Connect with us

Editorials

5 More Overlooked Indie Horror Films You Should Watch

Published

on

With the ease of movie-making technology and the advent of numerous new venues for watching films, the number of releases per year has grown exponentially. It’s great for horror fans looking for new movies, but it can be tough for horror filmmakers to find an audience with the sheer number of films for viewers to choose from.

Today we’re serving up five MORE overlooked indie horror films that deserve more attention than they received.


The Ugly (1997)


This 1997 film from New Zealand was released in the U.S. during its initial run, but you wouldn’t know it from its near-invisible streaming presence. The story follows a fame-hungry psychologist who wants to profile a notoriously violent serial killer who has spent years in isolation in a mental hospital. As she begins her sessions, she thinks she’s getting inside his head… but she slowly realizes it’s the other way around.

The dilapidated asylum is a stand-in for the corroded mind of the killer Simon, played with both vulnerability and menace by Paolo Rotondo. Scott Reynolds’ feature directorial debut is assured and disturbing, and it’s a crime that both he and Rotondo weren’t hot commodities after this film. With stark cinematography, haunting images, and an impactful ending, the movie leaves a lasting impression. Though it’s hard to find it digitally, it’s definitely worth hunting down.


They Look Like People (2015)


Perry Blackshear’s first feature is a triumph of ingenuity on a tiny budget. Childhood friends Wyatt and Christian get together again as twentysomethings after both have just gotten out of a troubled relationship. Christian is wounded and trying to find motivation to ask his co-worker out, while Wyatt is dealing with something much more serious: he believes that creatures are infecting and taking over people he loves in preparation for a worldwide takeover.

The film has three primary performers, and they all do subtle, excellent work, with the two male leads embodying a compelling and lived-in friendship. The sound work in the film is excellent and unnerving, and the few visual effects in the film are simple but hauntingly memorable. They Look Like People is a slow-burn indie that uses its minuscule resources for fantastic results.


Mr. Jones (2013)


There have been so many found footage films in the wake of The Blair Witch Project and Paranormal Activity that sometimes it feels like there’s nothing new to do with the format. Thankfully, films like Mr. Jones come along to re-invest me with hope for the future of the style. To spoil how it subverts expectations would be robbing the film of its most interesting surprises.

Writer/director Karl Mueller tells the story of a couple who moves to a cabin in the woods so the boyfriend can work on finishing his film project. They discover they’re distant neighbors with a strange outsider artist named Mr. Jones, known for anonymously mailing his disturbing work to random people. After they sneak into his house to learn more about him, strange things start to plague them. There’s so much more to the story than this; find out for yourself.


PVC-1 (2007)


The central premise is simple: a woman has a bomb secured in a PVC pipe around her neck by armed gunmen who tell her family to provide them with ransom money or they will activate the bomb. What ensues is the real-time journey of the family, from their isolated house to a police station where an officer tries to help them deactivate the bomb.

The simplicity of the story allows director Spiros Stathoulopoulos to flex his muscles with this film that is shot entirely in a single unbroken take. The terrifying directness of the story is all the more affecting if you know that the events of the story are based on a true story. Cast with non-actors in many roles, and containing passages of haunting silence and close-ups of anguished faces in the midst of existential uncertainty, PVC-1 is a powerful piece of verite filmmaking.


The Human Race (2013)


In an instant, eighty people are torn out of their normal lives and dropped into a winner take all race. They are given a designated path and a few rules: don’t leave the path or you die, get passed three times by the group and you die, and keep going until there is only one runner left. It is appropriate that director Paul Hough’s film is about running because the action in his first feature film never slows down.

A clear labor of love for the filmmaker and his enormous cast, the film paints a big picture on a small canvas. Shocking deaths, double-crosses, a diverse cast, and a wickedly dark sense of humor make this high-concept, high-octane film a fantastic watch with a group of friends. It can be found easily online, and you should find it soon.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading