Connect with us

Interviews

[Interview] Sam Barlow Talks Movie Mystery Game ‘Immortality’, ‘Inland Empire’ Inspiration, and the Spiritual Successor to His ‘Silent Hill’ Game

Published

on

Her Story and Telling Lies are effective, thrilling stories told using video footage of real actors. Still, developer Sam Barlow chafes at the idea that his two previous games are interactive movies.

“I, as a movie fan, was like, ‘They’re not really movies.’ Movies are about editing, and cuts, and montage, and this very specific presentation of images by the director to tell you the story. We kind of went in a different direction,” Barlow says. “Yes, it’s filmed footage, but there is no cut. And certainly, in Telling Lies, we were trying to expand that and have images that were very uncinematic in terms of just sitting and watching people and thinking about them.”

Now, Barlow is leaning into the comparison. This time, he and his team at Half Mermaid are making an interactive movie about movies. Immortality is the story of Marissa Marcel, an actress who starred in three films, Ambrosio, Minsky and Two of Everything, between 1968 and 1999. Then she disappeared. None of the films were ever released. 

Barlow’s previous games have asked the player to solve mysteries using databases, fast-forwarding, rewinding, and searching keywords until they felt satisfied that they had thoroughly discovered the story’s twists and turns. In this game, Half Mermaid is eschewing the database for a mechanic that, Barlow teases, has “something to say about movies.”

“We’ve come up with a mechanic that I won’t super explain at this point but, we got rid of the text-searching idea and the idea of there being this database software and really wanted to come up with some mechanics that were cinematic, that were visual and were about the magic of being cut, and the various tools of cinema, and we’ve come up with something pretty neat,” Barlow says. “I still get excited by it when I play around with it.”

We’ll have to wait and see what exactly that means. For now though, Bloody Disgusting had the chance to dig deep on Barlow’s cinematic influences, his love of David Lynch films and the spiritual successor to Silent Hill: Shattered Memories that is currently in pre-production at Half Mermaid.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

BD: Until the E3 reveal, Immortality was known only as “Project Ambrosio” and had a heavily redacted Steam page. And going through the trailer, we can see that Ambrosio is one of the Marissa Marcel movies that’s lost to time. So I’m curious what does ‘Ambrosio’ signify to you as a working title, and what do you think it suggests about the game’s themes?

SB: We tried to come up with a codename that we could use externally that doesn’t ruin things. It’s not like “Codename This Is Exactly What the Game Is About.” One of the fun things about this project [as opposed to] Telling Lies and to some extent Her Story is that [those games were] really hard to talk about because giving any details of the plot, the characters, or setting was kind of ruining the gameplay. Her Story definitely benefits from, in this very high-level way, it’s just about, did this person murder her husband? And then you start to get more details. It was definitely hard for Telling Lies because the premise of the game, the genre we were subverting, how the characters were related to each other was kind of fun for people to figure out in the first hour of the game or something, and we were kind of reticent there. Here, there’s a lot to dig into, so we can be pretty explicit about what this is about, who these people are, and these movies they made. And with Ambrosio, it’s even easier because this movie Ambrosio is an adaptation of an existing book that was written in the late 1700s, The Monk, which was one of the great page-turning, pulpy, dark gothic novels. It just has everything you want out of that kind of book: satanic rituals, all sorts of violence, and gothic nonsense. So I think pinning ourselves onto that aspect, which was already out there, felt like a fun thing. And to some extent, when you dig into the three movies, Ambrosio is this movie that Marcel kind of debuts in and is cast very much from obscurity to be in this thing and so it’s kind of the making of her. And there’s definitely a way you can look at it where the other movies feel like iterations on that story or are kind of refinements of some of the elements of it. It’s a cool word as well.

BD: You’ve talked about Immortality being “10 times more ambitious” than your previous work. One of the clear markers of increasing ambition from Her Story to Telling Lies was the expansion of the cast. Her Story had one actress, Telling Lies had a core cast of four characters plus some bit parts. Does the ambition on this extend to a larger cast than what you’ve done before?

SB: Yeah, I think the ambition is two-fold. We have dug up these three movies, so that’s three movies’ worth of story and cast and characters and locations and everything, and there’s a lot of stuff in there. But the ambition is also the scale of the questions we’re asking. “Let’s do something with movies” ended up being “Let’s use this as a means to questionwhat even are movies, why do we make movies, how does one make a movie?” And then it becomes about looking at these decades. That’s almost the second half-century of cinema. What does that progression look like? And you find between Ambrosio in ‘68, and what they’re doing on Minsky [in ‘72] it’s this leap from kind of the studio system and the remnants of that, to New Hollywood and these very different movies where suddenly you have the directors leading things, these movies become more organic and personal, and the way they’re shot is very different. Suddenly they’re shooting on location, and everything is much more natural and the types of stories that get told. Then, tracking to the end of the ‘90s where, like 1999 was, for obvious reasons, a fascinating year for movies. You’re at the end of the millennium, and everyone was just sort of getting their stuff out. Coming out of the decadence of the ‘80s, in the ‘90s, there was a correction where you had these directors coming up who revered the ‘70s and were looking back and attempting to create… everything had to have a bit more cleverness to it or a little bit of a twist, and it was a lot of referential stuff. Basic Instinct is heavily quoting Vertigo, and Lost Highway is doubly applicable here because it’s living in this weird Lynchian timelessness where it’s definitely the ‘90s but a lot of it has this noir feel… but then you have Trent Reznor on the soundtrack. So there’s a very interesting fusion at that point. That definitely plugs into the ambitions of the questions that we’re trying to use this material to explore, get quite big and ambitious and chunky.

BD: It’s interesting that you bring up the New Hollywood because I just finished reading Peter Biskind’s Easy Riders, Raging Bulls a few weeks ago. I’m very interested to see how you dig into those differences, from the end of the studio system, as such, into the directors’ pictures of the ‘70s.

SB: That book was quite a trip because I think when I first read it I kind of assumed that, “Oh I get the studio system was bad and the way they created and sculpted their stars. Some of the power dynamics.” And in my head, it was, “And then you get to the ‘70s, and you’re making these wonderful works of art, and everything’s cool.” And then when you dig into it, you’re like, “Actually, you just kind of shifted the power to the director, and a lot of those power dynamics were still in play.” There are definitely some darker stories dredged up in that book.

BD: Right, and it seems like having that power may have had some scarring effects on some of those people. Like you look at, in that book, they say multiple times that Coppola, after he went to shoot Apocalypse Now, was never the same. You look at where the directors are in 1980 when that era is coming to a close, and most of them are not doing so hot. Except for the golden boys, like Spielberg, who learned to work within the studio system.

SB: I think even Spielberg had the quote in that book that was like, by 1972, the ‘70s were over. [laughs] There’s this kind of inertia to it all. There’s this trajectory to it all, and then everything falls off.

BD: You mentioned Lynch earlier, and I know that you’re a fan of Inland Empire. It’s the Lynch film that I find the most frustrating because I love the premise so much: that Jeremy Irons, Justin Theroux, and Laura Dern are working on a movie that is supposed to have been cursed as the previous leads were killed while they were working on it. Immortality, similarly, is about movies that were never released. What do you think is captivating about that idea of the unreleased film?

SB: I could talk about lost movies for a long time… There’s definitely the excitement of having a work, especially if it touches on genius or something, that is not lessened by reality. You don’t have to sit and watch them and see if they actually work; you can just imagine. I was a huge fan of the novel Dead Calm. They eventually made the movie with Nicole Kidman. But Orson Welles was obsessed with this book, and he was directing a version of it that he never finished. That whole kind of, Orson Welles, at a certain point, is just trying hard to make movies, and he’s just pulling scraps together. I think even just beyond lost movies, something that we were able to explore on this project is just the process and the fluidity of things. Everyone loves to read those Buzzfeed articles that are like, “Famous Roles that Were Almost Cast Differently.” Oh, Tom Selleck was almost Indiana Jones. The one that blows my mind from the art house end is that Andie MacDowell was going to be the star of The Double Life of Veronique and Kieślowski was really, really into that idea. And all these things that could have gone differently, all these choices that could have been made. People love to talk about Jodorowsky’s Dune and be like ‘Oh look at the concept art, I can imagine it.’ And obviously, the movie you are imagining when you look at that art and think about it, I’m almost guaranteeing, is better than the movie would have been if it had actually gone through, right? Your imagination can really go places. 

And then I think there’s also a charge to the idea of all that effort to put something on camera to create a performance to conjure up these stories that, when left in the darkroom, festers to some extent. It gains a slightly sinister charm. It’s something that is endlessly fascinating to me, which is weird because there are enough movies that do exist that I have not watched that I could go watch right now. But the idea of the road not taken… Maybe it’s that as well. It plugs into your awareness of the many alternate realities that are floating around. 

I think when you dig into the careers of artists, you realize the extent to which these random little decisions are instrumental. You take Lynch. I think probably the world agrees that Dune is not the best Lynch movie, and it’s probably the one that you could leave behind if you were traveling to a desert island. But if he had not made that movie, he would not have then been owed Blue Velvet by Dino De Laurentiis, and you would not have the entire catalog of Lynch movies that we have had since. And even rewinding a little bit more, there you have The Elephant Man because Mel Brooks has watched Eraserhead and decides this guy is the one I want to come make this movie and has to convince the execs. So when you start thinking about these missing projects — and every director or star has a bunch of these in their history, things that didn’t quite happen — it kind of makes you then pay attention to what did happen and the machinations of it all. 

 

And I probably would say Inland Empire is my favorite Lynch. I might be slightly biased because when I saw it,, I lived in this little town in England where we didn’t have a cool cinema. It was just the one multiplex that would show big blockbuster movies. But, we had a museum that was a naval museum that was essentially a recruiting tool for the navy. But they had an incredible cinema that they used just to show recruitment videos and documentaries about battleships. So there was a couple in the town that started renting it in the evenings when the museum was shut to put on arthouse movies and horror movies and the cooler stuff. And we went to see Inland Empire there, and we were the only people in the entire audience that showed up. And to get to it, you had to walk through the museum after hours, so you’re walking through this empty dark museum to get to go see your movie and so sitting in a giant empty movie theater in a museum that’s been closed watching that movie was a real mind trip. At every point where the movie was really futzing with what was really going on, what was real, all these layers, I started being like, “Is this movie affecting my brain?” Such a weird, surreal setting watching this movie. And there’s a shot in that movie — and I won’t ruin it for people that haven’t seen it — that’s in my top five horror moments. And it’s not gory or intense; it just uses a boom mic. And for me because it was a moment in the film, about two-thirds of the way through the movie, and it was like, “Oh, maybe we’re settling in on what’s really happening.” It’s this scene where you think, ‘Maybe this is building to giving some solid footing in this crazy nightmare with all these competing, layered realities.” and just when you think that’s happening, it’s ripped away from you. You’re cast back into this maelstrom of unsettling, weird, different set-ups and that in itself, in a very abstract, Lynch-y way, was so terrifying.

I think sometimes that’s what’s cool about Lynch, he’ll cut to something very inoffensive, he’ll cut to a ceiling fan, and then he’ll slow things down a bit, and the soundtrack kicks in, and it’s like, “Damn, this ceiling fan is terrifying.” I don’t think we immediately related things to Inland Empire [on Immortality], but when I made Her Story, part of locking in the [creative direction] was me watching that and being like, “Shit, David Lynch is running ‘round filming things with a cheap video camera. I guess I could do that, too.” If that’s what he’s up to, why don’t I embrace this kind of aesthetic? It’s definitely one of the better movies about… the darkness behind the glamor of Hollywood and… what does it mean for an actress to lose herself in a role; to become so emotionally [invested] in that, and with the other forces swirling around her, where does that push her? It’s very intense and cool, and Laura Dern is incredible.

BD: The cheapness of the camera is definitely part of what makes Inland Empire feel as unsettling as it does. That early scene with Grace Zabriskie coming in and speaking to Laura Dern in the sitting room of her house sets the tone for the rest of the movie. Laura Dern’s character is very confused by what’s happening and you are very confused about what’s happening and the camera that Lynch is using to shoot that is a big part of why it feels as unsettling as it does. The cheapness gives it a sort of found footage feeling.

SB: He got excited by what happens when you blow it up on a big screen. It becomes “dreamy,” that’s his favorite word. That’s what I was digging into on Her Story. I watched Inland Empire. I watched a bunch of things, like real-life footage from investigation and interrogations that had been released into the public domain. And then, I watched the casting tapes from Basic Instinct, which had the same texture. It was all shot on a little dinky video camera with very little cinematic flair. There’s a different edge to it that’s interesting. There are a few things we’re playing with here, not entirely similar, but getting to interrogate what is the difference between cinematic reality and real reality in a deliberate way. 

BD: So, we’ve been talking a lot about Lynch without mentioning that one of the writers on this game is Barry Gifford, who wrote the book Wild at Heart is based on and the screenplay for Lost Highway. We’ve sort of talked about Inland Empire’s connection to Her Story, but do you see there being a Lynchian flavor to what you’re doing on Immortality and what Barry Gifford’s work is doing in it?

SB: Yeah, I want to be specific because Lynch’s name gets thrown around a lot in video games. “Oh yeah, we’re going for like a Lynch thing.” And you’re like, “What you mean it’s going to be slightly weird?” I think the most we’ve referenced him on this project is in understanding some of the more horror aspects and what types of horror do I like playing with and what is more disturbing. Some of his movies you wouldn’t out and out call horror movies, but there are always moments in Lynch’s movies that are upsetting and horrific and dig into those textures as deep as anyone does. Certainly understanding his toolkit and how he crafts those things has been on my mind. 

As far as Barry and [co-writer] Allan [Scott], part of the research of digging into this was going back and speaking to people who were working in movies at this time and producing the great works at the time amongst the various creative pairings and things. And so, for us to make this, figuring out which bits are real… well let’s speak to the people, let’s pull in the people that actually did this work. So we spoke to a bunch of people. Is this research or is this me having a fanboy moment digging into all these stories? But then yeah bringing them in so we could pull in those textures and have those things. And there’s some fun stuff with Barry that we’ll probably get to later. But the very long phone conversations with Barry have definitely been a highlight for everybody on the team.

BD: In the fiction, are all three American made movies?

SB: So, Ambrosio is a European co-production, has a British director, and was shot in Italy, as many movies were back then. Then, when you get to Minsky, the interesting thing about Minsky is that the director of photography on Ambrosio is the director of that movie. He’s an American director, and that is shot in New York. And then the third of the movies, also shot by the same director but many years later, is shot in L.A. and New York, so yeah, it kind of starts in Europe and then moves to the twin cities of New York and L.A. It was an interesting angle on the second half of movies in the 20th century and the post-war reinvention of movies in a bunch of European countries that then seeds the New Wave and then inspires what happens in the ‘70s, initially in New York, you have that very kind of New York thrust of New Hollywood but then that stuff kind of spreads over to Hollywood as well.

BD: So, we are a horror website, and you’ve said that Immortality is “spooky.” Can you talk about the genres of horror that you’re interested in tapping into here?

SB: I will say, no one knows what happened to Marissa Marcel and the initial thrust of the game is figuring that out. There are a lot of dark and violent theories around what happened, why these movies didn’t come out. Back then, we didn’t have the internet and gossip sites, so it was easier to shut down rumors and have things just become vague bits of hearsay. So, we’re really interested in having players cooperate with us in digging into this. But if you’ve played Shattered Memories, we’re putting both feet back into that world. Her Story and Telling Lies were… the format was so explicitly banal, that was part of the provocation of Her Story: imagine anything less interesting than a database program from the 1990s. And you boot up the game, and it’s there, it’s a database program, and it’s a Windows desktop, and there’s nothing less evocative or Gothic than that. But that then is a perfect frame to then take people in that direction. So they’re expecting it less and it freshens things up a bit. So both of those projects were then rigidly defined by having to behave themselves because they had this real-world kind of framework, and it’s probably fair to say that we don’t have those same requirements this time around. And I have a personal love for… when you sit and watch a Hitchcock movie; you know that Hitchcock is, in some cases, trying to push your buttons. And is trying to set you up so that you’re more vulnerable to then him coming back on the attack. So a lot of my favorite horror stuff in any medium is the stuff that gets inside your head… [I remember reading] the idea that when you’re watching a movie or reading a book, you’re sort of letting something bad inside your head… It’s not just scary and upsetting but it’s what is even going on here?

BD: In addition to Immortality, you’ve said that you’re pitching a spiritual successor to Silent Hill: Shattered Memories. Can you tell us anything about that pitch? Or what elements of Silent Hill you’re still interested in exploring?

SB: Yeah, it’s slightly less pitchy and slightly more in early pre-production. So, yeah, the interesting thing was, when I made Her Story, I was slightly reacting to, “All right, I’ve spent three years making a Legacy of Kain game that was then canceled.” There’s a chance that would have been a very cool game, but there was lots about it that was challenging. Part of it was, when I made Shattered Memories, it was a lot of me digging into a lot of my favorite games growing up were exploratory immersive sims and then getting into making Silent Hill games where you have a story emphasis on exploring these atmospheric locations. I kind of started to wonder, to question walking a character around a 3D space, is it too easy? You just naturally get this level of immersion and involvement, but then questioning, how does that specifically drive the story? 

And at that time, you were seeing games like Gone Home and stuff that we’re doing this subtractive thing of taking out gameplay elements. Gone Home very much feels like them taking the BioShock and survival horror vibes but then removing combat and inventory and all these things. So when I made Her Story, it was somewhat out of frustration and somewhat just wanting to push further in a direction, knowing that progress is very slow and incremental in AAA games. So I was excited to explore with Her Story, “What does a game look like if I don’t have the prop of walking a character around a 3D space? What happens if me being the protagonist doesn’t necessarily mean I’m the star of the story?” And it was still taking at the purest level, what is interesting about games: exploration, expression, challenge, and just translating those to something that wasn’t an avatar in a 3D space.

And now I’ve had sufficient time away from that world that I notice myself, at the end of every year, I’ll be on a couple of juries, and so I’ll play through every big game coming out. I’ll play through all the third-person story games and horror-adjacent games or action games. I just notice myself more vocally being like, “They’re doing it wrong! They should do this!” And then I’m like, oh, okay, maybe it would be fun to come back… I realized that with Shattered Memories I had not exhausted all of my ideas as to how to mix up the conventional third-person horror game.

Interviews

“Be Not Afraid”: Andrea Perron Shares the Chilling True Story Behind ‘The Conjuring’ [Interview]

Published

on

Pictured: 'The Conjuring'

Welcome back to DEAD Time. I hope you left a light on for me because this month we’re going inside The Conjuring house to find out the real story of what happened to Carol and Roger Perron when they moved their five daughters into a house in Burrillville, Rhode Island in the early 1970s.

In 2013, director James Wan unleashed the terrifying horror film The Conjuring, which was based on the case files of paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren and told the story of a family tormented by a demonic force after moving into their new home. In real life, the Warrens did investigate the activity in the Perron home, but the story goes a bit differently. You may think you know what really happened inside that house based on the horror movie alone, but you would be mistaken. The true story is much, much scarier.

Bloody Disgusting was delighted to have the opportunity to chat with Andrea Perron, the oldest of the five Perron daughters, who was witness to the paranormal activity in the family’s home. Andrea is a lecturer and the author of the trilogy of books, House of Darkness House of Light, which tells the story of what her family experienced while living in the house in Rhode Island for a decade. Read on for our exclusive interview.


Bloody Disgusting: Your family moved into the old Arnold Estate in 1970, correct? How long after you moved into the house did your family begin to experience unusual activity?

Andrea Perron: We bought the house in December of 1970, but we didn’t move in right away because my mother didn’t want to move during Christmas. My mother found the farm for sale and our family went to the farm a number of times and we loved it and we all felt like it was home to us. It was an original colonial home and a farm and 200 acres of land it was a big deal. My parents paid $72,000 for the house and back in 1970 that was a lot of money. All of the times we visited the house with Mr. Kenyon, who was the owner, none of us remembered having anything strange or otherworldly or mystical happen. We just enjoyed the property and the land, and the place itself was just so incredibly enticing. None of us have any memory of seeing anything strange or weird there until the day we moved in. It was as though the spirits were all just holding their breath [laughs] waiting for us to get there and live there.

The first thing that happened was my father opened up the back of the moving truck and handed me a box. We were in the middle of a snow and sleet and ice event, and the wind was whipping around, and it was freezing cold. I went into the nearest door with the box that was marked kitchen and my mother had already come in with my baby sister April and had gone into the kitchen. April was only five, she was too young to help unpack or help unload boxes, so she just stayed with mom. I walked into the parlor and took a right into the living room and Mr. Kenyon was packing a box of his wife’s china. I stopped and started chatting with him and then I picked up the box and turned to go into the kitchen through the front foyer, and there was a man standing there that I thought was oddly dressed. He seemed like flesh and blood to me to the extent that as I walked past him, I said, “Good morning, sir.” I didn’t see him when I walked into the room, but he was standing in the corner of the door when I picked up the box. So, I walked into the kitchen, and I remember asking my mother who that man was with Mr. Kenyon. Her response was, “There’s nobody with Mr. Kenyon. His son is on the way, but he’s not here yet.” So, I’m sure at the age of twelve, I assumed that a neighbor had stopped by, and my mom didn’t know it.

I went back outside to the moving van and meanwhile, my sister Christine walked in, and she saw him and walked into the kitchen and asked my mom the same question. Mom was busy; she had discovered that Mr. Kenyon had not packed anything in the kitchen. So, Christine asked who the man was. Then my sister Cindy walked through with her box, and she saw him and asked mom about the man that was with Mr. Kenyon and made some comment that he was dressed funny. Then Nancy walked in behind Cindy and said, “Cindy, did you see that man with Mr. Kenyon? I did, but he just disappeared.” That was our introduction to the farm, and it all happened within the first five minutes. Right before he left, Mr. Kenyon asked my father to go for a walk with him. He said to my father, “Roger, for the sake of your family, leave the lights on at night.” My father didn’t know how to interpret that statement. In his mind, Mr. Kenyon was saying that we were moving into a new house with one bathroom on the first floor and the girls would be sleeping upstairs, and that he should leave lights on, so the kids don’t go tumbling down the stairs in the middle of the night. That’s how he interpreted what Mr. Kenyon said to him. Over the first few months we were living there, we were told by various people in the area that there was never a time when it was dark outside that every light in the house would not be on.

BD: I read that you described the house as “a portal cleverly disguised as a farmhouse.” What led you to believe the house was a portal?

AP: It wasn’t just the house, it’s the property. The barn is as active as the house is. And the property is as active as both the house and the barn. There’s an awful lot of elemental activity. There’s tons of extraterrestrial activity there. And I think it has something to do with the fact that the farm is built on top of an ancient river which was lost during the last Ice Age. It’s known as the Lost River of New Hampshire, but it actually runs all the way underground. It’s buried about 700 feet underground. And on certain days when the water is very heightened and rushing, you can actually feel the vibration of it in the land. And you can lay on the stone walls and feel the stones vibrating from the river rushing underneath our feet. And it goes directly underneath the farm, but also there are two creeks or tributaries to the Nipmuc River, which runs right along the bottom of the property just beyond the stone wall that marks the backyard. So, the river is maybe 700 or 800 yards away.

I think it has something to do with all the water that it is surrounded by. Somebody sent me a drone shot of the farm from high enough up that it was probably, the drone was probably at least 3,000 feet. And it was the most interesting photograph that I have ever seen of the farm because from the angle that the shot was taken directly over it, it looks like a pyramid in the middle of a forest.

BD: Do you have an idea of how many spirits or entities you were dealing with in the house?

AP: Well, I can tell you that there were at least a dozen of them that we were very familiar with that we saw over and over and over again. Another interesting thing too is that the, none of us had any fear of this spirit that we saw that first day moving in. It was, it was not that kind of a vibe at all. In fact, he appeared to be very sweet-natured and cheerful, and he was really focused on Mr. Kenyon. But within the first couple of nights that we lived there, my sister Cindy came crawling into bed with me and she was obviously upset. She was only eight years old and asked if she could sleep with me. And I said, “Of course.” Then I pulled back the quilt and she hopped down.

I’m like, “What’s wrong?” And she said that she could hear voices in her room. Well, the upstairs of the house, every door opens into the next bedroom. And we had all of the doors open because the house was cold and that was the way, you know, to keep the heat moving instead of being trapped in one room or the other. And it was a new house to us even though it was 250 years old. And so, we always left the doors open between our bedrooms. And when she came in, she kept saying, “I hear voices. There’s voices in the room and I’m scared and it got louder and louder. I can’t believe you didn’t hear it.” I can’t believe it didn’t wake you up.” And at first, she was at that time sharing a room with Christine. And my sister Christine has a tendency to talk in her sleep from time to time.

So, I think I just assumed that Chris was doing that. And I asked her, and she said, “No, it’s not me.” She said, “It’s a whole bunch of voices and they’re all talking at the same time. And they’re all saying the same thing.” So naturally I asked her what they were saying, and her response was, “There are seven dead soldiers buried in the wall. There are seven dead soldiers buried in the wall” over and over and over. And she said all the voices were what you would describe as monotone, even though she did not use that word. She didn’t know that word at that time. But she said they all sounded the same. Like they were all talking together, and they all had basically the same voice. And they were all saying the same thing at the same time. And they were all around her bed to the point where the floorboards were shaking. The bed was shaking. And she put the pillow over her head to try to muffle the sound. And when it became so loud that she couldn’t tolerate it anymore, that’s when she jumped out of bed and ran into my room and got in bed with me. And about three years ago, the house, I mean, nothing could be buried in the walls of the house because the house is just clapboard with horsehair plaster. That’s it. There’s no insulation. There’s no, you know, there’s some eaves that go up under the roof line. But there’s just, there’s no place that bodies could have ever been stored or hidden.

So, it didn’t make any sense. But over the years other people speculated maybe there’s someone buried out near the retaining wall behind the house or down around the stone walls. And so, the previous owner, not the woman that owns it now, but the previous owners had some people come in with ground penetrating radar. And sure enough, they found seven distinct anomalies under the stone wall at the bottom of the property just before you go into the cow pasture. And because it is illegal to exhume anything in the state of Rhode Island, all they could do is offer the photographs as evidence. But there it is. There are seven distinct images that are buried just behind the stone wall on the side of the cow pasture. And that’s where they found whatever they found. But when you consider that that house was completed as it stands now in 1736, the property was originally deeded in 1680. And the house was finished as it is now 40 years before the signing of the Declaration of Independence. And so, it really is truly an original colonial home. And it survived the Revolutionary War.

It survived the door rebellion. The King Phillips War, the Civil War. And at the time of the Civil War, the owners, and it was all through marriage. It was eight generations of one extended family that built and then lived in the South for hundreds of years. And we were the first outsiders. We have absolutely no familial attachment to the Richardson family or the Arnold family. And that house was passed through marriage because at that time women were not allowed to own property. So, through marriage it became the Arnold estate, but it actually is the Richardson Arnold homestead.

The Real ‘Conjuring’ House – Photo Credit: Visit Rhode Island

BD: At what point did Ed and Lorraine Warren become involved? There were a few things I read that made it sound like they just showed up at your house because they’d heard about the case.

AP: Yes, they really did. They just showed up at our house. Just one day they just showed up.

BD: So, your family had no idea they were coming?

AP: Well, it’s actually a little bit more complicated than that. We’d already been there for about two and a half years. A group of college students came to the house. Keith Johnson and his twin brother, and some of their friends, were paranormal investigators. And Keith said that my mother had called him and asked him to come check the house out. And my mother said, “I never called anybody.” I never told anybody other than our closest friends about the activity in the house.” Our attorney, Sam, knew. Our babysitter, Kathy, knew. And my mother’s friend, Barbara, knew. And she can’t remember anybody else that she ever said a word to about it. It was a very taboo subject back then. And, yeah, nobody wanted to open Pandora’s box. It was way more than a can of worms. It was just not something that people would talk about except for some of my peers at school, kids that had grown up in that town and knew the reputation of the house, which we were never warned about before we moved in. But, you know, I guess the best way to look at this is that the college students that came, we will never know why they showed up. Keith said my mother called him.

My mother said, “I never called anybody.” But there was some reason, and this is a spirit thing. There is some reason that he was drawn to that house and brought his team and had such extraordinary experiences on the one afternoon that they spent there that he sought out. Ed and Lorraine Warren, he and his team sought them out. They were speaking. His team was from Rhode Island College, and the Warrens were doing a lecture in the fall of that year at the University of Rhode Island. And they told the Warrens about our predicament and where we lived and who we were. The Warrens came the night before Halloween in 1973. It was either the night before Halloween or the night after Halloween. When they showed up at the door, my mother let them in the house. It was freezing out and she offered them a cup of coffee and presumed that they were lost because the farm is very remote. And then they identified themselves. My mother had absolutely no idea who they were. She had never heard their names before. And Mrs. Warren walked over to our old black stove in the kitchen, and she put her hand over her eyes and her other hand on the corner of the stove and became very quiet. And she said, “I sense a malignant entity in this house. Her name is Bathsheba.” Now, Mrs. Warren knew absolutely nothing about the history of the house or the area. Nothing. And she plucked that name out of thin air.

Bathsheba Sherman never lived in that house. She lived at the Sherman farm, which was about a mile away. There were only a few homesteads in the area at that time. She was born in 1812 and she died in 1885. And there were stories that she was in that house and had an infant in her care and that the baby died. The autopsy revealed that a needle had been impaled at the base of its skull and it was ruled that the baby’s death was from convulsions. My mother only found one article about it and it was stored in the archives of Clark University in Worcester, Massachusetts. She read about an inquest in the town of Burillville, Rhode Island. So, there was apparently a hearing in the neighboring town of Gloucester. And apparently there was an inquest and Bathsheba was questioned by a judge about her involvement with the death of the child. And apparently, she was very convincing that she had absolutely nothing to do with it. So it never went to a jury. There was never a formal indictment. It was let go and she was dismissed from the inquest. But in the court of public opinion, this young woman who had just married Judson Sherman was tried and convicted in the court of public opinion. And there were all kinds of accusations and innuendos and rumors that circulated around her for years and years, all the years of her life, that she had something to do with it.

Oh my God, if you were to ever go there and just go to a few of the graveyards around that farm, you would stumble over one little, tiny gravestone after another after another. I mean, infant mortality rates were through the roof. And it was actually bad luck to name your baby before it reached one year old. And Bathsheba Sherman was by some, I guess, accused of practicing witchcraft. She was apparently a very beautiful woman and the other women in town were threatened by her. It was back in the time when folklore and old wives tales and the accusation of being a witch could get you killed up in San Luis, which was just like an hour north of where we were living. And had it been a little bit different time, she could have paid with her life for being accused of that. But instead, it was just a vicious rumor that circulated that she had killed the baby for making a deal with the devil for eternal youth and beauty. We listen to all of that now and say, “Well, that’s just stupid. You know, that’s just superstitious nonsense. The woman would not be buried in the middle of hallowed ground in the Riverside Cemetery in Harrisville next to her husband and all of her children had there been any proof that she was a practicing witch.” I will spend the rest of my life defending her because even though I don’t know for certain if she had anything to do with the death of that child, I don’t think it’s fair to accuse someone of murder unless you have some evidence as proof. And there was no evidence back then. There was no DNA. There was nothing. And so, I just don’t think that she had anything to do with that.

I think that it was a very unfair condemnation of her. But unfortunately, the Warrens were asking my mother to be able to do an investigation of the house. My mother told her what she knew about the history of the house. After Lorraine came up with that name, my mother said, “Well, I’ve been doing some historical research on this property and some surrounding properties in the area.” And she showed Lorraine her notebook that was filled with stories and birth certificates and death certificates. On her second or third visit, Mrs. Warren asked for the notebook, and it was filled with descriptions of the spirits in the house. It was filled with drawings of the spirits that my mother had seen. And Mrs. Warren asked if she could borrow that thick notebook of absolutely invaluable information. And she wanted to make Xerox copies of it, so it tells you what time in history that was. My mother begrudgingly handed it over to her with the promise that she would get it back. But she never did return it. Mrs. Warren kept it. It was our understanding that when the movie The Conjuring was made that that notebook was sold as part of her case files. And it’s gone. We never ever saw it again. My mother asked for it back.

My mother felt that it was part of her legacy to her children. Mrs. Warren perceived it to be a haunted item and didn’t think that it belonged in the house. So, she told my mother she would return it, but then she never did and like 15 years later, she sold it. A number of things that we had found on the property went missing when they came one night with their team. It was the night of the séance that they foisted upon my mother, insisting that she was being oppressed and that she was right on the verge of possession and if they didn’t intervene on her behalf at that point that she would be lost. That was the most horrible night of my life. I was 15 when that happened. And I remember it like it just happened. It was absolutely traumatizing. I suffer PTSD from it. I swear to you I do. It was just a few minutes, but in those few minutes, I saw the dark side of existence and that is why I choose deliberately to live in the light. I will never let anything that evil touch me. I never will.

The Warrens only came maybe five times over the course of about a year and a half. And the last time that they came was after the séance. And when my father threw them out of the house that night along with their entourage, they left that house with my mother unconscious on the parlor floor. They came back to see if she had survived that night because when they left that house, they didn’t know if she was dead or alive. It was horrible. I don’t want to disparage them. They can’t defend themselves. Mrs. Warren, I think her heart was in the right place. I mean, she was a collector of objects. Their paranormal museum didn’t make itself. Every investigation she ever did, she had something from that investigation that went into their paranormal museum. And I know people personally who’ve been through it and have seen items that disappeared from our house the night of the séance that are under glass in that museum now.

BD: Do you know if that notebook was in their paranormal museum?

AP: No, it never was. Not that I know of. No, that was kept separately.

BD: What were your interactions with the Warrens like during the times that they were doing their investigation?

AP: Mrs. Warren didn’t really have anything much to do with us, with the children. She kind of turned us over to Ed, and he’s the one that interviewed us individually. My little sister, April, had a friend, a spirit friend, up in the chimney closet between the first and second bedroom. And she wouldn’t tell them about him. And he had identified himself to her as Oliver Richardson. But she wouldn’t tell Ed about him because she was afraid that the Warrens would make him go away and she loved him. And she felt very protective of him. And he was basically the same age as she was in life when he died. So, they had a very strong connection that she was not willing to jeopardize by telling them anything about him. But the rest of us just spilled our guts. It was kind of cathartic. It was a relief to be able to talk about the activity in that house with someone who believed us.

The night that Mrs. Warren originally came to the house, Mrs. Warren told my mother that I was in the room. I was a witness to this conversation. And she told my mother that the reason, even though she had known about our predicament for a number of weeks, she decided that she and her husband would not come out to the house until Halloween was because she said that’s when the veil has thinned. And I remember my mother looking at her and then kind of not laughing because it was certainly not a laughing matter, but kind of this incredulous grunt came out of her like, well, and then she just looked at her and she said, “Well then, I guess every day is Halloween at this house and there is no veil. I don’t know what you’re talking about, this veil. There’s no veil here. We share this with a lot of spirits.” One of the things that my mother resented about the film The Conjuring—I understand why they did what they did. I get it. But what they tried to do is juxtapose the devout Roman Catholic paranormal investigators, Ed and Lorraine Warren, against the godless heathen parent family. You know, like we were, I won’t say pagan because pagan is a religion also, but that we didn’t have any connection to the church. And my mother took great exception to that. She didn’t even watch the film until it had been out on DVD for more than a year.

I thought that she would be very upset about the way she was represented in the film. Some of it she thought was just so ridiculous that it was not anything that she would bother to take exception to. But the one thing that she was really offended by was that our portrayal was that of a family that had no faith. And nothing could have been further from the truth. My father was born and raised in a staunch Catholic tradition as the eldest of six boys. Church was an integral part of his childhood and his family’s life. He went to parochial school, and he served as an altar boy for years of his youth. And when he graduated from high school, he went into the Navy with the intention of serving the country and then going immediately into seminary to become a priest. That’s what my father’s life plan was. And in the interim, he met my mother and fell in love. And so, the priesthood thing was out the window. But my mother, who he met in Georgia, was a Southern Baptist. And she had to convert to Catholicism in order to marry him. All of us were baptized and all of us made our first communion and all of us were raised in the Roman Catholic Church.

It was the second year, the second Easter that we were at the farm. April was seven years old, and we went to Easter Mass, and we filled our own pew. There were so many of us. And at the very end of Mass, the priest said, “and the father and the son and the Holy Ghost.” And April turned and just with her big blue eyes just looked up at my mother and she said in her big girl, outdoor voice, “See, Mom, God has ghosts just like we do.” And every single head in that church turned and looked at our family. And as we got up to leave, the priest followed us out and he came up to my father and he said, “Mr. Perron, I would appreciate it if you would take your family and worship elsewhere.” My father was so angry and so hurt that he felt abandoned by the religion that he had invested himself into his whole life. I have rarely seen my father cry and he cried on the way home that day. As we were all getting out of our big Pontiac Bonneville car, which we called the Catholic Mobile because it had room for seven plus luggage and the family dog, my mother said, “Girls, if you want to know God, go to the woods. Go to the woods.” We never ever went back to church again. Ever. Our family has never been together in a church ever since then.

BD: That’s awful for a priest to react that way to a child.

AP: The priest was afraid. He was afraid that he had that weird family from the old, haunted house up on Round Top Road in St. Patrick’s Parish. And that others might not come back to the parish if we were there. I was already in catechism classes to make my confirmation and, you know, all my friends were Catholics. Everybody went to St. Patrick’s. I would just go and kind of sit in the back of the class and all my peers were there who were getting ready to make their final confirmation into the church. It was the nuns who were teaching us. But one night, the priest was there, and he recognized me. And sure as hell, not a week later, my parents received a letter from the Bishop, who was the head of the diocese of Providence, informing my parents that I was not welcome in confirmation classes because I asked too many questions. That was it. There was something about living in that house that made you more faithful. And I found out very early on that when all hell was breaking loose in that house and there was a lot of negative energy swirling in the house, or I felt threatened or any of my sisters felt threatened, all you ever had to do was say, “Oh God, help me. “And it stopped instantly. Good conquers evil and love conquers fear. And hatred is not the opposite of love. Fear is the opposite of love and hatred is born of fear.

I believe in my heart that the Warrens had the best of intentions. 40 years later, when I saw Mrs. Warren again out in California when she and I had been invited to preview The Conjuring before it was released, she recognized me immediately and came and wrapped her arms around me. During those three days that we spent in California together, she told me that she and Ed were in over their heads the moment they crossed the threshold of that house. They just didn’t know it. She admitted terrible mistakes were made. They didn’t mean to stir up activity, but she was a bona fide clairvoyant. She had great abilities, and she didn’t always use them to their greatest good. And I think that that was because of her fascination but also her reverence and respect for spirits. She knew that spirits were real, but unfortunately, because of her sensing Bathsheba in the house, who was really only a neighbor—Her sense of that spirit’s presence is what changed everything. Because not only did she have a sense of her presence and we didn’t find out until five decades later that her husband, Judson Sherman, died on that property. We still don’t know how he died. One of my historian friends dug up that he died at the Arnold state. We don’t know how, but that would explain why her presence would be there. You know, spirits are free to come and go as they please.

They’re not locked into an earthbound, specific location. There are differences of opinion even within our own family about how free the spirits are. My sister Cindy will still argue with me about it. She believes that they’re attached to the farm because she said that when we moved, they loved us so much that if they could have come with us, they would have. My response to her is that the spirit that was standing behind Nancy on the front porch of that house the day the whole rest of the family left for Georgia was the spirit that was standing behind my sister Cindy when we arrived at the new house in Georgia. Same exact woman; same entity standing right behind her. And Cindy’s like, “No, no, it must have been somebody else. It must have been one of my guides because the spirits are stuck there. They’re trapped there. And I’m like, “No, they’re not, babe.”

‘The Conjuring’ Movie House – Photo Credit: J. Patrick Swope

BD: How much of what we see in The Conjuring really happened?

AP: There are so many discrepancies between The Conjuring and the real story that is documented in House of Darkness House of Light, the trilogy of books that I wrote that they are unrecognizable except for the names. Everybody that was associated with the film read my books, including the actors, except for maybe the youngest children couldn’t read them. But everybody, all the adults for sure, read the books and said, “Oh, hell no, we can’t tell this story,” because they were about to invest somewhere between $25 and $30 million into making this film. And it was based predominantly on the case files of Ed and Lorraine Warren. It says right on the movie trailer, case files of Ed and Lorraine. But I gave them permission to use anything that was in my books that was the actual story, the authentic telling of our family memoir. And they wouldn’t. The screenwriters, Chad and Carey Hayes, twin brothers, lovely men, wanted desperately to include elements of the true story and they wrote some of the stories into the screenplay. And every single time the suits at New Line Cinema and Warner Brothers sent the script back and said, “Take that out, redact it. We’re not going to run people out of the theater. We’re not going to make a movie that nobody will stay to watch to the end because they are terrified.” So, The Conjuring is a very toned-down version of events.

BD: Why didn’t they want to use it?

AP: They thought it was too scary; it was too real; it was too raw. It was, I mean, people who read my trilogy of books are changed. They are never the same again. When they come up for air after that deep dive, they think about everything differently. Nothing is ever the same. A lot of my readers over the years have deemed it interactive literature. They feel like by the time they’re done reading volume three, that they lived there with us, that they grew up with us, that they know every member of my family intimately well, and that they had the same experiences that we did. There’s something about this story that unlocks a person’s third eye and opens them to the netherworld in a way that nothing else ever has or ever could. Actually, the ability to expand human consciousness is not the most important part of the trilogy. House of Darkness House of Light got its title from my mother when I was about 300 pages into the first book. And she asked me what I was going to title the trilogy, and I told her I didn’t know. And she stood next to me at her old cherry desk right here in the room in which I’m sitting speaking with you right now. I wrote those books in this house. And she just looked at me and she said, “House of Darkness House of Light,” it was both. No comma, it was both. And so, there is no comma. It’s House of Darkness House of Light as one thing because my mother believes the same way that I do; that everything is energy, and everything is consciousness, and everything is one thing.

There is no delineation between natural and supernatural, between normal and paranormal. At least there isn’t for us. This is just how our lives are now. That you cannot experience what we did immersed in that environment for a decade and be unchanged by it. And I think the greatest value in me finding the courage to finally tell our story more than, I didn’t even start writing it until more than three decades after we had left. But I finally got to an age and a place in my own mind where I didn’t care how people were going to react to it anymore. I knew that we would be scrutinized. I knew that we would be belittled. I knew that there would be mean-spirited people out there that would attack our family. And instead, we were embraced by the paranormal community worldwide.

I would not be one of the very best-selling authors in this genre worldwide had it not been for The Conjuring. So, I don’t hold any grudges. The power of a well-made feature film and the images that are placed in people’s minds is what causes them to dig deeper. And based on a true story, well where’s the true story? Who wrote the true story? All they have to do is Google the name Perron and up come the books. They’ve been read all over the world. Hundreds of thousands of copies have been sold. And they’re selling better now than they did after the film came out. So, the story is getting around. And I think that the great value of the story is not the expansion of human consciousness. It is liberating people to tell their own story. Because so many people have been touched by spirits and they’re afraid to share it. They’re afraid to speak out. They’re afraid to be criticized and to be treated as somehow less than. Or I’ve often been asked, “Was there ever a time that you questioned your own sanity?” Oh, hell yes. And that is true of every member of my family. We saw things in that house that there’s no plausible explanation other than spirits are real.

We’re still learning things about that house and about the spirits who quote unquote live there, who dwell there. And I love them. I even love the cranky ones. I do because to me it doesn’t even matter who they were, that they still are is a freaking miracle. That is magical. That is cosmic forces beyond our comprehension. One of my famous quotations is very simple, but it’s very true—To be touched by a spirit is not a curse, but a blessing. It is that rare glimpse into the realm from which we come and will all inevitably return. And I end it with, be not afraid.

Continue Reading