Connect with us

Editorials

‘Puppet Master 4’ at 30: The Horror Tokusatsu Sequel You Never Knew You Needed

Published

on

Puppet Master 4 Totem Fights Blade

One wouldn’t think that a schlocky slasher series about killer puppets would produce more than a dozen films across three decades, let alone sequels that are still being discussed today, yet here we are getting deep in the weeds over the straight-to-video sequel bliss that is Puppet Master 4. Puppet Master is easily the most successful property to come out of Charles Band’s Full Moon Features, best known for movies like Castle Freak and Subspecies, as well as more low-hanging fruit like The Gingerdead Man and The Evil Bong series. Puppet Master falls comfortably between these two extremes. After a satisfying initial trilogy that chronicles the grandiose revenge scheme of a persecuted toymaker, Puppet Master–like many long-running horror series–is forced to ask, “What’s next?” 

In Puppet Master’s case, the franchise strangely pivots towards the rehabilitation of Blade, Leech Woman, Six-Shooter, and the rest of these tiny terrors as they’re rebranded as antiheroes who help in the good fight against malevolent stop-motion demons. While an odd choice, it’s not one that’s unprecedented, such as in movies like Critters or The Terminator. More importantly, this decision actually speaks towards the horror sequel’s compulsion to draw greater inspiration from Japanese tokusatsu productions than the slasher genre. All of this makes Puppet Master 4 a surprisingly interesting genre relic, especially on its 30th anniversary with three decades of horror hindsight.

The first three Puppet Master movies, while comparable in tone and execution, each have different directors between David Schmoeller, Dave Allen, and David DeCoteau. A new name is once again chosen for Puppet Master 4, Jeff Burr, who was regarded as a bit of a sequel savant between his previous work on Stepfather II, Leatherface: Texas Chainsaw Massacre III, and Pumpkinhead II: Blood Wings. Burr doesn’t just become the first director to helm two Puppet Master movies, but the director shoots the fourth and fifth installments back-to-back to create great consistency between the two projects. Burr is really the perfect choice for Puppet Master considering his extensive genre experience, as well as his preexisting history with prosthetics and practical effects.

The previous Puppet Master films were flawed fun, but the smartest decision that Burr makes with this sequel is to turn it into Full Moon’s tribute to the horror tokusatsu genre. It’s important to first understand that “tokusatsu” is a Japanese term for live-action film and television that’s dominated by practical special effects. Tokusatsu started to find mainstream success during the 1960s and it covers a wide range of content, typically sci-fi, fantasy, and war, but there’s also a healthy emphasis on horror. Over time, the tokusatsu genre has been further fragmented into kaiju, superhero, and mecha content, with Puppet Master 4 comfortably fitting into the parameters of the kaiju and superhero tokusatsu sub-genres.

It’s easy to conflate all sentai tokusatsu stories with Super Sentai or Kamen Rider, but Japan has a rich history with frightening horror tokusatsu that are designed to inspire fear over excitement. There are explicit horror tokusatsu series like The Guyver and Tokyo Gore Police, while other established brands dip their toe into this darker degree of content. Ultra Q is an Ultraman horror anthology series that’s akin to The Twilight Zone, while Kamen Rider Kiva explicitly references classic Universal Monsters through its villains. Noboru Sugimura, the writer of Kakuranger (which is what season three of Mighty Morphin’ Power Rangers is based on) was even hired to write Resident Evil 2–which is often considered to be the crown jewel of the survival horror gaming genre–because of his work on the tokusatsu series.

With this horror tokusatsu precedent established, Puppet Master 4 ambitiously transforms Full Moon’s Puppet Master from a killer doll franchise into a horror tokusatsu film akin to Power Rangers or Ultraman. Puppet Master 4’s reliance on these tropes is why the film still resonates three decades later and is a turning point for the franchise when many new, younger fans jumped on board and the franchise started to redefine itself through its sequels. Burr even uses this experience and goes on to direct Beetleborgs, an American sentai tokusatsu production.

On this level, Puppet Master 4 is really a fascinating relic and the perfect time capsule for 1993 when this style of tokusatsu action series were at a mainstream high in America. The film even starts with an introduction where a man-in-suit monster commands his demonic minions while they stare into a prophetic cauldron as they plan to invade the real world from their dark realm. It’s no different from a Mighty Morphin’ Power Rangers episode that kicks off with Rita Repulsa setting the stage for the Rangers’ latest villain. It’s no coincidence that Puppet Master 4 begins with these new tokusatsu characters rather than the classic Puppet Master figures or Andre Toulon.

Puppet Master 4 is also ripe with other tokusatsu staples here like all of the “Capital S Science” activities that go down in the vague BioTech Industries. Sutekh’s evil totems even look like the toys that Rita Repulsa transforms into her giant tokusatsu monsters. Additionally, Sutekh totems steal souls like they’re Doctor Sleep’s True Knot sapping steam from scared kids. Even the film’s young protagonist, Rick Myers (Gordon Currie), who teams up with Toulon’s puppets, is very much in the mold of a Power Rangers lead, like Billy. His group of friends also feel very much like a group of Rangers, too. One of Puppet Master 4 ‘s livelier scenes involves a Battlebot laser tag training exercise that feels like some Zordon training exercise. On that note, Puppet Master 4 practically presents Toulon as a Zordon-esque figure with an ancient rivalry against Sutekh, like any tokusatsu feud. The movie’s big electricity explosion ending also has a lot more in common with a standard Power Rangers episode than any other Puppet Master movie or Full Moon Features film. 

There’s still violence and death in Puppet Master 4, like its predecessors, but it does feel like a softer reboot that’s specifically meant to appeal to younger audiences with anti-heroes who they can root for rather than the lurid slash-fest that are the first three movies. The franchise’s signature Nazi iconography is almost entirely absent in this picture with an emphasis on demons over fascists. Puppet Master 4 even ends with Toulon’s puppets saluting their new, younger puppet master who’s clearly positioned to be the franchise’s new protagonist and de facto Toulon replacement moving forward. None of the Puppet Master movies are particularly long, but at only 79 minutes (75 without credits), Puppet Master 4 isn’t even as long as Mighty Morphin’ Power Rangers’ two theatrical efforts. While on the subject, Maligore and Elgar from Turbo: A Power Rangers Movie are also more intimidating and frightening than Puppet Master 4’s Sutekh.

Puppet Master 4 Demno Totem Explodes

What does feel representative of past Puppet Master films is the entertaining stop-motion battle sequences between the puppets and demon totems. It’s also particularly satisfying to see these puppets work together as a team and deliver killer cooperation as opposed to the previous movies where they’d usually divide and conquer with each puppet getting their own separate murder set piece. While that has its charm, it’s also quite fulfilling to watch the puppets pool together their unique abilities while they eviscerate demons. Their teamwork also results in some oddly comical gags, like Pinhead concernedly wiping demon blood off of Tunneler’s drill after a massacre. This added humor and levity feels like another attempt to appeal to the younger crowd even though the previous Puppet Master movies weren’t bereft of black comedy. This also feeds into what’s arguably the best sequence in the movie, where all of the puppets work together to pull off a Frankenstein’s Monster-like resurrection for Toulon’s prized game-changing puppet, Decapitron. It’s a stop-motion marvel that’s reminiscent of what Phil Tippett does decades later in Mad God

Alternatively, Toulon’s head being superimposed on Decapitron to impart wisdom during the film’s conclusion is such a ludicrous fever dream of a visual that’s pure Full Moon camp. One has to respect Puppet Master 4 for attempting such a sequence. On the topic of Decapitron (who was actually designed for another movie before being co-opted into Puppet Master), a puppet with many change-able heads that have different functions is a novel idea. It’s reminiscent of Mike Mignola’s The Amazing Screw-On Head and actually a great direction to take the series, which makes it a shame that this compelling concept doesn’t really receive further development.

There’s tremendous value in a horror tokusatsu project, as wild as that sounds. However, it’s understandable why Puppet Master 4 didn’t kickstart this trend, but it’s easier to picture it succeeding three decades later if the right, passionate genre filmmakers were involved. Jordan Peele, Guillermo del Toro, or even Robert Rodriguez would excel in this territory and absolutely nail the assignment. Puppet Master 4 doesn’t rejuvenate the bloody B-horror slasher series in the way that it hoped to, but three decades later it’s still built a legacy and stands out as a cult classic, albeit for different forward-thinking genre reasons.

Daniel Kurland is a freelance writer, comedian, and critic, whose work can be read on Splitsider, Bloody Disgusting, Den of Geek, ScreenRant, and across the Internet. Daniel knows that "Psycho II" is better than the original and that the last season of "The X-Files" doesn't deserve the bile that it conjures. If you want a drink thrown in your face, talk to him about "Silent Night, Deadly Night Part II," but he'll always happily talk about the "Puppet Master" franchise. The owls are not what they seem.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading