Editorials
[Editorial] Back at the Table: Revisiting the Brilliant “Hannibal,” Five Years Later
In 2013, Hannibal Lecter became scary again.
Mind you, the witty epicurean with a taste for human flesh had been terrifying long before — in Thomas Harris’s original novels, or when Brian Cox played him as a sulky genius in Michael Mann’s 1986 Manhunter, and especially in Jonathan Demme’s Academy Award winning The Silence of the Lambs (1991). Anthony Hopkins’s magnetic and unsettling performance in that film not only earned him a Best Actor Oscar, but also cemented Hannibal’s place among the great movie monsters.
But like Dracula, Freddy, and nearly all of his predecessors, Lecter quickly devolved into something familiar and toothless. Hopkins’s portrayals grew increasingly hammy in Ridley Scott’s Hannibal (2001) and Brett Ratner’s Red Dragon (2002), and by the time French actor Gaspard Ulliel played the character in the 2007 prequel film Hannibal Rising, Lecter had been reduced to a familiar set of tics and quotes.
NBC’s weekly series Hannibal returned the character to his frightening glory. A network crime procedural hardly seems like the ideal venue for such a rehabilitation, but over the course of three seasons, showrunner Bryan Fuller and his collaborators created some of the most surreal and disturbing prime time television since the original Twin Peaks.
Set before the events of Harris’s first novel Red Dragon, Hannibal follows the relationship between FBI profiler Will Graham (Hugh Dancy), whose “pure empathy” allows him to assume anyone’s perspective, and Lecter (Mads Mikkelsen), known at this time only as a respected psychiatrist and gracious host. As they investigate cases brought to them by FBI Director Jack Crawford (Laurence Fishburne), the two men engage in something between a romance and cat and mouse game.
By his own admission, Fuller gave Hannibal a “case of the week” procedural structure as a concession to NBC, allowing it to sit comfortably alongside legal thrillers like CSI and Law & Order. For the first season and a half, episodes would involve Crawford sending a wise-cracking forensic team (featuring Aaron Abrams, Hettienne Park, and Kids in the Hall alum Scott Thompson) to investigate some bizarre crime, with Graham creating psychological profiles of the perpetrator, while Hannibal and fellow psychiatrist Alana Bloom (Caroline Dhavernas) keep Will from getting lost in murderous minds.
But despite its conventionality, the structure placed the series in a troubling alternate reality, one where anybody could be a killer. Combining the lurid absurdity of Harris’s prose with the gothic whimsy Fuller demonstrated in his earlier death-obsessed shows Dead Like Me and Pushing Daisies, Hannibal found grisly tableaux in the most inconspicuous places: a kindly pharmacist turns his victims into a mushroom farm, a caring acupuncturist blinds her patients and fills their bodies with beehives. Fully embracing Fuller’s “pretentious art film from the 80s” aesthetic, Hannibal portrayed the corpses in a manner both grotesque and gorgeous, eschewing realism for dream-like phantasmagoria.
In the era of The Blacklist and The Following, gory crime has almost become commonplace, accepted by both tv investigators and the audiences watching them. But Hannibal made the convention part of the show’s worldview. Throughout the series, Lecter nudges others towards acts of violence, in an attempt to normalize himself. He quotes great philosophers and Renaissance artists, but nothing proves his point better than a grouchy old man who gathers 30 years’ worth of victims into a macabre totem pole.
In a world such as this, what makes Hannibal Lecter remarkable? His ability to manipulate. Where all versions of the character have had that quality, most exercised their control through overt provocation —just recall Hopkins’s wide-eyed glee when Clarice Starling (Jodie Foster) recoiled at his story about the census taker. Mikkelsen’s Lecter is a consummate observer. He’s always watching from his shark black eyes and cataloguing responses to his suggestions. So detached is this Lecter that his own therapist Dr. Du Maurier (Gillian Anderson) describes him as a monster wearing a “person suit.”
And what a compelling suit it is, as Mikkelsen underplays the menace to underscore his manners. Largely restraining his murderous impulses (at least until season three, when he fully reveals his nature), Hannibal covers his machinations with good psychiatry, and his schemes with decedent dinner parties. In Mikkelsen’s hands, we understand how Lecter could live so long as among high society. This Lecter can believably demonstrate empathy for his patients, as when he encourages Jack Crawford’s wife Bella (Gina Torres) to view her terminal cancer diagnosis as change to embrace, not a defeat to suffer.
But the show never lets us forget that Hannibal’s compassion is an extension of his curiosity, not of his humanity. When Bella attempts suicide, ending life on her own terms instead of allowing the cancer to kill her, the camera rests on Hannibal watching her expiring body before he casually pulls out a coin and flips it into the air. He decides to revive her, to prolong her suffering and create turmoil in Jack’s life, all based on a coin toss, just to see what they would do.
This inhumanity also allows Mikkelsen to bring plenty of playfulness to the role, as someone who, as Du Maurier puts it to the FBI, can be brought down by his own “whimsy” toward his crimes. The camera catches the twinkle in Mikkelsen’s eye when he talks of having friends for dinner, or of eating the rude. The jokes are funny, sure, but they’re also terrifying, and not just because they’re about cannibalism. They’re terrifying because we’re enjoying the thought of eating people.
Take the end of the 7th episode of season one, which features Hannibal’s first on-screen murder spree as he collects ingredients for a dinner party. The final scene begins with a pan across a table filled with ornate dishes, guests clapping as baroque classical plays, eventually landing on Hannibal, taking it all in. “Before we begin, you must all be warned,” he declares with a pregnant pause. “Nothing here is vegetarian.”
We viewers share in the attendees’ satisfied chuckles, and when Hannibal raises a glass in salute, he raises it directly toward the camera, toward us as well. As his smirk reveals, Lecter has accomplished his goal: he’s made his guests into ravenous cannibals and he’s made us enjoy it.
That’s why Fuller’s most effective stroke was making Will Graham the protagonist of Hannibal’s story. An FBI agent who cares for stray dogs obviously makes for an easier audience surrogate than a cannibal psychiatrist (no matter how charming), but Will’s empathy abilities better serve the show’s primary theme and builds the tension.
The series’s iconography demonstrates the relationships between Will and the criminals he hunts, particularly Hannibal himself. Throughout the show, Will has visions of a black stag, a representation of the serial killer Garrett Jacob Hobbs (Vladimir Jon Cubrt), who Will had to shoot in the series pilot and to whom he feels a connection. As Lecter pushes Will into becoming a butcher himself, it mutates into a slate black creature with Hannibal’s face and the stag’s horns, sometimes stalking Will and sometimes giving birth to a chimera with Will’s face.
But for viewers, the most powerful illustration of Will’s vulnerability is the visual representation of his empathy. These sequences open with establishing shots on a crime scene, such as a man with a cello neck protruding from his throat or a dead family with mirrors in their eyes. Yellow bars wipe across the screen, each pass erasing the viscera until all lives and limbs have been restored. The audience then watches the crime play out, with Will taking the place of the murderer, narrating each of his bloody actions until he declares, “This is my design.”
As with the killer of the week structure, these empathy sequences serve a generic purpose by providing exposition. But they also show us Will’s unraveling mind; they make us scared for him and, by extension, scared of Hannibal.
One of the best examples occurs in the 4th episode of season two, which features the death of Beverly Katz (Park), a member of the show’s forensics team. Pushed by the incarcerated Will to investigate a murder, Katz discovers evidence of Hannibal’s involvement. Director David Semel frames the scene in classic horror movie fashion: in the foreground, dread creeps across Katz’s face as she realizes what she’s found; in the background, Hannibal emerges from the shadows. Cut to black.
The real terror comes in the next episode, in which Jack finds Katz’s body, cut into vertical slices and displayed in glass. Jack brings Will from prison to profile the killer, and viewers watch a recreation of the scene. After the yellow bars undo the carnage, we watch Will strangle Katz. We see him freeze her body and cut it into bits, preparing it for the display. We see him fully corrupted by Lecter.
This tension plays out in various ways throughout Hannibal’s three seasons, giving us a fresh take on Lecter. He’s just as charming and witty as he’s ever been, and despite the constraints of network television, Hannibal kills and cooks with memorable violence.
But as we grow to know and love Will, Jack, and the other characters, and as we continue to enjoy Mikkelsen’s mesmerizing performance, we find that Lecter has stuck in our head. Our bodies might be safe from a voracious tv cannibal, but we experience a new horror as we turn off the tv and still feel him there, nibbling on the corners of our minds.
Editorials
Steven Spielberg Just Directed the Scariest Scene of His Career in ‘Disclosure Day’
Steven Spielberg has always been conversant in the cinematic language of the horror genre, despite relatively few credits in the genre. His contributions as a writer and producer on things like Poltergeist are legendary, and films like Duel and Jaws certainly wield the horror genre in remarkable, often chilling ways. He may not be a horror filmmaker, but he knows when he needs to scare us, and he has the tools to make that happen.
I didn’t go into Disclosure Day, Spielberg’s alien epic, expecting outright horror, and indeed the film leans much more into thrilling than frightening. This is not a horror film, but for a few minutes in the middle, much to my surprise, it became one.
Spielberg has filmed more than his fair share of scary scenes over the years, but with Disclosure Day, he directed a new contender for the scariest scene of his entire career.
SPOILERS AHEAD for Disclosure Day!

Josh O’Connor in DISCLOSURE DAY, directed by Steven Spielberg.
Among the various alien secrets laced throughout Disclosure Day are a trio of palm-sized rods, the color of pencil graphite. These rods, originating from another planet, can be used for a number of things, but for the purposes of this scene, the most important is “diving,” gripping the rod in one bare hand and using its power to “dive” into the mind of another person.
The person holding the rod in this scene is Noah Scanlon (Colin Firth), head of shadowy cybersecurity firm Wordex, who is hellbent on keeping human knowledge of extraterrestrials secret from the general public. Scanlon’s trying to find whistleblower Daniel Kellner (Josh O’Connor), who’s got all of those alien secrets tucked in a backpack while he’s on the run, and while Daniel’s more experienced mind is protected from diving, his girlfriend Jane’s (Eve Hewson) is not. So, monitored by medical personnel at Wordex headquarters (diving is dangerous), Scanlon pushes his way into Jane’s mind to find the location of Daniel’s safe house.
A telepathic invasion is scary enough on its own, but Spielberg doesn’t stop there. When Scanlon dives into Eve’s mind, he appears to her to be sitting across the kitchen table, like he’s in the room. Her bright blue eyes turn Scanlon’s dark brown, and she loses much of her control over her own body, not to mention her mind. Moments before, Daniel finally shared with her the secrets in his backpack, so Jane is shocked, conflicted, deeply vulnerable when Scanlon slips inside her head. This is not just telepathy. This is possession.
Spielberg underscores this not just through the visual language of the scene, as Jane breaks out in a sweat and struggles to sit upright as Scanlon invades her mind, but through Jane’s background. As she revealed to Daniel earlier in the film, Jane is a former novitiate nun who left her convent when she began to question her calling. She still believes firmly in God and, more importantly, believes that perhaps proof of alien life should be kept secret from the public because, in her eyes, it would upset the entire balance of faith in the world. God is a defining factor for humankind, Jane argues, and showing humanity proof of creatures from the stars would undercut that in dangerous ways.

This context, combined with the crucifix necklace Jane’s holding in her hand at the time of the dive, makes this scene the closest thing Spielberg will ever shoot to something out of The Exorcist. It’s not just a battle of wills, but a battle of faith. As an amoral technocrat worms his way into her memories, her beliefs, her faith, Jane turns the crucifix into a weapon, squeezing it until her hand bleeds when she discovers that a pain response can momentarily push Scanlon out of her head.
Of course, when you put a crucifix and a bloody hand together, it conjures images of stigmata. Screenwriter David Koepp pushes the allusion further by having Scanlon quote Christ on the cross to Jane by way of convincing her that she must be the one to stop Daniel by any means necessary.
It’s easy to see why this is scary, right?
On a very basic level, you have a powerful, wealthy man subduing and assaulting an innocent young woman, which is frightening enough. Then, the layers of the scene kick in. Scanlon doesn’t just assault Jane, but possesses her, seizes her memories, her knowledge, and finally her own free will, all while Jane literally clings to her faith in an effort to fight back. Disclosure Day is, among other things, a story about who has a right to the truth, and Scanlon believes that he should be the arbiter of that truth. Not just the truth as he sees it, but the truth as Jane sees it as well. If they don’t see eye to eye, he’ll make her.
But the possession, as it turns out, cuts both ways. Using the rod to dive is, for a normal human being, an intensely strenuous process. Scanlon admits that previous attempts almost killed him, and for some members of his time, so much as touching the rod results in a near-death experience. Even accessing an unprepared mind like Jane’s takes a lot of Scanlon, and when she kicks him out by squeezing the crucifix – again, so much meaning embedded in the details here – his team holds him back and tries to offer medical intervention. But Scanlon persists, pushing them away, and keeps diving back in.
This means that Jane can’t escape him because he just won’t stop pushing back through her defenses, but it also means that each time Scanlon enters her mind, and thus the safe house, he looks more monstrous. By the end, through a combination of lighting and makeup, Firth barely looks human, conjuring up images of the possessed Father Karras at the end of The Exorcist.

Colin Firth (center, standing) in DISCLOSURE DAY, directed by Steven Spielberg.
On a pure, visceral craft level, all of this is quite frightening, but the real trick to making this scene into Spielberg’s most terrifying lies in the more existential horror surrounding all of this. Disclosure Day is a film about the battle for the truth over extraterrestrials, but it’s also about a fight against an impossibly powerful surveillance state, the devaluing of human and alien lives in favor of some nebulous collection of assets, and the value of the individual in a world that increasingly lumps people into demographic boxes and writes them off.
In this scene, the surveillance state becomes supernatural, a human life is worth less than a piece of information, and an extragovernmental technocrat would rather sacrifice his own humanity than see reason. In 2026, few things could be more terrifying than that. Spielberg knows this and wields it mightily, proving once again that, while he’s not a strictly horror filmmaker, he can direct horror with the best of them.
Disclosure Day is in theaters now.

Eve Hewson (second from left) in DISCLOSURE DAY, directed by Steven Spielberg.





You must be logged in to post a comment.