Connect with us

Editorials

[Butcher Block] Dario Argento’s Video Nasty ‘Tenebrae’

Published

on

Butcher Block is a weekly series celebrating horror’s most extreme films and the minds behind them. Dedicated to graphic gore and splatter, each week will explore the dark, the disturbed, and the depraved in horror, and the blood and guts involved. For the films that use special effects of gore as an art form, and the fans that revel in the carnage, this series is for you.

By the time Dario Argento made and released Tenebrae in 1982, he’d already perfected the art of giallo. Between his Animal Trilogy and Deep Red in the ‘70s, he’d already established himself a master of gialli before switching gears and dipping into the supernatural with Suspiria and Inferno. Tenebrae marked his return to giallo, and while it faced censorship in his own native country, it came along at just the precise moment of time to draw the ire of the Director of Public Prosecutions in the UK. Successfully prosecuted under the Obscene Publications Act, along with 38 other horror films, Tenebrae was banned until 1999- where it finally released with a few seconds trimmed. It wasn’t until 2003 that it finally passed uncut. Stateside, Argento’s film wasn’t released until 1984, heavily cut under the title Unsane. By today’s standards, it’s fairly tame, but that doesn’t mean it’s difficult to see why it ruffled the feathers of censors- it gets extremely bloody.

The plot sees American horror novelist Peter Neal (Anthony Franciosa) in Rome promoting his latest release, with his literary agent Bullmer (A Nightmare on Elm Street’s John Saxon) and assistant Anne (Daria Nicolodi) in tow. His arrival coincides with the start of a series of grisly murders, and the bodies bear pages of his novel Tenebrae. The police seek Neal out for questioning, then assistance, as a result.

Most of the victims are women, at least in the first half. Throat slashings, stabbings, and even a tense, drawn out dog attack sequence. Many of the victims are affiliated with Neal in some way. And then there are the weird flashback sequences, in which a woman is getting frisky with multiple unseen men until one of them slaps her. The rest chase that assailant down so the woman can get revenge by way of kicking him then shoving the heel of her red stiletto in his mouth. It’s every bit as violent and sexual as it implies. But halfway through, Argento gives equal opportunity for vicious slayings to the men as well. Axe swings to the head and back, strangulations, and surprise impalements means that the men get it just a brutally and the women. Another rarity is that the majority of the deaths take place in broad daylight. The killer has no qualms about stabbing his victims even in a fairly populated street square, under the bright sun.

The diversity in kills isn’t just gender specific; a pair of lesbian lovers fall victim to the murderer, and Argento wanted to depict their relationship openly, without judgment. Considering Italy was conservative toward homosexuality at the time, Argento felt this was the main reason Tenebrae was censored in its native release, not the gore. Sexual deviancy is the central theme here, both in how many of the victims are sexually liberated and how the killer is sexually repressed. The passages of Neal’s book, Tenebrae, gives massive insight to the themes and motivation, but it also adds a layer of culpability in terms of how we consume and digest art. All of which to say that there’s a lot going on in this particular Video Nasty, making it far more than the gorefest the censors labeled it.

If you haven’t seen Tenebrae, I won’t spoil the identity of the killer, but I will say it’s one of the most satisfying. And one of the earliest adaptors of this particular type of killer. Which leads to the scene that was mostly widely trimmed in its various censored releases – the blood spraying death of Neal’s ex-wife Jane (Veronica Lario). Seated by a window in wait, an axe crashes through it and chops through her arm. Blood sprays everywhere, painting those white walls crimson. The killer isn’t done with her, or anyone else that stops by her house after.

Like most horror films, it wasn’t widely regarded by critics upon release but has since found reappraisal in the decades since. Uncut releases no doubt helped that reappraisal. From a visual standpoint, it’s Argento at the top of his game. But more than just a well shot, stunning giallo, it’s clear Argento had a lot on his mind with Tenebrae.

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Co-Host of the Bloody Disgusting Podcast. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon and SeriesFest.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading