Connect with us

Editorials

[Exhumed & Exonerated] ‘The Addams Family’ (1991)

Published

on

Every decade has its ups and downs when it comes to cinema, no matter the genre.  Horror fans love to loft on high the output of the ‘30s & ‘40s, the ‘70s & ‘80s, and the more recent decades.  More often than not, however, the 1990s are labeled as the worst decade for the genre.  Not only that, but ‘90s horror tends to be written off as a whole, beyond a handful of undisputed classics.  The purpose of Exhumed & Exonerated: The ‘90s Horror Project, is to refute those accusations by highlighting numerous gems from the decade.  Stone cold classics will be tackled in this column from time to time, but its main purpose will be to seek out lesser-known and/or less-loved titles that I think deserve more attention and respect from fans.  Let the mayhem begin!

The Addams Family

Directed by Barry Sonnenfeld
Screenplay by Caroline Thompson & Larry Wilson
Produced by Scott Rudin & Bonnie Arnold
Starring Raul Julia, Angelica Huston, Christopher Lloyd, Christina Ricci, Jimmy Workman, Elizabeth Wilson, Dan Hedaya, Dana Ivey, Carel Struycken, Christopher Hart, and Judith Malina
Released on November 22, 1991

Fester Addams has been missing for a long time. His brother, family patriarch Gomez Addams (Raul Julia), feels responsible for Fester’s departure and laments the decades that have passed without him. Each year on the anniversary of his disappearance, the titular family holds séance and pleads for his return. On the 25th anniversary of his disappearance, however, they finally receive an answer. A man (Christopher Lloyd) fitting Fester’s description knocks on the door of their mansion, with a shady psychiatrist named  (Elizabeth Wilson) and the Addams’ lecherous lawyer Tully Alford (Dan Hedaya) in tow.

AddamsFamily2

According to them, Fester was lost in the Bermuda Triangle and now has amnesia. Is this man really Fester? The family appears split on the matter. Gomez and son Pugsley (Jimmy Workman) immediately take him at his word. Morticia (Angelica Huston) has her suspicions. Daughter Wednesday (Christina Ricci) outright considers him an imposter. As for Granny (Judith Malina), Lurch (Carel Struycken), and It (Christopher Hart’s hand)? Well, they seem too busy worrying about other things to weigh in on the situation.

Initially we as an audience know from the outset that Christopher Lloyd’s Fester is really a dimwitted con artist named Gordon Craven. In league with his mother, Abigail Craven (Wilson), and Mr. Alford, the lot of them aim to swindle the Addams’ out of the immense family fortune. As the film goes on, however, you no longer become sure if Gordon is really Gordon, if Gordon is really Fester, or if Gordon has simply decided to become Fester for real. This is only but a part of the beauty of this film, which easily ranks among the best comic (and TV)-to-film adaptations ever produced.

The look of the film is spot-on. Dark and spooky enough to evoke the characters’ horrific pastimes and ideals, but still bright enough to bring across the property’s trademark satirical wit. It has crackerjack pacing, with each joke, gag, or sly remark landing like a magically wielding hammer atop a perfectly primed nail. Even the side remarks, many of which go unnoticed upon the first viewing or two, are perfectly timed. The script is, simply put, wonderful. Hailing from the writers of Beetlejuice, Edward Scissorhands, and The Nightmare Before Christmas, it’s no wonder. The film carries a definite Tim Burton vibe at times. This is something that then-first time director Barry Sonnenfeld seemed to lean into to a degree, both here and on a few of his other projects that followed (such as Men in Black).

AddamsFamily3

Writing isn’t everything, as even the best material can be undone by a mediocre or bad performance. No worries with The Addams Family on that front, however. Virtually every role is perfectly cast to the point where I find it hard to imagine much anyone else in these parts, at least within the timeframe it was produced. Raul Julia is practically beaming with love for his role as the boisterous Gomez, for whom every day is a new dark delight. Angelica Huston matches him every step of the way as the more contained, but no less passionate, Morticia. I could watch these two interact for hours on end.

Christina Ricci’s Wednesday Addams might be the best of the film’s triumvirate of MVPs, however. There’s a reason the character has become a meme machine in recent years. Ricci’s turn in the role is just as iconic as Julia’s and Huston’s performances. All three are roles for the ages.

Christopher Lloyd is great as always, excelling here in what amounts to a dual role. Struycken, Malina, and Workman have less to work with as Granny, Lurch, and Puglsey, but they fill out their parts well nonetheless. On the villainous side of the coin, Hedaya and Wilson both dish out deliciously vile antagonists, whose comeuppance is very much earned and rooted for.

AddamsFamily4

More than anything, it’s the humor that stands out for me after all of these years. Whether it’s a sight gag like the Addams’ pouring a boiling pot of tar onto Christmas carolers at the beginning (you can see the tar on the stoop throughout the film after) or Wednesday’s continuous attempts to kill her brother or Gomez continuing to call Sally Jessy Raphael about where he can find those brainwashing voodoo doctors that she’s doing a show about, the film is absolutely hysterical from start to finish. It’s the kind of humor that most (if not all) horror fans should be able to have a blast with.

I liked the film a lot upon release 25 years ago, but I absolutely love it now. Hell, the sequel, 1993’s Addams Family Values (which I’ll cover eventually), is just as good! I don’t know if the creations of Charles Addams will ever be revived again on the big or small screen anytime soon. There was talk of an animated film awhile back, but that seems to have died out. If it ever is adapted again, the legacy of both the original series and this film (and its sequel) has certainly set the bar high.

To those who haven’t seen it in a while (or at all), The Addams Family might not seem like traditional horror fodder beyond surface looks. Trust me when I say that it absolutely fits the bill as a horror comedy. It is not only one of the best genre outings of the ‘90s, but also one of my all-time favorite horror comedies. Both this film and Values are on Netflix, so if you’re curious to finally see them or revisit them, there’s no better time than now.

Up Next: The Ugly (1997)

Previously On…
Species | Mute Witness | Popcorn | Wishmaster | Alien 3 | Cast A Deadly Spell
Disturbing Behavior | The Sect | The Addams Family

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading