Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

Disney’s Terrifying Original Movie ‘Don’t Look Under the Bed’ Turns 20!

Published

on

Don't Look Under the Bed (1999)

Twenty years ago, on October 9, 1999, a Disney Channel Original Movie premiered on television that instilled nightmares for a generation. If you were a kid growing up in the ‘90s, then there’s a high probability this movie and its nightmarish imagery embedded itself into your skull and never left. For many, Don’t Look Under the Bed is considered Disney’s most terrifying original movie. It was one of the rare titles to earn a PG-rating for its scary scenes. Perhaps too scary; the Disney Channel ultimately stopped airing the film at the request of unhappy parents that complained it was too much for their kids to handle. Two decades later, the film is still a standout for its bold take on the boogeyman and grown-up themes.

The movie is set in the small town of Middleberg, where a series of strange pranks is setting its residents on edge. Alarm clocks are going off hours too early, dogs wind up on the roofs of homes, and even the school’s pool is filled with gelatin. All signs seem to point toward teen Frances Bacon McCausland (Erin Chambers) as the prank mastermind. Frances suspects the culprit is new kid Larry Houdini (Ty Hodges), but it quickly becomes clear that only she can see him. It turns out that Larry is an imaginary friend, and Frances’ only ally in her fight against the true villain- a terrifying boogeyman that really has it out for her.

That plot set up doesn’t exactly scream “scary” does it? For a good chunk of the first act, Don’t Look Under the Bed feels like pretty standard Disney fare. Except for one tiny little motif that keeps recurring, indicating something very foreboding ahead; the freaking dolls. Frances is constantly in a state of defense and confusion as the scapegoat of the prankster, so only the audience is aware that something sinister has invaded her home. How? The porcelain dolls in Frances’ room move on their own accord when no one is looking. That’s nightmare fuel for a grown-up, let alone a kid.

As the narrative progresses, the more we get to know and like imaginary friend Larry Houdini. But Larry also starts to undergo bodily and personality changes. It’s not of the puberty variety, either. Poor Larry is slowly transforming into a boogeyman. Gnarly long fingernails. Glowing purple eyes. And the teeth. Sharp, pointy rows of teeth. It’s pretty creepy, actually. Especially when he crawls along the floor. Never mind that this is before Frances’ baby brother is dragged under the bed into a bizarre boogeyman world for an exhilarating third act showdown.

Between the haunting atmosphere, subtle touches, and full-on creepy boogeyman design, it’s not so surprising in hindsight that this movie would have put parents on edge. It is surprising, though, to realize just how mature and timeless the central themes are. Larry is turning into a boogeyman because the child he was attached to stopped believing in him far too soon, before the child was ready. Being forced to face adulthood doesn’t seem outside the norm for Disney, but the why of it is.

It turns out that Larry’s kid buddy was Darwin, Frances’ baby brother. Throughout the film, the McCausland family references Darwin’s former bout with illness. It turns out he’s in remission from Leukemia, and Frances pushed Darwin to shun his imaginary friend out of her own fears. It’s not just growing up too soon that permeates this film, it’s the tangible and adult fears of death. Of cancer or illness that threaten to claim your loved ones. When Darwin crawls into his sister’s bed and confesses that he’s afraid to get sick again, it’s heartbreakingly mature. Don’t Look Under the Bed offers up the one-two punch of both supernatural and real-world horrors.

Disney has been on a spree announcing exclusive titles for their upcoming streaming service, including tons of Disney Channel Originals. Luckily, they’ve announced this movie as part of its exclusive offerings. Don’t Look Under the Bed earned its PG rating and its reputation as “too scary for kids.” Even twenty years later, its unexpected depth and complex approach to the scares still holds up well. This one deserves to haunt a whole new generation.

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon, SeriesFest, and Popcorn Frights Film Fest.

Click to comment

Editorials

Taking a Closer Look at the ‘Christmas Carol’ Ghosts of Ti West’s ‘Ebenezer’

Published

on

The trailer for Ti West’s upcoming adaptation of A Christmas Carol raised a lot of eyebrows when it dropped earlier this week. While plenty of folks initially dismissed Ebenezer as a derivative project meant to cash in on the recent wave of unnecessary prequels that expand the backstory of beloved characters (such as 2023’s Wonka), Charles Dickens’ original novel already made a point of exploring Ebenezer Scrooge’s origins in detail – meaning that this new film is likely just a particularly faithful adaptation of the source material under a different name.

Couple that with the fact that the movie is being helmed by a genuine horror auteur and I think it’s safe to say that the latest iteration of the first modern ghost story is in good hands.

That being said, one detail that immediately jumped out at me during the brief teaser (other than a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it nod to Johnny Depp’s iconic bedroom death scene from the original A Nightmare on Elm Street) is the fact that many of Ebenezer’s ghosts appear to have been directly lifted from the iconic John Leech illustrations that accompanied the first edition of Dickens’ novel.

Here are a couple of stills from the trailer compared to the original artwork:

The Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come in ‘Ebenezer’ and ‘A Christmas Carol’

The Phantoms in ‘A Christmas Carol’ and ‘Ebenezer’

Marley’s Ghost in ‘Ebenezer’ and ‘A Christmas Carol’

Mainly working with old-school wood and steel engravings that would later be transferred to print, Leech was instrumental in crafting the iconic look of history’s most influential phantoms – especially since Dickens is said to have been deeply involved with the creation of these so-called “comic illustrations.”

And since the novel is commonly said to have popularized spiritualism in Victorian England, much of the ghostly iconography that we still see in genre media to this very day (including some of Ti West’s previous films) can be traced back to the author’s partnership with Leech.

Ebenezer won’t be the first A Christmas Carol adaptation to borrow heavily from these designs, but I can appreciate how Ti West is incorporating an important part of horror history into his latest film.

Ebenezer will be available in theaters starting November 13.

Continue Reading