Connect with us

Editorials

6 Things We’d Love to See in Future ‘Texas Chain Saw Massacre’ Video Game Updates

Published

on

Despite being based on a fifty-year-old film, Gun Interactive’s The Texas Chain Saw Massacre has proven to be a bona fide hit, boasting over a million unique players during the first 24 hours of launch and being praised by critics as a more polished successor to their Friday the 13th adaptation. As a lifelong fan of the TCM franchise, I think this is amazing news, with the game’s popularity proving that there’s an active fanbase hungry for more Leatherface in popular media.

Of course, regardless of any initial success, the longevity of this new title depends on Gun’s commitment to regular updates – something that may be complicated by the fact that the developers have only managed to license the rights to the original 1974 film. With that in mind, we’ve decided to come up with a list highlighting six additions we’d love to see in future updates to the newest member of the TCM family!

While these suggestions are obviously based on personal opinion, we’ll be limiting them to plausible updates that could be made without borrowing elements from any of the numerous sequels or remakes.

With that out of the way, don’t forget to comment below with your own ideas about what could improve what is shaping up to be one of the best online horror experiences in recent memory.

Now, onto the list…


6. Tie-ins with Future TCM Projects

While any existing Texas Chainsaw sequels are currently off-limits to Gun Interactive, there’s nothing preventing the developers from kickstarting mutually beneficial partnerships with any future projects involving everyone’s favorite chainsaw-wielding killer. I mean, Netflix is rumored to already be developing a follow-up to their surprisingly successful 2022 entry in the TCM franchise, so why not feature some cross-promotional material in the game?

Even temporary cosmetic additions could be a breath of fresh air considering the limited amount of content available in the base game, though I’d absolutely love a playable version of Old-Man Leatherface with different stats and abilities. While this option would still require jumping through some legal hoops, I’d argue that it’s a lot easier than trying to purchase the rights to previous films.


5. More Story Elements

With the exception of Dead by Daylight’s shockingly elaborate mythology, in-depth lore isn’t exactly the first thing that comes to mind when players think of online horror experiences. That being said, Gun has gone the extra mile and provided us with an original prequel to the 1974 film following a group of friends looking for a missing teenager who fell into the clutches of the murderous Sawyer family.

And while I appreciate the fact that every match plays out like one possible outcome of this simulated slasher flick, my only gripe surrounding these narrative elements is the fact that most of them are told through off-screen supplemental material – something that I think should be addressed in future updates.

Hell, a new “season” of content could even continue the story with more maps and characters leading up to the events of the original movie, maybe even killing off the new members of the family so it makes sense that they don’t appear in the film.


4. Atari 2600 Leatherface

Gun’s Friday the 13th already featured plenty of nods to Jason’s previous interactive romps, but I think it’s worth pointing out that Leatherface’s presence in gaming goes back even further. The first digital Texas Chain Saw Massacre adaptation actually came out way back in 1983 on the Atari 2600, with the controversial title releasing alongside an equally infamous take on John Carpenter’s Halloween.

And like the NES’s purple Jason, the 8-bit Leatherface has already made an appearance as a cult favorite action figure, so why not bring this iconic part of the character’s history into the game as an unlockable extra? If licensing isn’t an issue, they could even negotiate with Wizard Studios to have the entirety of this controversial title included as a nostalgic bonus.

And while they’re at it, the developers might as well add some original Leatherface variants for higher level players…


3. Single Player Missions

Another element that was present in Friday the 13th but sorely missed in Texas Chain Saw Massacre is the inclusion of single-player missions. While they mostly functioned like scripted tutorials paying homage to iconic moments and tropes from the films, they also meant that the game would still have some historic value to future players once the servers inevitably shut down.

At this point, even a game mode populated by bots would be a welcome addition to TCM, even if it’s simply for archival purposes. I’d also appreciate the inclusion of an explorable hub like the Crystal Lake Cabin where we could enjoy the title’s bonus content in something a little more immersive (and creepier) than a static menu.


2. Survivors from the Original Film

sally hardesty chain saw

It may be an age-old trope at this point, but the presence of a young and relatable “Scooby gang” in Hooper’s original film was actually a bold move back in 1973. That’s why I think it’s a shame that those iconic characters aren’t present in Gun’s adaptation. At the very least, I’d argue that Sally Hardesty needs to be added to the title at some point – if only to celebrate Marilyn Burns’ legacy as one of the very first final girls.

I’d even love to see Franklin make an appearance as a playable survivor, with his disability making for some interesting gameplay opportunities while also serving as a welcome bit of representation for folks who don’t usually see themselves in video games.


1. New Game Modes

Last but not least, it’s pretty clear that The Texas Chain Saw Massacre desperately needs some new game modes in order to keep the experience feeling fresh. While there’s nothing wrong with the current state of mechanical affairs, there’s simply too much potential here for varied gameplay for the developers to ignore.

From a one-on-one slasher simulator where one player takes on the role of a final girl while the other hunts them down as Leatherface in a horrific chase sequence to a mode where survivors can band together to fight back against the Sawyers and possibly kill them, the sky is the limit when it comes to making creative use of the title’s assets.

Only time will tell, but if Gun Interactive continues to support the game, I think the future looks bright for fans of The Texas Chain Saw Massacre.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading