Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

Why I’m Worried About the Running Time of ‘A Cure for Wellness’

Published

on

While IMDb has it categorized as a mystery thriller, for the sake of argument, let’s deem Gore Verbinski’s latest, A Cure for Wellness, a horror film. I mean, watch that trailer and tell me there isn’t some serious genre stuff in there.

The ominous braaam, the sinister boardroom, the horrific imagery, the cloaked cult members, embryonic deformity, Jason Isaac’s German accent, mad scientists’ labs: it’s all very intriguing stuff… then I saw the running time.

A Cure for Wellness is 2h 26m long*.

UK critic Mark Kermode uses 2001: A Space Odyssey as a cinematic yardstick, arguing that if a film can chart the entire history of the human race in 2h 24m (in its theatrical release) then there should be little excuse for ever going over that mark.

It’s a rule horror cinema largely abides by. In fact, how many really long horror films are there?

I’m always struck by the length of the films in the Scream franchise, but even they top out at just 2h (Scream 2). And what of Stephen King, whose genre source material is renowned for its length? Discounting the TV miniseries (“It” and “The Stand” etc.), he’s responsible for one of the longest well-known horror films, in the form of the 2h 26m The Shining (original cut). Dreamcatcher (2h 14m) and The Mist (2h 6m) also aren’t short, but the vast majority of King adaptations still come in under two hours. Anthologies can be long – ABCs of Death (2h 9m), Three… Extremes (2h 5m), Creepshow (2h) and Chillerama (2h) etc. – but the segmented pacing works entirely differently, so they don’t really apply here.

Like The Shining, there are a select few horror “epics”. The Conjuring 2 springs to mind at 2h 14m, a whole 22 minutes longer than its already pretty lengthy predecessor (1h 52m). Looking back, you also have things like Romero’s 2h 7m Dawn of the Dead as well as Bram Stoker’s Dracula (2h 8m), Interview with the Vampire (2h 3m), and the genre blurring, but undeniably horrific, Se7en (2h 7m). There are also some Asian offerings that seem determined to play by their own rules: just this last year, The Wailing came in at a butt-numbing 2h 36m.

However, the aforementioned examples are definitely outliers. Most horror films are all wrapped up by the 100-minute mark, if not a sharp 90. And for good reason: atmosphere can only be sustained for so long, before it dissipates or just straight up gets boring. War movies might need the extra running time for scale and melodramas can ape out endless emotion but, when it comes to horror, there is a serious case for short and sweet, in my book.

Bringing this back to A Cure for Wellness, it’s hard not to be reminded of Shutter Island, to which this film is clearly indebted. And, the comparisons extend beyond the set-up and the iconography on display in the trailer: Scorsese’s film is 2h 18m.

That’s what has me worried. I like Scorsese, and the visual panache is there as always, but Shutter Island does feel really long. The dense, twisty plotting doesn’t help, but there’s just not enough of an emotional bond to justify the lengthy journey. Unlike something like The Conjuring 2, which features some genuinely moving character beats (the Elvis scene, to name just one).

Although he may not be quite on Scorsese’s level, Verbinski’s certainly enough of a visual stylist to make A Cure for Wellness an aesthetic treat and I do rate his The Ring remake (even if that too is a tad on the long side), but can he deliver the emotional involvement to justify that meaty running time?

I guess we’ll soon find out!

What do you think of long horror films? Is 90 minutes the dream, or are you open to two-hour-plus epics? Let me know in the comments.

*Throughout this article, I use the IMDb-listed running times for consistency because, as you may know, running times vary around the world according to broadcast and DVD color encoding.

23 Comments

Editorials

André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies

Published

on

André Øvredal's Troll Hunter

In this day and age, the wordtrollis often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.

It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shoutstrollat the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.

For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

troll hunter

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.

The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.

As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?

Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.

Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Troll Hunter

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.

There is always a small risk whenever using the termmockumentaryto describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.

In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.

Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.

Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we callfound footage.

troll hunter

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.

Continue Reading