Editorials
Unpopular Opinion: ‘Extinction’ Is the Best Film in the ‘Resident Evil’ Franchise
A few weeks ago, our own Jonathan Barkan wrote an article ranking the Resident Evil films, and he selected Resident Evil: Apocalypse as his favorite film. He ranked Resident Evil: Extinction third, stating that “it was actually quite a sharp decline that [he] feel[s] lost the feeling of the games and the spirit they held.” That is all well and good, but I couldn’t disagree more. Extinction is actually the best film in the Resident Evil franchise (Apocalypse is the worst). It may not be the best adaptation of the games, but that is different from being the worst movie (and the subject of an entirely different article).
I’ll get the bad out of the way first. Resident Evil: Extinction is not a perfect film. As is the case with pretty much every film in the franchise, there are logical inconsistencies aplenty. Where is Jill Valentine? If Alice’s blood is the cure for the T-Virus, why doesn’t she just surrender? Why does L.J. fail to tell anyone when he is bitten by a zombie (thereby becoming the Rain/Peyton of Extinction). The plot hinges on a simple Macguffin: Alaska. How do so many people get on the helicopter at the end of the film? Why does Alice keep introducing herself at the beginning of the movie?
A lot of the acting (from the villains specifically) is cringe-worthy. Jason O’Mara’s Albert Wesker is so bad that you immediately understand why they recast him with Shawn Roberts in Afterlife. A pre-Game of Thrones Iain Glenn fares slightly better, though his pronunciation of the word “flesh” is enough to make you turn off the television. Really, if this entire office scene were cut, Extinction would be all the better for it.
I’ll be the first to admit that giving Alice superpowers was a bad move. It doesn’t fit with the franchise or the games that inspired them (the first few games, anyway). Given that the opening moments of Afterlife rid her of those powers immediately shows that screenwriter Paul W. S. Anderson agreed. Giving Alice powers was a dead end for the franchise so he copped out and got rid of them. It’s also a pretty lazy plot device.
Extinction sort of drops the ball with its conclusion as it becomes clear that Anderson is merely trying to set up another sequel (none of the Resident Evil movies feel like actual movies….they just feel like episodes of a TV series). Claire and the other survivors supposedly fly of to Alaska while Alice wakes up all of her clones. It’s an inspired setup, albeit one that is undone in the opening moments of Afterlife, once again making Extinction feel pointless in hindsight. Still, that final Tyrant boss fight is mighty fun to watch.
On to the good! One thing that immediately sets Extinction apart is its daylight setting. It feels more like a Mad Max movie than it does a Resident Evil movie, which is a big part of why so many fans dislike it. The problem with the first two Resident Evil films is that they eschewed everything about the video games that made them so special (characters you cared about, actual horror, etc.). The first film worked as a prequel to the storyline introduced in the games and the second film is a cheap imitation of the games. Extinction is another beast entirely. Directed by Russell Mulcahy (Highlander), Extinction changes everything about Resident Evil in regards to its style. About 90% of the film takes place in the daylight, with the desert being the primary setting.
Many fans were turned off by the setting of Extinction and it’s understandable why. It’s simply not Resident Evil. Nothing about Extinction feels like a Resident Evil game or movie. It feels more like Mad Max with a female lead (or, you know, Mad Max: Fury Road). While it is understandable that this would not appease fans, it actually helps Extinction to stand out as the dark horse of the film franchise. It’s sort of the Halloween III of the Resident Evil franchise, and that helps it to stand out from the crowd. Sure, it’s different, but why hold that against it? Extinction is a post-apocalyptic film that happens to have zombies in it. It feels dirtier than the rest of the films in the series and that works to its advantage. People just hate it because it’s a non-Resident Evil movie that happens to be called Resident Evil: Extinction.
There are some outstanding set pieces in Extinction that rival any of the set pieces in the first two films. The crow attack, while a bit silly, is still the most memorable sequence from the film. The sojourn into Las Vegas provides a memorable backdrop to one of the more frightening attack sequences in the franchise’s history (seen in the below video with a fan-made score). The aforementioned final battle with the Tyrant also makes for a fist-pumping climax, complete with references to the first film and a Chekhov’s gun laser hall. Also, we finally get a Tyrant in Extinction, and he doesn’t disappoint. The creature design on Dr. Isaac’s Tyrant creature is much better than the stiff Nemesis rubber suit.
Extinction was given a similar budget as Apocalypse, but everything about the production value is better. Makeup and gore effects are more realistic. The fight choreography is improved. The editing is much better (you can actually tell what is going on during the fight scenes) and save for the aforementioned villains, the acting is a huge step up from Apocalypse. Anderson wrote a better script with Extinction as well. Where Apocalypse felt like a hollow “Greatest Hits” of the Resident Evil games, Extinction actually tries to build a world within the film. It’s not trying to check off a list of things to include from the games. It wants to be its own film, and that is commendable.
One aspect that Anderson gets right in his script that he failed to do with Apocalypse (and to an extent, the first film) is create actual characters. While some do get the short end of the stick (looking at you, Chase the cowboy), many actually get to be fleshed out in a way that Apocalypse didn’t allow them to be. We learn more about Ashanti’s Nurse Betty in her two or three brief scenes than we ever learned about Jill Valentine in the entirety of Apocalypse. When Betty dies, it means something. When L.J. dies, it means something. When Carlos dies, it means something. Anderson upped the pathos in Extinction and that is why the film works as well as it does. They are all given little moments that allow the audience to connect with the characters (not a lot, but more than any other film in the series).
Claire Redfield’s caravan has a sense of community that was not present between the characters in the first two films. Could you name any of the characters in the first film besides Alice, Rain and Matt (if you even remembered Matt to begin with)? Extinction benefits from actually trying to flesh out these characters. I’m not saying that the film is a deep look into the lives of its characters or is even the poster movie for character development, but it tries to do something that the other films do not. It sure as Hell does it a lot better than Apocalypse did.
Resident Evil: Extinction is a terrible adaptation of the video games. As a film, it’s far from great. It is, however, pretty decent. It is definitely the best film in the franchise, offering characters you care about, exciting set pieces, higher production value, etc. It’s a shame it isn’t appreciated more among fans of the films. That Extinction is seen as the beginning of the decline of the Resident Evil film franchise is lamentable, since it was actually crawling out of the hole that Apocalypse dug for it. You don’t have to agree with me, but go back and re-watch Extinction one of these days with a new perspective. Watch it simply as a film, not a Resident Evil film. You may find yourself enjoying it a lot more than you did before.
If anything, at least we get to hear Alice call the Red Queen a homicidal bitch.
Editorials
How ‘Weapons’, ‘Hokum’, and ‘Widow’s Bay’ Continue Stephen King’s Horror Legacy
After fifty years of continuous writing, Stephen King has become a genre unto himself.
The unrivaled Master of Horror made a splash in 1974 with his debut novel Carrie and has been terrifying readers ever since. Two years later, Brian De Palma brought this shocking story to the screen with an equally electrifying horror film that remains a genre classic and a prototypical example of “Good For Her” horror. This dual debut seemed to open the floodgates, unleashing endless waves of Stephen King films.
From the highs of Misery, Cujo, and The Shawshank Redemption to the schlocky fun of Cat’s Eye, Creepshow, and Children of the Corn, the last five decades have seen just about every notable horror creator take a stab at the author’s massive collection.
In recent years, this singular subgenre has begun to burst at the seams, expanding to include Stephen King-esque fare. In 2016, brothers Matt and Ross Duffer debuted Stranger Things, a sci-fi series heavily inspired by two of King’s most famous books. The Netflix series remixes Firestarter and It by following a little girl with psychic powers and an intrepid group of kids on bikes who must battle an otherworldly foe and a sinister government agency. With its clever blend of modern effects and comforting nostalgia, this gateway horror series paved the way for Andy Muschietti’s It adaptation which remains the highest grossing horror film of all time.
Four years later, Mike Flanagan would create Midnight Mass, a spiritual adaptation of King’s second novel Salem’s Lot. Published in 1975, the book sees a tiny New England town torn apart by a centuries-old vampire. Though Flanagan’s story is perhaps more tender, both iterations of the classic horror tale follow close-knit communities shaken to their core by the presence of an ancient evil.
In addition to these recent hits, 2025 was a banner year for the Master of Horror. Audiences delighted in six mainstream adaptations, including the massively popular It: Welcome to Derry which chronicles earlier cycles of the titular clown’s reign. With this boost to King’s cultural cache, it’s no surprise that we’ve begun to see more unofficial adaptations of the author’s work and horror creators who build their own unique castles in King’s creative sandbox.
So what defines a Stephen King-esque story?
For the past fifty years, the prolific author has dipped his toes in nearly every subgenre from supernatural stories and grisly gore to western fantasy and science fiction. Including his vast catalogue of short fiction, King has tackled ghosts, demons, werewolves, zombies, aliens, mutants, and self-driving cars, not to mention bizarre monsters of his own creation. But what truly unites this vast array of horror is King’s focus on relatable characters. In his 2000 memoir/instructional text On Writing, the prolific author describes the amusement he finds in writing disparate characters, placing them in horrific scenarios, then exploring the ways they try to survive.
An unofficial Stephen King adaptation may take place in the author’s native New England — bonus points if it’s set in Maine — and reference his well-known heroes and villains. But what makes the King connection unbreakable is a character-driven story about average people who band together in the face of abject terror.
Weapons Captures Small Town Stephen King

Following his 2022 shocker Barbarian, Zach Cregger returned with Weapons, a sprawling story that begins in a doomed elementary school. On an otherwise ordinary day, Justine (Julia Garner) arrives at her desk to find that all but one of her students have disappeared. As the mystery grows increasingly violent, Justine and Archer (Josh Brolin), the father of a missing boy, find their way to the home of Alex (Cary Christopher), the class’ only surviving student. In some ways reminiscent of Salem’s Lot, Weapons swings wildly through the unfortunate town, introducing us to its flawed inhabitants as we watch their lives fall apart.
Cregger’s setup nods to a pair of King short stories. Both “Suffer the Little Children” and “Here There Be Tygers” tackle monstrous presences in elementary schools, but as Weapons reaches its final act, Constant Readers may remember another Stephen King tale. Featured in his 1985 collection Skeleton Crew, “Gramma” introduces us to George, a little boy tormented by an aging witch. On an afternoon alone with his sickly grandmother, the frightened child gradually realizes that the imposing old woman has been waiting for an opportunity to cast a spell that will extend her own life by possessing his body.
Alex finds himself similarly tortured by his aunt Gladys (Amy Madigan), a garish witch who orchestrates a desperate plot to sustain her own strength. Transforming humans into mindless weapons, Gladys has taken over Alex’s family home and lured his classmates to the basement. Holding them in a comatose state, she syphons off their energy to extend her own supernatural life.
Vastly different in many ways, both “Gramma” and Weapons hinge on a sinister witch who uses horrific magical spells to sacrifice the bodies of her vulnerable prey.
Hokum Echoes The Shining and 1408

It’s nearly impossible to watch a film about a haunted hotel without thinking of King’s third novel, The Shining. This icy story follows Jack Torrance, an angry writer struggling with his sobriety and a shameful incident haunting his past. Accompanied by his wife and young son, Jack has taken a job as the winter caretaker for the Overlook, a haunted hotel situated high in the Rocky Mountains. Snowed in, Jack finds himself tormented by dangerous ghosts who amplify his greatest fears.
Damian McCarthy’s Hokum follows a similarly troubled figure. Ohm Bauman (Adam Scott) is a surly writer who travels to the Bilberry Woods Hotel in rural Ireland to spread his parents’ ashes. Haunted by his own tragic past, Ohm finds himself trapped in the honeymoon suite, a decaying room that’s been permanently closed to protect visitors from a dangerous witch trapped within its walls. Visual nods to King’s text abound with woodcut figurines and an animated clock, mirroring ominous descriptions found in King’s text.
Another terrifying sequence sees Ohm staring with horror at a closed door, the only thing separating him from the approaching witch. As the door knob slowly turns, Constant Readers remember Jack’s narrow escape from the ghostly woman in room 217. And Ohm’s popular Conquistador books directly reference King’s long-running fantasy series The Dark Tower which follows a gunslinger named Roland Deschain tasked with protecting the nexus of the universe.
In addition to these thematic comparisons, Hokum bears striking resemblance to King’s terrifying short story “1408.” Collected in 2002’s Everything’s Eventual, the terrifying story follows Mike Enslin, a dejected writer who’s risen to fame penning essays about his adventures in haunted locations. Mike arrives at the Hotel Dolphin and bullies his way into the titular room, despite the manager’s dire warnings. McCarthy nods to this story with an ominously misplaced hotel room door, reminiscent of King’s entry to 1408, an unsuspecting portal that appears to move each time Mike looks away.
However, McCarthy’s most direct reference lies in a minicorder Ohm uses to capture notes. Trapped inside the dreaded honeymoon suite, this device offers well-timed messages while sitting next to a decomposing corpse. Mike records his time in 1408 with his own trusty minicorder. Described for the reader, his tape has captured the man’s slow descent into madness as the room prepares to swallow him whole. With conclusions that differ wildly in tone, both Ohm and Mike find their lives irrevocably changed by encounters with the supernatural realm.
Widow’s Bay Builds Its Own Version of Castle Rock

Katie Dippold’s Widow’s Bay has taken the idea of an unofficial King adaptation and turned it into an art form. The Apple TV series sees the residents of the titular island plagued by a curse that dates back centuries. Not only does the picturesque hamlet not accommodate wifi connections, those born on the island face certain death should they ever try to leave. Desperate to modernize the tiny town, Mayor Tom Loftis (Matthew Rhys) draws in waves of tourists just as a new cycle of terror begins.
Blending horror with deft comedy, Dippold makes cheeky references to King’s body of work. Tom warns that, “there’s something in the fog,” reminding readers of King’s 1980 novella The Mist. And Loftis’ own stay in the town’s haunted hotel sees him tormented by the ghost of a murderous clown. We even spy a vintage King hardback peeking out of a local book trade box.
In many ways Widow’s Bay feels like a new iteration of the author’s Little Tall Island, a tiny village off the coast of Maine. In addition to the 1992 novel Dolores Claiborne and a handful of harrowing short stories, this quaint fishing village is also the setting for King’s 1999 teleplay Storm of the Century. Premiering on ABC primetime, this tragic tale follows a terrified group of islanders who batten down the hatches for a dangerous Nor’easter only to find a more sinister threat lurking within.
Constant Readers may also be reminded of Castle Rock, the author’s favorite fictional town.
First introduced in the 1981 novel Cujo, the charming village becomes the star of Needful Things, King’s satire about consumerism. After several Castle Rock stories, we’re reintroduced to its residents as they gossip about the arrival of Leland Gaunt and the grand opening of his curio shop. Anything their hearts desire can be found in his varied inventory, so long as they’re willing to pay the price. Pitting cantankerous neighbors against each other, Gaunt ignites a wave of grisly violence by exploiting long-held resentments and feuds.
The town’s only defense against this supernatural threat is beleaguered sheriff Alan Pangborn. Still grieving the deaths of his wife and younger son, Alan struggles to connect with his older child and pick up the pieces of his shattered life. Also a widower, Loftis struggles to raise his own restless son and explain the strange details of his wife’s tragic death. Attempting to unravel the island’s dark secrets, Tom is aided by quirky residents including a surly fisherman named Wyck (Stephen Root) and Patricia (Kate O’Flynn), an earnest Town Hall employee. King’s own novels feature many of these proactive alliances with disparate characters combining their strengths to overcome insurmountable odds.
With Widow’s Bay renewed for a second season and Mike Flanagan’s Carrie series on the horizon, the future seems bright for new King adaptations, both spiritual and directly pulled from his catalogue. The prolific author also shows no signs of slowing down with two publications nearing release. His upcoming novel, Other Worlds Than These, is the long-awaited third Talisman book which teases direct ties to his Dark Tower world. Holly Forever will be a new installment of his crime series, offering a different kind of genre fare.
This embarrassment of riches spawning multiple worlds seems ripe for spiritual adaptation and will likely inspire horror creators for decades to come.

Kate O’Flynn, Stephen Root and Matthew Rhys in “Widow’s Bay,” now streaming on Apple TV.

You must be logged in to post a comment.