Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

Shyamalan’s ‘Split’ Has a Bit of a Twist Problem

Published

on

*THIS ARTICLE CONTAINS SPOILERS. AVOID READING UNTIL YOU’VE SEEN SPLIT*

It should come as no surprise that Split has a twist. A really cool one.

M. Night Shyamalan’s Split is an immediately compelling film. Three young women are kidnapped from a parking lot by a mysterious man who clearly isn’t playing with a full deck, and they’re taken to some sort of underground bunker that’s strangely well-furnished. We quickly learn that the man has multiple (well over 20 of them) personalities within himself, but like the characters themselves, we have no idea why these women have been kidnapped. We have no idea what the man’s plan is. And we really have no idea what’s even going on. We just know that the many personalities seem dead set on the idea that a so-called “Beast” will soon be making an appearance. And goddamn is it tense while we wait for his arrival.

It’s no secret by now that Shyamalan is a filmmaker who builds most of his movies around a final act twist, and Split is certainly no different. We’re promised answers to all the questions we (and the characters) have been pondering throughout, and we can be pretty sure that things won’t turn out how we’re expecting them to. But the strange thing about Split is that they do. For the most part, everything about the core story ends up in the exact place we’d most expect it to. Everything the multiple characters residing within the villain (including a man, a woman, and a child) have been telling the women turns out to be true: one of those personalities is a “Beast” of sorts, and he ends up killing and consuming two of the women.

The other one, the clear survivor from the outset… she survives. Go figure.

So what’s the big twist? After the movie’s title comes up on screen and it seems to be over, we’re treated to a post-credits stinger of sorts. The occupants of a diner are watching a news story about the events we just witnessed. One of them remarks that the story seems similar to something that happened years prior: a train was blown up by a man given a villainous moniker by the media. The man sitting next to the woman who makes the comment turns out to be Bruce Willis’ heroic character from Unbreakable (and yes, he’s played by Willis). “Mr. Glass,” he tells the woman, when she inquires about the train attacker’s name. Yes, Split is revealed to be, in the literal final moment, freakin’ Unbreakable 2.

Okay so that’s super cool. My jaw honestly dropped nearly to the floor, and though I’m pretty sure most everyone else in the theater with me had no idea why such a big star like Bruce Willis was popping up for a cameo appearance at the tail end of a horror film (‘wait, is this a Die Hard movie?!‘), I can confirm that I was genuinely shocked and totally surprised. Like Shyamalan’s best twists, I damn sure didn’t see this one coming, and as I left the theater and walked to my car, I had a huge smile on my face. I was thrilled. And totally won over.

There’s simply no denying that Split‘s twist is a treat for longtime Shyamalan fans, ending the film on the highest of notes; but as I made the drive home and the thrill of that shocker wore off a bit, I began to remember that just prior to that post-credits stinger, I wasn’t exactly thrilled with the film. In fact, I was downright disappointed by the way the initially riveting events played out. The twist, though it distracted from the movie’s flaws, only distracted me for so long.

Highlighted by an incredible performance (or series of performances, really) from James McAvoy that would probably earn him an Oscar nomination had this not been a horror film, as well as yet another one from Anya Taylor-Joy that suggests she’s quickly on her way to becoming genre royalty, Split is a fine film, but it’s also one that just doesn’t really go anywhere. As compelling as it is in the early going, it eventually starts to drag and, worst of all, feel longer than it actually is. It feels as if Shyamalan didn’t quite know where to go with the clever concept (using multiple personality disorder as the basis for, essentially, a body-horror film, is pretty damn clever), and by the time the end title popped up on the screen, I had almost completely lost interest in the whole thing. The story doesn’t really even end, at least not in satisfying fashion, and in many ways it feels like a film that’s missing a few final scenes that it really needed to feel like a complete whole that said something and was worth sitting through. It could’ve also used a trim in the editing room, but that’s not what we’re here to talk about.

Let’s get back to that totally awesome twist, which provides the illusion of making the film feel complete and satisfying. It makes you forget that the actual story wasn’t very good, because holy shit, that’s Bruce Willis and this was a sequel to Unbreakable. But when you take that away, and look at the story that was actually being told in Split, you’re left with an incomplete movie that, let’s be honest, kind of shits the bed in the final act. Sure, the twist is the coolest we’ve seen in a handful of years, but it’s also one of the cheapest we’ve ever seen. Shyamalan pulls that card out way too late in the game, and he damn near pulls it from the bottom of the deck. Rather than focusing on telling us a new story, he instead chooses to remind us of an old one, hoping that we’ll be too awestruck to care that he didn’t really bother to finish that new story or create something on the level of the old one.

And it works… if only for a few minutes.

Ultimately though, Split‘s twist makes the film feel like a prequel to the nonexistent movie you’d rather watch instead: Unbreakable 2. It reminds, and not in a good way, of those superhero movies that build up excitement for the future while not actually delivering anything worthwhile in the present. I admire Shyamalan for creating his own super-villain universe of sorts (the brilliant Unbreakable, my personal favorite of his films, remains the best grounded-in-reality superhero movie ever made), and I’m hoping he does build upon it in the future, but I can’t help but be baffled by the choice to make Split a half-ass sequel to Unbreakable rather than a full-on one or, well, its own thing entirely. Had David Dunn (Bruce Willis) showed up earlier in the film, I’d probably have a new favorite movie in Split, but connecting the two in literally the final moment had a cheapness to it that rubbed me the wrong way. It was fan service, to be sure, but it was fan service that seemed specifically designed to distract us from the fact that Split was a half-cocked movie that couldn’t stand on its own two feet.

Split deserved better than its cop-out ending, cool as it may have been.

SPLIT

Writer in the horror community since 2008. Editor in Chief of Bloody Disgusting. Owns Eli Roth's prop corpse from Piranha 3D. Has two awesome cats. Still plays with toys.

34 Comments

Editorials

Steven Spielberg Just Directed the Scariest Scene of His Career in ‘Disclosure Day’

Published

on

Colin Firth in DISCLOSURE DAY, directed by Steven Spielberg.

Steven Spielberg has always been conversant in the cinematic language of the horror genre, despite relatively few credits in the genre. His contributions as a writer and producer on things like Poltergeist are legendary, and films like Duel and Jaws certainly wield the horror genre in remarkable, often chilling ways. He may not be a horror filmmaker, but he knows when he needs to scare us, and he has the tools to make that happen. 

I didn’t go into Disclosure Day, Spielberg’s alien epic, expecting outright horror, and indeed the film leans much more into thrilling than frightening. This is not a horror film, but for a few minutes in the middle, much to my surprise, it became one.

Spielberg has filmed more than his fair share of scary scenes over the years, but with Disclosure Day, he directed a new contender for the scariest scene of his entire career. 

SPOILERS AHEAD for Disclosure Day!

Josh O’Connor in DISCLOSURE DAY, directed by Steven Spielberg.

Among the various alien secrets laced throughout Disclosure Day are a trio of palm-sized rods, the color of pencil graphite. These rods, originating from another planet, can be used for a number of things, but for the purposes of this scene, the most important is “diving,” gripping the rod in one bare hand and using its power to “dive” into the mind of another person. 

The person holding the rod in this scene is Noah Scanlon (Colin Firth), head of shadowy cybersecurity firm Wordex, who is hellbent on keeping human knowledge of extraterrestrials secret from the general public. Scanlon’s trying to find whistleblower Daniel Kellner (Josh O’Connor), who’s got all of those alien secrets tucked in a backpack while he’s on the run, and while Daniel’s more experienced mind is protected from diving, his girlfriend Jane’s (Eve Hewson) is not. So, monitored by medical personnel at Wordex headquarters (diving is dangerous), Scanlon pushes his way into Jane’s mind to find the location of Daniel’s safe house. 

A telepathic invasion is scary enough on its own, but Spielberg doesn’t stop there. When Scanlon dives into Eve’s mind, he appears to her to be sitting across the kitchen table, like he’s in the room. Her bright blue eyes turn Scanlon’s dark brown, and she loses much of her control over her own body, not to mention her mind. Moments before, Daniel finally shared with her the secrets in his backpack, so Jane is shocked, conflicted, deeply vulnerable when Scanlon slips inside her head. This is not just telepathy. This is possession. 

Spielberg underscores this not just through the visual language of the scene, as Jane breaks out in a sweat and struggles to sit upright as Scanlon invades her mind, but through Jane’s background. As she revealed to Daniel earlier in the film, Jane is a former novitiate nun who left her convent when she began to question her calling. She still believes firmly in God and, more importantly, believes that perhaps proof of alien life should be kept secret from the public because, in her eyes, it would upset the entire balance of faith in the world. God is a defining factor for humankind, Jane argues, and showing humanity proof of creatures from the stars would undercut that in dangerous ways. 

This context, combined with the crucifix necklace Jane’s holding in her hand at the time of the dive, makes this scene the closest thing Spielberg will ever shoot to something out of The Exorcist. It’s not just a battle of wills, but a battle of faith. As an amoral technocrat worms his way into her memories, her beliefs, her faith, Jane turns the crucifix into a weapon, squeezing it until her hand bleeds when she discovers that a pain response can momentarily push Scanlon out of her head.

Of course, when you put a crucifix and a bloody hand together, it conjures images of stigmata. Screenwriter David Koepp pushes the allusion further by having Scanlon quote Christ on the cross to Jane by way of convincing her that she must be the one to stop Daniel by any means necessary.

It’s easy to see why this is scary, right?

On a very basic level, you have a powerful, wealthy man subduing and assaulting an innocent young woman, which is frightening enough. Then, the layers of the scene kick in. Scanlon doesn’t just assault Jane, but possesses her, seizes her memories, her knowledge, and finally her own free will, all while Jane literally clings to her faith in an effort to fight back. Disclosure Day is, among other things, a story about who has a right to the truth, and Scanlon believes that he should be the arbiter of that truth. Not just the truth as he sees it, but the truth as Jane sees it as well. If they don’t see eye to eye, he’ll make her. 

But the possession, as it turns out, cuts both ways. Using the rod to dive is, for a normal human being, an intensely strenuous process. Scanlon admits that previous attempts almost killed him, and for some members of his time, so much as touching the rod results in a near-death experience. Even accessing an unprepared mind like Jane’s takes a lot of Scanlon, and when she kicks him out by squeezing the crucifix – again, so much meaning embedded in the details here – his team holds him back and tries to offer medical intervention. But Scanlon persists, pushing them away, and keeps diving back in.

This means that Jane can’t escape him because he just won’t stop pushing back through her defenses, but it also means that each time Scanlon enters her mind, and thus the safe house, he looks more monstrous. By the end, through a combination of lighting and makeup, Firth barely looks human, conjuring up images of the possessed Father Karras at the end of The Exorcist.

Colin Firth (center, standing) in DISCLOSURE DAY, directed by Steven Spielberg.

On a pure, visceral craft level, all of this is quite frightening, but the real trick to making this scene into Spielberg’s most terrifying lies in the more existential horror surrounding all of this. Disclosure Day is a film about the battle for the truth over extraterrestrials, but it’s also about a fight against an impossibly powerful surveillance state, the devaluing of human and alien lives in favor of some nebulous collection of assets, and the value of the individual in a world that increasingly lumps people into demographic boxes and writes them off.

In this scene, the surveillance state becomes supernatural, a human life is worth less than a piece of information, and an extragovernmental technocrat would rather sacrifice his own humanity than see reason. In 2026, few things could be more terrifying than that. Spielberg knows this and wields it mightily, proving once again that, while he’s not a strictly horror filmmaker, he can direct horror with the best of them.

Disclosure Day is in theaters now. 

Eve Hewson (second from left) in DISCLOSURE DAY, directed by Steven Spielberg.

Continue Reading