Editorials
31 for 31: Through the Decades Challenge – Final Week
It’s almost time for Halloween which means it’s time to watch a crap ton of horror flicks! This year with my 31 films in 31 days of October I wanted to branch out a bit. I realized that most of the films I watch are generally from the 80s (with a sprinkling of late 70s). To push myself outside my norm, I’m donning this year’s adventure “31 for 31: Through the Decades Challenge”. Simply put, each day will correlate to a specific decade, and I must watch at least one film a day. No exceptions! Of course, I couldn’t leave well enough alone. I had to make a further set of rules for myself to ensure I’m getting lots of variety. Those rules as follows:
- One film must be watched from each decade (50s – 10’s)
- One film must be watched from a major horror franchise.
- One film must be watched from one of our late-great masters (Craven, Romero, or Hooper).
- One film must be watched that deals with witches or witchcraft.
- One film must be watched that deals with the undead.
- One film must be watched that stars either Christopher Lee or Vincent Price.
- One film must be watched that contains sci-fi/horror elements.
- One film must be watched that is a remake.
- One film must be watched that is from Italy.
- One film must be watched that takes place during Halloween.
October 23rd – The Curse of Frankenstein (1957)
Rules Met: 1, 5, 6
“Victor Frankenstein builds a creature and brings it to life, but it behaves not as he intended.”
As I stated at the beginning of this challenge, Hammer Films are a pretty big blind spot on my horror viewing list. When it comes to Dracula and Frankenstein, I tend to prefer the original Universal adaptations and all the numerous reboots, remakes, and reimaginings leave me fairly cold. There’s only so many times you can see the same story play out and maintain interest. So, that’s a large part of why I have avoided the Hammer versions. I assumed they would all be the same thing ad nauseum. Luckily, I was wrong. The Curse of Frankenstein is a successful adaptation, and it’s clear to see why it launched the company’s brand in a big way. While it does follow some of the same beats as the Universal film, it manages to play with audience expectations in fairly inventive ways. Christopher Lee as the monster manages to imbue the character with a wounded vulnerability that elevates him from simple mindless boogeyman. There’s a humanity in his portrayal that quickly gives way to animalistic rage during the more horrific moments. Peter Cushing is simply a captivating delight. His version of Dr. Frankenstein as a full-tilt sociopath is a refreshing and often darkly comic take that has me excited to follow his further adventures in the various sequels.
October 24th – The Witches (1966)
Rules Met: 1, 4
“Following a horrifying experience with the occult in Africa, a schoolteacher moves to a small English village, only to discover that black magic resides there as well.”
The Witches is another Hammer production but not one that is considered upper tier. It is, however, fairly entertaining despite a languid middle act. Following an intense opening, we follow the lovely Joan Fontaine in her final film role as she transfers to teach in a small village with a lot of strange inner-politics. We quickly realize, this town has more than a few witchy secrets up its sleeve. The big reveal isn’t all that revealing, most horror fans will have spotted it about ten minutes in. But it’s a trippy “hysterical woman” tale that will keep fans of such retro thrillers engaged for most of the running time.
October 25th – Primal Rage (1988)
Rule Met: 1, 9, 10
“A scientist at a Florida university inadvertantly creates a “rage virus” while performing experiments intended to restore dead brain tissue in baboons. When a journalist for the college paper breaks into the campus lab, he’s bitten by one of the infected baboons; the virus soon spreads to a trio of rapists and a valley girl, all of whom go on killing sprees.”
In honor of the late Italian sleaze-meister Umberto Lenzi who passed away this month, I decided to break out my old Code Red DVD of the Lenzi penned Primal Rage. The story is your basic zombie-not-zombie 28 Days Later rage virus pic, except that you get a cool Halloween party with absurd costumes and a red-assed baboon. Ultimately, people aren’t checking this film out for the narrative and complex characters (though they are slightly more developed than most Italian mozzarella). If you like 80s gore flicks, this is certainly one of the more underseen gut-munchers. Primal Rage is perfect beer and pizza movie night fodder.
October 26th – Critters 4 (1992)
Rules Met: 1, 7
“After being cryogenically frozen and waking up on a space station in the near future, the Critters aim to have the unwitting crew for lunch.”
Critters 4 doesn’t necessarily count as a major franchise sequel (I saved that for later), but I’ve alway been pretty partial to theses little buggers. This “such and such in space” sequel is not quite as good as I remember, though. It’s saved by a faulty computer system named Angela who provides most of the film’s humor. She refuses to complete the commands of the crew who find themselves stranded on this abandoned space station, so they simply request Angela do the opposite of what they need. It’s a cute joke in what is yet another Aliens “homage” (read: ripoff). We also get both Angela Bassett and Brad Dourif in lead roles which is always welcome. The stars of the show, the critters, are sorely underused, however. Unfortunately, space is where most franchises go to die and it was no different for the Crites.
October 27th – Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974)
Rules Met: 1, 3
“Two siblings visit their grandfather’s grave in Texas along with three of their friends and are attacked by a family of cannibalistic psychopaths.”
Damn. This movie is intense. Texas Chainsaw Massacre is one of the top horror films of all time for a good reason. It’s a complete, almost documentary style descent into one nightmarish evening of cannibalism, shrill screams, bbq, and “Grandpa”. Yes, of course, I’ve seen Tobe Hopper’s film before, but this was my first chance to see it on the big screen. My local drive-in (the one who did the awesome Friday the 13th/Nightmare on Elm Street double feature last week) screened the film just in time for Halloween. Despite how many times I’ve seen this, seeing the restored version on a massive screen with sound pumping through my car speakers was a revelation. This is how the film is meant to be seen. No other viewing has ever been as effective. To put it mildly, I was losing my shit. Grandpa has always given me the willies, but this time it felt like I was truly there with Sally with each failed blow. Thank you Coyote Drive-in, this was easily the highlight of my Halloween viewings this year.
October 28th – House of Wax (2005)
Rules Met: 1, 8
“A group of unwitting teens are stranded near a strange wax museum and soon must fight to survive and keep from becoming the next exhibit.”
The Dark Castle remake of House of Wax is far better than it has any right to be. Director Jaume Collet-Serra has made a career out of taking well-worn genre conventions are breathing entertaining life into them with the killer kid pic Orphan or the killer shark thriller The Shallows. With House of Wax he takes another “kids take a wrong turn to hell” tale and cranks up the style, suspense, and gore. The film plays more like a remake of the Full Moon film Tourist Trap (itself a riff on Texas Chainsaw) than a remake of its namesake. Despite all the Paris Hilton sex tape hoopla surrounding the film’s release, it manages to defy expectations and deliver a roller coaster thrill ride that was part old school slasher and part torture porn, which was still all the rage at the time. Thankfully, the film holds up well long after the craze has ended.
October 29th – Leatherface (2017)
Rules Met: 1, 2
“A teenage Leatherface escapes from a mental hospital with three other inmates, kidnapping a young nurse and taking her on a road trip from hell, while being pursued by a lawman out for revenge.”
Well, I’d put off checking out the prequel to Hooper’s original TCM for a while. On one hand, I had zero interest in yet another origin story for the hulking, chainsaw wielding maniac. On the other, I love directors Alexandre Bustillo and Julien Maury (Inside, Among the Living). Unfortunately, after watching Leatherface, it’s clear the rumors are true. A lot of the film was reportedly reshot and re-edited without Bustillo and Maury involved. Their style is almost completely absent from the film I saw. Perhaps one day we’ll get a director’s cut or, at least, a clearer idea of just what changes were made. The version we are currently left with is more uninteresting than just outright bad. It feels like Rob Zombie’s The Devil’s Rejects in its style and structure and only feels like it exists in the world of Chainsaw during the final ten minutes. Chalk this one up as a miss.
October 30th – Halloween (1978)
“Fifteen years after murdering his sister on Halloween night 1963, Michael Myers escapes from a mental hospital and returns to the small town of Haddonfield to kill again.”
I’ll keep these next two flicks short and sweet as they’re likely films you’ve watched yourself. The last two days of the month I decided to pare down to one simple rule: Films must take place at Halloween. What better film for Devil’s Night than the original film that kicked off the slasher craze, John Carpenter’s Halloween. This is real meat and potatoes stuff, and that is, of course, why it works so well. Michael Myers stalks a babysitter and hacks up her friends along the way. You don’t need much more than that and it’ll be interesting to see how David Gordon Green taps into that simplicity for the upcoming remake.
October 31st – Trick ‘r Treat (2007)
“Five interwoven stories that occur on Halloween: An everyday high school principal has a secret life as a serial killer; a college virgin might have just met the guy for her; a group of teenagers pull a mean prank; a woman who loathes the night has to contend with her holiday-obsessed husband; and a mean old man meets his match with a demonic, supernatural trick-or-treater.”
After a tumultuous journey to release, Michael Dougherty’s Trick ‘r Treat was an instant classic among fans once they finally had the chance to see it. Warner Brothers dumped the film straight to video (at a time when straight to video still carried a heavy stigma), luckily the fan base seems to grow every year to the point where a sequel is inevitable though who knows how much longer we may have to wait. Thankfully, we can easily bide the time as this anthology only seems to get better with each viewing and it’s always fun to share it with those who haven’ yet seen it.
Happy Halloween! The challenge is complete and I’m excited to hear what films you guys have been enjoying this Halloween season. Sound off below.
Editorials
Why ‘Baise-moi’ Is Still One of the Most Controversial Horror Films Ever Made
Of all the films in the New French Extremity movement, Baise-moi may be the most shocking.
From its aggressive English language title Rape Me to several scenes of unsimulated sex, Virginie Despentes and Coralie Trinh Thi’s 2000 film may not drip with the subgenre’s trademark blood and gore, but the story’s overwhelming nihilism feels like a middle finger to the patriarchal establishment.
Inspired by Despentes’s 1993 novel of the same name, Baise-moi stars adult film actresses Raffaëla Anderson and Karen Bach as Bonnie and Clyde-style criminals who rampage through France leaving a trail of bodies in their wake. But this fierce story has a tender core. When we peel back the layers of explicit sex and ostensibly senseless violence, we find the tragic tale of two young women desperate to reclaim their power in a world built on male entitlement.
After a brief glimpse at our female criminals, Baise-moi opens in a local dive bar. A boorish man plays pool with his friends while callously dismissing his girlfriend’s concerns. She hasn’t seen him in nearly a week and simply wants to know if he plans to come home. But he angrily brushes her aside, insisting that he doesn’t have to answer for his selfishness. We will never see this couple again, but their one-sided dispute reflects a world in which women must beg for attention from men who see them as less than human.
Throughout this uncomfortable argument, Nadine (Bach) has been drinking at the bar while men discuss her fondness for random sex. At home, she openly masturbates in the living room, refusing to be shamed by her nagging roommate. We learn that Nadine is a sex worker and follow her to a nearby hotel. Refusing to kiss her john on the lips, she dispassionately performs oral sex then watches TV while he fails to give her an orgasm. Despentes and Trinh Thi play with camera angles to show the extent of Nadine’s disinterest. More concerned with sausage being sliced on an infomercial, she has emotionally disconnected from her own body.

We meet Manu (Anderson), an occasional porn actress, under much more traumatic circumstances. While chatting on a park bench, she and a friend are hauled into a dirty warehouse then savagely assaulted by three strange men. We watch as Manu’s friend (played by adult film star Lisa Marshall) is repeatedly punched in the face while her clothes are ripped off followed by an extreme close-up of actual penetration. It’s a disturbing sequence that rivals New French Extremity’s most infamous texts. But this is the reality of sexual assault and Despentes and Trinh Thi refuse to shield the audience from what we are watching.
Though her friend screams and tries to escape, Manu stares daggers at her attackers while stoically obeying their commands. Her dissociation repels the angry man and he walks away, complaining about “fucking a zombie.” Manu will later explain this emotional detachment to her traumatized friend, saying, “If you park in the projects, you empty your car ‘cause someone’s gonna break in. I leave nothing precious in my cunt for those jerks.” Though they’ve not yet met, both Nadine and Manu have become so accustomed to being used for sex that they see no value in themselves. Manu assures her sobbing friend that,”It’s just a bit of cock. We’re just girls. It’ll be ok now.” then continues on with the rest of her day. While disturbing in and of itself, her response hints at prior trauma and the long-term pain of navigating a world filled with predatory men.
Despentes and Trinh Thi will spend the rest of the film subverting the classic rape-revenge structure. We never again see Manu’s attackers again and she is not driven by a newfound hatred of men. But her rage spills out wherever she goes, directed at anyone who dismisses her humanity. Manu’s brother responds with indignation and demands the rapist’s identities, seeming more upset about an insult to his family name than what his sister actually needs. When he implies that she somehow welcomed the assault, Manu shoots him in the head, steals his money, and walks out the door. Nadine finds herself in a similar position after strangling her conservative roommate to death. In parallel scenes we watch both women reach their breaking points and use murder to flee lives of shameful subservience.

Manu and Nadine cross paths in an empty subway station after the last train has left for the night. With nowhere else to go, they cut a violent path across France, careening towards Nadine’s vague errand. Their first victim is a well-dressed woman murdered for her ATM card. Though Nadine confesses sadness in the aftermath of the crime, she eventually admits, “now I feel really great. So great I almost feel like doing it again.” We remember Manu’s final words to her brother — “Bastards like you always have to hit something to feel alive” — and watch these newly liberated women succumb to the same temptation. Their crime spree seems driven by a need to reclaim power by dominating anyone who gets in their way.
Despite the carnage they leave behind, Manu and Nadine do not kill indiscriminately. Shortly after hitting the road, they pick up two strangers at a bar and have sex on their respective hotel beds. Though they do not physically touch each other, the scene ripples with intimacy as they gaze at each other instead of their men. In a traditional rape-revenge film, Manu would kill these unsuspecting paramours, punishing them for another man’s crimes. But she seems content with indulging in her own physical pleasure and the connection she establishes with Nadine. Both women have found a kindred spirit who will not judge them for asserting their own messy independence.
This is not to say that men are safe around these two unpredictable outlaws. Manu shoots a man in the street when he catcalls Nadine and they ambush and murder a condescending gun dealer. When a prospective john balks at their unapologetic promiscuity and insists on wearing a condom, Manu brands herself “the fucking condom dickhead killer” while mocking the man for his self-righteousness. She degrades and sexually humiliates him before using her high heels to stomp in his face.
Nadine has a similar response to another victim who tries to psychoanalyze her criminality. While opening his safe at gunpoint, the man flirts by insisting her crimes have been caused by a traumatic past only he can understand. Rather than fall for this faux empathy, Manu laughs in his face while Nadine shoots him to death on the living room floor. While certainly asserting their feminine strength, they do not lash out at just any man, but save their rage for male authority figures who condemn their feminist rebellion.

Though they rage against the outside world, Manu and Nadine have no grand illusions of victory and expect to die in the violence they’ve sparked. On a peaceful stroll, the outlaws discuss different methods of suicide, rejecting self-immolation as too pretentious. After tossing around options, they agree to do a bungee jump without the cord, though Nadine admits that she may need help stepping off the edge. To maintain the appearance of control, Manu suggests leaving a banner behind to frame their deaths as a courageous act rather than submission to the establishment. They will not let anyone rewrite their story and insist on going out with their heads held high.
It’s only through boredom that we uncover the hopeless heart of their true motivations. Blowing stolen cash on a fancy hotel, Nadine and Manu drink the day away while staring at the ocean, surprised that they have not yet been caught. With their faces on the cover of newspapers, they have achieved some notoriety, but failed to rock the system they despise. Simply described as two women, “one taller than the other,” their bombastic rebellion now feels more like screaming into the void. They may have found joy in rejecting rigid gender norms, indulging in random sex, and gleefully dominating toxic men, but the patriarchal world continues to turn. In this quiet moment, Manu and Nadine realize that they will not be remembered as vigilante heroes, but two waves crashing against an endless sea of male authority.
As we grow more attached to the ferocious couple, Despentes and Trinh Thi remind us of the women’s villainy, directly resisting an anti-hero narrative. Dressed to the nines, Nadine and Manu storm a swinger’s club where women openly service men. In another film, they would be feminist avengers, shooting violent johns while setting helpless women free. But Manu and Nadine kill everyone they see, leaving no one alive in the establishment. As a climax to this massacre, they force the bartender to strip and kneel on all fours before penetrating him with a loaded gun. It’s a horrific act of sexual abuse that mirror’s Manu’s own ordeal. We’re reminded that while the women’s anger may be righteous, their actions are not. Perhaps this is a showy escalation designed to force police intervention. Or has Manu become the very thing that once destroyed her life: a bastard who hurts others to feel alive?

This crime spree ends just as erratically as it began when Manu is shot while stopping for gas. Nadine burns her corpse beside a frozen lake, ensuring that no one can claim power over what little autonomy her body still holds. Dressed in a man’s suit, the grieving woman prepares to join her friend in death and holds a gun to her head. But she seems incapable of pulling the trigger. While remembering their short but violently joyful time together, we hear a gunshot and see Nadine fall to the ground. Seconds later she opens her eyes to find herself surrounded by police. The spell of her connection with Manu has been broken and the world has finally come crashing in.
We’re left to wonder what their rampage was for. They’ve failed to resist a dehumanizing social structure and will now be simply tossed aside. But the English translation casts an uncomfortable shadow over their motivations. Taken as a command, the worlds “rape me” seem to imply consent that is antithetical to sexual assault. It’s an unsettling turn of phrase that harkens back to a question Manu’s friend asked in the wake of her attack: “how could you let this happen to you?” Though it reflects the story’s aggressive tone, this translated title seems to blame the women for their destructive actions rather than interrogate the system they’ve tried to resist.
But there is an alternate interpretation, one that reflects the story’s tender core. A more accurate Enlgish translation would read “fuck me” or “kiss me,” perhaps nodding to sex positivity or the gentle kiss Nadine leaves with Manu before lighting her makeshift funeral pyre. These alternative titles seem to honor the women’s ferocious journey of self-discovery and empowerment.
Though flawed, villainous, and ultimately broken on a patriarchal wheel, Nadine and Manu have found a way to reclaim something precious in their unapologetic strength and authenticity.
Baise-moi is currently available to stream on Shudder.









You must be logged in to post a comment.