Editorials
Who Partied With the Deadites Last Night? Let’s Discuss.
If you’re like me, you just wanted your Halloween parties to end so you could go home and watch “Ash vs Evil Dead.” Now that you’ve (hopefully) nursed your hangover and washed the grease paint off your body, let’s talk!
Coming in hot here…did you love it or hate it? Did you just kind of like it? Are you pretending to love it because it’s super in vogue right now?
I loved it. And also I just kind of liked it. But mostly I loved it. Despite how it sounds, there’s nothing complicated about my feelings for last night’s premier of “Ash vs” I loved it because I truly love the Evil Dead franchise. I loved the throwbacks, the call backs, the references, and Bruce Campbell. I love deadites. I think they are truly one of the coolest evil forces in all of horror. And I really, really love Ray Santiago. But the episode definitely had a few misfortunes and I don’t think it should be excused of those simply because the franchise has been aged into the Hall of Cult Classics. For example, the tone shifted an alarming amount of times and so drastically it was almost uncomfortable. The scenes without Ash felt much more reminiscent of Fede Alvarez’s 2013 “Evil Dead,” which is not a bad thing in my opinion (I really liked that film for what it was), but the tonal shifts didn’t sit well with me. To directly quote MrDisgusting from his review of the first two episodes: No matter, Ash is back and I don’t want to appear ungrateful. So I’ll stop there. But how about you? Like it? Love it? Hate it? Need to chew on it a bit?
Does “Ash vs” work as a stand-alone television series or do you need to be a fan of/familiar with the franchise to enjoy it?
I can’t speak to this. Because I am such a huge fan of the franchise. But I’m dying to know…legitimately would love to hear from any of you who are not fans of or familiar with the franchise…does this show stand tall on its own merits or is it dependent on the former films? And if the answer is “yes,” is that a bad thing?
As MrDisgusting pointed out, the show is incredibly unapologetic. It’s going to do its thing whether you like it or not—awesomely campy CGI and one-liners included. So does that work for you?
It worked for me. But I needed that. I needed it to be campy. Or else it would have just been another Alvarez-type take on the concept.
Were you as sad as I was that S-Mart didn’t make an appearance?
While it makes total sense that a department store from 30 years ago would no longer exist, it bummed me out. S-Mart has become iconic in horror. Plus I was truly hoping Ash would revive his catchphrase that comes with the name of his fictional employer of old. But alas, no S-Mart. So, Shop Smart. Shop…ValueStop.
But here’s my honest truth: when Ash pulled back the curtain in his trailer to reveal the silhouette of his chainsaw, when he fought with a deadite to see who could get to it first, or when he plugged in his dentures and gave the world his classic doofy Ash grin, everything fell into place and the atmosphere just felt…right. So even though I said the show’s mishaps shouldn’t be excused because of the franchise’s cult status? Whatever, man.
So what did you think?
I’ll be starting weekly reviews next week. So tune in and circle back to let me know what you thought.
Editorials
‘Bloodlust: Subspecies III’ Remains One of Full Moon’s Greatest Achievements
The problem with filming sequels back-to-back is that, unless you can afford expensive reshoots, there’s no easy way to adjust course in between movies if fans react badly to where the story is headed. That’s why it’s important to have a complete narrative thought out well in advance lest you accidentally kill a budding franchise.
However, this isn’t always the case. Every once in a while, it seems like the cinema gods smile upon certain chaotic productions and gift moviegoers with complete franchises that feel like more than the sum of their hastily produced parts. Ted Nicolaou’s Bloodlust: Subspecies III is precisely one of these miraculous pictures, with the raw talents of the artists involved (as well as the continued support from Romania) turning the feature into an effective conclusion for a series that kind of made things up as the filmmakers went along.
That’s why I’d like to invite my fellow readers to join me on this third part of our journey through the Subspecies franchise as we look into Bloodlust and talk about how it remains a surprisingly satisfying finale to the original trilogy.
A Trilogy Planned on the Fly

Released only a year after Bloodstone found plenty of success in rental stores and mail-in VHS catalogues worldwide, 1994’s Bloodlust was produced at the same time as its predecessor in (mostly) the same locations and with the same team. This means that the movie benefited from all the same upgrades as Bloodstone, with the crew now being more experienced with the ins and outs of surviving a low-budget Romanian production and the cast really settling into their characters.
At this point, everything from location scouting to the makeup process had been streamlined, with Wayne Toth and Norman Cabrera, the main duo behind special effects, even switching out time-consuming prosthetics for latex gloves in order to speed up Anders Hove’s monstrous transformation. The titular “subspecies” demons were also once again relegated to a mere cameo appearance due to the laborious puppetry required to bring them to life.
The only real hiccup came from the fact that actress Denice Duff had replaced the first film’s Michelle (Laura Mae Tate) and was immediately expected to portray the character as both an innocent victim in part II and as a secondary villain in part III. According to behind-the-scenes interviews, the hectic production schedule that blended two different movies meant that Duff would often find herself having to alternate between two incredibly different versions of Michelle during the same shooting day – though it’s obvious that she’s having more fun with Bloodlust’s more traditionally vampiric version of her character.
In the finished film, we pick things up immediately where the previous entry left off as Rebecca (Melanie Shatner) is forced to leave her vampire sister Michelle (Duff) behind in the dungeons of Castle Vladislav due to the rising sun. This allows Mummy (Pamela Gordon) to use Michelle’s blood to revive the vicious Radu (Hove) so that he may continue his quest for the coveted Bloodstone – a magical artifact that perpetually drips the Blood of Saints.
Meanwhile, the dreamy US embassy agent Mel (Kevin Blair) agrees to help Rebecca plan a rescue mission, though they’re unaware that Radu has become infatuated with Michelle during his attempts to guide her growing bloodlust. This all culminates in a climactic confrontation meant to tie up all of the series’ loose ends in one of Full Moon Pictures’ most ambitious productions.
The Evolution of Radu

Like its predecessor, Bloodlust: Subspecies III was also warmly received by fans who argued that the series was an even bigger success than Full Moon’s other major horror franchise, Puppet Master. This praise wasn’t unanimous, however, as 1994 had seen the rise of a more modern breed of sexy vampire popularized by Anne Rice, with old-school Nosferatu like Radu being viewed as obsolete when compared to the likes of Lestat and Gary Oldman’s take on Dracula.
In a way, one might argue that Nicolaou’s film is something of a swan song for the classic vampire story, as Bloodlust combines all of the traditional elements we tend to associate with these tales into a single tragic yarn that ties a neat little bow on Radu’s story as well as the old-fashioned monster movies that he represents. The finale remains shocking despite the fact that this is the third time we see Radu get brutally killed onscreen, with the brief tease that he may one day return feeling more like a nod towards the nature of evil rather than sequel bait.
The film dabbles a bit in gothic romance and even explores the inherent power fantasy behind transforming into an immortal creature of the night, but the filmmakers never lose sight of Radu as a demonic force even when he’s willing to betray his beloved Mummy for Michelle’s sake. In fact, his twisted “love” for his fledgling makes him even creepier as we get the feeling that his passion comes from a dark and disturbing place.
Anders Hove is at his absolute best in this film, with the effects department boosting his moments of what the younger generation would call “aura farming” whenever Radu emerges from shadows like a 90s version of Count Orlok. There are even a couple of surprisingly effective jump-scares here, which is why I’d argue that Bloodlust cements Radu as one of the most memorable cinematic vampires of all time despite his humble origins.
Subspecies Saves Its Best For Last

Nicolaou and Vlad Panescu also saved the best for “last” (more on that in a bit) regarding the film’s visuals, with the cinematography and overall atmosphere of Bloodlust absolutely surpassing what we saw in the previous films. Everything feels appropriately climactic this time around (including the wonderful soundtrack that was co-composed alongside an authentic Romanian orchestra), and I appreciate how this is the fastest-paced entry in the trilogy since the film doesn’t need to waste time setting anything up.
Bloodlust still suffers from some of the same low-budget blemishes as its predecessors, but there’s so much creative passion here that no amount of wonky effects work or stilted dialogue can get in the way of appreciating the flick’s gothic grandeur. That’s why it’s not surprising that the movie’s definitive(-ish) ending would later be retconned as fans begged for more Radu.
Of course, the next entry in this series would be a different kind of vampiric endeavor altogether, with the filmmakers attempting to engage with the same trends that ultimately killed Radu and his antiquated kin. That, however, is a story for another time. For now, I’ll merely insist that Bloodlust: Subspecies III remains a highlight of Full Moon’s expansive catalogue and is definitely worth seeking out today.

You must be logged in to post a comment.