Editorials
“They’re Back!”: Celebrating 30 Years of ‘Poltergeist II’
Good sequels are a rare breed. Most attempts fail to capture the essence, charm, and magic of the first film, failing to live up to the expectations that audiences hold. And in those cases, it’s often a shame. There are great stories that have huge potential to be expanded upon, revealing backstories, parallel storylines, and who knows what else? And it’s a shame when the stars don’t align and we’re left wanting.
But then there are sequels that actually hold up in a lot of ways to what was originally produced. Some exceed expectations while others meet them, but no matter what, the audiences are left feeling like they’ve gotten a bigger piece of the greater story.
Such is the case with Poltergeist II: The Other Side, the 1986 sequel to the Steven Spielberg-produced, Tobe Hooper-directed smash hit of 1982. And while many don’t hold it in as high of an esteem, I personally really enjoy the movie, which goes into some rather twisted directions.
Directed by Brian Gibson, the movie continues the story of the Freeling Family after their terrifying supernatural ordeal in Cuesta Verde, CA. Unable to maintain his real estate license and forced to sell vacuum cleaners door-to-door, Steve takes the family to live with Diane’s mother in Arizona. Their constant struggles with the insurance company, who argue that their previous home wasn’t destroyed but is instead “missing”, has left them in a financial pickle.
As their insurance woes continue, Diane’s mother suddenly passes away one night, an event that Carol Anne seems to have known about before anyone else, especially when she talks to her grandmother’s spirit on a toy phone mere moments after giving her a farewell kiss.
This loss sets off a storm of events that bring the evil spirits from the first film back after the Freeling’s, even though they are hundreds of miles away from the origin. But “The Beast”, who takes the physical form of Reverend Henry Kane, isn’t done trying to get Carol Anne and will do anything it takes to take hold of her soul.
Something of interest with Poltergeist II is that it expands upon the Indian burial ground concept that the first film was thought to have. The reality is that Poltergeist never mentioned the graves being part of an Indian burial ground. This was simply a myth that gained widespread traction, so much so that the sequel embraced the idea, turning it into something nearly as eerie.
The expanded storyline is that Reverend Kane convinced a large group of people that the Judgment Day was fast approaching, so he took them all into an underground cavern, where they all perished a slow, lingering death due to dehydration, starvation, and exhaustion. His evilness was so great and persistent that it turned him into a monster after his death, one that was capable of hosting “The Beast”, a force that, “…comes in many forms.”
The only connection to Native Americans that the film offers is in the form of Taylor (Will Sampson), a shamanistic character who protects and aides the Freeling’s through these difficult times. But that’s really about it. Even a casually mentioned Native American massacre has nothing to do with the overall story. It’s just…there.
If you haven’t seen Poltergeist II, you’re missing out on Reverend Henry Kane, who is, in my opinion, one of the creepiest villains in horror history. His little jingle, “God is in his holy temple…” is turned into a horrifying chant used in the soundtrack itself, as though those poor souls who died for Kane’s misguided beliefs are still bound by his creed.
Then, when Kane appears in his “true form”, the stumpy demonic vomit creature that was designed by H.R. Giger, it’s both horrifying and, as a horror fan, truly exciting and eye-grabbing.
Both Craig T. Nelson and JoBeth Williams play their roles with enthusiasm and gusto while Heather O’Rourke (who tragically died after the release of Poltergeist III) is just as innocent and doe-eyed as she was in the original, making the assault against her all the more distressing. Alas, Domnique Dunne, who played Dana in the first film, wasn’t able to reprise her role as she was killed the same year the original came out.
Overall, Poltergeist II: The Other Side is a really solid sequel that delivers scares, great characters, and interesting ways to expand the story. You’ll just have to suffer through a quintessentially hokey 80’s ending. Floating through heavenly mist to defeat the evil because you have familial strength? Really?
Editorials
André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies
In this day and age, the word “troll” is often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.
It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shouts “troll” at the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.
For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.
The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.
As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?
Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.
Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.
There is always a small risk whenever using the term “mockumentary” to describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.
In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.
Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.
Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we call “found footage“.

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.

You must be logged in to post a comment.