Movies
Monsters (limited)
“It might not feature the Kaiju Big Battel backdrop that most might hope for, but it is an exceptional film in its own right, even if that doesn’t include being a grade-A horror film.”
When it comes to horror films, there are a few central complaints that everyone makes about why many of them turn out so lackluster. But one of the big – and most prevalent – reasons is that there isn’t enough emphasis on plot and compelling characters. And if you find that’s normally your beef with the increasingly large number of dreadful duds, then perhaps MONSTERS is the film you’ve been searching for. That is, if you don’t mind it really not being a horror film.
What it is, however, is a fairly thought-provoking tale about the human condition and an entertaining romantic drama road movie that just happens to have a sci-fi horror setting. Several years after a probe crash lands in a Mexican region, it becomes infested with giant monsters and is dubbed an “infected zone.” The creatures are Lovecraftian – read: tentacled – and quite large, leaving a path of devastation wherever they go. Oh, and they also discharge hazardous fumes that are deadly to humans, which causes pretty much everyone living in, or around, the infected zones to wear gas masks. The presentation of the creatures is what proves the most ambitious and noteworthy about them: director Gareth Edwards has a background in digital effects so he created and animated the CGI creatures by himself. He also chose to show them as little as possible, only giving them about 20 minutes total of screen time – and that might even be overestimating it a bit. What he does with this tactic is give the creatures an almost omnipresent sense of dread by merely showing the destruction and human anguish left in their wake.
Enter photojournalist Andrew (Scoot McNairy), who is traveling through central Mexico, chronicling the monsters descent on our planet and society’s reaction to it. Moments into the film, he gets a call from his boss, who orders him to escort his lovely daughter, Samantha (Whitney Able), back to America safely. After their passports are stolen and they can’t take the ferry back home, the two hire a tour guide and travel the dangerous path directly through the monsters’ stomping grounds.
The growing relationship between our two main characters through their treacherous journey home is the real meat of the flick, which gives McNairy and Able plenty of time to shine in their roles. They’re practically the only characters in the film – everyone else might as well have “cannon fodder” written across their forehead – and as it goes on, their relationship progresses very organically. It’s really the subtler touches and small bits of dialogue that make their journey refreshingly realistic; in fact, it’s really the desolation of the humans they see along the way that makes their attraction to each other much more, dare I say, touching.
There’s too much ambition and heart in MONSTERS to have a meandering middle stretch completely discredit it. Not only does it create a very realistic post-apocalyptic world on an extremely modest budget, it also says a lot about the world we live in and the kindness people exude after a disaster occurs. It might not feature the Kaiju Big Battel backdrop that most might hope for, but it is an exceptional film in its own right, even if that doesn’t include being a grade-A horror film.
Editorials
Taking a Closer Look at the ‘Christmas Carol’ Ghosts of Ti West’s ‘Ebenezer’
The trailer for Ti West’s upcoming adaptation of A Christmas Carol raised a lot of eyebrows when it dropped earlier this week. While plenty of folks initially dismissed Ebenezer as a derivative project meant to cash in on the recent wave of unnecessary prequels that expand the backstory of beloved characters (such as 2023’s Wonka), Charles Dickens’ original novel already made a point of exploring Ebenezer Scrooge’s origins in detail – meaning that this new film is likely just a particularly faithful adaptation of the source material under a different name.
Couple that with the fact that the movie is being helmed by a genuine horror auteur and I think it’s safe to say that the latest iteration of the first modern ghost story is in good hands.
That being said, one detail that immediately jumped out at me during the brief teaser (other than a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it nod to Johnny Depp’s iconic bedroom death scene from the original A Nightmare on Elm Street) is the fact that many of Ebenezer’s ghosts appear to have been directly lifted from the iconic John Leech illustrations that accompanied the first edition of Dickens’ novel.
Here are a couple of stills from the trailer compared to the original artwork:

The Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come in ‘Ebenezer’ and ‘A Christmas Carol’

The Phantoms in ‘A Christmas Carol’ and ‘Ebenezer’

Marley’s Ghost in ‘Ebenezer’ and ‘A Christmas Carol’
Mainly working with old-school wood and steel engravings that would later be transferred to print, Leech was instrumental in crafting the iconic look of history’s most influential phantoms – especially since Dickens is said to have been deeply involved with the creation of these so-called “comic illustrations.”
And since the novel is commonly said to have popularized spiritualism in Victorian England, much of the ghostly iconography that we still see in genre media to this very day (including some of Ti West’s previous films) can be traced back to the author’s partnership with Leech.
Ebenezer won’t be the first A Christmas Carol adaptation to borrow heavily from these designs, but I can appreciate how Ti West is incorporating an important part of horror history into his latest film.
Ebenezer will be available in theaters starting November 13.


You must be logged in to post a comment.