Connect with us

Editorials

The “South Park” of Anime – “Ghost Stories” and Its Infamous English Adaptation

Published

on

Ghost Stories

While it might seem like Ghost Stories was only acting on the emerging J-Horror trend, this 2000 anime was in fact another adaptation of Tōru Tsunemitsu’s popular series of children’s books. After four live-action films based on the teacher-turned-author’s books, animation was the obvious next step. The anime — technically the second after a standalone ’96 OVA — has since gone on to become a favorite among Western audiences, although not for reasons the Japanese showrunners could have expected. No, this series is best remembered for its off-the-wall English adaptation that many fans liken to South Park.

Admittedly, Ghost Stories didn’t leave a big mark upon and after its initial release (other than a controversy regarding the ultimately unaired Kuchisake-onna episode). In its defense, though, many anime back then had a hard time standing out or living up to new expectations. As a reminder, that previous decade gave rise to a number of innovative and heralded series, such as Neon Genesis Evangelion and Cowboy Bebop. The anime industry had just come off a considerable high, both in terms of creativity and success.

However, when the now-defunct, Texas-based anime distributor A.D. Vision (better known as ADV Films) licensed the series in 2005, they claimed Ghost Stories had done so poorly in its homeland that the Japanese producers gave them their blessing to change the series, so long as they could make it profitable. As it turns out, this was a half-truth. Despite an enduring narrative that says otherwise, Ghost Stories, or Gakkō no Kaidan/School Ghost Stories, did relatively well when it aired as part of Fuji TV’s Sunday programming. This undoubtedly comes as a shock after years of misinformation from all around.

Perhaps something was lost in translation during ADV’s purchase of the series. If that’s the case, then the long-established notion that Ghost Stories was a total flop right from the start actually stems from the show’s underwhelming performance on Animax. Launched in the late nineties, the 24-hour, Japan-based anime channel Animax was once made available in other parts of Asia. This entailed original (and poorly acted) English dubs for international audiences. Ghost Stories was indeed translated into English before ADV’s licensing, but in the end, the series didn’t fare too well on account of its late-night scheduling. Hence the “failure” falsehood that was only recently disproven.

ghost stories

Leo Kakinoki doesn’t realize he’s being watched.

In Japan, Ghost Stories’ surprisingly high ratings came from a built-in audience — the popularity of Tsunemitsu’s books is comparable to that of Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark — as well as its own uniqueness for the time. Even today, current anime is rarely focused on local Japanese horrors, apart from the long-running and minisode-centric series Yamishibai. Naturally, people also immediately think of Junji Itō whenever anime horror is mentioned, but for the most part, Itō’s works are original rather than based on existing Japanese lore. The source material for Ghost Stories was inspired by the urban legends Tsunemitsu collected from his young students.

Old and angry Japanese spirits haunting the present are considered passé at this point, yet Tsunemitsu’s books predate the peak of the J-Horror boom by several years. The colloquial term J-Horror, which tends to be a catch-all for any Japanese horror movie, was adopted in the West once these movies were distributed outside of Japan. Stylistically, the craze took off following Hideo Nakata’s 1998 adaptation of The Ring. And the other most renowned examples of this cinematic fad — Pulse, Ju-On (2002) and One Missed Call — were released after Ghost Stories aired. This anime wasn’t original as far as tales of creeping and vengeful ghosts go, but in some respects, it was ahead of the curve.

Children getting themselves mixed up with ghosts isn’t a novel concept in Japan. Years before Ghost Stories was even a pitch, Shigeru Mizuki’s vintage manga-turned-anime GeGeGe no Kitarō placed yōkai in a contemporary setting. Similarly, the Ghost Stories anime throws its own modern-day protagonist, Satsuki Miyanoshita, into the deep end of the paranormal pool once she and her younger brother, Keiichirō, move to their late mother’s hometown. The uncanny goings-on are generally contained to an abandoned school building within walking distance of the newer one, but this anime always found a way to lure the kids to the old (and very haunted) campus.

As Satsuki and Keiichirō settle into their unsettling new surroundings, they befriend three classmates: the arrogant Hajime Aoyama, the nerdy know-it-all Leo Kakinoki, and the mediumistic Momoko Koigakubo. Along with the Miyanoshitas’ pet cat, who is now the host/prison for a powerful demon named Amanojaku, the cast solves supernatural cases as they come up. Which, of course, is often. Cookie-cutter setups and executions aside, Ghost Stories manages to stir up genuine, if not fleeting entertainment in each episode. Every spectral encounter is like its own short J-Horror movie. There is continuity in place, however, it’s nothing so heavy or complicated that a casual viewer would be lost if they watched a random episode. The biggest plot thread here concerns Satsuki and Keiichirō’s mother, who originally sealed all the spirits now set free by recent construction and renovation.

ghost stories

From nearby, the ghost nurse watches the hospitalized Keiichirō Miyanoshita.

Anyone who has tried the Japanese version on for size before finally sticking with ADV’s dub can confirm this series originally played everything straight. All that changed once Steven Foster stepped in and turned the anime into a parody. Foster, who has a history of satirizing anime, turned the dial all the way up with Ghost Stories. In addition to Foster and Lucan Duran’s jokey English scripts, the dub’s voice actors improvised. There were caveats from Fuji TV to remember when producing this English version, though; particular elements, such as how a ghost was defeated, had to remain intact. The core structure of episodes, more or less, stayed the same.

The obvious area where ADV’s dub takes the most creative liberty is the tone. Whereas Japanese series director Noriyuki Abe preferred a more serious take, the (second) English version is a dark comedy. The story is unmistakably set in Japan, yet the dub makes constant references to American pop culture. From Al Roker to J-Lo, this script is localized to the max. Major character names had to be left unchanged, although backgrounds were, in some cases, overhauled. Leo was now Jewish, and Momoko was a born-again and devout Christian. Both characters turn in their fair share of self-deprecating humor on top of the most barbarous jabs at everyone else. And by “everyone,” no one is off limits here. Anyone watching the dub for the first time today might be taken aback by the edgy and unapologetic dialogue. To say this English dub is a product of its time would be a massive understatement.

The shock value and appeal of the Ghost Stories English dub is undeniable, even in an age where people are largely more enlightened. Its distinct and unsanitized flavor isn’t for everyone; a number of jokes won’t fly today. Fans will also dismiss the original Japanese version, going so far as to say it’s boring. Yet for those looking for entertaining lessons on both classic and contemporary Japanese horror mythology, it’s hard to beat this delivery system. The infamous English dub only makes the whole package more pleasurable, albeit in a guilty way.

Ghost Stories is currently available on Prime Video and Crunchyroll.

ghost stories

The characters meet the ghost called da Vinci.

Paul Lê is a Texas-based, Tomato approved critic at Bloody Disgusting, Dread Central, and Tales from the Paulside.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading