Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

There’s Only One King

For over 40 years, author Stephen King has been tapping into our greatest fears. With the new ‘Pet Sematary’ on the way, we look back at his career and why his writing is so timeless.

Published

on

“Pet Sematary”—in its misspelled form—was scribbled by neighborhood children behind Stephen King’s house, providing the inspiration for the title of his 1983 book. It was then adapted into a movie by Mary Lambert in 1989. Thirty years later, the cult classic has been reimagined by filmmakers Kevin Kolsch and Dennis Widmyer to terrify a whole new generation of moviegoers.

Pet Sematary is about a family who moves into a new town and discovers a series of strange occurrences at a nearby ancient burial site where dead pets are laid to rest in the hopes that they will come back to life. After a tragic accident, the parents turn to the cemetery’s magic powers to revive one of their children, which results in a whole new nightmare. It’s not only a highly anticipated 2019 release but also another testament to the timeless resonance of King’s stories.

“HAVING KING’S WORK TRANSLATE FROM PAGE TO SCREEN HAS FURTHER EMBEDDED HIS NAME IN THE POP CULTURE CONSCIOUSNESS.”

Multi award-winning author Stephen King has penned so many iconic tales over the course of his career—with 58 novels and approximately 200 short stories on his resume—that it’s impossible to choose just one as his defining work. His first novel Carrie (1974), about a telekinetic teen girl with an abusive mother, led to director Brian De Palma’s powerful on-screen adaptation. The 1976 film boosted the reputation of King, who previously was just another struggling, unknown writer. In a 1979 New York Times interview, he said, “The [Carrie] movie made the book and the book made me.” But then there’s also The Shining, It, Misery, Cujo, Salem’s Lot, and, of course, the aforementioned Pet Sematary in his bibliography. Many of which are notable for being both bestselling books and box office gold. It’s no small feat for a man from such humble beginnings.



Born in 1947 in Portland, Maine, King studied English at the University of Maine. It was on campus that he would meet his wife Tabitha—a prolific author in her own right. The couple built a life for themselves in nearby Orrington, which would later play a big role in King writing Pet Sematary’. He and his lived right next to a major truck route where many pets became roadkill. Local kids made a habit of burying their cats and dogs in a makeshift cemetery nearby. As fate would have it, King’s family cat wound up killed by a semi and he was forced to have a conversation about death with his young daughter. That dialogue and experience would become the foundation for what would become Pet Sematary.

Over the course of  his 40-plus year career, King has penned several novels that have become the groundwork for classic film adaptations, from auteurs like Stanley Kubrick and Brian De Palma. Having his work translate from page to screen has further embedded King’s name in the horror and pop culture consciousness. That impact has been even more evident in recent years as both It— originally a two-night television miniseries in 1990—and Carrie have been remade as big budget films. The new Pet Sematary is shaping up to be an even more horrifying adaptation.

Pet Sematary, which originally hit theatres in 1989, is next in line. Starring Jason Clarke, Amy Seimetz, and John Lithgow, 2019 version follows the twisted journey of Dr. Louis Creed (Clarke), a flawed hero whose trauma leads him to ultimately foolish but understandable motivations. It’s not hard to sympathize with Dr. Creed’s decision to resurrect his daughter after she was struck by a truck, especially if you’re a parent or know the harrowing emptiness of living on when someone you love is gone. That’s what makes Pet Sematary such a poignant story about grief.

“EVEN AMIDST SUPERNATURAL HAPPENINGS, KING’S STORIES GET AT THE HEART OF PEOPLE’S VERY REAL ANXIETIES.”

Diehard King fans will be quick to note that in the novel and original film it was actually Dr. Creed’s toddler son Gage who was killed and reanimated, but the new film reveals a slightly different vision. Rather than focusing the horror on someone so young, the project utilizes the range of slightly older actor to breathe new life into King’s book. In an interview with Entertainment Weekly, producer Lorenzo di Bonaventura said, “Gage is so young, you can’t really do that much with him. So this way, we’re able to really get underneath our affected child. We’re able to get into the psychological horror of a child [coming back] because of [the daughter’s] age.” Given how positive early reviews have been, it seems critics are on board with the change as well.

Even amidst supernatural happenings, from undead creatures to vampires, King’s stories get at the heart of very real, private anxieties that happen to ordinary people. Perhaps that’s why they’re so terrifying: the notion that it could happen to you. And because King’s books center on universal and timeless themes, they are ripe for adaptations. While the terrifying story remains the same in the upcoming Pet Sematary, the subtle plot shifts should be expected because as the film’s tagline says: “They don’t come back the same.”

Pet Sematary is in theatres April 5th.

Click to comment

Editorials

Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel

Published

on

Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction

The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.

That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.

It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.

That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.

The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’

For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.

This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.

This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.

Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.

So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.

The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.

Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.

While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.

At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.

After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.

Continue Reading