Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

10 Facts You May Not Have Known About ‘Freddy’s Dead: The Final Nightmare’

Published

on

Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare

Today marks the 25th anniversary of Freddy’s Dead: The Final Nightmare, arguably the worst entry in the Nightmare on Elm Street franchise. Coming off of the financial disappointment that was A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child, New Line Cinema decided that it was time to retire Freddy for good. While the film has its detractors (mostly due to the shift from horror to comedy), there are those that still like it (like John Squires). This article is for those people. Here are 10 facts about Freddy’s Dead: The Final Nightmare that you may not have known.* Or maybe you do. Either way, enjoy!

*All of these facts were pulled from the documentary Never Sleep Again: The Elm Street Legacy, the extras on the Blu-Ray for Freddy’s Dead: The Final Nightmare and of course, Wikipedia.

1. Alice’s (from Nightmare 4 and 5) son Jacob was the protagonist in the original script.

The script, written by Michael Almereyda, would have had Jacob being helped by the third film’s Taryn, Joey and Kincaid (they were called “The Dream Police”) after Freddy kills Alice. Talalay didn’t like the script, so it was scrapped. Jacob was written into the John Doe character in the final version of the film, which was written by Michael DeLuca.

Lisa Wilcox

2. Peter Jackson wrote a draft of the script.

In his draft, titled A Nightmare on Elm Street: The Dream Lover, Freddy was powerless in the dream world so kids would have slumber parties where they would take sleeping pills and take turns beating him up in their dreams. While Jackson didn’t get the gig, it started his relationship with the executives at New Line Cinema, paving the way for his adaptations of The Lord of the Rings novels.

Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare

3. Director Rachel Talalay was an assistant production manager on the original film.

Talalay actually worked on every film in the franchise up until that point except for A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child. She was an assistant production manager on the first film, a production manager on the second, a line producer on the third and a producer on the fourth. This gave her enough leverage to convince Robert Shay to let Freddy’s Dead be her directorial debut.

Rachel Talalay

4. A lot of the weirder ideas in the film came from Twin Peaks and John Waters.

Talalay had a background as a producer for two of John Waters’s most mainstream films: Hairspray and Cry-Baby. Because of this, most of the crew on Freddy’s Dead were carried over from the  Cry Baby set. It was being filmed when David Lynch’s Twin Peaks was at the height of its popularity as well, so those are the mains reasons why Freddy’s Dead is so much more humorous than previous entries in the franchise.

Twin Peaks

5. Divine was supposed to be in the plane seat next to Shon Greenblatt

Legendary drag queen Divine passed away shortly before filming began, but the role of the woman in the airplane sitting next to Shon Greenblatt was intended to be hers.

Freddy's Dead The Final Nightmare

6. Talalay wanted Freddy’s death to be more epic, but was limited by the use of 3D.

So difficult was the 3D filming process that it took all of the focus out of Freddy’s death. In fact, the manner in which he died wasn’t really thought out prior to filming. According to Talalay, “It became all about ‘How do I make the 3D work?’ and not ‘How to I make killing Freddy interesting?'” That’s a real shame, as it made Freddy’s death feel less epic than his “deaths” in any of the previous films.

Freddy's Dead

7. Nintendo did not approve the line “Now I’m playing with power!”

Those of you old enough to remember Nintendo’s Power Glove might remember it’s popular catch-phrase “Now you’re playing with power!” Well, Freddy Krueger has his own take on the tagline when he kills Spencer (Breckin Meyer) with a Power Glove. Unfortunately for New Line, Nintendo rejected their request to use the line in the film. Unfortunately for Nintendo, Robert Shaye didn’t care and he told Talalay to use it anyway.

8. The studio held a real-life funeral for Freddy Krueger while promoting the film.

The funeral saw the reunion of several actors and crew members from past films of the franchise. It was a big publicity stunt, but it worked. Freddy’s Dead had the highest opening weekend gross out of any film in the franchise up until that point (though it would end up being the fifth highest grossing film overall).

Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare

9. Freddy’s Dead is the only film in the series not to feature the jump rope girls.

Not exactly headline-making news, but it’s still odd for a film to leave out one of the trademark moments of the series.

Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare

10. The film takes place from June 14 to June 17, 1999.

This isn’t nearly as convoluted as the Friday the 13th timeline, but it’s still funny to think that the Nightmare films were being churned out so quickly that they couldn’t keep up with their own timeline.

Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Denver, CO with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

85 Comments

Editorials

The Mark of the Beast: The Lasting Impact of ‘The Omen’ at 50

Published

on

The Omen at 50

Of the three films that make up the Diabolical Trinity of classic religious horror films—Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), and The Omen (1976)—The Omen is the most purely entertaining.

While Rosemary’s Baby digs into the societal shifts of the 60s and The Exorcist explores spiritual tensions between faith and doubt in an ever-shifting world, The Omen seems most interested in just telling a thrilling story. It achieves this by blending two major trends of the 1970s, the devil movie and the paranoid thriller, into one crackling adventure yarn. In the process, The Omen has sparked fear and curiosity about what could happen in theend timesif such events are to occur.

After seeing The Exorcist, producer Harvey Bernhard contacted writer David Seltzer and said something along the lines of,Hey, write me one of those.Seltzer, having never read the Bible, thought it would be an interesting challenge, so, according to various interviews, he read the Bible and several commentaries in search of a story. Then he stumbled upon a passage in the book of Revelation, the image of a great Beast rising out of the sea, that sparked his imagination. In the commentaries, he found that the sea represented politics in some interpretations of the text, and he began building his story on that foundation.

Seltzer has told this story often, and I am inclined to believe him. However, from there, much of the theological-sounding lore of The Omen was created purely by Seltzer. Many of the ideas surrounding The Antichrist in the film appear to be drawn much more from the pop-eschatology sensation of the 1970s, The Late Great Planet Earth by Hal Lindsay, than any Biblical source.

Lindsay’s book was the bestselling nonfiction book of the 1970s and re-popularized views of thelast daysthat had been dying along with fundamentalism for decades, namely Dispensationalism, Millennialism, and the Pre-Tribulation Rapture. In dispensationalism, history is broken into several epochs of time (or dispensations) that culminate in the return of Christ and his thousand-year (millennial) reign.

Before this return, a seven-year Tribulation will occur in which the Antichrist comes to power and persecutes all who oppose him, culminating in a battle between the forces of good and evil at the valley of Megiddo, usually called Armageddon. Of course, in this worldview, the true believers in Jesus will be lifted out, or raptured, before all this takes place. Since the publication and popularity of The Late Great Planet Earth, this has been the prominent belief in Evangelical and Fundamentalist Christian circles, though Roman Catholic, Orthodox, and mainline Protestant denominations largely reject it.

Lindsay also did something unique that had not been the case even in dispensationalist circles before him—he posited that the creation of the modern state of Israel in 1948 started the countdown to Armageddon. Fans of the film will immediately realize where Seltzer ran with this idea in the first line of the poem created for the movie:When the Jews return to Zion…

Damien Thorn and the Creation of Horror’s “Innocent Villain”

The Omen

Seltzer’s next inspiration focused on the idea of the Antichrist as a child, what he would call the film’sinnocent villain.In watching The Omen, it is readily apparent that Damien Thorn (Harvey Stephens) does not really do anything evil beyond a bit of normal kid mischief. Even the moment in which Damien knocks Kathy Thorn (Lee Remick) over a second-floor railing can be read as an accident orchestrated by Damien’s diabolically connected nanny, Mrs. Baylock (Billie Whitelaw). The film takes this idea of the innocent villain a step further by casting Gregory Peck, best known for playing arguably the greatest father in film history, Atticus Finch in To Kill a Mockingbird (1962), as Damien’s earthly father, an element that greatly satisfied Seltzer.

The New Testament itself says very little about the Antichrist and certainly nothing about his childhood. In fact, the word antichrist is used twice (1 John 2:18 and 2 John 7 for the curious) and refers to groups of people, not a particular person. There is also a passage in 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12 in which the writer (usually attributed to Paul) discussesThe Man of Lawlessnesswho willexalt himself over everything that is called Godandproclaim himself to be God.

Then there is the Beast of Revelation chapter 13 withseven heads and ten hornsthat Seltzer latched onto, which has been interpreted in a multitude of ways over the centuries. Powerful people throughout history, from Charlemagne, various Popes during the Protestant Reformation era, Napoleon and Hitler, to modern politicians, including Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump, have all had the label placed on them by various circles. Even religious leaders like Billy Graham have not escaped being called the Antichrist.

Lindsay and modern dispensationalists are certain the Antichrist will be a 21st-century individual as they are equally certain that the Rapture, Tribulation, and return of Christ are imminent, likely within their lifetime. Many scholars and theologians, however, interpret these passages as symbolic representations of the Roman Empire and the first-century Caesars who persecuted, tortured, and murdered Christians and Jews who refused to submit to Imperial rule and worship them as gods. For example, that the Beast from the sea in Revelation has seven heads is symbolic of the famous seven mountains of Rome, with the 10 horns referring to rulers and magistrates of the Empire.

But this is all really of no matter to Seltzer and the story of The Omen. Instead of being concerned with any historical or theological accuracy, he instead built his own lore, which sends Robert Thorn and photographer Keith Jennings (David Warner) on a globetrotting investigation into the nature of the Antichrist and how to stop him. Some of this lore includes the child being born of a jackal, the reaction of animals, the protective cult that arises around Damien, the daggers of Megiddo, and maybe most interesting of all, the peculiar flaws in Jennings’s photographs that presage the ways certain individuals will die.

All these aspects are where the paranoid thrillers come in, as films like Blow Up (1966), Z (1969), The Conversation (1974), The Parallax View (1974), 3 Days of the Condor (1975), and All the President’s Men (1976) were all the rage at the time. Especially in the wake of the Watergate scandal, the idea of journalists (like Jennings) as ordinary heroes who could bring down the powerful, nefarious forces in the world was exactly what audiences craved. And what greater hidden evil force was there than the Devil? This is also why the device of the daggers of Megiddo is so important to a movie like this. If Damien is indeed the Antichrist, there must be a way to stop him, though in the Biblical text, the only power capable of destroying the Devil is God Himself.

The Mark of the Beast, 666, and the Film’s Most Famous Religious Symbolism

The piece of lore created for the movie with the most solid Biblical grounding is the Mark of the Beast. Revelation describes a mark on the forehead or hand of those who worship the Beast and his image. Again, this is symbolic language differentiating those who belong to the power of the Roman Empire and those who belong to Christ, who have the Mark of the Lamb. In Seltzer’s hands, the mark is very literal, a birthmark that is borne by not only the Antichrist but all his followers, meaning they are marked from before birth as belonging to Satan, and there is no escaping it. This is all rather distressing to the priest Father Brennan (Patrick Troughton), who betrays his mark by warning Thorn about Damien and pays the price by memorably being impaled by a spire that falls from a church steeple after being struck by lightning.

Why is the mark three sixes? Again, this is drawn from a passage in Revelation that states that the Beast can be identified by calculating his number. In Biblical scholarship, this is believed to be the sum of the name of a man transferred into Hebrew numerology, a practice in which each Hebrew letter also represents a number. Using this method, the number of the name Caesar Nero, which many believe to be the most logical choice, is six hundred sixty-six. In the film and elsewhere, this number is changed to three individual sixes. According to the film, this represents the Diabolical Trinity (a designation also unique to the film) made up of Satan, the Antichrist, and the False Prophet. That Damien carries this unique birthmark under his hair convinces Robert that the child is the Antichrist, and it’s up to him to destroy him.

Part of what makes The Omen great is its ambiguity. Damien could be the Antichrist, or he could be at the center of a series of coincidences. Director Richard Donner stated in interviews that he believed Robert Thorn had gone insane by the end of the film, which, to Donner, is the only explanation for why Thorn would attempt to kill an innocent child. However, that enigmatic smile in the final shot suggests that Damien does embody a spirit of great evil. The sequels, however, all but erase this ambiguity.

In audiences, The Omen sparked a renewed interest in the concept of the Antichrist and the dispensationalist interpretation of the end times that continues to echo throughout the last five decades. Around the time of the film’s release, even Elvis Presley was photographed brandishing a paperback copy of Seltzer’s novelization. Dispensationalist authors like Hal Lindsay, Tim LaHaye, and John Hagee have made millions publishing books and giving lectures about the Antichrist and the end of the world.

The Legacy of The Omen, 50 Years Later

Though A Thief in the Night (1972) preceded The Omen in initial release, it gained quite a resurgence (along with the ability to create three sequels) in the wake of the popularity of The Omen and went on to scar the psyches of Evangelical children for decades. Hal Lindsay was also able to release a film version of The Late Great Planet Earth in 1978, complete with narration and a brief onscreen appearance from Orson Welles.

In the 1990s, the Left Behind series became a cultural phenomenon, spawning twelve books in the core series, a YA spinoff series, video games, and a movie series (2000-2005) starring Kirk Cameron. A bigger studio adaptation of the first book was released in 2014, starring Nicolas Cage. 20th Century Fox and The Omen got in on the renewedend-of-the-worldvigor by releasing a remake of the original film on June 6, 2006. The franchise was revived once again in 2024 with The First Omen, which explores ideas of the Antichrist and the motivations of those in power in our current religious, social, and political context.

But despite all the sequels, spinoffs, rip-offs, remakes, andend timesmoney grabs of the last 50 years, the original version of The Omen remains untouchable. Its greatest strength is that it seeks, first and foremost, to entertain. And it does so admirably.

After half a century, its influence can be felt in horror, the culture at large, and even in various faith circles. It is a testament to the power of story and film that, consciously or unconsciously, fans of The Omen and those who have never seen it alike are, to this very day, marked by the Beast.

Continue Reading