Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

We Need More Killer Shark Movies

Published

on

THE SHALLOWS

If you’ve been paying attention to horror news this week, you may know that Universal announce the Blu-Ray releases of all three Jaws sequels (Jaws 2 fans unite!). Columbia Pictures also released a terrifying new still from the new Blake Lively thriller The Shallows. If you’re a regular reader of my posts, you may know that I’m huge fan of aquatic horror (it’s my favorite sub-genre after slashers), so I’m particularly excited about all of this news. It may be is too early to declare this a renaissance for the killer shark film, but it does make me hopeful that if the Jaws sequels sell well and The Shallows can turn into the sleeper hit of the summer (it won’t be a blockbuster, but Columbia must have a lot of confidence in it to be giving it a theatrical release it in the heart of summer), then we may see more killer shark movies getting released in the future.

Once in a while, a really good killer shark movie will come along. After Jaws was released in 1975, it was followed by a slew of copycats with films like Piranha and Orca. The 80s saw a lack of shark films after Jaws fatigue set in with Jaws 3-D and Jaws: The Revenge (slashers became the name of the game with mainstream horror releases at that time). Sharks made a return in the 90s with films like Deep Blue Sea and (sort of) the Shark Attack films. In the 2000s we saw Open Water make sharks terrifying again before SyFy came around in the 2010s with films like Sharknado, Sharktopus and Jersey Shore Shark Attack, making jokes of the animals.

With a serious shark film getting released in the summer and Universal finally (finally) releasing the Jaws sequels on Blu-Ray (Jaws 2 is amazing. I don’t care what anyone says), it seems like the perfect time for the ocean’s deadliest predator to make a return to mainstream horror and be scary again. Let’s face it, sharks are terrifying, and the fact that they’ve become a joke in Hollywood is fairly depressing. We must now rely on Jaume Collet-Serra to revive the sub-genre and make it relevant in the eyes of the audience. No pressure though, Mr. Collet-Serra.

The issue with many killer shark films is that it becomes difficult to keep coming up with reasons for the characters to go back in the water. The most recent well-reviewed killer shark films Open Water and The Reef fixed this problem by having their characters stranded in the middle of the ocean, and the Australian film Bait 3D trapped its characters in a flooded grocery store after a tsunami. The Shallows will follow this trend by having Blake Lively stranded on a rock 200 yards from shore.

It’s understandable that major studios are afraid to dip back into killer shark territory. The aforementioned SyFy films have most likely scared them into thinking they won’t make any money (thanks, Syfy). If they would just give a script a chance, then a talented director could really make a fantastic killer shark movie. There really isn’t much more that needs to be said on the subject. Basically, I’m just tired of sharks being the butt of whatever joke Hollywood is making. Maybe some big wig will read this and thing “Hey, maybe that guy is right. Let’s finance a killer shark movie!” This is highly unlikely, but a man can dream, can’t he?

What are your thoughts on killer shark movies? Do you feel that it will be impossible to make them scary again? Or does the right movie need to be made? Will moviegoers flock to the theater to see a horror movie about a shark even in a post-Sharknado world? Let me know your thoughts in the comments below or shoot me a Tweet!

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Denver, CO with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

45 Comments

Editorials

Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel

Published

on

Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction

The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.

That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.

It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.

That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.

The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’

For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.

This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.

This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.

Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.

So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.

The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.

Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.

While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.

At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.

After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.

Continue Reading