Connect with us

Editorials

Sin and Damnation – How Scott Derrickson’s Underrated ‘Hellraiser: Inferno’ Rises Above Expectations

Published

on

Hellraiser Inferno

At the recent Silver Scream Con, I was surprised to hear Hellraiser star Doug Bradley remark, “The only one in the series I feel doesn’t work is Inferno, for various reasons.” I had always considered the 2000 effort one of the franchise’s stronger offerings, but it had been a while since I revisited the series, so I thought it may not hold up as well as I remembered.

As I’m working my way through the series ahead of David Bruckner‘s reboot, which drops October 7 on Hulu, I can confirm my support for the fifth installment. I have no doubt that Bradley has his reasons for disliking the film – it being the first installment to be released straight to video no doubt required adjustments, not to mention his minuscule screen time as Pinhead – but, even with its shortcomings, I think Hellraiser: Inferno is better than he gives it credit for.

Contrary to rumors, Inferno was not an existing script retrofitted with Hellraiser elements. That would become the norm for the franchise going forward, but this one was pitched as a Hellraiser sequel by writer-director Scott Derrickson – making his feature debut before helming the likes of The Black Phone, The Exorcism of Emily Rose, Sinister, and Doctor Strange – and his then writing partner, Paul Harris Boardman (The Exorcism of Emily Rose).

Inferno was the first Hellraiser installment with no involvement from Clive Barker. In an interview that appeared in his fan club newsletter after the film came out, Barker actively warned people against seeing Inferno. He went on to say, “It’s really terrible and it’s shockingly bad, and should never have been made.” While it’s not difficult to see why Barker didn’t connect with a drastically different direction for his creation, I respectfully disagree with his denunciation.

Hellraiser Inferno pinhead

Inferno doesn’t bother trying to compete with the operatic transgression of the first two Hellraiser films or even the over-the-top fervor of the third installment. Derrickson delivers a Seven-esque psychological thriller with a supernatural twist, peppered with Lynchian surrealism and film noir elements. While this approach often supersedes the franchise’s cornerstones, the tenuous connection is still more organic than in many of the sequels that would follow.

The film centers on Joseph Thorne (Craig Sheffer, Nightbreed), a corrupt Denver police detective with an affinity for puzzles. When a mysterious puzzle box is discovered at the scene of a homicide, Thorne takes it upon himself to solve it, resulting in nightmarish hallucinations. He traces the murder back to The Engineer, an enigmatic figure tied to a kidnapping. The closer Thorne gets to solving the crime, the more implicated he becomes, while his grip on reality loosens.

The premise is intriguing, even if the resolution isn’t wholly satisfying. Tonally and aesthetically, Inferno shares more in common with Jacob’s Ladder, Angel Heart, or Silent Hill than Hellraiser. Derrickson, working with cinematographer Nathan Hope (The Fog (2005), CSI: Crime Scene Investigation), focuses more on atmosphere than gore – but the franchise’s signature blending of bloodshed and eroticism is intact.

Derrickson’s evangelical upbringing (from which he has since distanced himself) made him an interesting candidate to play in such a philosophical sandbox. In a 2002 article written for Christian Century, the filmmaker explains that the movie was a personal rebellion against Christian art’s discomfort with tension and ambiguity. “I wanted to make a movie about sin and damnation that ended with sin and damnation. After all, isn’t that the experience of many people?”

Despite Barker’s lack of support, casting the star of Nightbreed in the lead role was a sign of good faith. Sheffer’s character becomes increasingly distasteful as the plot progresses. Bradley’s screen time is limited, but the use of Pinhead as a neutral judge among humans is more harmonious with the character’s original intention than the previous two entries. James Remar (Dexter, The Warriors) appears as Throne’s therapist, largely serving as a Hellraiser lore exposition dump.

Nicholas Turturro, having just wrapped his seven-season run on NYPD Blue, plays Thorne’s partner who attempts to be a moral compass. Nicholas Sadler (Sometimes They Come Back) has a memorable turn as a drug-dealing ice cream man. The supporting cast also includes Michael Shamus Wiles (Breaking Bad), Alexandra Barrese (The Hangover), Kathryn Joosten (Desperate Housewives), and Carmen Argenziano (Stargate SG-1).

Although he initially didn’t feel he was right for the project, Derrickson is proud of the film. “I still have a soft place in my heart for that film, but the script was really great. The script was better than the movie that I directed,” he divulged during a recent interview on Post Mortem with Mick Garris. The film was green-lit on the first draft and then “highly developed” through various drafts before shooting began on a modest $2 million budget.

Perhaps genre fans would have been more inclined to embrace Inferno had it been made independent of the Hellraiser banner, but that double-edged sword would have meant an uphill battle for discovery in the crowded home video market. In a time when “direct to video” was considered a red flag – often connoting a lack of quality, budget, studio confidence, or some combination therein – Hellraiser: Inferno rose above expectations to deliver something different.

Hellraiser Inferno scott derrickson

Editorials

‘A Haunted House’ and the Death of the Horror Spoof Movie

Published

on

Due to a complex series of anthropological mishaps, the Wayans Brothers are a huge deal in Brazil. Around these parts, White Chicks is considered a national treasure by a lot of people, so it stands to reason that Brazilian audiences would continue to accompany the Wayans’ comedic output long after North America had stopped taking them seriously as comedic titans.

This is the only reason why I originally watched Michael Tiddes and Marlon Wayans’ 2013 horror spoof A Haunted House – appropriately known as “Paranormal Inactivity” in South America – despite having abandoned this kind of movie shortly after the excellent Scary Movie 3. However, to my complete and utter amazement, I found myself mostly enjoying this unhinged parody of Found Footage films almost as much as the iconic spoofs that spear-headed the genre during the 2000s. And with Paramount having recently announced a reboot of the Scary Movie franchise, I think this is the perfect time to revisit the divisive humor of A Haunted House and maybe figure out why this kind of film hasn’t been popular in a long time.

Before we had memes and internet personalities to make fun of movie tropes for free on the internet, parody movies had been entertaining audiences with meta-humor since the very dawn of cinema. And since the genre attracted large audiences without the need for a serious budget, it made sense for studios to encourage parodies of their own productions – which is precisely what happened with Miramax when they commissioned a parody of the Scream franchise, the original Scary Movie.

The unprecedented success of the spoof (especially overseas) led to a series of sequels, spin-offs and rip-offs that came along throughout the 2000s. While some of these were still quite funny (I have a soft spot for 2008’s Superhero Movie), they ended up flooding the market much like the Guitar Hero games that plagued video game stores during that same timeframe.

You could really confuse someone by editing this scene into Paranormal Activity.

Of course, that didn’t stop Tiddes and Marlon Wayans from wanting to make another spoof meant to lampoon a sub-genre that had been mostly overlooked by the Scary Movie series – namely the second wave of Found Footage films inspired by Paranormal Activity. Wayans actually had an easier time than usual funding the picture due to the project’s Found Footage presentation, with the format allowing for a lower budget without compromising box office appeal.

In the finished film, we’re presented with supposedly real footage recovered from the home of Malcom Johnson (Wayans). The recordings themselves depict a series of unexplainable events that begin to plague his home when Kisha Davis (Essence Atkins) decides to move in, with the couple slowly realizing that the difficulties of a shared life are no match for demonic shenanigans.

In practice, this means that viewers are subjected to a series of familiar scares subverted by wacky hijinks, with the flick featuring everything from a humorous recreation of the iconic fan-camera from Paranormal Activity 3 to bizarre dance numbers replacing Katy’s late-night trances from Oren Peli’s original movie.

Your enjoyment of these antics will obviously depend on how accepting you are of Wayans’ patented brand of crass comedy. From advanced potty humor to some exaggerated racial commentary – including a clever moment where Malcom actually attempts to move out of the titular haunted house because he’s not white enough to deal with the haunting – it’s not all that surprising that the flick wound up with a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes despite making a killing at the box office.

However, while this isn’t my preferred kind of humor, I think the inherent limitations of Found Footage ended up curtailing the usual excesses present in this kind of parody, with the filmmakers being forced to focus on character-based comedy and a smaller scale story. This is why I mostly appreciate the love-hate rapport between Kisha and Malcom even if it wouldn’t translate to a healthy relationship in real life.

Of course, the jokes themselves can also be pretty entertaining on their own, with cartoony gags like the ghost getting high with the protagonists (complete with smoke-filled invisible lungs) and a series of silly The Exorcist homages towards the end of the movie. The major issue here is that these legitimately funny and genre-specific jokes are often accompanied by repetitive attempts at low-brow humor that you could find in any other cheap comedy.

Not a good idea.

Not only are some of these painfully drawn out “jokes” incredibly unfunny, but they can also be remarkably offensive in some cases. There are some pretty insensitive allusions to sexual assault here, as well as a collection of secondary characters defined by negative racial stereotypes (even though I chuckled heartily when the Latina maid was revealed to have been faking her poor English the entire time).

Cinephiles often claim that increasingly sloppy writing led to audiences giving up on spoof movies, but the fact is that many of the more beloved examples of the genre contain some of the same issues as later films like A Haunted House – it’s just that we as an audience have (mostly) grown up and are now demanding more from our comedy. However, this isn’t the case everywhere, as – much like the Elves from Lord of the Rings – spoof movies never really died, they simply diminished.

A Haunted House made so much money that they immediately started working on a second one that released the following year (to even worse reviews), and the same team would later collaborate once again on yet another spoof, 50 Shades of Black. This kind of film clearly still exists and still makes a lot of money (especially here in Brazil), they just don’t have the same cultural impact that they used to in a pre-social-media-humor world.

At the end of the day, A Haunted House is no comedic masterpiece, failing to live up to the laugh-out-loud thrills of films like Scary Movie 3, but it’s also not the trainwreck that most critics made it out to be back in 2013. Comedy is extremely subjective, and while the raunchy humor behind this flick definitely isn’t for everyone, I still think that this satirical romp is mostly harmless fun that might entertain Found Footage fans that don’t take themselves too seriously.

Continue Reading