Connect with us

Editorials

‘The Exorcist III’ at 30: Brad Dourif’s Incredible Performance as the Gemini Killer is Legion

Published

on

The mere mention of The Exorcist III tends to bring to mind two things: one of the most effective and iconic jump scares of all time, and Brad Dourif‘s intense performance as the Gemini Killer. That William Peter Blatty‘s sequel already boasts a stacked cast, led by powerhouse George C. Scott, only speaks to the strength of Dourif’s scene-stealing appearance in the sequel. In the thirty years since the film’s release, on August 17, 1990, the discourse has explored just about every corner of Blatty’s vision. Even still, not enough praise has been heaped upon Dourif for what he brought to the table, or the effort he put into the character.

Blatty, who wrote the original novel and then a screenplay for The Exorcist, eventually conceived of a story for a sequel for William Friedkin to direct. When creative differences caused Friedkin to back out, Blatty instead turned the story idea into a novel, Legion. After it landed on the bestseller list, he then decided to turn it into a screenplay. After more creative differences with potential directors, including John Carpenter, Blatty took on the director’s seat. He cast Scott as Lt. William F. Kinderman, and Dourif as Patient X, a psychiatric patient claiming to be both the deceased Gemini Killer and Father Karras.

Set fifteen years after the events of the first film, a new series of murders plagues Georgetown, and they bear an uncanny resemblance to the murders of serial killer James “The Gemini” Venamun. The only hitch is that Venamun was executed around the same time as Karras sacrificed his life to save young Regan MacNeil. Kinderman’s investigation leads him to an amnesiac psychiatric patient in the hospital, who claims to be both the Gemini Killer and Father Karras.

The scenes between Scott and Dourif are mesmerizing; Dourif’s long monologues contain every bit of the actor’s trademark intensity. The actor has a way of humanizing even the evillest of characters, which makes them far more compelling as a result. The sheer volume of dialogue spoken, and while Dourif’s role remains confined to a straightjacket, meant a tricky performance to get right. It took time… a lot of time. Both Blatty and Dourif went through it line by line, breaking down each singular thought to get the character right, to make it engaging for an audience. He nailed it- the progression of emotions in his monologues are enthralling to watch. As is the push and pull between Venamun and the stoic Kinderman.

The only catch? The studio wasn’t happy with the cut Blatty turned in. His more character-focused, less supernatural movie ended on a bleak note- with Kinderman shooting Patient X in the head- and contained absolutely no exorcisms. They demanded reshoots that would include an exorcism. Moreover, they wanted Jason Miller, the original Father Karras, to play Patient X for brand recognition. That resulted in Blatty calling Dourif to break the news that his part in the film would be cut entirely.

Blatty’s plans would quickly be changed once again when Miller’s declining health and battle with alcoholism proved too difficult for the actor to retain the large swaths of dialogue his part entailed. So, Blatty called Dourif back and asked him to return to the role, in a slightly different capacity. To appease the studios, Miller would play Karras, and Dourif would play the Gemini Killer. He had roughly only two days to prepare for the altered role and script, still with an overabundance of monologuing to study.

This wasn’t the first time Dourif came through on short notice. On Child’s Play, Dourif was only cast to play killer Charles Lee Ray in the opening, with Jessica Walter providing the voice of Chucky. Director Tom Holland realized her voice didn’t fit the character and called Dourif back in to voice the now-iconic killer doll. All of which to say, that throughout Dourif’s career, he’s shown immense reliability and professionalism. Chucky is his most recognizable role, for good reason, but the Gemini Killer marks arguably his strongest performance in horror. Dourif made portraying such a tricky role look effortless, which is no small feat.

Dourif himself prefers Blatty’s original version over the theatrical, and it makes perfect sense; playing all components of Patient X gave added complexity and even a little ambiguity to the part. He still shines just as bright in the theatrical cut, though, digging in and grabbing hold of Venamun’s family issues to give a grounded, empathetic performance that makes for one of the most memorable characters of all time. To scene-steal from the likes of George C. Scott alone makes Dourif an actor worth celebrating.

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Co-Host of the Bloody Disgusting Podcast. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon and SeriesFest.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading