Connect with us

Editorials

Life Finds a Way: ‘Jurassic Park’ Turns 25!

Published

on

Released in theaters 25 years ago on June 11, 1993, Jurassic Park smashed box office records. That it was such a big hit was no surprise to most involved; Universal Studios outbid numerous studios and producers to win adaptation rights to Michael Crichton’s novel before it had even been finished. That Steven Spielberg was attached also made it a safe bet. For Spielberg, this was returning to familiar territory, as an opportunity to revisit Jaws but on land. This meant that while it’s more sci-fi adventure, there are also a lot of horror elements that lends to a tense thrill-ride that helped solidify Jurassic Park as an enduring classic that no sequel has quite been able to match.

Crichton adapted his own novel, toning down some of the gore and violence, and David Koepp (Death Becomes Her) reworked the script further. Having just completed Hook, Spielberg fulfilled a promise to cast young actor Joseph Mazzello in a future project, who had screen-tested for Hook but was considered too young at the time; he cast Mazzello as Tim in Jurassic Park. Casting Mazzello led to changing the role of Lex to an older sister, rather than younger, and making her the computer whiz kid. Ariana Richards was then cast based on her impressive screaming ability. Harrison Ford was offered the role of Dr. Alan Grant, but he felt it didn’t suit him so he turned it down. Sam Neill, who hadn’t read the book or knew anything about the project, was cast just a few weeks prior to shooting. A large part of what makes Jurassic Park so great is its cast; from Neill, to the kids, to Jeff Goldblum as Dr. Ian Malcolm and Laura Dern as the ever-endearing fan favorite Ellie.

Ironically, the biggest draw of the film, the dinosaurs, wound up only featured in roughly 15 minutes of actual dinosaur footage. Even still, what an impact those few scenes made. Spielberg assembled an all-star roster of special effects masters to create the dinosaurs; Stan Winston and his team built and operated the animatronic dinosaurs, Phil Tippett created Go Motion dinosaurs, Michael Lantieri handled the interactive elements on set with the dinosaurs, and Dennis Muren lead the Industrial Light and Magic team to handle the digital compositing. Jurassic Park holds up well for its use of practical effects, but it was also groundbreaking for its use of CG. The CG dinosaurs make up about 6 minutes of those 15 on screen dino minutes, and it can be difficult to tell.

Aside from the groundbreaking special effects, and the innovative way the dinosaurs moved, Spielberg once again demonstrated his uncanny ability to craft nail-biting suspense with the film’s more predatory dinosaurs. The Velociraptor became a household name after the film’s release, thanks to some terrifying scenes that featured the surprise scene-stealing dinos. Jurassic Park may not be outwardly considered horror, but it consistently has featured on “scariest movie of all time” lists by critics associations and film institutes. The scene in which Lex and Tim are slowly stalked by a pair of raptors in the kitchen continues to be cited as one of cinema’s scariest movie moments.

Jurassic Park’s legacy didn’t just bring dinosaurs back to the forefront of pop culture. Beyond the sequels, merchandising, and theme park attractions, Spielberg’s movie completely revolutionized film. It had a major impact on computer-generated effects. Subsequently, it inspired George Lucas to start on the Star Wars prequels (for better or worse), Stan Winston to join with James Cameron to form new special effects company Digital Domain, and Peter Jackson to get in touch with his inner child to eventually bring The Lord of the Rings trilogy to life.

From the quotable dialogue, the characters brought to life by its talented cast, composer John Williams earworm score that instantly invokes fond memories of the film, the overall sense of wonderment, and of course, the dinosaurs, Jurassic Park remains an all-time highlight of Spielberg’s impressive career. Here’s to 25 more years in Jurassic Park.

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Co-Host of the Bloody Disgusting Podcast. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon and SeriesFest.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading