Connect with us

Editorials

5 Retro Horror Movies Deserving of a Remake

Published

on

Horror remakes are often a source of consternation, usually seen as an unnecessary cash grab rife with uninspiring attempts to overhaul beloved properties. Let’s face it; horror movies get remade far more often than any other genre, and a lot of them miss their mark. But with the right property to remake, and the appropriate care put into it, horror also boasts some of the best. Films like The Thing or The Fly took lesser-known films from decades prior and transformed them into horror classics. They both exemplify what we want from an ideal remake; take something lesser known and use it as a foundation to borrow what worked about the film and transform it into something new and better. With that in mind, here are 5 retro horror movies that could use some dusting off and polish:


Maximum Overdrive

With the countless other shows and films of Stephen King’s work having been released or currently in production, I’d like to recommend one more to the mix; a long overdue remake of Maximum Overdrive. Originally released in 1986, this adaptation has often been considered among the worst, which is a shame considering King directed this one himself. But, King had never directed a feature movie before (or since), and the film was made at the height of King’s self-admitted cokehead days, so perhaps unsurprisingly the adaptation was abysmal. There’s an ‘80s charm to it for sure, but the dialogue and acting weighs down a really solid theme in which humanity’s reliance on technology rears its ugly head, this time in the form of homicidal, sentient technology by way of a passing comet. Decades later, technology has advanced so much farther than ever imagined, and our reliance on it commensurate with that growth. Which makes no better time than now for Maximum Overdrive to get an update.


The Boneyard

This straight-to-video 1991 proved why having a decent cover box was extremely important. The monstrous poodle with a pink bow meant I passed this up over and over as a child, until finally giving in to discover a surprisingly creepy story at the heart of the film. With a very atypical protagonist, the film follows a depressed psychic as she works with detectives to get to the bottom of the mystery behind a funeral home owner with three corpses of mummified children in his possession. Only, these aren’t dead children, but “kyoshi,” or undead cursed children that must feed on human flesh. While the movie winds up dragging in places and devolves into the giant poodle monster showdown touted on the cover, this is an insane diamond in the rough begging to be polished. There are surreal dream sequences that deliver the chills and the mummified children were the stuff of nightmares. In the meantime, at least it’s finally coming to Blu-ray!


C.H.U.D.

This 1984 sci-fi horror was heavy on the political critique and light on the actual creature feature many signed up for when renting this one. A well put together film that follows a photographer whose current project is capturing the essence of New York City’s homeless population, but there’s been a recent string of disappearances that seems indicative of a government cover-up. And it is, in the form of toxic waste dumping that has caused the underground dwelling population to mutate into cannibalistic humanoid underground dwellers. It’s a matter of a plot that sounded way better than it is, because it takes far too long for the creatures to make their appearance. The viewer spends too much time getting to know George, the crumbling city, and the government cover-up. With a relocation to a new urban setting suitable of the plot, and a more balanced creature to social commentary ratio, C.H.U.D. could be something special.


Rawhead Rex

Without this ‘80s adaptation of Clive Barker’s short story, he wouldn’t have decided to take on a more prominent role in Hellraiser, so Rawhead Rex has that going for it. The core idea makes for a great horror movie setup; a monstrous Pagan god is released from his prison and begins to hunt down children, violate women, and literally piss on his followers makes for a very intriguing and gruesome story. Of course, Barker’s original story described the Pagan beast as a nine-foot-tall phallus with teeth, which makes translating that to screen sound laughable. But thanks to the extreme rush job, the special effects team had no time to create Rawhead Rex and the result is also somewhat laughable. There’s Heinrich von Schellendorf, who worked out for months to get in ferocious Pagan god rampaging shape, and he has to sport a mask that’s perpetually frozen in one expression for the entire film. That doesn’t even touch on the strange design, either. Barker has been wanting to give this one a crack for a while, and I think it’s past time that he should try.


Dark Night of the Scarecrow

Originally airing on October 24, 1981, this made for TV horror movie is far better than it had any right to be. The exceptional Larry Drake starred as Bubba, the mentally challenged man that befriended a little girl in a small town full of prejudice and judgmental jerks. When the girl is attacked by a dog and found unconscious, the meanspirited post man assumes the worst of Bubba, accusing him of raping and hurting the girl, and poor Bubba is murdered by a group of vigilantes as a result. Shortly after, a mysterious scarecrow shows up, enacting revenge on those who wronged Bubba. So atmospheric and disturbing, and well-acted, that it’s one of the more overlooked gems in horror. So why remake this one? Because it was made for TV, the kills weren’t nearly as gratifying. In short, I want the shackles removed. Also, horror could use more scarecrows.

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Co-Host of the Bloody Disgusting Podcast. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon and SeriesFest.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading