Editorials
Why ‘The Crazies’ and ‘Dawn of the Dead’ Make for a Perfect Horror Remake Double Feature
According to some, remakes do untold damage to childhoods the world over, leaving nothing but tears, regrets, and crumpled up memories in their wake. Obviously, the idea of redoing a beloved movie is a touchy subject for film fans as the results are sometimes less than stellar. In some cases, they’re not even adequate. But horror remakes fair a little better. Specifically, ones with a creative team with something on their mind or a singular perspective.
Every week in October, I’m suggesting a double feature of remakes for your Halloween viewing pleasures. The movies are connected and never random, even if the connection is not-so-obvious at first sight. Besides the fact we’re all dying for horror to watch during the spooky season, double features are great introductions to movies for the uninitiated. And for seasoned vets, watching two movies back-to-back can sometimes put them in a different light.
So, without further ado, let’s get to the picks.
What Are the Movies?
Zack Snyder’s Dawn of the Dead and Breck Eisner’s The Crazies provide two different angles on George Romero’s material. The pace is different, the look is different, the reverence to Romero is different, and they’re both products of their respective decades. Don’t get it confused; these movies have their similarities as well. Chief among them the fact they’re both dope movies in their own right and stand as two of the best remakes of all-time, horror or otherwise.
Dawn of the Dead is quintessential early 2000s horror. The movie is fast, gory, a tad over the top, and about as subtle as a Puff Daddy music video. James Gunn’s script is less concerned with commenting on the downfall of society through consumerism, and more focused on grabbing its audience by the neck for an hour and 40-minute rollercoaster without a single barf bag within reach. The first fifteen minutes could stand on its own as a short film and is possibly the strongest opening of any horror flick that decade. While Romero’s Dawn of the Dead initially focused on zombie attacks in the city, the remake’s opening shows us what happens when all hell breaks loose in the suburbs. From the opening attack, Snyder tells us his zombies are fast, athletic, and somehow a bit cunning. They sometimes lull their victims into a false sense of security before attacking. The zombies plot, plan, and are, at times, surprisingly patient. Even if the movie they’re in is sometimes the exact opposite.
Romero’s original showed man as the true monster. Snyder’s remake, on the other hand, makes it abundantly clear the monsters are the true monsters.
The Crazies hit in 2010, the same year as Insidious, Paranormal Activity 2, and Frozen. Saw was on its way out as horror flicks became more interested in suspense and tension instead of shock and awe. With that in mind, it’s easy to see why Breck Eisner’s remake is similar in tone to the 1973 original. The scares are spaced out for maximum effect, dread lords over the entire proceedings, and the relationships have shades of complexity. Unlike the original, which boasts an abundance of central characters, Eisner’s film is a story of four people making their way through a manmade hell. Tightening the scope of the movie allows for deeper characterizations, providing the audience reason to truly give a damn when one of them is at risk of being dearly departed.
The Crazies get back to Romero’s idea that humans are the awful things that go bump in the night. Rather than zombies, our heroes are dealing with an outbreak and the government cover-up that follows. Sure, the townspeople get infected and go a tad psycho, resulting in a couple choice set-pieces, but who we should really fear is never in question.
Okay, Why These Two?
Besides the obvious Romero connection? Both films have “end of the world as we know it” vibes, and show the good and not-so-good ways humans react in a crisis while placing a spotlight on an extended family doing their best to survive. Dawn of the Dead and The Crazies have at least one moment each where the audience is asked to empathize with specific choices the characters make. Which leads them to question what they would do in a similar circumstance.
Romero had his own voice, and these two directors do as well. Dawn of the Dead introduced us to Zack Snyder, and while his style evolved over the years, the foundation he laid in 2004 is still there today. Breck Eisner was very close to giving us another shot of his brand of horror with a sequel to 2009’s Friday the 13th but the movie business has a way of spoiling everyone’s fun.
These two movies are respectful to the source material without being slavish. Dawn of the Dead is a good chaser to the shot of the original. The Crazies improves on what came before and makes it relevant to the decade of horror it started and our current moment in time.
Watch The Crazies first to get you in the right mood, and follow it with Dawn of the Dead to cap the night with a little enjoyment. The Crazies is streaming for free on Tubi and is available to rent on most streaming platforms. Dawn of the Dead is streaming on Peacock and is also available to rent on most streaming platforms.
Editorials
André Øvredal’s ‘Troll Hunter’ Remains One of the Best Found Footage Movies
In this day and age, the word “troll” is often used to describe various online nuisances. Yet as abundant and irksome as the modern troll can be, they aren’t usually as fearsome as their mythological counterparts. I’m not talking about the small and gentler versions that have become more common to see in media. No, there are much bigger and scarier trolls out there—and André Øvredal’s movie Troll Hunter is one of the best places to find them.
It doesn’t take long for Troll Hunter (or Trolljegeren) to dump the Blair Witch Project-esque setup and aim for something a lot fresher. The trajectory of the story is augmented by Otto Jespersen’s character Hans, the titular Troll Hunter. The second he comes barreling out of the deep, dark woods and shouts “troll” at the camera, this movie takes a turn into what feels like uncharted territory. Not only subject-wise, but also conceptually.
For fantastical and made-up subject matter in cinema, found footage is a fast way to add a guise of believability. After all, what we accept to be the most crucial aspect of documentaries—the truth—rubs off on pseudo-documentaries, despite our understanding of the pretense involved. That is what Øvredal delivered with Troll Hunter: a movie so convincing that some viewers wondered if trolls really do exist. So, had this been straightforwardly made, it likely wouldn’t have been as effective. Conventional narratives would be more inclined to treat something like trolls as flat out unreal, and never try to convince the audience to think otherwise.

Hans petrifies the three-headed Tusseladd troll.
The viewers, like the characters trailing Hans, are quickly thrown into the deeper end of that extraordinary story. They have to process all this new information while staying on the go. So, although there is no significant amount of meandering, narratively or physically, there is still a good amount of atmosphere, not to mention tension building. It’s never anything frightful, but then again, Troll Hunter isn’t your standard offering of horror; it’s more on the low end of the dark fantasy spectrum. We aren’t ever spirited away to a faraway world—we stay in rather familiar surroundings, as well as dip into those less so. The outcome is a movie where you’re constantly more in awe than in terror.
As fantasy fiction might do, Troll Hunter prefers not to deal with incredulity. There is no time to waste on doubt, as interviewer Thomas (Glenn Erland Tosterud), soundperson Johanna (Johanna Mørck), and cameraman Kalle (Tomas Alf Larsen) all follow Hans around, recording whatever this character is willing to reveal about his bizarre job. Of course, the Troll Hunter himself is not an open book; in that respect, the diegetic documentary fails to fully capture and unpack the more interesting of its two subjects. Yes, all those giant, monstrous trolls are indeed incredible, but understandably, your mind wanders to their pursuer. What kind of person signs up for this gig and then chooses to stick with it for so long?
Reviews have called out Troll Hunter for its lack of character development. In regard to Thomas and his fellow documentarians, that criticism is valid, but bear in mind, they aren’t the focus of the story, either. Meanwhile, Hans is a well-crafted character. At least better than first realized. Before he was introduced, Hans had already grown tired of the troll grind. Fed up with that low compensation for his services, resentful of the bureaucracy, and wanting to expose his employer on a large scale, Hans’ discontent is glaring.
Then there are those finer details about the Troll Hunter, such as that indifference to both the natural splendor of his everyday surroundings and the affections of an obviously smitten colleague, that also suggest some level of despondency. So it is fair to say this movie doesn’t feature any sizable growth for its characters; however, the namesake isn’t underwritten. No doubt, putting a real-life character like Otto Jespersen in that role is partly why Hans is so fascinating—maybe even relatable.

Otto Jespersen as Hans the Troll Hunter.
There is always a small risk whenever using the term “mockumentary” to describe a found-footage movie, as the word could imply humor where there is none. In the case of Troll Hunter, the term’s usage is appropriate. Some folks have claimed the English-dubbed version has the more comedic tone, however, the Norwegian cut isn’t exactly humorless. Apart from the trolls’ absurd appearances, this is a movie where the characters nearly choke on the monsters’ farts, and Christians are like walking targets. Hans’ complete apathy towards everything is another cause of laughter. Overall, the comedy is intentionally dry and inconsistent. Unfunny, though? Absolutely not.
In a movie where endemic creatures are maltreated, as well as disavowed from living freely and peacefully, it’s hard not to notice the ecological message buried beneath the story. In addition to that is the unmistakable political satire. There is this whole business about intrusive and unsightly power lines—like trolls, they’re big blemishes on the land—that leads to what is perhaps the movie’s funniest moment. The scene in question is that one where certain electric lines, the ones secretly being used to keep the trolls at bay, go in a loop and don’t actually send power to any residents. Yet the monitors of said lines don’t find this at all weird. So it stands to reason that Øvredal was having a go at those who accept the government’s doings without question.
Looking past the fact that trolls aren’t actually real, this movie is an enlightening source of information. And not just for international audiences; Norwegians, too, get schooled about their homeland’s own mythology. It’s also evident from everything on screen that Øvredal and his crew were enthusiastic about the topic. The creature designs are the most indicative of that zeal; those imaginative yet myth-accurate manifestations are equally amusing and grotesque. One second you’re laughing at their phallic noses, the next you’re white-knuckling during a hairy sequence. Most surprisingly is how well the trolls’ visual effects hold up after fifteen years. It’s not all spotless, but on the whole, they remain impressive.
Vouching for a mockumentary about trolls isn’t easy, but those who do come around and give it a shot will more than likely be grateful for the recommendation. For Troll Hunter is a real find in that vast and varied genre we call “found footage“.

A bridge troll reaches up for food and finds Hans decked out in armor.






You must be logged in to post a comment.