Connect with us

Editorials

30 Years Later: Why ‘Bloodstone: Subspecies II’ Remains the Fan-Favorite Sequel

Published

on

After Puppet Master, Subspecies is undoubtedly Full Moon’s most successful franchise. The two are similar in that they both have an intricate central mythology that is expanded upon over time, and while both have their share of quirky humor, the films are much more serious in tone than other notable Full Moon franchises like Gingerdead Man or Evil Bong. The two series, however, also have their share of stark differences. For one thing, the Puppet Master series has spawned 15 films to date: 13 official entries from the home studio, plus a crossover by the Sci-Fi Channel and a remake. They also play it fast and loose in terms of continuity. Many different screenwriters have come and gone, adding to and contradicting the established mythology—sometimes in equal doses.

Subspecies, meanwhile, is only just now seeing the release of its fifth entry after a twenty-five year gap since the last sequel, Subspecies 4: Bloodstorm. In addition to that, the Subspecies movies are known for a clear vision, a single story unfolding through each movie, driven by writer/director Ted Nicolaou. It also features returning cast members throughout each sequel, particularly Anders Hove as Radu and Denise Duff as Michelle. But these things, which are perhaps the two things that fans celebrate most as well as make Subspecies stand out from the rest of the Full Moon output, really began with the second movie.

subspecies 2

When you ask fans to name their favorite movie in the series, you’ll most often find that the answer is Bloodstone: Subspecies II. I think there are a lot of strong reasons for that, but first and foremost, I think that is because this movie set both the tone and the story for the rest of the franchise. While the original is certainly celebrated, there are things that make it stand out from the rest of the series. That first film was the only movie in the series that Ted Nicolaou did not write. He still directed it, of course, but took over writing duties for the second, and has written each movie since. It was also the only movie in the series in which the protagonist, Michelle, was not played by Denise Duff. She took over the role with the sequel, and is one of the rare cases in which an actor recast for a sequel became the face of that character in the eyes of the fans. She joins the likes of Danielle Harris in the Hatchet series, Guy Rolfe in the Puppet Master franchise and, well, Don Cheadle in the MCU, in that regard.

Story-wise, Subspecies II picks up immediately where the first one ends. After Radu was decapitated at the end of the previous movie, we get to watch his head re-attach to his body in one of if not the greatest practical gore effect in any Full Moon feature. In the last moments of the original, Michelle expressed her fear at becoming a vampire, having been bitten by Radu. She had her lover, Stefan, bite her in the hope she would become more like him than his evil brother, and they went to rest in Stefan’s coffin as the sun rises, hopeful for their future together. The opening moments of the sequel undo all of that. Radu kills Stefan and Michelle escapes with the bloodstone—the relic that eternally drips the blood of saints, sort of the MacGuffin at the center of the franchise—while Radu gives chase. The story is expanded wonderfully as our heroine Michelle finds herself becoming a vampire, and that world of the undead goes from something kept at arm’s length to something we are given a much more intimate perspective into as Michelle undergoes all the learning curves of her transformation. From this point on through the rest of the series, humans are relegated to supporting roles, with the most important of them in this entry being Michelle’s sister, Becky.

subspecies 2

In Becky’s introduction, there’s a clever inversion of the sibling relationship in Subspecies. Stefan and Radu could not have been more different in every way. One was a handsome, tortured soul, the other a wickedly ruthless ghoul. In Bloodstone, a very different sibling relationship is shown. Michelle and Becky appear to be endlessly supportive of one another. Becky jumps on a plane to Romania the moment she fears Michelle is in trouble. Throughout this movie, she does everything she can to try and piece together what happened and to help Michelle however she can.

There’s another clever inversion of the original in the sequel’s introduction of Mummy, the grouchy, rotting, mummified corpse of Radu’s witch of a mother. At the beginning of the first movie, Radu killed his father, the vampire king. His mother, a sorceress who had supposedly seduced the king, had only been mentioned briefly. Her introduction is a major expansion of the lore. The relationship between mother and son could not be more different than what was seen in the single scene Radu shared with his father. King Vladislas, while clearly disappointed in Radu and even attempting to kill him, approached him with a degree of sympathy and kindness, and Radu murdered him without hesitation all the same. In Subspecies II, Radu relies on the support and guidance of Mummy, but she is openly antagonistic toward him. They bicker and fight, she is overbearing in a “mother knows best kind of way” especially when it comes to Michelle, and yet in other ways they are completely in sync.

While this sequel goes bigger by expanding the franchise and introducing a character crucial to the lore who had only been mentioned in the original, it does what any great sequel should do and goes deeper at the same time. The Radu we saw for the first time in the opening scene of Subspecies was an evil, petty, depraved creature living solely for power and carnage—and in most respects, he remains that way. But Bloodstone is where we begin to see the cracks. There are hints of vulnerability with Radu this time around, whether it be in moments with Michelle or with his domineering skeleton of a mother. In both of those relationships, there’s an almost pathetic quality that might have been somewhat visible in the original, but is more clearly rising to the surface in the second.

subspecies 2

With his mother, Radu yearns to step out of the shadow of his family’s legacy and create something of his own. And in Radu’s scenes with Michelle, it truly starts to become clear just how lonely he is. He puts up with more from Michelle than he’d probably allow from anyone else, and even sometimes insists he’s going to kill her, but it never sounds like anything more than an empty threat, and I don’t think it’s meant to be anything more than that. In Radu’s mind this might be some twisted kind of love, and there are moments in the series when he seems to insist that’s the case—but honestly, more than anything, I think it’s just that he doesn’t want to be so alone. Radu is a boogeyman among vampires and yet in being such he’s also kind of a pariah. No vampire would ever dare be close with him, not with his record for ruthlessness and betrayal. He believes himself to be utterly unlovable, but with Michelle, more than any kind of feelings he may project onto her, there is simply the hope of finally having found someone who might not leave him. She needs him to help mentor her in the ways of being a vampire, and Radu is a monster perfectly happy to mistake dependency for gratitude.

Another thing worth mentioning about Bloodstone: Subspecies II is that it was shot back-to-back with Bloodlust: Subspecies III. Full Moon did this with several films in the ‘90s, shooting two at the same time in order to save cost. At this point, they had previously done it with Puppet Master 4 and 5. That had been an established franchise, and I think the decision to make the second and third Subspecies at the same time did a great deal for its ongoing success, turning it into a franchise pretty much right out of the gate. Within three years of the original’s release, there was a Subspecies trilogy that told a cohesive, mostly singular story.

Thirty years after its release, it is so obvious to see why Bloodstone became the franchise favorite, even topping the original in the collective eyes of fans. This is essentially where the series truly began. This is where Denise Duff stepped into the role of Michelle for the first time. This is where we were introduced to Mummy, a character integral to the lore, who would continue into further sequels. Most importantly, this is where Ted Nicolaou took over as writer/director, after having only directed the first movie. He continued to write every Subspecies sequel as well as its spinoff, Vampire Journals, all the way up to the release of Subspecies V: Bloodrise. All of these things shaped not only this movie, but every entry as the franchise moved forward. This is the sequel that set the tone and defined the arcs of both lead characters of the franchise and that legacy continues to this day.

Radu returns in Subspecies V: Bloodrise, on SCREAMBOX and Full Moon Features on June 2.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading