Connect with us

Editorials

Sweets to the Sweet – ‘Candyman’ Celebrates 25 Years

Published

on

This month marks the 25th anniversary of Bernard Rose’s Candyman – a beautiful and haunting film that is just as effective, relevant and terrifying today as it was upon its release. Based on a short story by Clive Barker, Candyman gives us a horror boogeyman who lives within his own legend, killing to spread rumors of his deeds and then feeding on belief.

In Candyman, graduate student Helen Lyle (Virginia Madsen) is studying the history and effects of urban legends. Her research takes her to the Chicago housing project, Cabrini-Green. Long known for crime and gang-perpetrated violence, it is also home to the legend of Candyman – a vicious figure with a hook in place of his hand who will appear should you dare whisper his name five times while staring into a mirror.

Like all good ghost stories, Candyman’s legend is rooted in fact. He was born the son of an affluent freed slave. His father had achieved a great amount of wealth after the Civil War and Candyman was raised as a part of Chicago society. That is, until he made the mistake of falling in love with the daughter of a wealthy businessman. Candyman was hunted down and viciously murdered by an angry mob in the location where Cabrini-Green would eventually come to be built, and his spirit and legend are a very present part of the complex. Kept alive and fed through stories of horrific violence, his presence is more than a scary story told in the dark, as he hold sway over the residents of the projects. As Helen’s research brings her closer to his story, she finds herself becoming more entwined in his influence, becoming a part of his legend herself.

The film is singular in the way it portrays its boogeyman. The Candyman relies on the legend surrounding him to flourish, keeping the people of Cabrini-Green whispering and glancing fearfully into the shadows for some sign of his presence. He feeds on the anxiety and fear generated from his story. Rose skillfully builds on the way ghost stories are spread to tell the tale of Candyman, using the idea of how legends evolve and last to give its titular character life and power. Candyman was created through an act of violence, but he continues to exist because his legend has become larger than life itself.

A particularly fascinating component of this film is the setting of the story. We rarely see ghost stories told in such a distinctly urban environment. Small towns, suburbs, old houses and isolated locales are plentiful, but we don’t often see a ghost story set among the concrete spires of a city. Ghosts, at their core, represent something old and antiquated. Something of the past. Cities represent the present. The now. The two rarely come together in supernatural storytelling, but Candyman demonstrates that even the most modern of settings can have a dark backstory that haunts it to its core.

This setting is further solidified by giving the Candyman character distinctly American roots. Barker’s original story, set in Liverpool, examined class as an underlying theme, and didn’t really give the Candyman a backstory.  By setting it in the United States and making Candyman a Black man, Rose added another layer of complexity to the film. This incorporation of race ties the film more distinctly to America’s history and links it to inequalities that are still a part of our society today. Candyman was killed by a racist mob, and his spirit now resides and roots its legend in the walls of a housing complex – a place where the new elite have pushed the poorer people of color. He is a spirit that was very of his time when he was killed, and is still of our time in the modern setting of the story – a link between past and present.

The story is brought to life by an incredible cast. Genre legend Tony Todd inhabits the role of Candyman beautifully. Coming on the heels of Tom Savini’s Night of the Living Dead remake in 1990, Candyman cemented Todd as a horror centerpiece. His portrayal of the tragic boogeyman is both alluring and terrifying. Like Helen, we are inexplicably drawn to Candyman whenever he’s onscreen, yet fearful of him at the same time. His deep voice softly imploring her, “Be my victim” is beautifully hypnotic. As entrancing as he is, he is also brutal. The film doesn’t skimp on the gore, and Candyman is not afraid to rip his victims to pieces as he sees fit. It is this brutality that makes his allure all the more dangerous.

Virginia Madsen provides an excellent counterpart in Helen. She is intelligent and insightful and refuses to be deterred as she searches for the truth behind the events terrorizing Cabrini-Green. Her ambition is ultimately her undoing when it leads her headlong into Candyman’s grasp, but it is also what keeps her fighting. Kasi Lemmons and Xander Berkeley round out the cast in vital supporting roles.

As vital as the story and cast is in bringing this classic to life, so too is the phenomenal score by Philip Glass. Beautiful and haunting, it perfectly sets the tone of the film.  It captures the elegance of the world that Candyman came from while also creating an air of unease and mystery.

Candyman is a unique and fascinating film that captured our minds and nightmares twenty-five years ago and still has them in its grip today. This is a film that is socially relevant and amazingly effective. It is a tale for the ages that will draw you in and leave you whispering Candyman’s name in the dead of night…just be sure you don’t get to number five.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading