Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

‘Friday the 13th Part VI: Jason Lives’ Turns 30 Today!

Published

on

Friday the 13th Part VI: Jason Lives

The Friday the 13th series has had its ups and downs. After breaking into the scene in 1980, there was a new installment released almost every year after that. In 1984, Paramount made the misguided decision to kill off Jason once and for all in Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter (you can always tell when someone isn’t a horror fan because they actually think this is the final entry in the series). The idea came from Frank Mancuso, Jr. (the son of Paramount CEO Frank Mancuso, Sr.), because he wanted to work on different projects. While The Final Chapter (temporarily) killed off Jason, it didn’t stop Paramount from continuing the franchise with Friday the 13th: A New Beginning. This film, as many of you know, tricked audiences into believing Jason was the villain. This was of course not the case and after all of the audience backlash, Paramount decided to resurrect Jason for Friday the 13th Part VI: Jason Lives, which was released 30 years ago on August 1, 1986.

Friday the 13th Part VI: Jason Lives is the first entry in the Friday the 13th franchise to explicitly state that Jason is a supernatural being, making him an unkillable zombie. Jason Lives is considered to be one of the best entries in the franchise (I ranked it #3 last year), mostly thanks to the self-aware humor it injects into the proceedings. This self-referential humor was a response to reactions to the mean-spiritedness of A New Beginning, which had featured a series-high body count at the time. Mancuso, Jr. was all for this and hired Tom McLaughlin to write and direct the film. The humor in Jason Lives is apparent from the beginning, which features a title card that homages a James Bond film.

Even tough Mancuso, Jr. wanted out of the series, he approved of this new approach to the franchise, even being so kind as to give most of the creative control to McLaughlin (something that is almost unheard of for a big studio release even today). The only requirement he had was that the final girl be an attractive blonde. Everything else was left up to McLaughlin. McLaughlin did receive some pressure from producers to make the film more like the previous Friday the 13th films, but he held his ground, maintaining that his direction would be better for the franchise.

Shockingly, McLaughlin was proved right when Jason Lives turned out to be the first Friday the 13th installment to earn a positive reception from film critics since the original film. Critics appreciated the light-heartedness of the sequel The self-referential humor was ahead of its time and inspired films like Wes Craven’s New Nightmare and the Scream franchise. It even features a sequence in which a woman (Nancy McLaughlin, the director’s wife) uses her horror movie knowledge to tell her boyfriend (Tony Goldwyn) what not to do when face-to-face with a masked man holding a long metal rod. They don’t follow her advice and get killed anyway, but it’s still a fun scene.

By bringing Jason back into the mix, the ending of A New Beginning (in which Tommy Jarvis is revealed to have gone insane) was retconned and all of the actors whose characters survived that film had their contracts terminated. This was going to be a fresh start for the franchise and would arguably be its last truly great entry (though I unabashedly love Jason X). It is also notable for being the only film in the franchise to not contain any nudity. There is only one sex scene in the film and the characters are fully clothed for its entirety (where’s the fun in that?).

Another first for the series was that it didn’t need to be trimmed in order to get an R rating. The franchise had had a history of censorship with the MPAA, who always took issue with the amount of gore in the films. With Jason Lives, the producers actually asked McLaughlin to add more gore. The film originally contained 13 deaths, but McLaughlin went back and added three more kills to gore up the film a bit.

Friday the 13th Part VI: Jason Lives made $6.7 million ($14.7 million in 2016 dollars) during its opening weekend and went on to gross $19.4 million ($42.6 million in 2016 dollars) domestically. As mentioned above, critical reception was positive for a Friday film, even gaining a mildly positive statement from the late Gene Siskel, who was notorious for trashing the franchise (even going so far as to spoil the ending of the first film in his review). In his review, he called it “the least offensive film of the most offensive film series ever.” It’s not exactly high praise, but it’s certainly an accomplishment for the franchise.

Where does Jason Lives fall in your ranking of the 12 films in the Friday the 13th franchise? Were you old enough to have seen it in theaters 30 years ago? Let us know in the comments below and share your memories of this superb slasher sequel!

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Denver, CO with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

51 Comments

Editorials

Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel

Published

on

Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction

The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.

That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.

It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.

That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.

The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’

For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.

This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.

This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.

Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.

So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.

The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.

Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.

While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.

At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.

After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.

Continue Reading