Editorials
Interview: Andre Ovredal, Director of ‘TrollHunter’!!
The latest indie pickup from Magnolia’s genre arm Magnet Releasing is director Andre Ovredal’s TrollHunter (reviews), a found footage film from Norway about a group of three college students who set out to make a documentary about a supposed bear poacher named Hans, only to discover that he’s actually been sanctioned by the government to track down and kill the enormous trolls that roam the Norwegian countryside.
An engaging film that blends “shaky-cam” style with large-scale special effects, The Troll Hunter releases on VOD May 6th and in limited theaters on June 10th. Check out B-D reporter Chris Eggertsen’s exclusive interview with Ovredal inside to get his take on the film’s Jurassic Park influence, the buzz-worthy festival run that led to Magnet acquiring it for North American release, and what the future holds in store for him as a director.
Beginning a VOD run on May 6th and with limited theatrical dates to follow June 10th, director Andre Ovredal’s impressive second feature (after a student film he made in 2000 entitled Future Murder) The Troll Hunter is an action/horror movie that combines the “found footage” style of The Blair Witch Project with the large-scale spectacle of Jurassic Park. Though Cloverfield already did more or less the same thing, The Troll Hunter differs from that film pretty significantly in a tonal sense, imbuing its outrageous premise with a knowing sense of humor and a sly political subtext.
I recently had the opportunity of sitting down with the unassuming Ovredal, a Norwegian native who graduated with a film degree from California’s Brooks Institute, to talk about the film, whose buzz on the festival circuit subsequently led to a North American distribution deal with Magnet Releasing.
Bloody Disgusting: I was so impressed by the special effects, particularly given the budget you were working with. Talk about how came up with the design of how these trolls would look. I heard there’s a book that you took the inspiration from.
Andre Ovredal: Yeah, there is a book with all the folklore of Norway that’s called ‘The Fairy Tales of Asbjørnsen and Moe’. It has maybe 100 fairy tales, and a third of them include trolls. And there are some wonderful drawings in these books as well, that were made in the 18th century, that depict trolls as huge, big, wonderful monsters. But they do have clothes, and they do have this kind of human interaction, which I took away. I wanted to make them into animals, so they’d become really scary and…take away any inkling of cuddliness.
But they still have a funny look to them, because [they have] big noses…so that’s the basis of it. And then of course I chose some…I mean, there aren’t, in Norwegian folklore aren’t actually different trolls. They’re just kind of drawn differently. But I made them into species, or races, I guess…so that I could kind of create a mythology that only exists in this movie. And then I describe basically in the script trolls that I wanted to have on screen, from the one with three heads to one which is more like an ox, kind of muscular bull troll.
But they all are…they’re characters. There are different characteristics. One is almost…the three-headed creature, you know, obviously it’s kind of schizophrenic because if you have three brains, you’re gonna want to go all kinds of directions. And [then] to the big old troll at the very end that really kind of has this melancholy about it. And after I wrote the script, I gave the artist the drawings…you know, everybody in Norway knows these drawings, so I don’t really even need to show them.
But we worked on designs that were very close to that, but [they] still had to have their own individual feeling to them. So we mixed in references from other places, but we deliberately stayed away from all other depictions of monsters and trolls from other films and cultures.
BD: Where were the other inspirations that you pulled in?
AO: Mostly from animals and humans. Anything from really old people, like 70, 80 year old people who were kind of muscular, for example, like in bodybuilding contests. And you could really see how old bodies look. That’s more interesting than monsters in a way, as a reference. But this is something that…especially one of our main designers, Rune Spaans, he really went at it with this kind of research and came up with…really, you can feel it in the design of the trolls that he designed that he [took] from reality. I really appreciated that, because everything else is supposed to be real, including the trolls.
BD: Are you surprised at the response this has gotten in America, given how specific the film’s premise is to Norway? It’s played to really positive reception.
AO: Oh yeah, yeah, absolutely, I’m very surprised by that, because originally the film was geared to a regional audience. But it’s so great to see that it’s transcending and becoming something that other cultures who aren’t so used to the troll mythology are still able to respond to the film in such a great way. It’s wonderful, and absolutely surprising.
BD: Well I think a lot of it is that we’re so tired of vampires, and zombies, and werewolves, and this is a cool new monster that we can kind of incorporate more now.
AO: Yeah.
BD: I did notice a lot of a ‘Jurassic Park’ influence, particularly in the scene where they’re being chased in the car and you see the troll coming up behind them in the sideview mirror.
AO: That was an homage. I love that shot in ‘Jurassic Park’! But also, it was a practical thing because while we were shooting inside the car, we have to shoot inside the car because that’s where the camera is. And [when] we turned around we couldn’t see out the window…actually, I originally wanted to shoot out the back window, because that would’ve been really impressive as well, but it wasn’t possible. So then it became the homage solution.
BD: ‘Cloverfield’ is the closest film I can think of that uses the ‘found footage’ format with a giant being. Was there anything you took from that film?
AO: Actually, not so much from that film. I think ‘Jurassic Park’ was a much bigger reference in how to depict big creatures on screen. Because I love the clarity of the way Spielberg did it. You know, when the dinosaur comes out, that’s what we’re gonna see…you can wait and you can hide it for awhile, but when it comes, you’d better deliver. He did that, and I was trying to do the same thing.
And I think documentary films have actually been more of an inspiration than other documentary films…not specific documentaries, but just a way of making a documentary was what we researched more than anything.
BD: Yeah, I think I was reading that you tried to stray a bit from the ‘Blair Witch’ aesthetic, with the severe ‘shaky-cam’ type movements, and it does seem like you did try to be somewhat more precise than that.
AO: Yeah, I think there are like three levels to the documentary form in a film. You have when the camera crew is under control, [when] they’re filming, interviewing, and shooting whatever they want. And then the next one is they’re tagging along and they’re [saying], you know, ‘What is going on now? What is he doing now?’ And the next level is basically escaping and being in a fearful situation where they’re completely out of control and just surviving, but the camera’s obviously running.
BD: I heard that you didn’t originally intend for this to be a found footage film, but it seems fortuitous that you did end up going in that direction considering how big that sub-genre is in America right now.
AO: Actually, I’m not quite sure where you heard that, because it was always meant to be a mockumentary. [Interviewer’s note: The press kit clearly states that the mockumentary approach “wasn’t his original plan”] I mean, I thought of that five minutes after thinking of the idea. It’s like, I’m living in a small country with very small budgets and it’s like, ‘ok…how do we do Jurassic Park on this budget?’…Actually, not just that but it really helps the story because you get to be very much at the center of the things, with the camera. It’s always in your face in a way, the whole story. And also it’s adding to the absurdity of everything to insist so intensely that it’s real.
BD: I also heard earlier that Universal was planning an English-language remake, and I’m just wondering what your thoughts are on that. Financially it’s obviously good for you, but…
AO: Actually, we’re not really talking with Universal about that. It was kind of a discussion at the beginning of our relationship with them. But now there is another production company here that…I hope we’re signing the contract very soon. But that should be very exciting. They’re really a fantastic company, fantastic people.
BD: Can you say who the company is?
AO: Not yet.
BD: Is that something that you’d direct?
AO: I don’t think so, because I feel like I want to expand beyond the mockumentary genre right now. I mean, I might revisit it later, and if it takes awhile…if I get to do another film in the mean[time] maybe I’ll get back to ‘Troll Hunter’ the remake, or if they [don’t] find another director for it, I don’t know. It’s kind of a very open situation right now. But I’m definitely very…I don’t want to do another mockumentary as my next film. That’s a very important thing to me.
BD: What is next? I’ve heard a little bit about a monster comedy you’re doing with Chris Columbus.
AO: Not really, it’s there, and we’re working on it…but [we’re] keeping it a little bit silent for now.
BD: As far as ‘Troll Hunter’, there’s quite a bit of political subtext in the film, some of which is quite specific to Norway. Do you think that stuff will translate to American audiences?
AO: Oh yeah, I think it translates very well. I think everybody has this [suspicion of] the government keeping secrets. And I think actually that idea is even stronger here than in Norway, this kind of suspicion toward the government. I have myself seen theater audiences here in America reacting very well to the scenes when he starts explaining how it all works out, about him being a worker, and he complains about the working conditions and that kind of stuff. And the audience laughs very much, so I think they totally get it.
BD: I love the epilogue when you have the footage from a real-life press conference and the [Norwegian] Prime Minister [Jens Stoltenberg] says something about trolls, and obviously he’s not talking about your kind of trolls, but I love the stunned look on the guys’ face sitting next to him when he says it. Was that added in later or was it in the original cut of the movie?
AO: No, that was all added later actually. That was added during post-production. We had another ending, but we realized this is so great – ‘the Prime Minister is actually saying the word troll!’ And we just had to use it.
BD: Was that something that people in Norway picked up on when that press conference actually aired or is it just something you happened to stumble across?
AO: No, the reason actually [that] he’s talking about it…he’s actually talking about…a huge oil field outside of Norway that’s called the Troll Field. And he was talking about power supplies, and I can’t remember exactly the context. But he was saying something about the Troll Field, and we did some editing to the audio! [Laughs]
BD: So what are you hoping to do in the future? Is your plan now to focus your efforts solely on the American film industry or are you going to keep making films in Norway?
AO: I hope to do both, but right now I’m definitely hoping to do something here in Hollywood.
BD: As far as sequel potential for this, would you be open to doing a sequel at some point?
AO: Yeah, I think so. I mean, eventually a sequel…it’s high demand in Norway for a sequel, actually. People are sending me personal Facebook messages every week saying, ‘Where is the sequel? Come on, get it out!’
BD: I feel like there are a lot more places you could go with it. There could be a new species that they discover, for instance.
AO: Yeah, I think there are a lot of species we haven’t seen yet, so…
Editorials
The 10 Best Horror Movies of 2026 (So Far)
We’re now officially in the back half of 2026 now that July is here, but what a year it’s been for horror so far. The sequels and reboots are still holding strong at the box office with films like Scream 7 and Scary Movie, but it’s also been a year where new voices are shattering records in unexpected ways.
Markiplier eschewed conventional production and distribution channels with his feature adaptation of Iron Lung, for example. We’re also still in the midst of Backrooms and Obsession-mania, with the former back in theaters with bonus footage and the latter extending its box office reign. Liminal horror has exploded, and low-budget indie horror is seeing just as much, and sometimes even more, success as big studio-backed fare.
All of which to say that 2026 has been a hell of a year so far for the genre, and it’s only getting warmed up. Still on the way are Evil Dead Burn, Insidious: Out of the Further, Resident Evil, Clayface, Whalefall, and Werwulf, just to name a few.
Also catch up with the Best Horror Books and Best Horror Games of the year so far.
Here are the ten best horror movies of the year (so far).
10) Chime

Horror master Kiyoshi Kurosawa is back with one of his most haunting yet, though one that’d likely be higher on this list if it were more accessible. The 45-minute feature was initially produced and distributed as an NFT before receiving a theatrical run earlier this year, with no plans to distribute digitally or on home media. It spins a somewhat cryptic tale, introducing a culinary teacher, Takuji Matsuoka (Mutsuo Yoshioka, Never After Dark), whose classroom becomes disrupted by a strange sound that leads to violence. It’s a quiet but haunting unraveling, one that leaves no aspect of Matsuoka’s life untouched, in true Kiyoshi Kurosawa style. That it defies any easy explanation also ensures Chime embeds itself under your skin.
9) Send Help

Sam Raimi’s splatstick return to form is a delightfully deranged two-hander that doubles as infectious catharsis for anyone who’s ever had a bad boss. Rachel McAdams (Doctor Strange) and Dylan O’Brien (The Maze Runner) face off when their characters are shipwrecked on an island, prompting a bid for survival in more ways than one. While O’Brien often matches her, It’s McAdams who shines as she deftly handles everything that Raimi, working from a script by Damian Shannon & Mark Swift (Freddy vs. Jason), throws at her. Send Help is full of vibrant personality, packed with all of Raimi’s signatures, making for one of the most entertaining films of the year.
8) Mārama

New Zealand filmmaker Taratoa Stappard’s gothic tale begins in familiar fashion, with Mary Stevens (Ariāna Osborne) arriving in Yorkshire upon invitation to learn more about her parents, only to find the remote manor haunted. Just when Stappard’s period horror story feels doomed to succumb to familiar gothic trappings and jump scares, though, its true horror emerges. The more Mary uncovers about her heritage and her Māori culture, the clearer it becomes that this grim home is built on violence and exploitation. Stappard’s vision comes into its own when it leaves behind its gothic influences and embraces its Māori identity; few scenes are as powerful as when Osborne’s Mary performs a haka in response to her vile oppressors, heralding in a righteous bloodbath.
7) Touch Me

Writer/Director Addison Heimann draws from retro Japanese horror, exploitation cinema, and perhaps even hentai for his campy, psychosexual sophomore feature. A toxic friendship plagued by trauma, codependency, and addiction gets tested to the extreme when Brian (Lou Taylor Pucci), a hip-hop-loving, tracksuit-sporting alien, gets between them. Olivia Taylor Dudley and Jordan Gavaris have an easy rapport and play off each other well as directionless, depressed Millennial besties prone to ignoring their problems until they become insurmountable. But it’s Pucci’s inspired, childlike take on the chicken nugget-loving extraterrestrial with tentacled secrets of his own that steals the show. Heimann has a lot on his mind with his sophomore feature and neatly condenses it all into a quirky, eccentric psychosexual camp odyssey that leans heavily into humor.
6) Backrooms

Director Kane Parsons translates the vast liminal labyrinth of his web series to the big screen in his feature debut, one that instills existential dread with its atmospheric horror and narrative. The ‘ 90s-set horror movie introduces a protagonist with a serious chip on his shoulder over life’s many disappointments, who then discovers his furniture store harbors a hidden door that leads to an endless labyrinth. It’s not just the incredible production design that instills a disorienting sense of doom and terror, but the lead characters’ palpable and profound sense of loneliness and isolation. Parsons exudes impressive confidence and control as he methodically entrusts his quiet worldbuilding and talented leads to carry the dramatic weight. While Backrooms does deflate by the film’s cryptic, cliffhanger-y end, it’s arguably the most effective and scariest yet at capturing the uncanny valley of generative AI.
5) Leviticus

Writer/Director Adrian Chiarella uses an It Follows-like supernatural entity that relentlessly stalks its prey as a launchpad to immerse audiences in the horror of constantly living in fear for simply existing. A conversion therapy ritual among a deeply conservative community plunges a pair of erstwhile lovers into a nightmarish bid for survival when it summons a force that takes the shape of those whom the afflicted desires most. Chiarella refines the horror mechanics and metaphor with much sharper precision, ensuring that the scares and emotional gravity of the young couple’s terrifying predicament reach their intended impact. It’s the central layered performances by Joe Bird (Talk to Me) and Stacy Clausen (Thrash) that clinch emotional investment in their heartbreaking plight, ensuring that the social horror cuts deep.
4) Redux Redux

The McManus Brothers, writer/director duo Matthew and Kevin McManus (The Block Island Sound), dials up the intensity of a classic revenge story by setting it within a multiverse, where Irene Kelly (Michaela McManus) seeks to snuff out every single iteration of her daughter’s murderer, Neville (Jeremy Holm). The more she stalks and slays every world’s Neville, the more she risks losing her humanity entirely. Through a narrative foil in Mia (Stella Marcus), Redux Redux smartly bypasses repetition as it explores the moral complexities and vulnerabilities of Irene’s extremely violent quest. Holm becomes utterly terrifying in the climax, ensuring that no matter whether Irene loses herself to vengeance for good or not, it’s justified if it means ridding the world of this sick maniac.
3) 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple

Director Nia DaCosta takes the reins in the second entry in writer Alex Garland and original director Danny Boyle’s trilogy, picking up from the previous conclusion that saw Spike (Alfie Williams) fleeing from the infected straight into the welcoming arms of Sir Jimmy Crystal (Sinners’ Jack O’Connell). From here, DaCosta presents a stark contrast between humanity’s best and worst. The former sees the tender studies of Dr. Kelson (Ralph Fiennes) make poignant strides toward humankind’s future, while the latter unleashes more pain and bloodshed courtesy of the Jimmies. The dual paths of light and dark collide in one epic conclusion, an inspired confrontation between good and evil on a stunning set piece of heavy metal insanity. Yet it’s DaCosta’s handling of both extremes that impresses most, teeing up one epic conclusion to this trilogy.
2) Obsession

Sketch comedian turned horror filmmaker Curry Barker (Milk & Serial) wrings blood-curdling terror from a classic Monkey’s Paw wish fulfillment scenario in a way that no one could have ever anticipated. To say that it’s taken the box office by storm would be a massive understatement; Obsession is the top horror movie of the year in terms of gross. It’s not hard to see why, either. While Monkey’s Paw scenarios often yield predictable outcomes, and this outcome is practically telegraphed from the start, Barker manages to surprise with the journey itself. And it’s one insane journey paved with blood-soaked violence and no shortage of nightmare fuel. What truly sets it apart, though, is leads Michael Johnston and Inde Navarrette as the central pair undone by one vicious wish. Expect to see a lot more from breakout Navarette.
1) Hokum

A surly, traumatized writer must break free from his self-imposed shackles of guilt when confronted by a wicked witch haunting a quaint Irish inn in the latest by writer/director Damian McCarthy (Oddity). Adam Scott’s Ohm makes for an atypical but rewarding protagonist, and his complicated emotional journey gives way to a deeply moving story of a man so thoroughly broken by personal trauma that he constantly dwells in darkness. In true McCarthy style, expect the creepy as hell witch to dole out some supernatural retribution for crimes committed, but never in the way you’d expect. The filmmaker has a way of making whimsy pure nightmare fuel; Hokum distorts a kids’ show into eerie, uncanny valley-induced terror in its torment of Ohm. Channeling Stephen King, this creeper plays like a traditional campfire tale in mood and style, infusing genuine scares with a sense of magic and heart.

You must be logged in to post a comment.