is a Smart Character Drama That Subverts Aquatic Horror Tropes
There’s a moment near the end of the first act of Irish horror film Sea Fever that makes it clear to audiences just what type of film it is. Strange colored barnacles have begun appearing on the lower deck of fishing vessel Niamh Cinn Oir, creating unusual circles that have altered the boat’s physical texture. These circles have a gooey, mushy consistency to them – a gentle probe of the finger can push right through, which is exactly what a character does, despite the uncertainty of what lies beyond.
One of the thrills of watching horror films is waiting for the scare(s) to come. In this instance, writer/director Neasa Hardiman is well aware of those expectations: she keeps the camera trained on the hand and the strange circle, the music crescendos and… nothing. Hardiman resists the easy impulse to rip off an appendage in the most satisfying denial of expectations possible. Because that’s what Sea Fever is: a subversion of conventions, a zig when other (more conventional) films would zag and, above all, a smart film.
Sea Fever tells the story of smart, blunt, introverted grad student Siobhán (Hermione Corfield). Early in the film she is ordered out of the lab and into the real world by her professor. Siobhán specializes in behavioural patterns and her responsibilities aboard the trawler are to photograph and analyze their catch for abnormalities. Unfortunately for her, the crew are proper sea farers, which means that they are both extremely pragmatic and superstitious, particularly in regards to her red hair (which is bad luck on a boat).
Trouble looms when Captain Jarrod (Dougray Scott) discovers that the area he had planned to scour for fish is part of an exclusion zone. Unbeknownst to his wife Freya (Connie Nielsen) and the rest of the crew, he silently takes them in anyways – the crew is in a compromised position financially and they need a payday.
Almost immediately the ship becomes caught in…something. Shortly thereafter the mysterious barnacles appear and a cursory (terrifying) underwater investigation by Siobhán suggests they have been ensnared by a giant luminescent creature lurking deep below the surface. A mysterious boat on the horizon and a sick crew member soon raise the stakes as the crew must decide what they are willing to do – and sacrifice – in order to get home alive.
To casual viewers the description likely sounds familiar, evoking a variety of water-based horror films such as Leviathan, Sphere, The Abyss and even Virus. And yet Hardiman regularly seeks out ways to subvert the expectations that those other films have instilled in viewers. Early in the film attractive deck hand Johnny (Jack Hickey) and Siobhán have a meet cute as he helps her aboard the Niahm Cinn Oir, but Hardiman’s screenplay immediately dismisses the idea of a romantic coupling when Siobhan takes an interest in the handiwork of the ship’s engineer (Ardalan Esmaili).
There is a disaster aboard the N-29, the other boat that Jarrod, Johnny and Siobhán visit in search of answers, but it’s not an opportunity for cheap jump scares. Similarly, there is an infection that begins to creep through the crew, but the victims, the symptoms and the reactions are atypical for this kind of tale.
Considering the title of the film refers to a kind of sea-based insanity that befalls crews trapped for long periods of time in close quarters, as well as the paranoia that accompanies the spread of the infection, it would be reasonable to assume that Sea Fever will eventually turn into a full-on murderous brawl for survival. But while there is a certain level of disagreement, the film never descends into warfare; Hardiman opts instead for tension and level-headed arguments.
The film’s conflict comes from a place of desperation, but the characters never cease to be less than real people – they’re not simple caricatures who lose their minds when their safety is threatened. They bicker, they attempt to rationalize their situation, and they plot, but they don’t suddenly become homicidal killers. Sea Fever refuses to go the easy, familiar narrative route of simply turning characters into monsters; Hardiman would rather make them face the human realities of their situation. This often means that the film is more of a high concept character drama than a horrific monster mash.

That is not to say that Sea Fever doesn’t still have fantastical elements, though. The barnacles are revealed to be caused by bioluminescent tendrils that have suctioned themselves to the boat. The tendrils are revealed to be attached to the larger monster that resembles a glowing squid. Blue goo regularly oozes from the porous patches onto the deck and is tracked about the ship ominously. And the infection has more than a few icky body horror symptoms, including a legitimately shocking and unexpected demise for one character early in the film.
Ultimately Sea Fever is a subversive, intelligent, adult aquatic horror film that prioritizes characters first and foremost. Writer/director Hardiman has crafted a smart film that is aware of the conventions of the subgenre and leans into those tropes as often as she eschews them. The film looks great, it has unexpected developments and there is plenty of mystery in the mythology, which has elements of both environmental allegory and government conspiracy.
While Sea Fever may not be the madcap monster aquatic horror film that some audiences anticipate going in, the result is far more introspective and thought-provoking.
This is one that will stick with you.
Editor’s Note: This TIFF review was originally published on
Movies
‘Dante’ Review – A Paramedic’s Night Shift Turns Into A Blood-Soaked Nightmare [Tribeca 2026]
There’s something very special about horror stories that depict a single night that gets progressively out of hand and covers a lifetime of woe by the time the sun rises.
It’s a difficult balancing act, but one that’s magical when it’s properly executed, and this claustrophobic structure connects. Hugo Ruiz (One Night with Adela) rises to the challenge with Dante, a chaotic experience that’s pumping adrenaline, burning rubber, and snorting drugs from frame one and then rarely lets up. It feels like it starts in the middle of a film’s third act and then pushes itself to go to even more radical and exciting places.
Ruiz’s Dante is even more confident and accomplished than his freshman feature. It feels like a spaghetti western that’s trapped in a slaughterhouse. It’s Bringing Out the Dead by way of Quentin Tarantino after he’s come off a giallo binge session. It’s a white-knuckle, blood-soaked ride into hell that keeps its audience on edge until the credits roll.
Ruiz accomplishes something quite remarkable with Dante, a subversive take on Dante’s Inferno in which a paramedic ambulance driver, Eduardo (Chino Darin), gets embroiled in a vicious crime caper that pushes everyone involved closer to salvation. Dante, as its title suggests, isn’t exactly subtle with its allusions to Dante’s Inferno. That being said, none of the film’s efforts to match its source material’s themes and tone ever feels forced. It’s a bold, risky adaptation of the classic 14th-century epic poem, but it’s also a distinct film that stands on its own and becomes an incredibly satisfying sophomore entry in Ruiz’s career.

Eduardo innocently responds to a standard emergency call, only to find himself tending to a crime boss’s wounds and caught in the middle of a deadly feud between two erratic rival kingpins. Dante digs into an impossibly tense situation with a small cast of larger-than-life characters who really feel like they’re trapped in some layer of hell. Every minor victory is met with yet another physical trial and morality test for Eduardo to overcome. It also distills this harrowing encounter down to its most exciting elements so that Dante is a fast, easy watch that’s beautifully paced and always finds the right moment to heighten its mayhem.
There’s a shocking brutality here. It’s a visceral, gross, oozing horror film that’s often hard to look at. It’s a movie that lingers on not just pain, but how the human body can become such a disgusting mess. Ruiz lingers on gross visuals that reduce people to raw meat and emotion. However, this screaming, bloody mess is also an intimate chamber piece and character study. All this extreme subject matter serves a grander purpose and builds to a sweeping salvation rather than purely existing to be sensational. Dante is vicious, but it’s the film’s heart that stands out the most when everything is said and done.
Among the criminal capitulations is a deeper commentary on faith, passion, and identity. Eduardo is repeatedly confused for a doctor throughout, which is just one of several instances that reflect its themes regarding duality and labels. Eduardo’s wild night highlights life’s transactional nature and how everyone is the same in death. It’s the ultimate equalizer. Alternatively, Dante looks at the weird, unpredictable places in which people can find humanity, connection, and purpose in life, even if it’s surrounded by death and darkness. Everyone is looking for that spark and light that helps us heal.
In a film full of strong performances, Darin’s work as Eduardo is really spectacular. It’s a performance that’s so deceptively layered that it makes you want to immediately watch the film again as soon as it’s ended. Ruiz’s film is also really smart in response to when it digs deeper into Eduardo’s life and personality. It’s easy to picture Dante beginning with Eduardo carrying out several normal rounds to get a better sense of who he is before danger strikes with Mario. The film also excels as it asks the audience to make their own conclusions on this blank slate before the film begins to pull back the curtain on him.

Eduardo is a compelling moral compass throughout this dark night of the soul, albeit a character who is hardly infallible. Some of Dante’s strongest moments are when Eduardo’s mental state is unclear, and the audience is left to wonder if he’s actually getting a rush from this on some level. Eduardo is left to process many heightened emotions on his own. However, there’s also a real camaraderie between Eduardo and Mak (Ester Expósito) that’s genuinely sweet and progresses in a very natural, effortless manner. Their chemistry helps power the second half.
At one point, Eduardo muses that “a director must take risks.” This is a film that certainly adheres to its own advice.
Dante reaches a satisfying conclusion that feels like the natural endpoint of this story, only to then launch into such a wild turn that transforms the film into something considerably darker and a powerful meditation on the pervasiveness of pain and suffering. The ending guarantees that this is a movie that’s destined to be debated by both its lovers and haters.
There’s thankfully a lot more going on here so that Dante doesn’t live or die based on its ending alone. It’s just a brave step forward that reiterates why Hugo Ruiz is a filmmaker to look out for.
Dante made its world premiere at Tribeca 2026; release info TBD.




You must be logged in to post a comment.