Connect with us

Editorials

‘Scream VI’ – 12 Things We Learned from the Blu-ray Commentary Track

Published

on

Scream VI cameos

Ghostface takes Manhattan in Scream VI, the latest installment in the slasher franchise. The home video release includes an informative audio commentary with directors Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett, writers James Vanderbilt and Guy Busick, and executive producer Chad Villella.

Here are 12 things I learned from the Scream VI Blu-ray commentary…


1. Samara Weaving was the first and only choice for the opening scene.

Samara Weaving, who starred in Radio Silence’s Ready or Not, was the first and only choice to play Laura, the ill-fated film studies professor that serves as the opening kill. The actress has stated it’s the closest character to herself she’s ever played.

Gillett says, “We were walking to dinner in Montreal when we were like, ‘Let’s just call her and see if she’s game.'” They did so, and “she was super, super game to come and hang out with us for a few days.”

The photo that appears on her character’s phone is Weaving’s real-life husband (and Cocaine Bear writer), Jimmy Warden, and their dog, Muzzy.

Prior to production, Weaving sent audio files to the filmmakers featuring her reading the lines with and without her natural Australian accent. They ultimately decided to go with the accent to make the character more unique.


2. Roger L. Jackson originally lent his voice to the opening scene.

The opening scene originally had Roger L. Jackson’s unmistakable Ghostface voice speaking to Laura on the phone. It made it as far as test screenings before being replaced by Tony Revolori as Jason.

Vanderbilt explains, “It was sort of a situation where it felt like you were hearing Roger for too long a period. He’s so wonderful that by the time we got to [Ghostface’s call with Jason], you felt like the punch of ‘Oh, my God, Roger’s on the phone’ had kind of come out of it a little bit.”

Ghostface’s call with Jason originally featured a joke about Marvel movies — written before Spider-Man franchise actor Revolori was cast — but it was cut for being too meta.


3. Hasta El Fuego is a reference to Bad Boys for Life.

Horror references are a cornerstone of the Scream franchise, but Scream VI also has an unexpected nod to Bad Boys for Life. Hasta El Fuego, the name of the restaurant from the opening scene, originates from the 2020 Will Smith/Martin Lawrence sequel, although it has taken on new meaning among the filmmakers.

Vanderbilt explains, “It started during the pandemic because we couldn’t all hang out and see each other, so we would talk about movies we all wanted to watch and then discuss on the text chain. Then the text chain became Hasta El Fuego, and then the restaurant became Hasta El Fuego.”

“Really these movies are just a collection of dumb jokes taken too far, right?” chuckles Bettinelli-Olpin.


4. The head in the fridge belongs to Thom Newell.

The carved-up body of Jason’s partner in crime inside their fridge was added after the original shoot to amplify the intensity. The head belongs to Thom Newell, who the Radio Silence team met on Southbound. He attended the photo session on his lunch break then had to return to work covered in fake blood.

In addition to serving as post-production supervisor on Southbound, Newell has worked on American Horror Story, Godzilla vs. Kong, You’re Next, V/H/S/2, and Chucky, among others, in various capacities.

The character’s name, Greg Bruckner, is a nod to filmmaker David Bruckner (Hellraiser, The Ritual), with whom Radio Silence collaborated on V/H/S and Southbound.


5. Blackmore University’s name is an in-joke.

The name of the college that the characters attend in New York, Blackmore University, is another in-joke among the filmmakers. As Vanderbilt explains, it originated with casting director Rich Delia during the making of Scream 5.

“Rich Delia, when he sent out sides for Sam in Scream, there was a monologue about ‘I’m the daughter of Billy Loomis,’ but we really wanted to protect that secret. So he instead inserted the name, ‘My father was John Blackmore.’ So you have all these incredibly talented actresses sobbing in their auditions, reading the revelation that their father is, in fact, John Blackmore, which we found hilarious. And then when we started working on this movie, we gave it the code name Blackmore.’

After failing to come up with a satisfactory fake college name, someone suggested using Blackmore for that as well, to which everyone agreed.


6. Sam and Tara’s apartment was repurposed for another scene.

The set for the apartment that Sam, Tara, and Liana share was repurposed and redecorated for Jason and Greg’s apartment in the beginning of the movie, which was shot toward the end of production. Bettinelli-Olpin points out:

“Jason and Greg’s apartment is the same set as the Carpenter sisters’ apartment with a handful of walls moved and the entrance moved to the other side. So this was a set that was essentially tweaked and recycled because we were shooting this so late in production.”


7. Frat party costumes include Murder Party, Hot Rod, and I Think You Should Leave.

The filmmakers shout-out some of the costumes that appear in the frat party scene, including Ethan’s cardboard knight from Murder Party, Wednesday Addams, Hot Rod, and a Dan Flashes shirt from I Think You Should Leave (whose co-creator/star Tim Robinson makes a voice cameo as Quinn’s hook-up).

Gillett recalls, “It was so fun to show up on set and only know, I’d say, what 50% of the costumes were gonna be, because we had conversations with Avery [Plewes, costume designer] about them. And showing up and being just so surprised and thrilled with all of the fun Easter eggs. It was like being in a funhouse.”

In the subway scene, the film was allowed to use masks of horror icons like Freddy Krueger, Jason Voorhees, Michael Myers, Pinhead, and Chucky as long as they didn’t do anything the respective characters are famous for.


8. The writers originally wanted Kirby in Scream 5.

Vanderbilt and Busick originally considered bring Hayden Panettiere back as Kirby in Scream 5 before deciding to feature her as an Easter egg. They revisited the idea for Scream VI.

“We wanted to include her in [Scream] 5, and it was just so overstuffed as it was,” Busick notes. “There was no room, but here, it’s like we have the real estate, I think. When we landed on the FBI thing, it was like ‘Ta-da!'”

“We never wrote any other versions for her. We definitely had a couple conversations. Weirdly, we had conversations about who she could be before we came up with what [Scream] VI was,” says Vanderbilt. “The idea that what happened in Scream 4 would change her to the extent that she would go on this path in her life seemed really kind of interesting and cool and unexpected.”


9. The Ghostface shrine was originally in a warehouse.

The original script called for the Ghostface shine to be in a warehouse, but the chance discovery of a movie theater while location scouting changed that.

“It was always sort of a warehouse because we were like, ‘Where can we set a final sequence that’s really cool that hasn’t been done before?’ That was a big thing for us,” says Vanderbilt. “And then I remember you guys were scouting and you were like, ‘So, we found a movie theater.’ And I remember thinking to myself, ‘Oh, no. It’s Scream 2.'”

“We were reticent because of Scream 2,” adds Busick. “But then Jim and I went there to check out the location so we could kind of retrofit the script to it, saw this place and we’re like, ‘This isn’t going to feel anything like it. This is going to feel very different.'”

They landed on a happy medium between the two, Gillett explains, “I think the idea of bringing that warehouse feel to this space, making it feel like a museum and not necessarily like a theater, was such a cool hand-off between those two ideas.”

While the interior is loaded with Scream franchise Easter eggs — many of which are detailed here — the dilapidated theater marquee out front advertises The Rocky Horror Picture Show midnight screenings and a Jennifer Jolie retrospective, a reference to Parker Posey’s Scream 3 character.


10. Richie’s Stab fan film features Jack Quaid’s voice and a Twin Peaks homage.

Richie’s Stab fan film that plays in the shrine was shot by Radio Silence’s assistant, Adam Sand, and executive producer Ron Lynch’s assistant, Adriana King, after hours. Jack Quaid provided the voice of Ghostface, and the font used for the end credits is from Twin Peaks.


11. Chad was originally stabbed 14 times.

One of the most common criticisms about Scream VI is the Core Four’s inability to be killed despite sustaining seemingly fatal injuries, particularly Chad. The creatives address this:

“So we like to stab Chad. I feel like as a group we sort of need to own that,” Vanderbilt jokes. “I just remember through the editing process people going, ‘He can’t live,’ to the point where we digitally removed stabs.”

“We VFX-ed a bunch of stabs,” interjects Gillett. “I think it was 14 stabs in the original, and now it’s down to like seven.”

“Guy and I had discussions early whether or not he would survive that; not practically, but just narratively,” notes Vanderbilt. Gillett adds, “I remember us talking about that at the end, like who comes back, who’s there. I love that we all agreed that this one should make you feel happy.”


12. Liana’s return was inspired by Agatha Christie.

Liana fake death was inspired by Agatha Christie’s influential 1939 murder-mystery novel, And Then There Were None. Vanderbilt divulges:

“Liana surviving, being dead and coming back, was one of my favorite things. My favorite murder-mystery of all time is Agatha Christie’s And Then There Were None, and that’s the trick of that story; there’s a character you think is dead who’s sort of orchestrating it.

“That’s why we’re able to have the characters group together much more during the movie. Usually in a Scream movie everyone’s off doing some other thing. Four people have to be missing for it to work. So we loved this idea of underneath it all, they’re all together all the time, so how is this occurring?”


Scream VI is available now on 4K UHD, Blu-ray, DVD, and Digital.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading