Reviews
[TV Review] “Scream” Episode 2.10: ‘The Vanishing’
Well my #1 suspect got killed off tonight, so I have no clue as to who the killer can be. My bruised ego aside, this was one of Scream’s strongest episodes of the season and the main reason is because it narrowed down its focus to a few core characters. The entirety of the episode focused on Noah and Zoe’s kidnappings, with the occasional drop-in on Acosta and Maggie. This focus allowed Scream to actually tell a suspenseful story. It wasn’t perfect, but it sure was entertaining.
It was fairly obvious from the get-go that Zoe was going to be a goner this episode. While I wouldn’t put it past Scream to go yet another week without adding to the body count, it was reasonable to assume that either Noah or Zoe was going to die. Zoe has been a problematic character this season because she just hasn’t been that compelling of a character. In the early episodes of the season her scenes felt shoehorned in until her romance with Noah started developing. Kiana Ledé has been fine in the role, but her chemistry with John Karna hasn’t ever gelled on screen, with the buildup to their sex scene last week being the only time their relationship wasn’t grating.
Still, it’s hard not to feel bad for Noah in this situation. The circumstances surrounding Zoe’s death were a tip of the hat to the *SPOILER ALERT* “It’s not live” ending of Saw II and the *DOUBLE SPOILER ALERT* buried alive ending of The Vanishing, where the episode gets its namesake. The first woman Noah ever loved was taken from him so quickly. How he handles Zoe’s death will be anyone’s guess, but we’re most likely in for a very different Noah after this.
Noah’s kidnapping scene was a nice little homage to Randy’s death from Scream 2, right down to the spinning camera. Kevin Kolsch and Dennis Widmyer (the directors of Starry Eyes) did a great job nailing the intensity that the characters were feeling by mirroring the camera movements with their emotion. Bringing them back to direct another episode wouldn’t be the worst idea. Frequently cutting to Noah in the coffin exposed my cleithrophobia (yes, it’s different from claustrophobia), but I could have done without the Zoe hallucinations. It’s easy to see why they included her (to give Ledé more to do and emphasize Noah’s attraction to her to make her death more impactful), but it wasn’t necessary.

The majority of the episode was spent with Audrey and Emma, as they worked out their differences whilst hunting for Noah. Audrey confesses that she knew Piper was Emma’s half sister the entire time, which almost makes you want to go back and watch the first season and watch Taylor-Klaus. With this information, it’s more understandable that Audrey was so terrified of telling Emma about her relationship with Piper (and that she was mad at Emma for breaking her heart). It still doesn’t completely justify her childish behavior all season, but it makes it somewhat more tolerable.
We didn’t get to spend much time with Acosta and Maggie this week but we did get to see some flashbacks to their teenage years. It turns out that he helped Maggie bury a knife that Brandon had used to kill someone. Not much more information was given so it’s not exactly the most compelling part of the episode, but at least he found the killer’s lair in the farm house. Maggie revealed how she would communicate with Brandon as a child: by placing notes in the tree outside her house. In the present, she places another note in that very same tree in an attempt to save Emma’s life. This should be a touching moment, but it just enforces the idea that Maggie is a terrible parent who has barely been around all season (seriously, why isn’t she watching Emma like a hawk?). If your daughter is being stalked by a psychotic killer, maybe you should skip town until he’s caught. Don’t be placing notes in trees. That’s a little too passive for a situation of that magnitude.
“The Vanishing” gave us the best episode of Scream in weeks. Let’s hope it can keep up the momentum for the season’s final two episodes.
Random Notes
- Next week’s episode is titled “Heavenly Creatures“, after Peter Jackson’s most underrated film (it stars a very young Kate Winslet) and is directed by Jamie Travis, who directed the very underrated sex comedy For a Good Time, Call… That’s a weird pairing, but I’m intrigued to see what results from it.
- Eli witnesses Maggie placing the note in the tree. That can’t be good.
- That shot from inside Piper’s chest cavity was pretty neat, wasn’t it?
- “Long time listener. First time caller.” -I didn’t realize this was Noah’s first call from the killer. It’s about damn time!
- “How are my favorite final girls?”
- “He killed a hotel clerk just to prove a point!”
- Audrey looks around Noah’s room for two seconds before saying there’s too much stuff and it’s impossible.
- “Somebody’s living in that pig farm.” -This is just a phrase that sounds funny when spoken so seriously, but Fitzgerald sold it.
- “Well that’s not ominous.” -Audrey, on the scythe locking the doors to the pig farm.
- “You go outside and look in that field of daffodils and I’ll stay and look here.” -I cannot be the only one laughing at these lines, can I?
- Only two episodes left in the season everyone! Since my #1 Suspect was killed, who do you think is the killer now? I really don’t think it’s Gustavo (too obvious). Maybe it’s Aunt Tina? Whatever happened to her subplot with the mayor? She just disappeared off the face of the earth.
Reviews
‘Hungry’ Review – Finally, a Film Brave Enough to Call Out Hippos for the Monsters They Truly Are
When it comes to the animal attack subgenre of horror, there’s a hierarchy of sorts with the wildlife in question. Killer shark movies are easily the most ubiquitous, while alligators/crocodiles, dogs, bears, and snakes probably lead the rest of the pack.
It’s often worth paying attention, though, when a filmmaker targets a more atypical animal threat, including the likes of Jonathan King’s Black Sheep or Juan Piquer Simón’s Slugs. A new contender rumbles its way onto the screen this month, and while we all grew up thinking hippos are rotund cuties, the truth is far more frightening – this hippo is Hungry.
Sistine (Madison Davenport) and her best friend, Hannah (Olivia Bernstone), are enjoying a vacation in New Orleans, hoping to drown out their troubles back home. They sign up for an early morning bayou tour known for its alligator sightings and are joined by four other tourists and the boat’s skipper, Rodrigo (Michel Curiel). An uneventful trip sees Rodrigo take the group off the beaten path, but when an animal in the water capsizes their boat, the group finds themselves trapped in the swamp by something unexpected and deadly.
It’s a hippo. There’s a hippo in the bayou, and it’s not happy about all these pesky people.

From Joy Houck’s Creature from Black Lake to Walter Hill’s Southern Comfort to Adam Green’s Hatchet, the movies have warned us time and again not to go into the swampy bayous of Louisiana. Those cautionary tales are appreciated, though, as bigfoot, inbred hicks, and undead serial killers are a very real threat. But hippos? In the bayou? Well, that just seems silly.
And yet, Hungry plays its blubbery, big-toothed threat with deadly seriousness, and it’s all the better for it. “But Rob,” I can already hear some of you saying, “just yesterday you reviewed the new shark attack film, Chum, and said it suffered from taking itself too seriously. What gives?” For one thing, you’re misquoting me, but more importantly, the reference there was more of an observation on the animal attack subgenre successes as a whole. The “fun” ones tend to succeed more often than their more serious counterparts, but a dramatic and thrilling time can still be found with filmmakers who know what they’re doing.
Chum may be serious, but it’s also poorly written/performed, lacking in any degree of tension, devoid of personality, and so on. By contrast, Hungry lets its suspense build on the backs of engaging characters, good performances, and believable writing. Only one of its ensemble is obnoxious – a major feat for this kind of film – but even then, their motivations are both well-written and understandable.
The rest of the characters are people you’d be happy to see survive the night, and rather than looking forward to the next kill, director James Nunn and his cast leave us uncertain and nervous about who’s going to go belly up. The nervous business traveler wanting to get back to her kids? The family of three celebrating lost loved ones while on their vacation? Joaquim de Almeida’s Walker, an old hunter, is introduced saying, “The only cute hippo is a dead hippo,” so you pretty much know where he’ll end up.

To that end, the film teases out its hippo’s first appearance until well into the ninety-minute running time. We get ripples and splashes, but it’s only around the midway point that we get our first real look at the beast, and it looks fantastic. Nunn goes on to show the hippo in all its glory, and it’s a convincing antagonist brought to life through practical prosthetic effects and digital work. From the ear twitches to the beast’s giant maw opening wide with awe and malice, the hippo’s presence feels part of the action. There’s a tangible nature to it, something practical effects excel at while digital effects sometimes fail to convince of, and both succeed here with quality work from all involved.
While we get brief exteriors early on and some visually appealing drone shots, the bulk of the film unfolds on what looks to be a highly believable, set-dressed water tank (but could very well be an actual location, in which case, kudos to the team). It’s wholly convincing as a section of the bayou, complete with shoulder-high water and arching, twisting trees emerging into the sky. The film was shot in Malta, which is, coincidentally, where Chum was filmed as well.
Nunn, who also wrote Hungry, is now ten films deep into a fairly interesting career as a genre filmmaker. He’s made four movies with Scott Adkins, three of which are certified action bangers (with 2016’s Eliminators in particular being an underrated gem). He dipped a toe into the animal attack subgenre back in 2022 with the aforementioned Shark Bait, and it’s clear he learned some lessons from that endeavor, as its first hour is an engaging, attractively shot feature that sinks fast as soon as its poorly rendered shark becomes a lead character. Hungry improves on every aspect of that film, with its biggest step up being in regard to the effects.

If there’s an area or two where Hungry lacks bite, it’s in both its gore and its ending. There are numerous kills here, but the nature of the attacks and the choices made by Nunn mean none of them result in gory assaults or outcomes. We’re shown the torn apart corpse of an alligator early on, but most of the human kills see them attacked and dragged underwater, leaving nothing but a blood spill behind. Similarly, while the ending encounter satisfies, it still feels like it should have been a bigger confrontation. Neither of these aspects really hurt the film, but a bolstering of the gore and ending antics would have definitely upped the film’s ultimate entertainment value and rewatchability.
When all is said and done, Hungry is a genuinely solid animal attack film that succeeds in making its creature threat thrilling, entertaining, and, dare I say, educational? Title notwithstanding, the film acknowledges that hippos are vegetarians, meaning the five hundred or so people they kill every year – a true fact! – are slaughtered not out of hunger, but out of spite, self-defense, or a desire to play “land orca” while tossing around us fragile humans like we’re little more than seals in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Characters are grounded and engaging, the film moves well between suspense, character beats, and action, and the effects used to bring the hippo to life are highly effective and never feel like distractions. Drop those expectations of a Hungry Hungry Hippo romp, and settle in for a terrific little survival thriller about an angry, angry hippo instead.
Chomp chomp.
Hungry releases in select theaters today, June 3, before arriving on VOD on June 23, 2026.


You must be logged in to post a comment.