Connect with us

Editorials

No, Blumhouse Isn’t Remaking ‘Friday the 13th’

Published

on

This past weekend we collectively celebrated when production officially began on the David Gordon Green-directed Halloween, which will bring Michael Myers back to the big screen this coming October. The resurrection of the Shape came to fruition when Bloody Disgusting exclusively reported that Dimension Films had lost the rights to the franchise, which allowed Blumhouse to make a deal with Miramax through their distribution deal with Universal Pictures. The entire entertainment community has been watching closely as Halloween is one of the biggest horror franchises. With that, many sites are already fishing for the next big story, allowing clickbait headlines to turn into fraudulent news pieces.  It’s with great irritation that I’m having to report that, no, Blumhouse is not remaking Friday the 13th.

While the “news” spread this past weekend, this all started back in October when this YouTube interviewer was fishing for clickbait. When asked, “What classic horror movie would you like to reboot or remake?”

“I really wanted to do Friday the 13th,” Jason Blum replied. “I would love to do that movie. Maybe someday we’ll get to do that one?”

First of all, this interview is from October.  An uninformed clickbait website writer picked it up late (this past weekend), claiming that not only is Blumhouse interested in remaking Friday the 13th, but they are. That’s not what he said. Blum was simply being candid and answering the interviewer’s question. He would like to if the opportunity were to ever present itself. It’s a fun quote, but there’s nothing factual or all that newsworthy shared.

Once people assumed that Blumhouse was connected to Friday the 13th, it led to a second round of uninformed fluff pieces staged for clicks. You see, Universal Pictures announced a new slate of Blumhouse titles – one of which would be released on Friday, December 13, 2019. “An untitled Blumhouse movie coming out on Friday the 13th?! It must be a remake of Friday the 13th!”

WRONG.

In June of 2013, Warner Bros. Pictures traded their Friday the 13th rights to Paramount Pictures in exchange for Christopher Nolan’s Interstellar. It was a five-year deal that would allow Paramount to resurrected Jason Voorhees without Warner Bros. interfering. Unforuntaltey, a change in climate (found-footage dying) and leadership (Paramount playing musical chairs with development execs), as well as the flop of Rings, caused the Voorhees family to remain dormant. Now, the rights are about to revert back to Warner Bros. Pictures. Simply put, Warner Bros. will soon have the rights to Friday the 13th, not Universal. This would mean that, once the rights revert, Warners would have to hire Blumhouse to produce a new film for them. This makes absolutely no sense considering Blumhouse has a deal directly with Universal Pictures.

Furthermore, there’s an ongoing rights dispute with Victor Miller, who is claiming rights to the franchise. This is said to be resolved by this coming summer, but in the meantime, nothing is going to happen with the Friday the 13th franchise. Our inside sources tell us this is very real, and potentially hugely problematic. With that said, there is one way Blumhouse could end up with the opportunity to remake F13: If Miller were to win the suit, he could then take the property to Blumhouse and distribute through Universal.

This is not to say that Blumhouse won’t one day find a way to make their own Friday the 13th, but today it’s nothing short of irresponsible reporting. The only news that we have to share is that the rights will be reverting back to Warners soon and that this lawsuit with Miller is quite real, and potentially devastating to the franchise. All eyes should be on the courts to see what they rule in the coming months. I know this feels like a shot to the head, but until then, let’s just be happy that Michael Myers is alive and well.

Horror movie fanatic who co-founded Bloody Disgusting in 2001. Producer on Southbound, V/H/S/2/3/94, SiREN, Under the Bed, and A Horrible Way to Die. Chicago-based. Horror, pizza and basketball connoisseur. Taco Bell daily. Franchise favs: Hellraiser, Child's Play, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Halloween, Scream and Friday the 13th. Horror 365 days a year.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading