Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

How To Start Getting Into Horror Part 4: Supernatural

Published

on

The How To Start Getting Into Horror series has been going for a few weeks now and I’m hoping that it’s helping you get your friends and loved ones to appreciate the genre! We’ve looked at what we feel is the best way to ease your non-horror loving acquaintance into becoming interested, followed by some basics. Then we spoke about the Universal Movie Monsters, because no horror education is complete without the original baddies! But now we’re going to dive into something a little more cerebral, a little more unsettling… Today we dive into the supernatural.

For me, a good supernatural movie can be absolutely terrifying. When physical rules go out the window, it allows for all sorts of possibilities that we can’t expect nor anticipate. It’s because many Earthly cardinal rules lose their significance and basis that these films feel so dangerous and uncertain. It’s absolutely delightful!

But throwing The Changeling at a newcomer isn’t the best way to handle things. Rather, as always mentioned throughout this series, they need to be eased into the genre to see why it’s so much fun, why it’s so exhilarating.

That’s why I recommend beginning with fun films like Ghostbusters and House on Haunted Hill (the original, of course). The former combines quirky, lovable characters with some actually unsettling moments. As a small boy, the opening of the old woman in the library absolutely terrified me. To be honest, it still unsettles me to this day. But it’s how much fun this movie is that we can form the foundation of “supernatural films can be a good time”.

The latter showcases that delightful cheesiness that was present in the films of the 50’s and 60’s. Firstly, you have Vincent Price, who is an essential part of any horror fan’s education. Secondly, there’s a great deal of atmosphere in the “haunted mansion”. Thirdly, there are some genuinely creepy moments throughout. This movie has charm and spooks, which makes for a great entry. Also, it begins the road down the films of William Castle, which is an exciting path in and of itself!

With those two films watched, how about we keep the charm, quirkiness, and wonder going by popping in Beetlejuice? In my opinion, this may very well be the best film Tim Burton has ever directed. Non-horror fans love this movie, even though it’s completely rooted in the genre, overflowing with ghosts, scares, atmosphere, and surreal visions. Plus, that score by Danny Elfman! Astonishing!!!

Once you create that foundation that ghosts can be fun and exciting, that’s when it’s time to start diving into the truly terrifying films. That’s when you pop on The Conjuring, Insidious, The Changeling, The Ring, The Others, The Sixth Sense, etc…

There’s something to be said about feeling like something is lurking right over your shoulder, even though you can’t see it. Now it’s time to share that sensation.

12 Comments

Editorials

André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies

Published

on

André Øvredal's Troll Hunter

In this day and age, the wordtrollis often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.

It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shoutstrollat the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.

For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

troll hunter

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.

The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.

As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?

Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.

Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Troll Hunter

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.

There is always a small risk whenever using the termmockumentaryto describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.

In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.

Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.

Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we callfound footage.

troll hunter

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.

Continue Reading