Connect with us

Editorials

Smart Grindhouse: How ‘Thanksgiving’ Reminds the World that Slashers Have Brains Too

Published

on

Thanksgiving Blu-ray Eli Roth - killer pov

There’s something funny about Thanksgiving. And yes, that goes beyond the very intentional comedy that comes from watching copious amounts of blood spill from the human body in ways that defy nature and gravity. Eli Roth’s latest pulls a magic trick that genre stalwarts like George A. Romero, Tobe Hooper, or John Carpenter pulled on a relatively routine basis during their prime decades: Thanksgiving makes the audience scream and laugh while simultaneously poking and prodding them.

Three years into the decade, our cup runneth over with horror films that speak about more significant issues or satirize. But that commentary comes from painstaking affairs about trauma, either personal or the collective anguish the world feels after suffering through a pandemic. That’s not a knock on those films but rather an observation. Unfortunately, conventional wisdom says that films interested in more than just scares these days feel more like a dentist visit than a day at an amusement park. Thanksgiving bucks that trend and reminds those who believe “elevated horror” is a thing that the genre’s versatility helps it pack messages in any subgenre it chooses. And that, yes, even slashers with grindhouse DNA are timely, poignant, and intelligent. 

Spoilers for Thanksgiving. Obviously. 

Thanksgiving

Thanksgiving doesn’t hide its intentions or targets up its sleeve. Eli Roth’s latest rips its inciting incident from real life and, through violence, shows how ridiculous Americans get on Black Friday. He juxtaposes that scene with a Thanksgiving dinner that celebrates the Holiday for all of five seconds before turning into a discussion about the day after the Holiday. A moment about graciously acknowledging one’s blessings morphs into one of greed; the characters present show theirs while they banter about utilizing the town’s collective avarice. It’s as subtle as an axe to the throat, but one look at the real world helps Thanksgiving maintain its effectiveness.

We’re practically living in Dawn of the Dead territory, as Black Friday begins earlier every year. Twenty-twenty-three saw America jump the shark when retailers turned Black Friday into an entire month. To say nothing of stores putting out Christmas paraphernalia days before Halloween even graces our presence. Weirdly, we occupy a moment where Thanksgiving is the Christmas pregame. It’s hard thinking about how thankful we are for what we have while coveting or plotting for what we don’t. Turning Black Friday into Black November only makes that more challenging. Thanksgiving acknowledges those contradictions without, pun very much unintended, making a meal of it. 

It’s hard envisioning a version of this story where Sony writes Roth a check with multiple commas for his mediation on the Holiday and what it means in a world where everything is for sale. Horror is always Hollywood’s safe bet. It costs studios relatively nothing, and that low price gives creatives enough rope to hang themselves and any cast member they choose. It is a scary movie, after all. Thanksgiving focuses its commentary through that lens while never brow-beating anyone there strictly for the body count. How do selfishness and desire shape families? How far are we willing to go for the almighty dollar? Do lives matter when half-priced televisions and waffle irons are on the menu? And, of course, how our consuming urge affects even seemingly idyllic small towns. 

Thanksgiving 2023

Horror often houses filmmakers who possess big ideas with commercial shrewdness. Romero understood that a drama scolding his fellow Baby Boomers for exchanging their ideals for purchasing power and more stuff than they ever dreamed might not work at the box office. Especially if it’s made by the same guy who directed Night of the Living Dead ten years earlier. Instead, he nested those ideas within a zombie movie that put butts in seats. Carpenter and Debra Hill made Halloween their treatise on an insidious behavior born in the suburbs. Through American Psycho, Mary Harron dissected the ’80s economic culture that still haunts us as both the Ghost of Christmas Present and the Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come. Then there’s Brian Yuzna’s Society, which tackled the metaphor about the rich eating the poor and made it literal in ways words can’t appropriately do justice. 

All those films, including Thanksgiving, have their own sense of humor and flavor of violence. Some underplay the satire, while others make it inescapable. They all desire that viewers enjoy the rollercoaster and all the emotions from the ride while hoping they see themselves or the world differently when the ride ends. That task may sound tall, but it’s one horror routinely accomplished on the big screen since the days of black-and-white pictures that cost a penny.

Thanksgiving doesn’t come with the trappings critics and some audiences associate with “smart” horror. But neither did the movies mentioned above this paragraph nor the countless others not mentioned because there’s only so much space. Those movies retained their punk rock sensibilities and became part of the genre canon. Some even broke through the mainstream and got love from those who usually dismiss scary movies. Whether Thanksgiving rises to that level, one day is for future writers to wrestle with and fight about. As it stands, current devotees just got a brand new holiday slasher from a unique voice. Roth and his writing partner, Jeff Rendell, took a throwaway idea from almost 20 years ago and made it more intelligent than it looks.

Wes Craven said Night of the Living Dead showed him that “a horror film can go as deep as you’re capable of taking it so long as you scare the sh*t out people.” Thanksgiving doesn’t go as deep as that film, but it hits its target and leaves an indelible scorch mark. Doing it while winking at the audience is just an added bonus. 

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading