Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

Your Suffering Will Be Legendary: ‘Hellbound: Hellraiser II’ Turns 30!

Published

on

hellraiser II

December theatrical releases are usually reserved for big blockbusters that will draw families to the box office around the holidays or serious award contenders. When you think Christmas, you usually think uplifting films that evoke warm fuzzy feelings. Or, if you’re New World Pictures (or a horror fan), perhaps you’re thinking leather, torture, Cenobites, and a Lament Configuration instead. Released a mere 14 months after the first film, Hellbound: Hellraiser II arrived in theaters on December 23, 1988. The close proximity to Christmas didn’t phase audience goers, either, and the sequel did fairly well at the box office considering the season and limited scope of release.

In the sequel, we find the nightmare isn’t over for poor Kirsty Cotton (Ashley Lawrence), who has been institutionalized after the events of the first film. It’s a lucky coincidence for Dr. Channard (Kenneth Cranham), who has long been in search of the Lament Configuration, and uses the information Kirsty has unwittingly given him to revive Julia Cotton (Clare Higgins) in the same gruesome fashion we saw Frank Cotton resurrect in Hellraiser.

The iconic Cenobites may be the poster children for this series, but Julia Cotton is the true villain of the first two films. She’s one of the best horror villains of all time, really, in large part to Higgins performance. She’s the epitome of ruthless, and in Hellbound: Hellraiser II, that ruthlessness meant Julia’s been thriving in Hell. She has new ambitions and no one will stand in her way. Not even former lover turned betrayer Frank Cotton, as noted in one of the best moments in the film.

Despite attempts to warn everyone, Kirsty is forced back into the nightmare thanks to the actions of those around her, namely innocent patient Tiffany (Iomegn Boorman), Dr. Channard, and a mangled corpse that claims to be her suffering father. Whereas her wicked stepmother is callous and bloodthirsty, Kirsty is resilient and caring. Even when dragged into the Labyrinth of Hell, her focus is saving Tiffany. In other words, Kirsty and Julia are a perfect balance.

Perhaps more important of all, Hellbound: Hellraiser II doesn’t just continue Kirsty’s story, but it expands the universe in a gratifying way. This time, Kirsty finds herself in the Cenobite’s domain. A maze of hellish nightmares, Kirsty has to battle her family’s demons and actual demons. This sequel gives us more than just Cenobites, but the overseer of the Labyrinth of Hell, monstrous god Leviathan. It gives us the creation of a new Cenobite, while giving glimpses of the previous Cenobites’ humanity.

Clive Barker handed over the directorial reigns to Tony Randel, who served as production executive on the first film and knew the world well, while Barker stayed on as executive producer. It was through Rendel’s previous work in the universe, and the geometrical artwork of M.C. Escher that lent to the unique look for Hell. One of the biggest hurdles Rendel had to contend with as director was getting the film approved by the MPAA. Julia’s bloody mattress turned gooey resurrection became the biggest sticking point of the whole film for the board. It took a lot of trimming, and a lost appeal, to get the film approved for an R-rating for its theatrical release.

Luckily, the theatrical release was limited, and it eventually made its way onto home release unrated – gore intact. So, the most common version found today is the unrated version. Blood, viscera, interdimensional demons, expanded mythology and compelling characters in both Julia Cotton and series final girl Kirsty Cotton makes for a sequel that arguably surpasses its predecessor. Hellbound: Hellraiser II further embedded its characters into the horror lexicon, and holds up well even 30 years later. It will tear your soul apart… again.

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon, SeriesFest, and Popcorn Frights Film Fest.

Click to comment

Editorials

Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel

Published

on

Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction

The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.

That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.

It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.

That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.

The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’

For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.

This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.

This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.

Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.

So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.

The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.

Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.

While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.

At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.

After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.

Continue Reading