Editorials
Why ‘Saw III’ is the Best Sequel in the Franchise
With Jigsaw now out in theaters, we revisit the franchise’s high point.
It could hardly be considered an exact science, but a case could be made that it’s in the third installment that a franchise is often perfected. A Nightmare on Elm Street, Paranormal Activity and Friday the 13th are all home to second sequels that are standout fan favorites, and Saw is certainly no exception to that particular theory.
Because with Saw III, the franchise was most definitely perfected.
Franchise co-creator Leigh Whannell returned to write Saw III, released in 2006 and directed by Saw II‘s Darren Lynn Bousman. It’s important to note Whannell’s involvement, because Saw III was the third and final time he was directly involved in the series’ storytelling. And it shows, as Saw III works overtime to provide franchise closure.
There are two main storylines that inevitably collide in Saw III, both of them compelling enough to elevate what many have written off as “torture porn” over the years into nothing short of a damn fine horror film that nails all the key themes and ideas that made the franchise so much more than that. In the first story, grieving father Jeff is kidnapped by Jigsaw and placed into a game where he’s forced to confront everyone who played a role in the death of his young son. They’ve all been strung up in nasty traps, and Jeff gets to decide who lives and who dies.
Elsewhere, we catch up with Lynn Denlon, a surgeon who is also kidnapped and placed into her own game. In Lynn’s game, a dying Jigsaw is confined to a bed in a makeshift, far-from-sterile hospital environment, where “student” Amanda Young is watching over him. Lynn’s task? Keep Jigsaw alive. If he dies, a collar around her neck will explode.
It’s the second story that is unquestionably the most important in Saw III. As we find out at the very end of the film (spoiler alert!), Lynn’s game was actually Amanda’s game, which is a surprise twist even to Amanda. It was Amanda who had to keep Lynn alive, and Jigsaw intentionally kept from her the important little tidbit that Jeff and Lynn are husband and wife.
Why would Jigsaw be testing Amanda *again*, after she already survived the “reverse bear trap” in the first film? Well, that’s where Saw III gets really interesting. Jigsaw *wants* Amanda to take over his work after he dies, but he’s not convinced that she’s actually capable of carrying on his cause. Amanda’s traps are designed to kill rather than teach lessons, and Jigsaw’s final test for her, before he dies, is to see if she has the will to keep a “subject” alive. As for Amanda, well, she’s got some serious demons battling inside her head.
Amanda Young, unquestionably the most interesting character in the franchise, was seemingly destined to become just that in the first Saw. Though she only makes a minor appearance in that film, it’s something she says to the police after surviving her trap that hits to the heart of everything the franchise is about.
“He helped me,” she tells them, referring to Jigsaw.
Amanda is the only victim of Jigsaw’s games who has actually learned the lesson he spent the final years of his life trying to impart, finding through her near-death experience a purpose in her life for the very first time. She is incredibly important to Jigsaw, and naturally, he’s the most important person in her life. It’s this connection between the two characters that makes Saw III something of a twisted love story, as Amanda vies for Jigsaw’s attention in the presence of another woman (Lynn) who seems to be the new apple of her teacher’s eye.
This sends Amanda into a tailspin, and it becomes clear that she has a goal that’s very different from Jigsaw’s: while Jigsaw genuinely wants his subjects to survive, Amanda simply cannot deal with the idea of anyone else in the world possessing the unique gift that Jigsaw has provided her with. It’s this dynamic between the two villains that makes Saw III the most interesting film in the franchise from a storytelling standpoint, and the performances of a calm Tobin Bell and a distraught Shawnee Smith sell that dynamic beautifully.
Revisiting Saw III this week, it became clear to me that Leigh Whannell intended to use the film, again his final one in the series, to wrap up loose ends and bring all the storylines from the previous two films to a satisfying conclusion. And he does just that with his script, using Saw III to cap off what is great standalone trilogy within the franchise. In particular, Saw III deepens the character of Amanda before killing her off, returning to the events of the very first Saw movie and showing us something new: Amanda was helping Jigsaw all along.
It was Amanda, wearing that iconic pig mask, who kidnapped Dr. Gordon and Adam, and as we learned in Saw II, it was Amanda who was running that particular show with a front row seat. The first three films wonderfully build upon that story of Jigsaw and Amanda, and Saw III is the perfect conclusion to their saga together. With massive wounds to the neck, one by gunshot and one by circular saw, Jigsaw and Amanda bleed out together. It’s a tale somewhat akin to Romeo and Juliet, only 1000x more twisted, and there’s something beautiful about it all.
While all this is going on, Saw III also serves up some of the franchise’s most gruesome traps, both through flashbacks to some of Amanda’s subjects and also to Jigsaw’s final game, the latter involving Lynn’s husband, Jeff. The traps in Saw III are aggressive and hard to watch, with “The Rack” and “Pig Vat” being two particular standouts on that front.
Bottom line being, Saw III delivers on everything that made the Saw films so damn good in the franchise’s early days, telling a compelling story, nauseating us with creatively nasty traps, and hitting us with a final act twist that we genuinely didn’t see coming. In many ways, it’s the perfect Saw film, and it’s also one of the best franchise sequels of them all.
Unfortunately, there’s a downside to Saw III. After it killed off everything interesting about the story, the franchise quickly went downhill and never managed to recover.
But that original trilogy remains an incredible 3-part story of two characters: one who is searching for her own purpose, and another who is trying to give one to others.
Editorials
‘Other Mommy’ Trailer Hints at Big Changes from Novel ‘Incidents Around the House’
There’s been a lot of talk about how Christopher Nolan snuck in some horror elements into his epic adaptation of The Odyssey. However, even before the Cyclops began to eat Ithican soldiers and Circe subjected them to magical body-horror, cinemagoers were already witnessing supernatural terror through a certain trailer that was attached to most IMAX screenings of Nolan’s film.
It turns out that this trailer was for Rob Savage’s Other Mommy, an adaptation of Bird Box author Josh Malerman’s horror novel, Incidents Around the House. With the teaser now available online and revealing that the award-winning Jessica Chastain is playing the titular antagonist (as well as her ill-fated human counterpart), not to mention the fact that the picture is being helmed by the director of hits like Host and The Boogeyman, genre fans are understandably hyped for this upcoming thriller.
That’s why I’ve decided to take a closer look at the trailer and share four things we learned from this sneak peek at Other Mommy!
4. Rob Savage is Going Back to His Supernatural Horror Roots

I know I’m in the minority when I admit that Dashcam is my favorite Rob Savage movie, but even I understand why the filmmakers’ fans have been waiting a while for the director to get back to telling more grounded paranormal stories as he did with 2020’s Host.
Other Mommy obviously isn’t a found footage movie, but moments like the poltergeist activity on the kitchen table combined with the nature of the source material, which actually features a full-on exorcism, indicate that this adaptation is more than a simple creature feature. That’s why I think Savage is once again going to borrow from the same ghostly narratives that made his debut film such a viral hit.
3. Other Mommy is a More Convincing Doppelganger in the Adaptation

Part of the horror from Malerman’s original novel came from the fact that the entity taking on the form of Bela’s (Arabella Olivia Clark) mother wasn’t very good at passing itself off as human. This resulted in several uncanny moments where other characters began to notice that there was something visibly wrong with the family and decided to keep their distance.
Savage’s film appears to be taking a different route, with the trailer showing a version of the entity that can, at least physically, imitate Chastain’s character perfectly. This change is likely the result of the filmmakers wanting to incorporate more paranoid scenes where Bela and her father, played by Jay Duplass, are confused about which Mommy is safe to interact with.
2. The Family is Also Better Off This Time Around

Incidents Around the House featured some interesting subtext about how poverty can negatively affect American family dynamics. After all, the main characters were already feeling scared and isolated before the entity emerged from Bela’s closet and began scratching at their emotional wounds. The trailer for the movie, however, depicts the family as being relatively well off before these incidents begin to occur.
I can only imagine that this part of the story was changed so that the family’s fall from grace can be even more dramatic as the mom and dad’s pasts are revealed and Bela falls further into the clutches of the demonic antagonist.
1. Jessica Chastain is Embodying Evil Dead Rise’s Alyssa Sutherland

Mothers turning against their children is one of the most disturbing horror tropes out there (just check out classics like Hereditary and Carrie if you need proof), but it takes a remarkably skilled actress to pull off such a monstrous transformation. This is especially true when both a regular, loving mother and the Other share the screen in the same film.
That’s why I appreciate how Chastain appears to be channeling another evil redhead mother that recently traumatized audiences with her performance. It’s too early to be sure, but I’m fairly confident that Chastain’s character has at least some amount of Ellie in her cinematic DNA – Ellie being the iconic deadite brought to life by Australian actress Alyssa Sutherland in 2023’s Evil Dead Rise.
Let us know in the comments if you think we missed any important details from the trailer, and don’t forget to check out Other Mommy when it hits theaters on October 9!




You must be logged in to post a comment.