Connect with us

Editorials

Can ‘Insidious: Chapter 3’ Course-Correct The Franchise?

Published

on

Insidious: Chapter 3

When Insidious was released back in 2011, it marked the resurgence of low budget horror after a decade of big budget remakes and other (lazy) major studio horror films. The film was such a success (both critically and commercially), that a sequel was inevitable. Unfortunately, Insidious: Chapter 2 was not greeted with the same accolades that its predecessor received.With Insidious: Chapter 3 coming out this weekend, we thought it might be worth discussing whether or not it’s possible for the prequel to fix where the first sequel went wrong. 

Insidious is one of my favorite horror films so far this decade, and I never expected it to be. At the time of its release, PG-13 horror didn’t inspire much confidence (and still doesn’t), and James Wan wasn’t as much of a household name as he is now. Yes, he made a name for himself with Saw, but after a few duds like Dead Silence and Death Sentence, Wan was not the hot name he once was. Once I finally saw it, I was blown away.

I know people have a lot of issues with the final act of the film, but as I’ve mentioned before, I kind of love it. The film was terrifying (don’t even tell me you didn’t get scared by that lipstick-faced demon) and heartfelt, while being grounded by the performances of Lin Shaye, Rose Byrne (whom I absolutely love), Patrick Wilson and Barbara Hershey. Hell, even the child actors were great! It also subverted many of the haunted house genre expectations (they actually move to a new house!).

Two years later, Insidious: Chapter 2 was released. It still made a healthy profit, but it was bashed by critics and audience members alike. While it isn’t necessarily the sequel I wanted, I don’t hate it like so many other people seem to. It is certainly not as good as the first one, mostly because there aren’t any surprises. It’s just another case of “more of the same.” Also, all of the character’s are pretty stupid for not realizing the Patrick Wilson character is possessed immediately at the start of the film.

My main gripe with the film isn’t the direction the plot took the “Black Bride” character, but more so with the fact that the tone of the film seemed to drastically change. It was a sillier film, and this was due to the overabundance of the Specs and Tucker characters, both of whom I actually like, in small doses. Also, the heart that was present in the first film seemed to be missing from Chapter 2.

Insidious

Now we have Insidious: Chapter 3 being released this weekend, and I’m worried, but hopeful. It’s a prequel, which I’m usually not a fan of (I don’t care about backstory; I want to see the franchise’s plot move forward), but since the series kind of screwed itself by killing off Shaye in the end of the first film, a prequel makes sense. Her cameo in Chapter 2 felt awkward.

Add to that the fact that the Lambert family is (supposedly) no longer involved, James Wan is no longer directing (though if it had to be anyone, I’m glad Leigh Whannell was his replacement) and I’m not sure what to think of this film. As I mentioned earlier, Insidious had plenty of scares and a lot of heart, both of which were things missing from Chapter 2. The best thing Chapter 3 could do is reinfuse those things back into the story.

I’m not trying to be a Negative Nancy here at all, and I certainly am not asking for the backlash I received when discussing the X-Files reboot (though all opinions are welcome in the comments below). I want this film to instill in me the excitement I felt when I left the theater from watching the first film (twice). I just think it’s important for the filmmakers to remember what made the first Insidious so good in the first place. Chapter 2 felt rushed and a little bit lazy. I don’t want that for this film.

If the goal is to have each sequel be a standalone(ish) film following a different demon-hunting expedition of Elise, Specs and Tucker, then I suppose it could be interesting (though it doesn’t sound like it). I’m not really sure where I want the franchise to go, but I hope Chapter 3 sets it back on the right track (at least tonally).

Of course, it’s too late now for them to change anything about the film, but I’m interested to know what you think. Are you excited for Chapter 3? Or did Chapter 2 leave such a bad taste in your mouth that you’ve given up on the franchise? Let me know in the comments below!

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Austin, TX with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

Editorials

‘A Haunted House’ and the Death of the Horror Spoof Movie

Published

on

Due to a complex series of anthropological mishaps, the Wayans Brothers are a huge deal in Brazil. Around these parts, White Chicks is considered a national treasure by a lot of people, so it stands to reason that Brazilian audiences would continue to accompany the Wayans’ comedic output long after North America had stopped taking them seriously as comedic titans.

This is the only reason why I originally watched Michael Tiddes and Marlon Wayans’ 2013 horror spoof A Haunted House – appropriately known as “Paranormal Inactivity” in South America – despite having abandoned this kind of movie shortly after the excellent Scary Movie 3. However, to my complete and utter amazement, I found myself mostly enjoying this unhinged parody of Found Footage films almost as much as the iconic spoofs that spear-headed the genre during the 2000s. And with Paramount having recently announced a reboot of the Scary Movie franchise, I think this is the perfect time to revisit the divisive humor of A Haunted House and maybe figure out why this kind of film hasn’t been popular in a long time.

Before we had memes and internet personalities to make fun of movie tropes for free on the internet, parody movies had been entertaining audiences with meta-humor since the very dawn of cinema. And since the genre attracted large audiences without the need for a serious budget, it made sense for studios to encourage parodies of their own productions – which is precisely what happened with Miramax when they commissioned a parody of the Scream franchise, the original Scary Movie.

The unprecedented success of the spoof (especially overseas) led to a series of sequels, spin-offs and rip-offs that came along throughout the 2000s. While some of these were still quite funny (I have a soft spot for 2008’s Superhero Movie), they ended up flooding the market much like the Guitar Hero games that plagued video game stores during that same timeframe.

You could really confuse someone by editing this scene into Paranormal Activity.

Of course, that didn’t stop Tiddes and Marlon Wayans from wanting to make another spoof meant to lampoon a sub-genre that had been mostly overlooked by the Scary Movie series – namely the second wave of Found Footage films inspired by Paranormal Activity. Wayans actually had an easier time than usual funding the picture due to the project’s Found Footage presentation, with the format allowing for a lower budget without compromising box office appeal.

In the finished film, we’re presented with supposedly real footage recovered from the home of Malcom Johnson (Wayans). The recordings themselves depict a series of unexplainable events that begin to plague his home when Kisha Davis (Essence Atkins) decides to move in, with the couple slowly realizing that the difficulties of a shared life are no match for demonic shenanigans.

In practice, this means that viewers are subjected to a series of familiar scares subverted by wacky hijinks, with the flick featuring everything from a humorous recreation of the iconic fan-camera from Paranormal Activity 3 to bizarre dance numbers replacing Katy’s late-night trances from Oren Peli’s original movie.

Your enjoyment of these antics will obviously depend on how accepting you are of Wayans’ patented brand of crass comedy. From advanced potty humor to some exaggerated racial commentary – including a clever moment where Malcom actually attempts to move out of the titular haunted house because he’s not white enough to deal with the haunting – it’s not all that surprising that the flick wound up with a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes despite making a killing at the box office.

However, while this isn’t my preferred kind of humor, I think the inherent limitations of Found Footage ended up curtailing the usual excesses present in this kind of parody, with the filmmakers being forced to focus on character-based comedy and a smaller scale story. This is why I mostly appreciate the love-hate rapport between Kisha and Malcom even if it wouldn’t translate to a healthy relationship in real life.

Of course, the jokes themselves can also be pretty entertaining on their own, with cartoony gags like the ghost getting high with the protagonists (complete with smoke-filled invisible lungs) and a series of silly The Exorcist homages towards the end of the movie. The major issue here is that these legitimately funny and genre-specific jokes are often accompanied by repetitive attempts at low-brow humor that you could find in any other cheap comedy.

Not a good idea.

Not only are some of these painfully drawn out “jokes” incredibly unfunny, but they can also be remarkably offensive in some cases. There are some pretty insensitive allusions to sexual assault here, as well as a collection of secondary characters defined by negative racial stereotypes (even though I chuckled heartily when the Latina maid was revealed to have been faking her poor English the entire time).

Cinephiles often claim that increasingly sloppy writing led to audiences giving up on spoof movies, but the fact is that many of the more beloved examples of the genre contain some of the same issues as later films like A Haunted House – it’s just that we as an audience have (mostly) grown up and are now demanding more from our comedy. However, this isn’t the case everywhere, as – much like the Elves from Lord of the Rings – spoof movies never really died, they simply diminished.

A Haunted House made so much money that they immediately started working on a second one that released the following year (to even worse reviews), and the same team would later collaborate once again on yet another spoof, 50 Shades of Black. This kind of film clearly still exists and still makes a lot of money (especially here in Brazil), they just don’t have the same cultural impact that they used to in a pre-social-media-humor world.

At the end of the day, A Haunted House is no comedic masterpiece, failing to live up to the laugh-out-loud thrills of films like Scary Movie 3, but it’s also not the trainwreck that most critics made it out to be back in 2013. Comedy is extremely subjective, and while the raunchy humor behind this flick definitely isn’t for everyone, I still think that this satirical romp is mostly harmless fun that might entertain Found Footage fans that don’t take themselves too seriously.

Continue Reading