Connect with us

Editorials

‘Eye See You’: Have YOU Seen Sylvester Stallone’s Only Horror Movie?

Published

on

Sylvester Stallone has done it all. He’s earned multiple Oscar nominations for a franchise he created himself, and he’s headlined blockbuster action movies for decades. He directed the sequel to Saturday Night Fever. He’s been one of the biggest movie stars in the world. Heck, he even did a porno once.

And yes, although most people don’t know about it, Sylvester Stallone has also starred in one horror movie. Only one.

What’s more, unlike the many mainstream actors who appear in a couple horror movies early in their career and then move on from the genre – see: Leonardo DiCaprio (Critters 3), Tom Hanks (He Knows You’re Alone) and Jennifer Aniston (Leprechaun) – Stallone’s horror movie was made decades after the actor became a celebrity. And STILL most people don’t know about it.

The movie is a slasher called Eye See You (a.k.a. The Outpost, a.k.a. D-Tox), which was shot in the late 1990s, shelved, re-edited, and then eventually dumped into the straight to video market in 2002. As you can imagine, with a pedigree like that, it’s not exactly a masterpiece. But it’s also hardly the worst movie Stallone ever made.

Eye See You stars Stallone as F.B.I. agent Jake Malloy, who at the start of the film is hunting a serial killer who only kills police officers. When the killer murders one of Malloy’s personal friends, it’s actually just a trick to lure him away from his home, so the slasher can murder Malloy’s girlfriend, Mary (Dina Meyer).

With Mary murdered, and the killer seemingly dead after a shootout and foot chase, Eye See You cuts to three months later. Malloy has become an alcoholic, and his best friend and former superior officer Hendricks (Charles S. Dutton) tries to reach out to him.

At this point, Hendricks makes the bizarre mistake of telling a depressed alcoholic who orders more drinks by telling the bartender to “Kill me again,” that he should “act like a damn man” and “stop pissing Mary’s memory one sorry-ass day at a time.” He puts a gun on the table and dares Malloy to kill himself in the middle of a tavern, and when Malloy tries to take him up on the offer Hendricks leaves… because clearly Malloy is not a danger to himself and others and doesn’t need a friend right now.

Malloy, rather predictably, tries to kill himself, and the movie cuts again to a later date. Hendricks and Malloy are now in Wyoming, heading to an isolated detox center for cops with substance abuse problems. It’s a former military bunker that was turned into a mental asylum, which makes it look more like the setting of a horror movie than the kind of place any reasonable person would expect to find a new and positive perspective on life.

The rest of Eye See You takes place predominantly at this facility, where a serial killer – who may be the original killer – starts picking off the patients one-by-one in the middle of a snowstorm.

Those patients are played by an impressive cavalcade of character actors: Jeffrey Wright (Westworld), Robert Patrick (Terminator 2), Courtney B. Vance (American Crime Story), Sean Patrick Flanery (The Boondock Saints), and Robert Prosky (Christine), to name a few. The facility’s skeleton crew is also a Who’s Who of recognizable actors, including Kris Kristofferson (Blade), Polly Walker (Pennyworth), Stephen Lang (Don’t Breathe) and Tom Berenger (Platoon).

So let’s recap: Eye See You has a cast full of recognizable and incredibly talented actors, all of them thrown together into horrifying peril, in a concept that’s not exactly brilliant but is, at least, enjoyably high-concept. It was such a promising production that Ron Howard allegedly came close to directing it himself before opting to make How the Grinch Stole Christmas instead (which wound up being the highest grossing film of the year 2000, so that was probably the smart play).

What the heck happened to Eye See You that made it such a flop that Universal Studios dropped it? If only the answer was salacious or hilarious or bizarre. The simple fact is that the film, though hardly the worst that Stallone ever starred in, wasn’t very good.

Eye See You squanders a good set-up with laughable details and atrocious dialogue. If you ever wanted to see Sylvester Stallone try to romance Dina Meyers with a wind-up monkey toy, and telling her “Roses are obsolete, monkeys are the new language of love,” then you’re a very unusual person but this is definitely the movie for you. If you ever wanted to see a film in which Jeffrey Wright goes out in the middle of a blizzard to look for tracks in the snow – in the middle of a blizzard, I remind you – then the same is true.

One of the key plot points in Eye See You is that all of these characters who, again, are here because they are a danger to themselves and others, have to turn in their guns before they enter the detox center. Why, exactly, they were allowed to keep their service weapons after they tried to kill themselves is never explained, probably because it makes no sense.

What’s more, Eye See You completely squanders the obvious appeal of seeing this very impressive ensemble cast get to actually act together. There’s only one scene of their group therapy sessions before the plot kicks in, and the only thing they have to discuss from there on out is who’s the bad guy, whether they’re all going to split up and how badly screwed they all are.

It never occurs to these people to all stay in one place, to start a fire after the boiler breaks down, and simply wait out the storm. The whole film is built on extremely contrived reasons to split them all up so they can get killed one after the other. Which would be fine if this were a schlocky slasher made by someone with a sense of humor or at least outlandish bravado. Watching an all-star cast of macho character actors get butchered by an unseen bad guy is a great idea for good time, but watching it happen in such perfunctory fashion pretty much ruins it.

Eye See You was directed by Jim Gillespie, who was just coming off the blockbuster success of I Know What You Did Last Summer. He seems eager, here, to treat the film less like a slasher and more like a serious dramatic thriller. But the material is so hackneyed and corny that trying to take it seriously just makes it dull. Even the film’s big finale – in which Stallone impales the killer on a wheel of spikes and then pulls the killer off the spikes, lifts him over his head and impales him on the same spikes all over again – plays out like nobody noticed how awesome or weird it was.

There are worse horror films than Eye See You. There are worse Stallone films than Eye See You. Indeed, it’s easy to imagine that if the film were worse, and had genuine camp value, Universal might have released it anyway just to make a quick buck. Instead, it’s practically a non-film. I’ve seen it three times now, for various reasons, and when I watched it again I had actually forgotten who the killer was. Not because it’s a clever script, but because it simply didn’t matter. Practically anyone in the cast could have been the murderer and Eye See You would have been essentially the same. That’s not typically the sign of a brilliant mystery.

Eye See You is a film for Stallone completionists only, or for horror lovers who are into obscure misfires. It’s not painful to watch, it’s just kinda dumb and perfunctory. If you want a REAL horror show from Sylvester Stallone, you should stick to [insert perfunctory lazy joke about Stop! Or My Mom Will Shoot! or Judge Dredd here].

William Bibbiani writes film criticism in Los Angeles, with bylines at The Wrap, Bloody Disgusting and IGN. He co-hosts three weekly podcasts: Critically Acclaimed (new movie reviews), The Two-Shot (double features of the best/worst movies ever made) and Canceled Too Soon (TV shows that lasted only one season or less). Member LAOFCS, former Movie Trivia Schmoedown World Champion, proud co-parent of two annoying cats.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading