Connect with us

Editorials

‘Prisoners’ – Denis Villeneuve’s Modern Vigilante Classic 10 Years Later

Published

on

While I’m pretty sure that only parents can properly fathom the indescribable horror of discovering that your child is missing, I think anyone can relate to the desperation of losing a loved one. That’s why it makes sense that this premise has been used as a jumping off point for all sorts of revenge narratives since time immemorial, with badass protagonists often doing whatever it takes to either recover or avenge missing family members.

However, there is one film that explores a much less glamorous side of these cinematic vendettas, and that would be Denis Villeneuve’s 2013 thriller Prisoners, a modern classic that explores just how far a desperate man might go when he’s convinced that his terrible actions are completely justified.

Originally a spec script by Aaron Guzikowski that wound up on the 2009 Black List, Prisoners would only get off the ground when Mark Wahlberg stepped in as a producer after being impressed with the story’s many twists and turns. Directors like Antoine Fuqua and Bryan Singer were considered to helm the project before the production team landed on the then-upcoming French-Canadian filmmaker Denis Villeneuve – with this being his first American project.

In the finished film, we follow Hugh Jackman as Keller Dover, a Pennsylvanian survivalist whose daughter and her friend go missing on Thanksgiving after playing around a suspicious RV. Police Detective Loki (Jake Gyllenhaal) soon locates the mentally handicapped owner of said RV, Alex Jones (Paul Dano), only to realize that there’s no substantial evidence that he’s involved with the kidnapping. Unwilling to accept this, Keller takes the law into his own hands and kidnaps Alex with the intention of torturing him until he reveals where the kids are.

What follows is a harrowing look at the dark side of vigilante justice and just how easy it is for a well-intentioned man to spiral into madness.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

It’s no surprise that Prisoners was both a commercial and critical success upon release, winning several awards and launching Villeneuve’s mainstream Hollywood career. At the time, media outlets were a bit torn about the flick’s extreme content (with some critics and even the MPAA claiming that the film went too far in its depictions of violence), but it was mostly agreed on that this was one hell of an original thriller.

For starters, there are excellent performances here all-around. With an ensemble cast featuring heavy hitters like Viola Davis, Terrence Howard and even David Dastmalchian before he was recognized as one of our favorite character actors, the world of Prisoners feels alive despite the dreary tone and eerie subject matter.

I especially appreciate Gyllenhaal’s contributions to the film, with the actor coming up with Detective Loki’s idiosyncrasies on his own (like his Zodiac tattoos and facial tics) and serving as an unexpectedly likable foil to Jackman’s character in a story that subverts the usual moral standards of this type of film.

Naturally, the visuals also help to elevate this unusual experience, which is why Roger Deakins’ Academy Award nomination for best cinematography was completely justified. The film boasts some extremely foreboding atmosphere and rainy photography that completely resignifies the sleepy suburbs of inner Pennsylvania into a much darker hyper-reality. While the movie is never too stylized to be believable, you get the sense that you’re trapped in this rainy nightmare alongside our main characters.

Despite all these accolades, what I personally appreciate the most here is Guzikowski’s highly efficient script. The Raised by Wolves screenwriter is clearly making use of every part of the buffalo when nearly every piece of dialogue and recurring imagery is eventually repurposed in the narrative further down the line – making this a thoroughly satisfying mystery as well as an emotional roller coaster.


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Guzikowski has repeatedly claimed that his script was originally inspired by Edgar Allan Poe’s The Tell-Tale Heart, with the initial version of this yarn being a short story about a grief-stricken father trapping the man who killed his child inside of a well in his backyard. While only the broad emotional strokes of this premise remain in the finished film, Prisoners still retains the horrific spirit of a Poe narrative, with Jackman’s take on Dover remaining a clear analogue for Poe’s vision of a protagonist that’s slowly revealed to be a monster.

Honestly, the most disturbing thing about this film is Jackman’s portrayal of a man attempting to justify his insane behavior as he plays one of the most divisive main characters in modern cinema. While you can’t help but root for Keller’s quest in the same way you that might cheer for Liam Neeson while watching Taken, even the most jaded of genre fans will soon find themselves squirming in their seats as our protagonist resorts to Jigsaw-worthy acts of torture on a clearly confused victim.

And while the ultimate reveal isn’t quite as terrifying as the dreadful build-up (I would actually have preferred it if the abduction had been completely random and unrelated to the town’s sordid history), the dark subject matter and incredibly enthralling investigative elements are likely to stick with you long after the credits roll – especially after that banger of a final scene.

At the end of the day, Prisoners is more likely to thrill and captivate viewers than legitimately scare them, but there’s no denying that this mean little thriller dives into some deeply uncomfortable territory. That’s why I think it’s the perfect example of a horror-adjacent experience and Villeneuve’s creepiest film to date (though arachnophobes might disagree due to some unsettling imagery in Enemy).


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading